By engaging with journalists in the networked media environment, audiences can play a role in shaping the epistemologies of journalism: how journalists know what they know, and communicate knowledge claims. While audiences have been offered opportunities to engage in news-production processes, ongoing reciprocal relationships between journalists and audiences online are rare. This study shows how sustained reciprocity takes place in a large-scale WhatsApp group opened by an Israeli journalist/blogger for her audience. Based on an analysis of group conversations, blog posts, and interviews, we demonstrate how a continuous conversation between the journalist and her loyal audience members allows the co-construction of journalistic knowledge across the news-production process. The online space that affords ongoing reciprocal exchanges is termed here a meso news-space, occurring between the private and public realms. This study contributes to understanding how sustained reciprocity can be accomplished and how it can promote shared benefits for journalists and community members.
AndersonCW (2013) Rebuilding the News: Metropolitan Journalism in the Digital Age. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
2.
Belair-GagnonVAgurCFrischN (2017) The changing physical and social environment of newsgathering: a case study of foreign corresponding using chat apps during unrest. Social Media + Society3(1): 1–10.
3.
ChadwickA (2011) The political information cycle in a hybrid news system: the British prime minister and the “Bullygate” affair. International Journal of Press/Politics16(1): 3–29.
4.
ChadwickA (2013) The Hybrid Media System: Politics and Power. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
5.
DomingoDQuandtTHeinonenA, et al. (2008) Participatory journalism practices in the media and beyond: an international comparative study of initiatives in online newspapers. Journalism Practice2(3): 326–342.
6.
EkströmM (2002) Epistemologies of TV journalism: a theoretical framework. Journalism: Theory, Practice and Criticism3(3): 259–282.
7.
EttemaJSGlasserTL (1985) On the epistemology of investigative journalism. Communication8: 183–206.
8.
FishmanM (1980) Manufacturing the News. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
9.
FlyvbjergB (2006) Five misunderstandings about case-study research. Qualitative Inquiry12(2): 219–245.
10.
GillmorD (2004) We the Media. Sebastopol, CA: O’Reilly.
11.
HermidaA (2016) Social media and the news. In: WitschgeTAndersonCWDomingoD, et al. (eds) The SAGE Handbook of Digital Journalism. London: SAGE, pp. 81–94.
12.
HermidaALewisSCZamithR (2014) Sourcing the Arab spring: a case study of Andy Carvin’s sources on Twitter during the Tunisian and Egyptian revolutions. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication19(3): 479–499.
13.
LewisSC (2012) The tension between professional control and open participation. Information, Communication & Society15(6): 836–866.
LewisSCWestlundO (2015) Actors, actants, audiences, and activities in cross-media news work: a matrix and a research agenda. Digital Journalism3(1): 19–37.
16.
LewisSCHoltonAECoddingtonM (2014) Reciprocal journalism: a concept of mutual exchange between journalists and audiences. Journalism Practice8(2): 229–241.
17.
MainesDR (1982) In search of mesostructure: studies in negotiated order. Urban Life11(3): 267–279.
18.
MalkaVArielYAvidarR (2015) Fighting, worrying and sharing: operation “Protective Edge” as the first WhatsApp war. Media, War & Conflict8(3): 329–344.
19.
ManosevitchITenenboimO (2017) The multifaceted role of user-generated content in news websites: an analytical framework. Digital Journalism5(6): 731–752.
20.
MarchionniDM (2013) Journalism-as-a-conversation: a concept explication. Communication Theory23(2): 131–147.
21.
MathesonD (2004) Weblogs and the epistemology of the news: some trends in online journalism. New Media & Society6(4): 443–468.
22.
MourãoRR (2015) The boys on the timeline: political journalists’ use of Twitter for building interpretive communities. Journalism16(8): 1107–1123.
23.
NetzerYTenenboim-WeinblattKShifmanL (2014) The construction of participation in news websites: a five-dimensional model. Journalism Studies15(5): 619–631.
24.
NipJYM (2006) Exploring the second phase of public journalism. Journalism Studies7(2): 212–236.
25.
ÖrnebringH (2017) Epistemologies and professional roles. In: MelladoCHellmuellerLDonsbachW (eds) Journalistic Role Performance: Concepts, Contexts, and Methods. New York: Routledge, pp. 75–90.
26.
PapacharissiZ (2014) Affective Publics: Sentiment, Technology, and Politics. New York: Oxford University Press.
27.
PapacharissiZOliveiraM (2012) Affective news and networked publics: the rhythms of news storytelling on #Egypt. Journal of Communication62(2): 266–282.
28.
RaginC (1992) Cases of “what is a case?” In: RaginCBeckerH (eds) What Is a Case?Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–19.
29.
ReeseSD (2016) The new geography of journalism research: levels and spaces. Digital Journalism4(7): 816–826.
30.
SingerJBDomingoDHeinonenA, et al. (2011) Participatory Journalism: Guarding Open Gates at Online Newspapers. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
31.
TenenboimO (2017) Reporting war in 140 characters: how journalists used Twitter during the 2014 Gaza-Israel conflict. International Journal of Communication11: 3497–3518.
WestlundOLewisSC (2017) Reconsidering news production: how understanding the interplay of actors, actants, and audiences can improve journalism education. In: GoodmanRSSteynE (eds) Global Journalism Education in the 21st Century: Challenges and Innovations:. Austin, TX: Knight Center, pp. 409–428.
WitschgeTAndersonCWDomingoD, et al. (2019) Dealing with the mess (we made): unraveling hybridity, normativity, and complexity in journalism studies. Journalism20: 651–659.
