There is a new cast of self-proclaimed experts offering “how-to-succeed” resources aimed at coaching and inspiring gig workers. The emergence of such resources raises questions about the performance of expertise regarding the workings of algorithmic labor platforms. This article examines how Uber driver/bloggers—workers who are driving for Uber, while also creating Uber-related video content—perform expertise in driving for Uber on YouTube. I conducted in-depth interviews with 11 driver/bloggers and a qualitative analysis of the textual and video content published by driver/bloggers. Through the data, I show how driver/bloggers’ empowerment narratives became intertwined with their individualistic aspirations to develop dual careers as Uber drivers and YouTubers. Driver/bloggers employed three self-presentation strategies to perform expertise, including the construction of uniqueness and “know-how,” realness, and relatability with audiences. The study concludes with implications for our collective understandings of gig workers, expertise, and online curation across a wider platform ecology.
AshtonDPatelK (2018) Vlogging careers: everyday expertise, collaboration and authenticity. In: TaylorSLuckmanS (eds) The New Normal of Working Lives: Critical Studies in Contemporary Work and Employment. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 147–169.
2.
Banet-WeiserSArzumanovaI (2012) Creative authorship, self-actualizing women, and the self-brand. In: ChrisCGerstnerD (eds) Media Authorship. New York: Routledge, pp. 163–179.
3.
BaymNK (2018) Playing to the Crowd: Musicians, Audiences, and the Intimate Work of Connection. New York: New York University Press.
4.
BaymNKBurnettR (2009) Amateur experts: international fan labour in Swedish independent music. International Journal of Cultural Studies12(5): 443–449.
5.
BiggartNW (1983) Rationality, meaning, and self-management: success manuals, 1950-1980. Social Problems30(3): 298–311.
6.
BurgessJGreenJ (2018) YouTube: Online Video and Participatory Culture. 2nd ed.Malden, MA: Polity Press.
7.
CampbellH (2018) The Rideshare Guide: Everything You Need to Know about Driving for Uber, Lyft, and Other Ridesharing Companies. New York: Skyhorse Publishing.
8.
ChanNKHumphreysL (2018) Mediatization of social space and the case of Uber drivers. Media and Communication6(2): 29–38.
9.
ChenJY (2018) Thrown under the bus and outrunning it! The logic of Didi and taxi drivers’ labour and activism in the on-demand economy. New Media & Society20(8): 2691–2711.
10.
CollinsHEvansR (2007) Rethinking Expertise. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
De StefanoV (2016) The Rise of the “Just-in-time Workforce”: On-demand Work, Crowdwork and Labour Protection in the “Gig-economy.”Geneva: International Labour Office.
13.
DonathJ (2007) Signals in social supernets. Journal of Computer-mediated Communication13(1): 231–251.
14.
DuffyBE (2017) (Not) Getting Paid to Do What You Love: Gender, Social Media, and Aspirational Work. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
15.
EpsteinS (1995) The construction of lay expertise: AIDS activism and the forging of credibility in the reform of clinical trials. Science, Technology, and Human Values20(4): 408–437.
16.
EyalG (2013) For a sociology of expertise: the social origins of the autism epidemic. American Journal of Sociology118(4): 863–907.
17.
GambettaDHamillH (2005) Streetwise: How Taxi Drivers Establish Their Customers’ Trustworthiness. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
18.
GandiniA (2016) Digital work: self-branding and social capital in the freelance knowledge economy. Marketing Theory16(1): 123–141.
19.
GandiniA (2018) Labour process theory and the gig economy. Human Relations72(6): 1039–56.
20.
GeorgeM (2008) Interactions in expert service work: demonstrating professionalism in personal training. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography37(1): 108–131.
21.
GrayMLSuriSAliSS, et al. (2016) The crowd is a collaborative network. In: Proceedings of the 19th ACM conference on computer-supported cooperative work & social computing (CSCW ’16), San Francisco, CA, pp. 134–147. New York: ACM.
22.
HearnA (2010) Structuring feeling: Web 2.0, online ranking and rating, and the digital “reputation” economy. Ephemera: Theory and Politics in Organization10(3–4): 421–438.
23.
HilgartnerS (2000) Science on Stage: Expert Advice as Public Drama. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
24.
JasanoffS (1995) Science at the Bar: Law, Science and Technology in America. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
25.
JerslevA (2016) In the time of the microcelebrity: celebrification and the YouTuber Zoella. International Journal of Communication10: 5233–5251.
26.
JonesC (2002) Signaling expertise: how signals shape careers in creative industries. In: PeiperlMBernardMAnandA (eds) Career creativity: Explorations in the remaking of work. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 209–228.
27.
LaRossaR (2005) Grounded theory methods and qualitative family research. Journal of Marriage and Family67(4): 837–857.
28.
LehdonvirtaV (2016) Algorithms that divide and unite: delocalisation, identity and collective action in “microwork.” In: FleckerJ (ed.) Space, Place and Global Digital Work: Dynamics of Virtual Work. London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 53–80.
29.
LittE (2012) Knock, knock. Who’s there? The imagined audience. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media56(3): 330–345.
30.
MarwickAE (2013) Status Update: Celebrity, Publicity, and Branding in the Social Media Age. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
MulcahyD (2016) The Gig Economy: The Complete Guide to Getting Better Work, Taking More Time Off, and Financing the Life You Want. Nashville, TN: AMACOM.
33.
NaudinAPatelK (2017) Entangled expertise: women’s use of social media in entrepreneurial work. European Journal of Cultural Studies. Epub ahead of print 19 December 2017. DOI: 10.1177/1367549417743037.
34.
OriggiG (2018) Reputation: What It Is and Why It Matters. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
35.
PagisMAilonG (2017) The paradoxes of self-branding: an analysis of consultants’ professional web pages. Work and Occupations44(3): 243–267.
36.
PatelK (2017) Expertise and collaboration: cultural workers’ performance on social media. In: GrahamJGandiniA (eds) Collaborative Production in the Creative Industries. London: University of Westminster Press, pp. 157–176.
37.
PostigoH (2016) The socio-technical architecture of digital labor: converting play into YouTube money. New Media and Society18(2): 332–349.
38.
PruchniewskaUM (2018) Branding the self as an “authentic feminist”: negotiating feminist values in post–feminist digital cultural production. Feminist Media Studies18(5): 810–824.
39.
RosenblatA (2018) Uberland: How Algorithms Are Rewriting the Rules of Work. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
40.
RosenblatAStarkL (2016) Algorithmic labor and information asymmetries: a case study of Uber’s drivers. International Journal of Communication10: 3758–3784.
41.
RosenblatALevyKECBarocasS, et al. (2017) Discriminating tastes: Uber’s customer ratings as vehicles for workplace discrimination. Policy and Internet9(3): 256–279.
42.
ScholzT (2017) Uberworked and Underpaid: How Workers Are Disrupting the Digital Economy. Cambridge: Polity Press.
43.
SchwartzD (2018) Embedded in the crowd: creative freelancers, crowdsourced work, and occupational community. Work and Occupation45(3): 247–282.
44.
ShapiroA (2018) Between autonomy and control: strategies of arbitrage in the “on–demand” economy. New Media and Society20(8): 2954–2971.
45.
SmallML (2011) How to conduct a mixed methods study: recent trends in a rapidly growing literature. Annual Review of Sociology37: 57–86.
46.
SmithA (2016) Gig Work, Online Selling, and Home Sharing. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center.
47.
StarSL (1991) Power, technologies and the phenomenology of conventions: on being allergic to onions. In: LawJ (ed.) A Sociology of Monsters: Essays on Power, Technology and Domination. London: Routledge, pp. 26–56.
48.
StehrNGrundmannR (2011) Experts: The Knowledge and Power of Expertise. New York: Routledge.
49.
TiconaJMateescuARosenblatA (2018) Beyond Disruption: How Tech Shapes Labor across Domestic Work and Ridehailing. New York: Data and Society Institute.
50.
Van DoornN (2017) Platform labor: on the gendered and racialized exploitation of low-income service work in the “on-demand” economy. Information Communication and Society20(6): 898–914.
51.
WilliamsMG (2015) Cabs, community, and control: mobile communication among Chicago’s taxi drivers. Mobile Media & Communication3(1): 3–19.
52.
WoodAJGrahamMLehdonvirtaV, et al. (2019) Good gig, bad gig: autonomy and algorithmic control in the global gig economy. Work, Employment and Society 33(1): 56–75.
53.
WoodAJLehdonvirtaVGrahamM (2018) Workers of the Internet unite? Online freelancer organisation among remote gig economy workers in six Asian and African countries. New Technology, Work and Employment33(2): 95–112.
54.
WynneB (1989) Sheepfarming after Chernobyl: a case study in communicating scientific information. Environment31(2): 10–39.
