The Internet and political (in)equality in the Arab world: A multi-country study of the relationship between Internet news use,press freedom,and protest participation
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online May, 2019
The Internet and political (in)equality in the Arab world: A multi-country study of the relationship between Internet news use,press freedom,and protest participation
This study investigates the role of the Internet in protest participation in the Arab world. More specifically, we aim to address three important questions: (1) Does Internet news use increase the chances of protest participation? (2) Does Internet news use amplify or reduce participation gaps that exist among individuals at various socioeconomic strata? (3) How does a country’s press freedom act as a contextual factor to shape the role of the Internet in affecting protest participation gaps? The results based on an analysis of the third wave of Arab Democracy Barometer survey suggest that Internet news use for political purposes increases the likelihood of protest participation in the Arab world while it also deepens socioeconomic stratification in participation. Furthermore, national press freedom shapes the intervening role of the Internet. We discuss the theoretical implications of these findings for political inequality literature and the practical consequences for the Arab world.
BennettW (2012) The personalization of politics: political identity, social media, and changing patterns of participation. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science644(1): 20–39.
5.
BimberB (2003) Information and American Democracy: Technology in the Evolution of Political Power. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
6.
BlumlerJGurevitchM (1995) The Crisis of Public Communication. London: Routledge.
7.
CammettMDiwanIRichardsA, et al. (2015) A Political Economy of the Middle East. New York: Hachette.
8.
CarlisleJPattonR (2013) Is social media changing how we understand political engagement? An analysis of Facebook and the 2008 presidential election. Political Research Quarterly66(4): 883–895.
9.
ChoJKeumH (2016) Leveling or tilting the playing field: social networking sites and offline political communication inequality. The Social Science Journal53(2): 236–246.
10.
ChomskyN (2002) Media Control: The Spectacular Achievements of Propaganda. New York: Seven Stories Press.
11.
DahlR (1996) Equality versus inequality. PS: Political Science and Politics29(4): 639–648.
12.
DahlR (2006) On Political Equality. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
13.
DuffyM (2014) Arab media regulations: identifying restraints on freedom of the press in the laws of six Arabian Peninsula countries. Berkeley Journal Middle Eastern & Islamic Law6: 2.
14.
EllisonNSteinfieldCLampeC (2007) The benefits of Facebook “friends”: social capital and college students’ use of online social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication12(4): 1143–1168.
15.
EltantawyNWiestJ (2011) The Arab Spring social media in the Egyptian revolution: reconsidering resource mobilization theory. International Journal of Communication5: 1–18.
16.
Gil de ZúñigaHJungNValenzuelaS (2012) Social media use for news and individuals’ social capital, civic engagement and political participation. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication17(3): 319–336.
17.
GustafssonN (2014) Are social networks reducing inequality in political participation?Reports in Strategic Communication1(2): 1–36.
18.
HamptonKWellmanB (2003) Neighboring in Netville: how the internet supports community and social capital in a wired suburb. City & Community2(4): 277–311.
19.
HaniehA (2016) Inequalities in the Arab Region. World Social Science Report. UNESCO, pp. 101–103.
20.
HindmanM (2008) The Myth of Digital Democracy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
21.
HintonNMoseleyMSmithA (2012) Equality of political participation in the Americas. In: SeligsonMASmithAE andZechmeisterEJ (eds) The Political Culture of Democracy in the Americas: Towards Equality of Opportunity, Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University, pp. 75–117.
22.
HowardPHussainM (2011) The role of digital media. Journal of Democracy22(3): 35–48.
23.
HowardPDuffyAFreelonD, et al. (2011) Opening closed regimes: what was the role of social media during the Arab Spring?Project on Information Technology and Political Islam. Available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2595096
24.
JenkinsH (2006) Fans, Bloggers and Gamers: Exploring Participatory Culture. New York: New York University Press.
25.
JorbaLJensenMAnduizaE (2012) Introduction. In: AnduizaEJensenMJorbaL (eds) Digital Media and Political Engagement Worldwide: A Comparative Study. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 13–26.
26.
KallinikosJ (2004) Farewell to constructivism: technology and context-embedded action. In: AvgerouCCiborraC andLandF (eds) The Social Study of Information and Communication Technology: Innovation, Actors, and Contexts. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 140–161.
27.
KandilH (2012) Why did the Egyptian middle class march to Tahrir Square?Mediterranean Politics17(2): 197–215.
KimYChenTDe ZúñigaH (2013) Stumbling upon news on the internet: effects of incidental news exposure and relative entertainment use on political engagement. Computers in Human Behavior29(6): 2607–2614.
31.
LeesonP (2008) Media freedom, political knowledge, and participation. The Journal of Economic Perspectives22(2): 155–155.
32.
LijphartA (1997) Unequal participation: democracy’s unresolved dilemma presidential address, American Political Science Association. American Political Science Review91(1): 1–14.
33.
LivingstoneS (2008) Internet literacy: young people’s negotiation of new online opportunities. In: McPhersonT (ed.) Digital Youth, Innovation, and the Unexpected. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, pp. 101–122.
NeumanRBimberBHindmanM (2011) The internet and four dimensions of citizenship. In: ShapiroRYJacobsLR (eds) The Oxford Handbook of American Public Opinion and the Media. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 22–42.
36.
NeumanWGuggenheimLMo JangS, et al. (2014) The dynamics of public attention: agenda-setting theory meets big data. Journal of Communication64(2): 93–214.
37.
NirL (2012) Cross-national differences in political discussion: can political systems narrow deliberation gaps?Journal of Communication62(3): 553–570.
38.
OdineM (2011) Middle East media: press freedom in Kuwait. Journal of Advanced Social Research1: 1177–1190.
39.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2016) PISA in focus: are there differences in how advantaged and disadvantaged students use the internet? Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/5jlv8zq6hw43-en
OserJHoogheMMarienS (2013) Is online participation distinct from offline participation? A latent class analysis of participation types and their stratification. Political Research Quarterly66(1): 91–101.
TewksburyDWeaverAMaddexB (2001) Accidentally informed: incidental news exposure on the World Wide Web. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly78(3): 533–554.
49.
TufekciZWilsonC (2012) Social media and the decision to participate in political protest: observations from Tahrir Square. Journal of Communication62(2): 363–379.
ValenzuelaSSommaNSchermanA, et al. (2016) Social media in Latin America: deepening or bridging gaps in protest participation?Online Information Review40(5): 695–711.
52.
ValerianiAVaccariC (2016) Accidental exposure to politics on social media as online participation equalizer in Germany, Italy, and the United Kingdom. New Media & Society18(9): 1857–1874.
53.
VerbaSNieN (1972) Participation in America: Social Equality and Political Democracy. New York: Harper & Row.
54.
VerbaSNieNKimJ (1987) Participation and Political Equality: A Seven-Nation Comparison. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
55.
VerbaSSchlozmanKBradyH (1995) Voice and Equality: Civic Voluntarism in American Politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
56.
XenosMVromenALoaderB (2014) The great equalizer? Patterns of social media use and youth political engagement in three advanced democracies. Information, Communication & Society17(2): 151–167.
57.
ZhangWJohnsonTSeltzerT, et al. (2010) The revolution will be networked: the influence of social networking sites on political attitudes and behavior. Social Science Computer Review28(1): 75–92.
