While considerable scholarly attention has focused on analysing the role and impact of new media during the Arab Spring uprisings of 2010–2011, comparatively little research has been devoted to examining how online activism has changed in response to the regime stabilisation measures undertaken by the governments which survived the unrest. Characterising the de-liberalisation policies of post–Arab Spring states as ‘authoritarian downgrading’, this article considers how the growing involvement of authoritarian regimes in online spaces is impacting activists’ use of new media technologies. Adopting Bahrain as a case study, we present the results of a survey of Bahraini political activists conducted in 2017 and consider whether activists’ perceptions of their online safety and security are impacting their use of new media through behaviours such as self-censorship, the adoption of pseudonyms and the preferencing of direct messaging apps over Arab Spring-era social media platforms.
Abdul-NabiZ (2015) Based on the peace journalism model: analysis of Al-Jazeera’s coverage of Bahrain’s uprising and Syria’s chemical attack. Global Media and Communication11(3): 271–302.
2.
AdaySFarrellHLynchM, et al. (2012) New media and conflict after the Arab Spring. United States Institute of Peace, July. Available at: www.usip.org/sites/default/files/PW80.pdf (accessed 15 January 2015).
3.
AnasO (2016) Arab social media: from revolutionary euphoria to cyber realism. In: GunterBElareshiMAl-JaberK (eds) Social Media in the Arab World: Communication and Public Opinion in the Gulf States. London: I.B. Tauris, pp. 45–67.
4.
AouraghMAlexanderA (2011) The Egyptian experience: sense and nonsense of the Internet revolution. International Journal of Communication5: 1344–1358.
El-NawawyMElmasryMH (2015) Revolution or crisis? Framing the 2011 Tahrir Square protests in two pan-Arab satellite news networks. Journal of Applied Journalism & Media Studies4(2): 239–258.
14.
GenglerJ (2015) Group Conflict and Political Mobilization in Bahrain and the Arab Gulf. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
GunterBElareshiM (2016) The significance of social media in the Arab world. In: GunterBElareshiMAl-JaberK (eds) Social Media in the Arab World: Communication and Public Opinion in the Gulf States. London: I.B. Tauris, pp. 1–24.
17.
HartleyLLalaGDonaghueN, et al. (2016) How activists respond to social structure in offline and online contexts. Journal of Social Issues72(2): 376–398.
LouërL (2014) Activism in Bahrain: between sectarianism and issue politics. In: KhatibLLustE (eds) Taking to the Streets: The Transformation of Arab Activism. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, pp. 172–198.
27.
Lust-OkarE (2005) Structuring Conflict in the Arab World: Incumbents, Opponents, and Institutions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
28.
LynchM (2015) After the Arab Spring: how the media trashed the transitions. Journal of Democracy26(4): 90–99.
29.
MatthiesenT (2013) Sectarian Gulf: Bahrain, Saudi Arabia and the Arab Spring That Wasn’t. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
30.
MilnerHV (2006) The digital divide: the role of political institutions in technology diffusion. Comparative Political Studies39(2): 176–199.
PaczynskaA (2010) The discreet appeal of authoritarianism. In: AlbrechtH (ed.) Contentious Politics in the Middle East: Political Opposition under Authoritarianism. Gainesville, FL: University Press of Florida, pp. 34–49.
33.
PetersonJE (2012) The GCC states: participation, opposition, and the fraying of the social contract. Kuwait Programme on Development, Governance and Globalisation in the Gulf States, The London School of Economics, December. Available at: www.lse.ac.uk/middleEastCentre/kuwait/research/papers/politicalParticipation.aspx (accessed 5 November 2014).
34.
PriorM (2013) Media and political polarization. Annual Review of Political Science16: 101–127.
SadikiL (2009) Rethinking Arab Democratization: Elections without Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
37.
ShehabiA (2016) Inviolable sheikhs and radical subjects: Bahrain’s cyclical sovereignty crisis. Arab Studies Journal24(1): 228–253.
38.
ShirahR (2015) Electoral authoritarianism and political unrest. International Political Science Review37(4): 470–484.
39.
SikaN (2017) Ambiguities of student activism, authoritarianism and democratic attitudes: the cases of Egypt and Morocco. Journal of North African Studies22(1): 35–59.
40.
TillyCTarrowS (2015) Contentious Politics. 2nd ed.New York: Oxford University Press.
TufekciZWilsonC (2012) Social media and the decision to participate in political protest: observations from Tahrir Square. Journal of Communication62: 363–379.
43.
ValenzuelaS (2013) Unpacking the use of social media for protest behavior: the roles of information, opinion expression, and activism. American Behavioral Scientist57(7): 920–942.
44.
WehreyFM (2014) Sectarian Politics in the Gulf: From the Iraq War to the Arab Uprisings. New York: Columbia University Press.
45.
WilsonCDunnA (2011) Digital media in the Egyptian revolution: descriptive analysis from the Tahrir data sets. International Journal of Communication5: 1248–1272.
46.
WolfsfeldGYarchiMSamuel-AzranT (2016) Political information repertoires and political participation. New Media & Society18(9): 2096–2115.
47.
WrightJEscriba-FolchA (2012) Authoritarian institutions and regime survival: transitions to democracy and subsequent autocracy. British Journal of Political Science42(2): 283–309.
48.
ZartmanW (ed.) (2015) Arab Spring: Negotiating in the Shadow of the Intifadat. Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
