Scholarship on the politics of new media widely assumes that communication functions as a sufficient conceptual paradigm for critically assessing new media politics. This article argues that communication-centric analyses fail to engage the politics of information itself, limiting information only to its consequences for communication, and neglecting information as it reaches into our selves, lives, and actions beyond the confines of communication. Furthering recent new media historiography on the “information theory” of Shannon and Wiener, the article reveals both the primacy of communication in midcentury information theory, and also a striking resonance between these postwar communication theories and Habermas’s more recent communicative theory of democracy. To achieve a critical perspective beyond communication, the article proposes a media genealogy of the politics of subjects as a methodology for developing an analysis of how information formats us as subjects of data.
ApprichC (2017) Technotopia: A Media Genealogy of Net Cultures (trans. DeriegA). New York: Rowman & Littlefield.
2.
BowkerG (2005) Memory Practices in the Sciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT.
3.
BucherT (2012) Want to be on the top? Algorithmic power and the threat of invisibility on Facebook. New Media & Society14(7): 1164–1180.
4.
CaplanJ (2001) ‘This or that particular person’: protocols of identification in nineteenth-century Europe. In: CaplanJTorpeyJ (eds) Documenting Individual Identity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University, pp. 49–67.
5.
Cheney-LippoldJ (2017) We Are Data: Algorithms and the Making of Our Digital Selves. New York: NYU.
6.
ClarkeB (2010) Communication. In: MitchellWJTHansenMBN (eds) Critical Terms for Media Studies. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press, pp. 131–144.
7.
CrawfordK (2016) Can an algorithm be agnostic? Ten scenes from life in calculated publics. Science, Technology, & Human Values41(1): 77–92.
8.
Critical Genealogies Collaboratory (2018) Standard Forms of Power: Biopower and Sovereign Power in the Technology of the US Birth Certificate, 1903–1935. Constellations25(4): 641–656.
9.
CurrahPMooreLJ (2009) ‘We won’t know who you are’: contesting sex designations in New York City birth certificates. Hypatia24(3): 113–135.
10.
DavidsonA (1990) Closing up the corpses. In: AI Davidson (ed.) The Emergence of Sexuality: Historical Epistemology and the Formation of Concepts. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, pp. 1–29.
11.
DeleuzeGGuattariF ([1991] 1994) What Is Philosophy? (trans. TomlinsonHBurchellG). New York: Columbia University, 1994.
12.
FoucaultM ([1982] 2000) The subject and power. In: RabinowPFaubionJD (eds) Power: Essential Works, vol. 3. New York: New Press, pp. 326–348.
13.
GallowayA (2004) Protocol. Cambridge, MA: MIT.
14.
GallowayA (2012) The Interface Effect. Cambridge: Polity.
15.
GehlR (2014) Power/freedom on the dark web: a digital ethnography of the Dark Web Social Network. New Media & Society18(7): 1219–1235.
16.
GehlR (2018) Weaving the Dark Web: Legitimacy on Freenet, Tor, and I2P. Cambridge, MA: MIT.
17.
GeogheganBD (2011) From information theory to French theory: Jakobson, Lévi-Strauss, and the Cybernetic apparatus. Critical Inquiry38: 96–126.
18.
GillespieT (2010) The politics of “platforms.”New Media & Society12(3): 347–364.
19.
GillespieT (2014) The relevance of algorithms. In: GillespieTBoczowskiPJFootKA (eds) Media Technologies: Essays on Communication, Materiality, and Society. Cambridge, MA: MIT, pp. 167–193.
20.
GitelmanL (ed.) (2013) Raw Data Is an Oxymoron. Cambridge, MA: MIT.
21.
HabermasJ ([1992] 1996) Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy (trans. RehgW). Cambridge, MA: The MIT.
22.
HackingI (1986) Making up people. In: HellerTCSosnaMWellberryDE (eds) Reconstructing Individualism. Stanford, CA: Stanford University, pp. 222–236.
23.
HaimsonOHoffmannA (2016) Constructing and enforcing “authentic” identity online: Facebook, real names, and non-normative identities. First Monday21(6).
24.
HalpernO (2014) Beautiful Data: A History of Vision and Reason Since 1945. Durham, NC: Duke University.
25.
HarawayD ([1985] 1991) A Cyborg manifesto: science, technology, and socialist-feminism in the late twentieth century. In: HarawayDJ (ed.) Simians, Cyborgs, and Women. New York: Routledge, pp. 149–181.
26.
HarcourtB (2015) Exposed: Desire and Disobedience in the Digital Age. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.
27.
HarperT (2016) The big data public and its problems: big data and the structural transformation of the public sphere. New Media & Society19(9): 1424–1439.
28.
HaylesNK (1999) How We Became Posthuman: Virtual Bodies in Cybernetics, Literature, and Informatics. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago.
29.
HaylesNK (2010) Cybernetics. In: MitchellWJTHansenMBN (eds) Critical Terms for Media Studies. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago, pp. 145–156.
30.
IliadisA (2013) Informational Ontology: the Meaning of Gilbert Simondon’s Concept of Individuation. Communication+12: 5.
KlineRR (2015) The Cybernetics Moment: Or Why We Call Our Age the Information Age. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University.
33.
MarshallD (2012) Birth registration and the promotion of children’s rights in the interwar years. In: BreckenridgeKSzreterS (eds) Registration and Recognition: Documenting the Person in World History. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 449–473.
34.
KoopmanC (2013) Genealogy as Critique: Foucault and the Problems of Modernity. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University.
35.
KoopmanC (2019) How We Became Our Data: A Genealogy of the Informational Person. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago, pp. 272.
36.
MoneaA (2016) Numerical mediation and American governmentality. PhD dissertation, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC.
37.
MoneaAPackerJ (2016) Media genealogy and the politics of archaeology. International Journal of Communication10: 3141–3159.
38.
PanagiaD (2019) On the political ontology of the dispositif. Critical Inquiry45(3). DOI: 10.1086/702613.
39.
PearsonSJ (2015) ‘Age ought to be a fact’: the campaign against child labor and the rise of the birth certificate. Journal of American History1014: 1144–1165.
40.
PetersB (2009) And lead us not into thinking the new is new: a bibliographic case for new media history. New Media & Society11(1–2): 13–30.
41.
PetersJD (1988) Information: notes toward a critical history. Journal of Communication Inquiry12(2): 9–23.
42.
PetersJDPetersB (2016) Norbert Wiener as Pragmatist. Empedocles: European Journal for the Philosophy of Communication7(2): 157–172.
43.
RosenbergD (2013) Data before the fact. In: GitelmanL (ed.) Raw Data Is an Oxymoron. Cambridge, MA: MIT, pp. 15–40.
44.
SchüllND (2018) Self in the loop: bits, patterns, and pathways in the quanitified self. In: PapacharissiZ (ed.) A Networked Self and Human Augmentics, Artificial Intelligence, Sentience, New York: Routledge, pp. 25–38.
45.
ShannonCE ([1948] 1949) The mathematical theory of communication. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois.
46.
ShannonCE (1956) The Bandwagon. IRE Transactions on Information Theory2(1): 3.
47.
ShannonCE ([1950] 1993) Communication theory–exposition of fundamentals. In: SloaneNJAWynerAD (eds) Collected Papers. New York: Wiley, pp. 173–176.
48.
SimondonG (1989) Individuation Psychique et Collective. Paris: Aubier.
49.
SpadeD (2011) Normal Life. Brooklyn, NY: South End.
50.
SterneJ (2012) MP3: The Meaning of a Format. Durham, NC: Duke University.
51.
TerranovaT (2004a) Network Culture: Politics for the Information Age. London: Pluto.
52.
TerranovaT (2004b) Communication beyond meaning: on the cultural politics of information. Social Text22(3): 51–73.
53.
VismannC ([2000] 2008) Files: Law and Media Technology (trans. Winthrop-YoungG). Stanford, CA: Stanford University.
54.
Von FoersterH (ed.) (1952) Cybernetics. New York: Josiah Macy Jr. Foundation.
55.
WeaverW (1949) Recent contributions to the mathematical theory of communication. In: ShannonCEWeaverWThe Mathematical Theory of Communication. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois, pp. 1–28.
56.
WienerN ([1948] 1961) Cybernetics: Or Control and Communication in the Animal and the Machine, 2nd edn.Cambridge, MA: MIT.
57.
WienerN ([1950] 1988) The Human Use of Human Beings: Cybernetics and Society, 2nd ed. New York: De Capo.
58.
WienerN (1964) God and Golem, Inc. Cambridge, MA: MIT.
