The network is not the territory: On capturing mobile media

Abstract

Cellular mobile networks, in which devices constantly relay their location and their movements, are formed by the motion of end devices in relation to the position of radio towers. As a matter of principle, it is this motion that allows the location of devices to be identified within the network. The article argues that the emergence of mobile media based on cellular triangulation has introduced an ontology in which, by technical necessity, the position of every object is constantly registered and objects that do not have an address do not exist. The location and movement of all participants are, at all times, a known technical variable. With Xeros PARC’s “ubiquitous computing” as a reference case, the article scrutinizes how movement triggers the process that registers the locations of mobile phones or smartphones, a development it situates against the cybernetic imagination of determining the location and the movement of an object at the same time.

Keywords

Addressability capture cellular triangulation cybernetics digital cultures German media theory media archeology mobile media Philip Agre

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Agre

(1994) Surveillance and capture: two models of privacy. The Information Society: An International Journal 10(2): 101–127.

Andrejevic

(2007) Surveillance in the digital enclosure. The Communication Review 10: 295–317.

Barney

(2015) We shall not be moved: on the politics of immobility. In: Herman

Hadlaw

Swiss

(eds) Theories of the Mobile Internet: Materialities and Imaginaries. New York: Routledge, pp. 15–24.

Barreneche

(2012) Governing the geocoded world: environmentality and the politics of location platforms. Convergence: 18(3): 331–351.

Bollmer

(2016) Inhuman Networks: Social Media and the Archaeology of Connection. New York: Bloomsburg Publishing.

Brunton

Nissenbaum

(2015) Obfuscation: A User’s Guide for Privacy and Protest. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

Buschauer

(2014) (Very) nervous systems: big mobile data. In: Reichert

(ed.) Big Data: Analysen zum digitalen Wandel Von Wissen, Macht und Ökonomie. Bielefeld: Transcript, pp. 405–436.

Carvin

(2010) Missing internet pioneer Phil Agre is found alive. Available at: https://www.npr.org/sections/alltechconsidered/2010/01/missing_internet_pioneer_phil.html (accessed 7 March 2018).

Chapuis

Joel

(2003) 100 Years of Telephone Switching: Electronics, Computers and Telephone Switching. Amsterdam: IOS Press.

10.

Crandall

(2010) The geospatialization of calculative operations: tracking, sensing and megacities. Theory, Culture & Society 27(6): 68–90.

11.

Derrida

(1981) Plato’s pharmacy. In: Derrida

(ed.) Dissemination (trans. Johnson

). Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press, pp. 63–171.

12.

Dourish

(2001) Where the Action Is: The Foundations of Embodied Interaction. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

13.

Dourish P and Bell

(2011) Divining a Digital Future: Mess and Mythology in Ubiquitous Computing. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

14.

Franklin

(2015) Control: Digitality as Cultural Logic. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

15.

Galison

(1994) The ontology of the enemy: Norbert Wiener and the cybernetic vision. Critical Inquiry 21(1): 228–266.

16.

Gerlitz

Paßmann

(2014) ‚Good’ platform-political reasons for ‚bad’ platform-data. Zur sozio-technischen Geschichte der Plattformaktivitäten. Mediale Kontrolle Unter Beobachtung 3(1): 1–40.

17.

Goggin

(2012) Encoding place. In: Wilken

Goggin

(eds) Mobile Technology and Place. New York: Routledge, pp. 198–212.

18.

Hagen

(2009) Zellular—Parasozial—Ordal: Skizzen zu einer Medienarchäologie des Handys. In: Döring

Thielmann

(eds) Mediengeographie: Theorie—Analyse—Diskussion. Bielefeld: Transcript, pp. 359–380.

19.

Heilmann

(2015) Datenarbeit im “Capture”-Kapitalismus: Zur Ausweitung der Verwertungszone im Zeitalter informatischer Überwachung. Zeitschrift für Medienwissenschaft (2): 35–47.

20.

Hesselberth

(2017) Discourses on disconnectivity and the right to disconnect. New Media & Society 20(5): 1994–2010.

21.

Joel

(1972) Mobile communication system. Patent.3,663,762. 16 May. US.

22.

Leistert

(2013) From Protest to Surveillance: The Political Rationality of Mobile Media: Modalities of Neoliberalism. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.

23.

Mandraud

Monnot

(2008) Les neuf de Tarnac. Le Monde diplomatique, 20 November. Available at: https://www.lemonde.fr/societe/article/2008/11/20/sabotages-a-la-sncf-les-neuf-de-tarnac_1120974_3224.html

24.

Pentland

Rueter

(1994) Organizational routines as grammars of action. Administrative Science Quarterly 39(3): 484–510.

25.

Ring

(1947) Mobile Telephony: Wide Area Coverage. Technical Memorandum for Bell Telephone Laboratories.

26.

Schäffner

(2011) The telephonic revolution of the digital image. Grey Room 43: 144–155.

27.

Siegert

(1999) Relays: Literature as an Epoch of the Postal System. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

28.

Thrift

French

(2002) The automatic production of space. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 27(3): 303–335.

29.

Tiqqun (2010 [2001]) The cybernetic hypothesis. Available at: https://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/tiqqun-the-cybernetic-hypothesis (accessed 7 March 2018).

30.

Wakefield

(2007) Introduction to Mobile Communications: Technology, Services, Markets. Boca Raton, FL: Auerbach Publications.

31.

Want

(2010) An introduction to ubiquitous computing. In: Krumm

(ed.) Ubiquitous Computing Fundamentals. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall, pp. 1–35.

32.

Want

Adams

Goldstein

et al . (1993) Method and system for maintaining processing continuity to mobile computers in a wireless network. Patent 5,564,070. 30 July. US.

33.

Want

Schilit

Adams

et al . (1995) An overview of the PARCTAB ubiquitous computing experiment. IEEE Personal Communications 2(6): 28–43.

34.

Weiser

(1991) The computer for the 21st century. Scientific American 265: 94–104.

35.

Weiser

(1993) Some computer science issues in ubiquitous computing. Communications of the ACM 36(7): 75–84.

36.

Well

(2014) Ping! The admissibility of cellular records to track criminal defendants. St. Louis University Public Law Review 33(2): 487–518.