This study examines the effects of virality metrics on the judgment of a rumor on Twitter. In an online experiment (N = 203), a tweet about the rumor related to the issue of food safety was presented with the variations of virality metrics (i.e. the number of retweets, likes, and replies). The results showed that exposure to high virality metrics resulted in greater perceptions of descriptive norms and injunctive norms of sharing the tweet message, and in turn, increased message believability and viral behavioral intentions. Overall, findings demonstrated the normative influence of virality metrics. Implications of the current findings are discussed in light of social norm theories and online rumor literature.
AjzenIFishbeinM (1980) Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
2.
AlhabashSMcAlisterAR (2015) Redefining virality in less broad strokes: predicting viral behavioral intentions from motivations and uses of Facebook and Twitter. New Media & Society17(8): 1317–1339.
3.
AlhabashSMcAlisterARQuilliamETet al. (2015) Alcohol’s getting a bit more social: when alcohol marketing messages on Facebook increase young adults’ intentions to imbibe. Mass Communication and Society18: 350–375.
4.
AllportGWPostmanLJ (1947) The Psychology of Rumor. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
BaumgartnerSEValkenburgPMPeterJ (2011) The influence of descriptive and injunctive peer norms on adolescents’ risky sexual online behavior. Cyperpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking14(12): 753–758.
7.
BordiaPDiFonzoN (2004) Problem solving in social interactions on the internet: rumor as social cognition. Social Psychology Quarterly67(1): 33–49.
8.
BordiaPDifonzoNChangA (1999) Rumor as group problem solving: development patterns in informal computer-mediated groups. Small Group Research30(1): 8–28.
9.
ChaikenS (1980) Heuristic and systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology39(5): 752–766.
10.
ChuaAYKBanerjeeS (2017) To share or not to share: the role of epistemic belief in online health rumors. International Journal of Medical Informatics108: 36–41.
11.
ChuaAYKBanerjeeSGuanAHet al. (2016) Intention to trust and share health-related online rumors: studying the role of risk propensity. In: SAI Computing Conference (SAI), London, 13–15 July, pp. 1136–1139. New York: IEEE.
12.
CialdiniRBKallgrenCARenoRR (1991) A focus theory of normative conduct: a theoretical refinement and reevaluation of the role of norms in human behavior. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology24: 201–234.
13.
CialdiniRBRenoRRKallgrenCA (1990) A focus theory of normative conduct: recycling the concept of norms to reduce littering in public places. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology58(6): 1015–1026.
14.
DiFonzoNBordiaP (2007) Rumor Psychology: Social & Organizational Approaches. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
15.
DiFonzoNRobinsonNMSulsJMet al. (2012) Rumors about cancer: content, sources, coping, transmission, and belief. Journal of Health Communication17(9): 1099–1115.
16.
DoerrBFouzMFriedrichT (2012) Why rumors spread so quickly in social networks. Communications of the ACM55(6): 70–75.
17.
FishbeinMAjzenI (1975) Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.
18.
FiskeST (2004) Social Beings: A Core Motives Approach to Social Psychology. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
19.
GarrettRK (2011) Troubling consequences of online political rumoring. Human Communication Research37(2): 255–274.
20.
HayesAF (2013) Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-based Approach. New York: Guilford Press.
21.
HoltonAEChyiHI (2012) News and the overloaded consumer: factors influencing information overload among news consumers. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking15(11): 619–624.
22.
JinFWangWZhaoLet al. (2014) Misinformation propagation in the age of Twitter. Computer47(12): 90–94.
23.
KimHSSundarSS (2011) Using interface cues in online health community boards to change impressions and encourage user contribution. In: Proceedings of the 2011 Annual Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’11), Vancouver, BC, Canada, 7–11 May, pp. 599–608. New York: ACM.
24.
KimYCJungJY (2017) SNS dependency and interpersonal storytelling: an extension of media system dependency theory. New Media & Society19(9): 1458–1475.
25.
KimYCShinEChoAet al. (2015) SNS dependency and community engagement in urban neighborhoods: the moderating role of integrated connectedness to a community storytelling network. Communication Research. Epub ahead of print 29 July. DOI: 10.1177/0093650215588786.
26.
LapinskiMKRimalRN (2005) An explication of social norms. Communication Theory15(2): 127–147.
27.
LeeHOhHJ (2017) Normative mechanism of rumor dissemination on Twitter. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking20(3): 164–171.
28.
LeeJYSundarSS (2013) To tweet or to retweet? That is the question for health professionals on Twitter. Health Communication28(5): 509–524.
29.
Lee-WonRJAboMMNaKet al. (2016) More than numbers: effects of social media virality metrics on intention to help unknown others in the context of bone marrow donation. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking19(6): 404–411.
30.
LiHSakamotoY (2015) Re-tweet count matters: social influences on sharing of disaster-related tweets. Homeland Security & Emergency Management12(3): 737–761.
NaglerRH (2014) Adverse outcomes associated with media exposure to contradictory nutrition messages. Journal of Health Communication19(1): 24–40.
33.
OhOAgrawalMRaoH (2013) Community intelligence and social media services: a rumor theoretic analysis of tweets during social crises. MIS Quarterly37: 407–426.
34.
OhOKwonKHRaoHR (2010) An exploration of social media in extreme events: rumor theory and Twitter during the Haiti Earthquake 2010. In: Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Information Systems, St. Louis, MO, 12–15 December.
35.
ParkHSSmithSW (2007) Distinctiveness and influence of subjective norms, personal descriptive and injunctive norms, and societal descriptive and injunctive norms on behavioral intent: a case of two behaviors critical to organ donation. Human Communication Research33(2): 194–218.
36.
ReevesBGeiserS (1994) Designing experiments that assess psychological responses to media messages. In: LangA (ed.) Measuring Psychological Responses to Media Messages. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 165–180.
37.
RimalRNRealK (2005) How behaviors are influenced by perceived norms: a test of the theory of normative social behavior. Communication Research32(3): 389–414.
38.
RivisASheeranP (2003) Descriptive norms as an additional predictor in the theory of planned behaviour: a meta-analysis. Current Psychology22(3): 218–233.
39.
RobertsC (2010) Correlations among variables in message and messenger credibility scales. American Behavioral Scientist54(1): 43–56.
40.
RosnowRLKimmelAJ (2000) Rumor. In: KazdinAE (ed.) Encyclopedia of Psychology, Vol. 7. New York: Oxford University Press and American Psychological Association, pp. 122–123.
41.
RosnowRLEspositoJLGibneyL (1988) Factors influencing rumor spreading: replication and extension. Language & Communication8(1): 29–42.
42.
RosnowRLYostJHEspositoJL (1986) Belief in rumor and likelihood of rumor transmission. Language & Communication6(3): 189–194.
43.
ShibutaniT (1966) Improvised News: A Sociological Study of Rumor. Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill Company.
44.
StavrosituCDKimJ (2015) All blogs are not created equal: the role of narrative formats and user-generated comments in health prevention. Health Communication30(5): 485–495.
45.
SundarSS (2008) The MAIN model: a heuristic approach to understanding technology effects on credibility. In: MetzgerMJFlanaginAJ (eds) Digital Media, Youth, and Credibility. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, pp. 73–100.
WhiteKMSmithJRTerryDJet al. (2009) Social influence in the theory of planned behaviour: the role of descriptive, injunctive, and in-group norms. British Journal of Social Psychology48(1): 135–158.
48.
ZhangZZhangZLiH (2015) Predictors of the authenticity of Internet health rumours. Health Information & Libraries Journal32(3): 195–205.
