In this study, we investigate how quantification of Wikipedia biographies can shed light on worldwide longitudinal gender inequality trends, a macro-level dimension of human development. We present the Wikidata Human Gender Indicator (WHGI), located within a set of indicators allowing comparative study of gender inequality through space and time, the Wikipedia Gender Indicators (WIGI), based on metadata available through the Wikidata database. Our research confirms that gender inequality is a phenomenon with a long history, but whose patterns can be analyzed and quantified on a larger scale than previously thought possible. Through the use of Inglehart–Welzel cultural clusters, we show that gender inequality can be analyzed with regard to world’s cultures. We also show a steadily improving trend in the coverage of women and other genders in reference works.
BeneriaLPermanyerI (2010) The measurement of socio-economic gender inequality revisited. Development and Change41(3): 375–399.
2.
BlumenstockJE (2008) Size matters: word count as a measure of quality on Wikipedia. In: Proceedings of the 17th international conference on World Wide Web (WWW ’08), Beijing, China, 21–25 April, pp. 1095–1096. New York: ACM Press.
3.
CollierB andBearJ (2012) Conflict, criticism, or confidence: an empirical examination of the gender gap in Wikipedia contributions. In: Proceedings of the ACM 2012 conference on computer supported cooperative work (CSCW ’12), Seattle, WA, 11–15 February, pp. 383–392. New York: ACM Press.
DreschlerDJüttingJKatseliL (2008a) Measuring gender (in)equality: the OECD gender, institutions and development data base. Journal of Human Development9(1): 65–86.
6.
DreschlerDJüttingJKatseliL (2008b) Social institutions and gender equality: introducing the OECD gender, institutions and development data base (GID-DB). In: Proceedings of the statistics, knowledge and policy, measuring and fostering the progress of societies: measuring and fostering the progress of societies, Istanbul, 27–30 June, pp. 472–474. Paris: OECD Publishing.
7.
EckertSSteinerL (2013) (Re)triggering backlash: responses to news about Wikipedia’s gender gap. Journal of Communication Inquiry37(4): 284–303.
8.
EomYAragónPLaniadoDet al. (2014) Interactions of cultures and top people of Wikipedia from ranking of 24 language editions. Available at: http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.7183 (accessed 30 January 2015).
9.
FanchetteS (1974) Social indicators: problems of methodology and selection. In: FanchetteS (ed.) Social Indicators: Problems of Definition and Selection. Paris: UNESCO Press, pp. 7–10.
10.
ForteALarcoVBruckmanA (2009) Decentralization in Wikipedia governance. Journal of Management Information Systems26(1): 49–172.
11.
GhoshRAGlottRKriegerBet al. (2002) Free/libre and open source software: survey and study. Final report, International Institute of Infonomics, October, Maastricht University, Maastricht.
Graells-GarridoELalmasMMenczerF (2015) First women, second sex: gender bias in Wikipedia. In: Proceedings of the 26th ACM conference on hypertext & social media (HT ’15), Guzelyurt, 1–4 September, pp. 165–174. New York: ACM Press.
14.
HargittaiEShawA (2014) Mind the skills gap: the role of Internet know-how and gender in differentiated contributions to Wikipedia. Information, Communication & Society18(4): 424–442.
15.
HawkenAMunckGM (2011) Cross-national indices with gender-differentiated data: what do they measure? How valid are they?Social Indicators Research111(3): 801–838.
16.
HillBMShawA (2013) The Wikipedia gender gap revisited: characterizing survey response bias with propensity score estimation. PLoS ONE8(6): e65782.
17.
InglehartRWelzelC (2005) Modernization, Cultural Change, and Democracy: The Human Development Sequence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
18.
KlasenS (2006) UNDP’s gender-related measures: some conceptual problems and possible solutions. Journal of Human Development7(2): 243–274.
19.
KlasenS (2007) Gender-related indicators of well-being. In: McGilivrayM (ed.) Measuring Human Well-Being: Concept and Measurement. London: Palgrave, pp. 167–192.
20.
KleinM (2013a) Sex ratios in Wikidata, Wikipedias, and VIAF. Available at: http://hangingtogether.org/?p=2877 (accessed 30 January 2015).
21.
KleinM (2013b) Sex ratios in Wikidata, Wikipedias, and VIAF part 2. Available at: http://hangingtogether.org/?p=2986 (accessed 30 January 2015).
KoniecznyP (2009) Wikipedia: community or social movement?Interface: a Journal for and about Social Movements1(2): 212–232.
24.
LamSUduwageADongZet al. (2011) WP: clubhouse? An exploration of Wikipedia’s gender imbalance. In: Proceedings of the 7th international symposium on wikis and open collaboration (WikiSym 2011), Mountain View, CA, 3–5 October, pp. 1–10. New York: ACM Press.
25.
LandénMWålinderJLundströmB (1996) Prevalence, incidence and sex ratio of transsexualism. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica93: 221–223.
McDonaldP (2000) Gender equity in theories of fertility transition. Population and Development Review26(3): 427–439.
28.
MillsM (2010) Gender roles, gender (in)equality and fertility: an empirical test of five gender equity indices. Canadian Studies in Population37(3–4): 445–474.
29.
ReagleJ (2013) “Free as in sexist?” Free culture and the gender gap. First Monday18(1). DOI: 10.5210/fm.v18i1.4291.
30.
ReagleJRhueL (2011) Gender bias in Wikipedia and Britannica. International Journal of Communication5: 1138–1158.
31.
RossiRJGilmartinKJ (1980) The Handbook of Social Indicators: Sources, Characteristics, and Analysis. New York: Garland STPM Press.
32.
ThomasG (1992) A Position to Command Respect: Women and the Eleventh Britannica. Metuchen, NJ: The Scarecrow Press.
33.
United Nations Development Programme (1997) Human Development Report 1997. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
34.
WagnerCGraells-GarridoEGarciaDet al. (2016) Women through the glass ceiling: gender asymmetries in Wikipedia. EPJ Data Science5: 5.
