Unlike previous approaches to online news sharing behaviors dealing with the dissemination of information to broader audiences, this article interprets that behavior as an act of relational communication. Drawing from surveys of 400 online news users, we examine how they manage their self-presentation and account for their audience’s characteristics differently when they engage in online news sharing activities on mobile instant messenger (MIM) and social networking site (SNS). Our findings suggest that individuals who are highly motivated by self-presentation share news online more than others. Individuals also target different audiences, depending on their media environments. Specifically, SNS users are more cautious about their audiences’ connections with other users. The implications are that news sharing behaviors are a type of communication used for forming relationships and managing impressions beyond informational purposes, based on active individuals’ strategic considerations of their audiences’ characteristics.
BakshyEHofmanJMMasonWAet al. (2011) Everyone’s an influencer: quantifying influence on Twitter. In:4th ACM international conference on web search and data mining, Hong Kong, China, 9–12 February,pp.65–74. New York: ACM.
4.
BaumeisterRF (1982) Self-esteem, self-presentation, and future interaction: a dilemma of reputation. Journal of Personality50(1): 29–45.
5.
BaumeisterRFHuttonDG (1987) Self-presentation theory: self-construction and audience pleasing. In: MullenBGoethalsGR (eds) Theories of Group Behavior. New York: Springer, pp. 71–87.
6.
BaymNKBoydD (2012) Socially mediated publicness: an introduction. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media56(3): 320–329.
7.
BergerJSchwartzEM (2011) What drives immediate and ongoing word of mouth?Journal of Marketing Research48(5): 869–880.
8.
BrownBRGarlandH (1971) The effects of incompetency, audience acquaintanceship, and anticipated evaluative feedback on face-saving behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology7(5): 490–502.
9.
CappellaJNKimHSAlbarracínD (2015) Selection and transmission processes for information in the emerging media environment: psychological motives and message characteristics. Media Psychology18(3): 396–424.
10.
ChenZBergerJ (2013) When, why, and how controversy causes conversation. Journal of Consumer Research40(3): 580–593.
11.
CohenJ (1988) Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. New York: Routledge.
12.
De FleurML (1987) The growth and decline of research on the diffusion of the news, 1945-1985. Communication Research14(1): 109–130.
13.
De ZúñigaHGJungNValenzuelaS (2012) Social media use for news and individuals’ social capital, civic engagement and political participation. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication17(3): 319–336.
14.
DiFonzoNBordiaP (2007) Rumor Psychology: Social and Organizational Approaches. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
EllisonNBSteinfieldCLampeC (2007) The benefits of Facebook “friends”: social capital and college students’ use of online social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication12(4): 1143–1168.
17.
GoffmanE (1959) The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York: Doubleday Publishing.
18.
GovernJMMarschLA (2001) Development and validation of the situational self-awareness scale. Consciousness and Cognition10(3): 366–378.
19.
GoyalABonchiFLakshmananLVS (2010) Learning influence probabilities in social networks. In:3rd ACM international conference on web search and data mining, New York, 4–6 February, pp. 241–250. New York: ACM.
20.
HoggMATerryDJWhiteKM (1995) A tale of two theories: a critical comparison of identity theory with social identity theory. Social Psychology Quarterly58(4): 255–269.
21.
KatzE (1957) The two-step flow of communication: an up-to-date report on a hypothesis. Public Opinion Quarterly21(1): 61–78.
22.
KimEMIhmJParkHA (2017) News sharing as relational communication: focusing on self-presentation tendency and characteristics of sharing audiences. Korean Journal of Broadcasting and Telecommunication Studies31(3): 114–151.
23.
KimEMRheeJWJangHM (2011) The effects of blog motivations and the perception toward the size of audience on blogging and the intention to continue blogging focusing on bloggers as interactive media users. Korean Journal of Broadcasting and Telecommunication Studies25(6): 162–203.
KümpelASKarnowskiVKeylingT (2015) News sharing in social media: a review of current research on news sharing users, content, and networks. Social Media + Society1(2): 1–14.
27.
LeeC (2013) Self-presentation and WOM: focusing on mediating role of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. Korean Management Review42(1): 183–211.
28.
LeeCSMaL (2012) News sharing in social media: the effect of gratifications and prior experience. Computers in Human Behavior28(2): 331–339.
29.
LiHSakamotoY (2014) Social impacts in social media: an examination of perceived truthfulness and sharing of information. Computers in Human Behavior41: 278–287.
30.
LittE (2012) Knock, knock: who’s there? The imagined audience. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media56(3): 330–345.
31.
MaLSian LeeCGohDHL (2014) Understanding news sharing in social media: an explanation from the diffusion of innovations theory. Online Information Review38(5): 598–615.
32.
MarwickAEBoydD (2011) I tweet honestly, I tweet passionately: Twitter users, context collapse, and the imagined audience. New Media & Society13(1): 114–133.
MyersSAZhuCLeskovecJ (2012) Information diffusion and external influence in networks (CoRR, abs/1206.1331). Available at: http://arxiv.org/abs/1206.1331 (accessed 7 October 2012).
35.
NormanD (2013) The Design of Everyday Things: Revised and Expanded Edition. New York: Basic Books.
36.
OECD (2016) Education at a Glance 2016: OECD Indicators. Paris: OECD Publishing.
PariserE (2011) The Filter Bubble: What the Internet Is Hiding from You. London: Penguin Books.
39.
ParkNKeeKFValenzuelaS (2009) Being immersed in social networking environment: Facebook groups, uses and gratifications, and social outcomes. Cyberpsychology & Behavior12(6): 729–733.
40.
SekhonTSBickartBATrudelRet al. (2015) Being a likable braggart: how consumers use brand mentions for self-presentation on social media. In: DimofteCHaugtvedtCYalchR (eds) Consumer Psychology in a Social Media World. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe, pp. 23–39.
41.
ShirkyC (2008) Here Comes Everybody: The Power of Organizing without Organizations. New York: Penguin Books.
42.
ShirkyC (2010) Cognitive Surplus: How Technology Makes Consumers into Collaborators. New York: Penguin Books.
StephenATLehmannDR (2009) Why do people transmit word-of-mouth?The effects of recipient and relationship characteristics on transmission behaviors. Working paper, Columbia University, New York, 4May.
45.
SundarSSLimperosAM (2013) Uses and grats 2.0: new gratifications for new media. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media57(4): 504–525.
46.
TurnerJCOnoratoRS (1999) Social identity, personality, and the self-concept: a self-categorization perspective. In: TylerTRKramerRMJohnOP (eds) The Psychology of the Social Self. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 11–46.
47.
WaltherJB (1996) Computer-mediated communication. Communication Research23(1): 3–43.
48.
WaltherJB (2011) Theories of computer-mediated communication and interpersonal relations. In: KnappMLDalyJA (eds) The SAGE Handbook of Interpersonal Communication. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, pp. 443–479.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
