By examining advertisements, technological design, workplace wellness programs, and legal discourses involving Fitbit activity trackers, this article examines how cultural ideas about disability infuse the representation, use, study, and implementation of wearable technology. Although Fitbit features wheelchair users prominently in advertising, Fitbit only measures movements in steps, and its use in workplace wellness programs has been accompanied by legal concerns about wellness programs’ potential weakening of workplace protections afforded to US workers by the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act (GINA). This article shows that inspirational and tragic representations of disability work to depoliticize wearable technology and argues that disability needs to be a more central category of analysis for cultural studies and sociological studies of the cultural impacts of fitness tracking and wellness culture.
CramerJM (2009) Critical discourse analysis. In: LittlejohnSWFossKA (eds) Encyclopedia of Communication Theory. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE, pp. 220–223.
12.
EllcessorE (2016) Restricted Access: Media, Disability, and the Politics of Participation. New York: NYU Press.
13.
EllcessorEKirkpatrickB (2017) Disability Media Studies. New York: NYU Press.
14.
EllisKKentM (2017) Disability and Social Media: Global Perspectives. London: Routledge.
15.
ElmanJP (2014) Chronic Youth: Disability, Sexuality, and U.S. Media Cultures of Rehabilitation. New York: NYU Press.
16.
EvensonKRGotoMMFurbergRD (2015) Systematic review of the validity and reliability of consumer-wearable activity trackers. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity. Available at: https://ijbnpa.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12966-015-0314-1 (accessed September 2017).
17.
Garland-ThomsonR (1997) Extraordinary Bodies. New York: Columbia University Press.
18.
GilmoreJ (2016) Everywear: the quantified self and wearable fitness technologies. New Media & Society18(11): 2524–2539.
19.
GogginG (2016) Disability and mobilities: evening up social futures. Mobilities11(4): 533–541.
20.
GoodeAHallKSBatchBCet al. (2016) The impact of interventions that integrate accelerometers on physical activity and weight loss: a systematic review. Annals of Behavioral Medicine51(1): 79–93.
HamraieA (2012) Universal design research as a new materialist practice. Disability Studies Quarterly32(4). Available at: http://dsq-sds.org/article/view/3246/3185.
23.
HamraieA (2017) Building Access: Universal Design and the Politics of Disability. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
24.
HarawayD (1991) Simians, Cyborgs, and Women. New York: Routledge.
25.
HaylesN (2010 [1999]) How We Became Posthuman. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
26.
JainS (1999) The prosthetic imagination: enabling and disabling the prosthesis trope. Science, Technology, & Human Values24(1): 31–54.
27.
JakicicJDavisKKRogersRJet al. (2016) Effect of wearable technology combined with a lifestyle intervention on long-term weight loss. Journal of the American Medical Association316(11): 1161–1171.
28.
KaferA (2013) Feminist, Queer, Crip. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
29.
KirklandA (2008) Fat Rights: Dilemmas of Difference and Personhood. New York: New York University Press.
LunneyACunninghamNREastinMS (2016) Wearable fitness technology: a structural investigation into acceptance and perceived fitness outcomes. Computers in Human Behavior65: 114–120.
35.
LuptonD (2016) The Quantified Self. New York: Polity.
36.
McRuerR (2006) Crip Theory: Cultural Signs of Queerness and Disability. New York: New York University Press.
37.
McRuerR (2018) Crip Times: Disability, Globalization, and Resistance. New York: New York University Press.
NaslundJAAschbrennerKASchererEAet al. (2016) Wearable devices and mobile technologies for supporting behavioral weight loss among people with serious mental illness. Psychiatry Research244: 139–144.
45.
NeffGNafusD (2016) Self-Tracking. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
46.
NelsonECVerhagenTNoordzijML (2016) Health empowerment through activity trackers: an empirical smart wristband study. Computers in Human Behavior62: 364–374.
47.
PromisDErevellesNMatthewsJ (2001) Reconceptualizing inclusion: the politics of university sports and recreation programs for students with mobility impairments. Sociology of Sport18(1): 37–50.
48.
PullinG (2011) Design Meets Disability. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
49.
RoseN (2006) The Politics of Life Itself: Biomedicine, Power, and Subjectivity in the Twenty-First Century. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (2017) Wisconsin employer resolves EEOC case involving wellness program and retaliation. Available at: https://www.eeoc.gov/eeoc/newsroom/release/4-5-17a.cfm (accessed 15 September 2017).
