Through an analysis of relevant literature and open-ended survey responses from 2501 Singaporeans, this article proposes a conceptual framework to understand how individuals authenticate the information they encounter on social media. In broad strokes, we find that individuals rely on both their own judgment of the source and the message, and when this does not adequately provide a definitive answer, they turn to external resources to authenticate news items.
AllcottHGentzkowM (2017) Social media and fake news in the 2016 election. Journal of Economic Perspectives31(2): 211-236.
3.
AntunovicDParsonsPCookeTR (2018) “Checking” and googling: stages of news consumption among young adults. Journalism19(5): 632–648.
4.
AppelmanASundarSS (2015) Measuring message credibility. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly93(1): 59–79.
5.
BennettWL (2012) The personalization of politics: Political identity, social media, and changing patterns of participation. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science644(1): 20-39.
BroPWallbergF (2014) Digital gatekeeping: news media versus social media. Digital Journalism2(3): 446–454.
9.
BroersmaMGrahamT (2012) Social media as beat: tweets as a news source during the 2010 British and Dutch elections. Journalism Practice6(3): 403–419.
10.
CeronA (2015) Internet, news, and political trust: the difference between social media and online media outlets. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication20: 487–503.
11.
ChenSDuckworthKChaikenS (1999) Motivated heuristic and systematic processing. Psychological Inquiry10(1): 44–49.
ComptonJBenedettiP (2010) Labour, new media and the institutional restructuring of journalism. Journalism Studies11: 487–499.
15.
Delli CarpiniMX (2000) Gen.com: youth, civic engagement and the new information environment. Political Communication17(4): 341–349.
16.
EkströmM (2002) Epistemologies of TV-journalism: a theoretical framework. Journalism: Theory, Practice and Criticism3: 259–282.
17.
EttemaJGlasserT (1987) On the epistemology of investigative journalism. In: GurevtichMLevyM (eds) Mass Communication Yearbook. London: SAGE.
18.
EttemaJGlasserT (1998) Custodians of Conscience: Investigative Journalism and Public Virtue. New York: Columbia University Press.
19.
EvelandWP (2001) The cognitive mediation model of learning from the news: Evidence from nonelection, off-year election, and presidential election contexts. Communication Research28(5): 571-601.
GronkePCookT (2007) Disdaining the media: the American public’s changing attitudes toward the news. Political Communication24(3): 259–281.
26.
HargittaiEGalloJKaneM (2008) Cross-ideological discussions among conservative and liberal bloggers. Public Choice134(1): 67–86.
27.
HermidaA (2011) Fluid spaces, fluid journalism: the role of the “active recipient” in participatory journalism. In: SingerJHermidaADomingoDet al. (eds) Participatory Journalism: Guarding Open Gates at Online Newspapers. Malden, MA: John Wiley & Sons, pp. 177–191.
28.
HovlandCIWeissW (1951) The influence of source credibility on communication effectiveness. Public Opinion Quarterly15(4): 635–650.
29.
HuYSundarSS (2010) Effects of online health sources on credibility and behavioral intentions. Communication Research37(1): 105–132.
30.
KangHBaeKZhangSet al. (2011) Source cues in online news: is the proximate source more powerful than distal sources?Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly88(4): 719–736.
31.
KimJLeeJE (2011) The Facebook paths to happiness: effects of the number of Facebook friends and self-presentation on subjective well-being. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking14(6): 359–364.
32.
KiousisS (2001) Public trust or mistrust ? Perceptions of media credibility in the information age. Mass Communication and Society4(4): 381–403.
33.
LedbetterAMMazerJPDeGrootJMet al. (2011) Attitudes toward online social connection and self-disclosure as predictors of Facebook communication and relational closeness. Communication Research38(1): 27–53.
34.
LeeCSMaL (2012) News sharing in social media: the effect of gratifications and prior experience. Computers in Human Behavior28(2): 331–339.
35.
LewisJDWeigertA (1985) Trust as a social reality. Social Forces63(4): 967–985.
36.
LewisSWestlundO (2015) Actors, Actants, Audiences, and Activities in Cross-Media News Work. Digital Journalism3(1):19-37
37.
LingRLaiCH (2016) Microcoordination 2.0: Social coordination in the age of smartphones and messaging apps. Journal of Communication66(5): 834-856.
38.
LiuJ (2013) Mobilized by mobile media: How Chinese people use mobile phones to change politics and democracy. PhD dissertation, Copenhagen University, Copenhagen.
39.
LiuXLiQNourbakhshAFangRThomasMAndersonKKociubaRVedderMPomervilleSWudaliRMartinRDupreyJVachherAKeenanWShahS (2016) Reuters tracer: A large scale system of detecting & verifying real-time news events from twitter. Proceedings of the 25th ACM International on Conference on Information and Knowledge Management: 207-216.
40.
MetzgerMJFlanaginAJMeddersRB (2010) Social and heuristic approaches to credibility evaluation online. Journal of Communication60(3): 413–439.
41.
MetzgerMJFlanaginAJEyalKet al. (2003) Credibility for the 21st century: integrating perspectives on source, message, and media credibility in the contemporary media environment. Annals of the International Communication Association27(1): 293–335.
42.
MeyerHMarchionniDThorsonE (2010) The journalist behind the news: credibility of straight, collaborative, opinionated, and blogged “news.”American Behavioral Scientist54(2): 100–119.
OgonowskiAMontandonABothaEet al. (2014) Should new online stores invest in social presence elements? The effect of social presence on initial trust formation. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services21: 482–491.
47.
PettyRECacioppoJT (1986) The Elaboration Likelihood Model of Persuasion Communication and Persuasion: Central and Peripheral Routes to Attitude Change. New York: Springer, pp. 1–24.
48.
ReisingerYSteinerCJ (2006) Reconceptualizing object authenticity. Annals of Tourism Research33(1): 65–86.
49.
RobertsC (2010) Correlations among variables in message and messenger credibility scales. American Behavioral Scientist54(1): 43–56.
SteppC (2009) The quality-control quandary: as newspapers shed copy editors and post more and more unedited stories online, what’s the impact on their content?American Journalism Review31(2): 42–47.
57.
SunsteinC (2009) Republic.com 2.0. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
58.
TandocEDuffyA (2016) Keeping up with the audiences: Journalistic role expectations in Singapore. International Journal of Communication10(2016): 3338–3358.
59.
TandocELimZWLingR (2017) Defining “fake news:” a typology of scholarly definitions. Digital Journalism (Online First): 1-17.
60.
TandocEVosTP (2016) The journalist is marketing the news: Social media in the gatekeeping process. Journalism Practice10(8): 950-966.
61.
ThurmanNSchifferesSFletcherRet al. (2016) Giving computers a nose for news. Digital Journalism4(7): 838–848.
62.
TsfatiYCappellaJN (2003) Do people watch what they do not trust?Communication Research30(5): 504–529.
63.
TsfatiYCappellaJ (2005) Why do people watch news they do not trust? The need for cognition as a moderator in the association between news media skepticism and exposure. Media Psychology7(3): 251-271.
64.
TurcotteJYorkCIrvingJet al. (2015) News recommendations from social media opinion leaders: effects on media trust and information seeking. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication20(5): 520–535.
65.
UscinskiJButlerR (2013) The epistemology of fact checking. Critical Review25: 162–180.
66.
UslanerE (2002) The Moral Foundations of Trust. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
WestlundO (2006) Känslor av medieförtroende (Feelings of media trust), Report series no 37, Department of Journalism, Media and Communication, University of Gothenburg.
