Against the background of growing interest in normative frameworks within Media and Communication Studies and Internet Studies, I propose a virtue ethics framework for Digital Religion (DR). This framework conjoins loving as a virtue with consequent norms of equality and respect for persons. By understanding selfhood in terms of relational autonomy, this framework shares with DR a central focus on identity, community, and authority. Two applications of the framework within DR illustrate its practicality. I further show how this framework can counter two main objections to the introduction of normative interests within DR as an otherwise “value-free” social science.
CampbellH (2012) How religious communities negotiate new media religiously. In: CheongPHFischer-NielsenPGelfgrenS. (eds) Digital Religion, Social Media and Culture: Perspectives, Practices and Futures. Oxford: Peter Lang, pp. 81–96.
2.
CampbellH (2013) Religion and the Internet: a microcosm for studying Internet trends and implications. New Media & Society15(5): 680–694.
3.
CampbellHLövheimM (2011) Introduction: rethinking the online-offline connection in the study of religion online. Information, Communication & Society14(8): 1083–1096.
4.
CheongPHHuangSPoonJPH (2011) Religious communication and epistemic authority of leaders in wired faith organizations. Journal of Communication4(4): 265–271.
5.
CouldryN (2013) Why media ethics still matters. In: WardSJ (ed.) Global Media Ethics: Problems and Perspectives. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 13–28.
6.
DescartesR (1972 [1637]) Discourse on method. In: The Philosophical Works of Descartes (vol. I) (eds. HaldaneESRossGRT). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 81–130.
7.
EssC (2013) Digital Media Ethics. 2nd ed.Oxford: Polity Press.
8.
EssC (2015) The good life: selfhood and virtue ethics in the digital age. In: WangH (ed.) Communication and the Good Life (ICA Theme book, 2014). New York: Peter Lang, pp. 17–29.
9.
EssC (2016) What’s love got to do with it? Robots, sexuality, and the arts of being human. In: NørskovM (ed.) Social Robots: Boundaries, Potentials, Challenges. Farnham; Surrey, UK: Ashgate, pp. 57–79.
10.
HobbesT (1994 [1668]) Leviathan: With Selected Variants from the Latin Edition of 1668. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing.
11.
HursthouseR (1999) On Virtue Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
12.
HutchingsT (2015) Now the Bible is an app: digital media and changing patterns of religious authority. In: GranholmKMobergMSjöS (eds) Religion, Media and Social Change. New York: Routledge, pp. 143–161.
13.
KingMLJr (1964 [1963]) Letter from the Birmingham Jail. In: KingMLJr (ed.) Why We Can’t Wait. New York: Mentor Publishing, pp. 77–100.
14.
LomborgSEssC (2012) “Keeping the line open and warm”: an activist Danish Church and its presence on Facebook. In: CheongPHFischer-NielsenPGelfgrenS (eds) Digital Religion, Social Media and Culture: Perspectives, Practices and Futures. Oxford: Peter Lang, pp. 169–190.
15.
LundbyK (2012) Dreams of Church in cyberspace. In: CheongPHFischer-NielsenPGelfgrenS (eds) Digital Religion, Social Media and Culture: Perspectives, Practices and Futures. Oxford: Peter Lang, pp. 25–41.
16.
MacIntyreA (1994) After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory. 2nd ed.Notre Dame, IN: Guilford Press.
17.
OshanaM (2006) Personal Autonomy in Society. Aldershot: Ashgate.
18.
PatrignaniNWhitehouseD (2014) Slow tech: a quest for good, clean and fair ICT. Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society12(2): 79–92.
19.
PengTQZhangLZhongZ. (2013) Mapping the landscape of Internet studies: text mining of social science journal articles 2000–2009. New Media & Society15(5) 644–664.
20.
RainieLWellmanB (2012) Networked: The New Social Operating System. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
21.
RuddickS (1975) Better sex. In: BakerREllistonF (eds) Philosophy and Sex. Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books, pp. 280–299.
22.
SimonJ (2015) Distributed epistemic responsibility in a hyperconnected era. In: FloridiL (ed.) The Onlife Manifesto: Being Human in a Hyperconnected Era. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 145–159.
23.
SpiekermannS (2016) Ethical IT Innovation: A Value-Based System Design Approach. London: CRC Press.
24.
VallorS (2010) Social networking technology and the virtues. Ethics and Information Technology12: 157–170.
25.
VeltmanA (2014) Autonomy and oppression at work. In: VeltmanAPiperM (eds) Autonomy, Oppression and Gender. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 280–300.
26.
VeltmanAPiperM (2014) Introduction. In: VeltmanAPiperM (eds) Autonomy, Oppression and Gender. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 1–11.
27.
WangH (ed.) (2015) Communication and “the Good Life,”vol. 2 (International communication association theme book series). New York: Peter Lang.
28.
WellmanB (2011) Studying the Internet through the ages. In: ConsalvoMEssC (eds) The Handbook of Internet Studies. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 17–23.
