In recent years, intensive design and development events known as hackathons have become increasingly common. Issue-oriented hackathons are a subset of this trend that bring together ad hoc groups under the auspices of conceiving and prototyping technologies to address social conditions and concerns. In this article, we present ethnographic accounts of a set of issue-oriented hackathons that took place in the United States between 2012 and 2013, in order to explore how these events structure and express emerging forms of participation. Specifically, we propose that issue-oriented hackathons are sites of experimental material participation.
AugerJ (2013) Speculative design: crafting the speculation. Digital Creativity24(1): 11–35.
2.
BinderTDe MichelisGEhnP. (2011) Design Things. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
3.
BjörgvinssonEEhnPHillgrenPA (2010) Participatory design and democratizing innovation. In: Proceedings of the 11th biennial participatory design conference, pp. 41–50. Available at: http://perflensburg.se/p41-bjorgvinsson.pdf
4.
DeweyJ (1927) The Public and Its Problems. Athens, OH: Swallow Press Books.
5.
DiSalvoC (2009) Design and the construction of publics. Design Issues25(1): 48–63.
6.
DiSalvoC (2012a) Adversarial Design. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
7.
DiSalvo C (2012b) Spectacles and tropes: speculative design and contemporary food cultures. Fibreculture Journal20: 109–121.
8.
DiSalvoCLodatoTFriesL. (2011) The collective articulation of issues as design practice. CoDesign7(3–4): 185–197.
9.
Dunbar-HesterC (2008) Geeks, meta-geeks, and gender trouble: activism, identity, and low-power FM radio. Social Studies of Science38(2): 201–232.
10.
DunneARabyF (2013) Speculative Everything: Design, Fiction, and Social Dreaming. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
FaulknerW (2000) The power and the pleasure? A research agenda for “Making Gender Stick” to engineers. Science, Technology & Human Values25(1): 87–119.
13.
FunahashiDA (2013) Wrapped in plastic: transformation and alienation in the new Finnish economy. Cultural Anthropology28(1): 1–21.
14.
HallSMorleyDChenKH (1996) Stuart Hall: Critical Dialogues in Cultural Studies. New York: Routledge.
15.
KeltyC (2005) Geeks, social imaginaries, and recursive publics. Cultural Anthropology20(2): 185–214.
16.
KleifTFaulknerW (2003) “I’m no athlete [but] I can make this thing dance!”—men’s pleasures in technology. Science, Technology, & Human Values28(2): 296–325.
17.
KolkoJ (2010) Abductive thinking and sensemaking: the drivers of design synthesis. Design Issues26(1): 15–28.
18.
KuznetsovSPaulosE (2010) Rise of the expert Amateur: DIY projects, communities, and cultures. In: Proceedings of the 6th Nordic conference on human-computer interaction: extending boundaries, pp. 295–304. Available at: http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1868950
19.
LatourB (2005) From Realpolitik to Dingpolitik. Making Things Public: Atmospheres of Democracy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 14–41.
20.
Le DantecCADiSalvoC (2013) Infrastructuring and the formation of publics in participatory design. Social Studies of Science43(2): 241–264.
21.
LukacsG (2013) Dreamwork: cell phone novelists, labor, and politics in contemporary Japan. Cultural Anthropology28(1): 44–64.
22.
MarresN (2005) Issues spark a public into being: a key but often forgotten point of the Lippmann-Dewey debate. In: LatourBWeibelP (eds) Making Things Public: Atmospheres of Democracy, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 208–217.
23.
MarresN (2007) The issues deserve more credit: pragmatist contributions to the study of public involvement in controversy. Social Studies of Science37(5): 759–780.
24.
MarresN (2012) Material Participation: Technology, the Environment and Everyday Publics. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
25.
MorozovE (2013) To Save Everything, Click Here: The Folly of Technological Solutionism. New York: PublicAffairs.
26.
PerlmanM (2004) Golden ears and meter readers: the contest for epistemic authority in audiophilia. Social Studies of Science34(5): 783–807.
SoderbergJ (2010) Free space optics in the Czech wireless community: shedding some light on the role of normativity for user-initiated innovations. Science, Technology & Human Values36(4): 423–450.
29.
Van de PoelI (2008) The bugs eat the waste: what else is there to know? Changing professional hegemony in the design of sewage treatment plants. Social Studies of Science38(4): 605–634.
30.
Van OostEVerhaeghSOudshoornN (2008) From innovation community to community innovation: user-initiated innovation in wireless Leiden. Science, Technology & Human Values34(2): 182–205.
31.
WaksmanS (2004) California noise: tinkering with hardcore and heavy metal in Southern California. Social Studies of Science34(5): 675–702.
32.
WangTKayeJJ (2011) Inventive leisure practices: understanding hacking communities as sites of sharing and innovation. In: Proceedings of CHI 11, extended abstracts on human factors in computing systems, Vancouver, BC, 7–11 May 2011, pp. 1–10. New York: ACM.
33.
WhalleyP (1991) The social practice of independent inventing. Science, Technology & Human Values16(2): 208–232.
