In modern media environments, social media have fundamentally altered the way how individual opinions find their way into the public sphere. We link spiral of silence theory to exemplification research and investigate the effects of online opinions on peoples’ perceptions of public opinion and willingness to speak out. In an experiment, we can show that a relatively low number of online exemplars considerably influence perceived public support for the eviction of violent immigrants. Moreover, supporters of eviction were less willing to speak out on the issue online and offline when confronted with exemplars contradicting their opinion.
AlterALOppenheimerDM (2009) Uniting the tribes of fluency to form a metacognitive nation. Personality and Social Psychology Review13(3): 219–235.
2.
AustCFZillmannD (1996) Effects of victim exemplification in television news on viewer perception of social issues. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly73(4): 787–803.
3.
BarnidgeMRojasH (2014) Hostile media perceptions, presumed media influence, and political talk: expanding the corrective action hypothesis. International Journal of Public Opinion Research26(2): 135–156.
4.
BusselleRWShrumLJ (2003) Media exposure and exemplar accessibility. Media Psychology5(3): 255–282.
5.
ChevalierJAMayzlinD (2006) The effect of word of mouth on sales: online book reviews. Journal of Marketing Research43(3): 345–354.
6.
DaschmannG (2000) Vox pop & vox polls: the impact of poll results and voter statements in the media on the perception of a climate of opinion. International Journal of Public Opinion Research12(2): 160–181.
7.
DuanWGuBWhinstonAB (2008) Do online reviews matter? An empirical investigation of panel data. Decision Support Systems45(4): 1007–1016.
8.
Focus (2010) Sollen Ausländer, die wegen Schwerverbrechen, Sozialhilfebetrug oder Schwarzarbeit verurteilt wurden, automatisch aus Deutschland abgeschoben werden? (Should foreigners who have been convicted on serious crime, welfare fraud or illegal work, automatically be evicted from Germany?) In: Statista. Available at: http://de.statista.com (accessed 20 June 2015).
9.
GarrettRK (2009) Echo chambers online? Politically motivated selective exposure among Internet news users. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication14(2): 265–285.
10.
GibsonRZillmannD (1994) Exaggerated versus representative exemplification in news reports: perception of issues and personal consequences. Communication Research21(5): 603–624.
11.
GlynnCJParkE (1997) Reference groups, opinion intensity, and public opinion expression. International Journal of Public Opinion Research9(3): 213–232.
12.
GlynnCJHayesAFShanahanJ (1997) Perceived support for one’s opinions and willingness to speak out. Public Opinion Quarterly61(3): 452–463.
13.
GuntherAC (1998) The persuasive press inference: effects of mass media on perceived public opinion. Communication Research25(5): 486–504.
14.
HamptonKNRainieLLuW. (2014) Social Media and The “Spiral of Silence.”Washington, DC: Pew Research Center.
15.
HayesAFGlynnCShanahanJ (2005) Willingness to self-censor: a construct and measurement tool for public opinion research. International Journal of Public Opinion Research17(3): 298–323.
16.
HayesAFMatthesJEvelandWP (2013) Stimulating the quasi-statistical organ: fear of social isolation motivates the quest for knowledge of the opinion climate. Communication Research40(4): 439–462.
17.
HigginsETBarghJALombardiWJ (1985) Nature of priming effects on categorization. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition11(1): 59–69.
18.
HoekenHHustinxL (2009) When is statistical evidence superior to anecdotal evidence in supporting probability claims? The role of argument type. Human Communication Research35(4): 491–510.
19.
HoSSMcLeodDM (2008) Social-psychological influences on opinion expression in face-to-face and computer-mediated communication. Communication Research35(2): 190–207.
20.
HuangH (2005) A cross-cultural test of the spiral of silence. International Journal of Public Opinion Research17(3): 324–345.
21.
KieslerSSiegelJMcGuireTW (1984) Social psychological aspects of computer-mediated communication. American Psychologist39(10): 1123–1134.
22.
Knobloch-WesterwickSMothesCJohnsonBK. (2015) Political online information searching in Germany and the United States: confirmation bias, source credibility, and attitude impacts. Journal of Communication65(3): 489–511.
23.
LasorsaDL (1991) Political outspokenness: factors working against the spiral of silence. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly68(1–2): 131–140.
24.
LeeEJangYJ (2010) What do others’ reactions to news on internet portal sites tell us? Effects of presentation format and readers’ need for cognition on reality perception. Communication Research37(6): 825–846.
LiQWangJChenYP. (2010) User comments for news recommendation in forum-based social media. Information Sciences180(24): 4929–4939.
27.
McDevittMKiousisSWahl-JorgensenK (2003) Spiral of moderation: opinion expression in computer-mediated discussion. International Journal of Public Opinion Research15(4): 454–470.
28.
MetzgerMJ (2009) The study of media effects in the era of internet communication. In: NabiRLOliverMB (eds) The SAGE Handbook of Media Processes and Effects. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE, pp. 561–576.
29.
NekmatEGonzenbachWJ (2013) Multiple opinion climates in online forums: role of website source reference and within-forum opinion congruency. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly90(4): 736–756.
30.
NeuwirthKFrederickEMayoC (2007) The spiral of silence and fear of isolation. Journal of Communication57(3): 450–468.
31.
Noelle-NeumannE (1974) The spiral of silence: a theory of public opinion. Journal of Communication24(2): 43–51.
32.
Noelle-NeumannEPetersenT (2004) The spiral of silence and the social nature of man. In: KaidLL (ed.) Handbook of Political Communication Research. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 339–356.
33.
PanZMcLeodJM (1991) Multilevel analysis in mass communication research. Communication Research18(2): 140–173.
34.
ParkDLeeJHanI (2007) The effect of on-line consumer reviews on consumer purchasing intention: the moderating role of involvement. International Journal of Electronic Commerce11(4): 125–148.
35.
PerrySDGonzenbachWJ (1997) Effects of news exemplification extended: considerations of controversiality and perceived future opinion. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media41(2): 229–244.
36.
PerrySDGonzenbachWJ (2000) Inhibiting speech through exemplar distribution: can we predict a spiral of silence?Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media44(2): 268–281.
37.
PeterCRossmannCKeylingT (2014) Exemplification 2.0. Journal of Media Psychology: Theories, Methods, and Applications26(1): 19–28.
38.
RojasH (2010) “Corrective” actions in the public sphere: how perceptions of media and media effects shape political behaviors. International Journal of Public Opinion Research22(3): 343–363.
39.
SalmonCTNeuwirthK (1990) Perceptions of opinion “climates” and willingness to discuss the issue of abortion. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly67(3): 567–577.
40.
ScheufeleDAMoyP (2000) Twenty-five years of the spiral of silence: a conceptual review and empirical outlook. International Journal of Public Opinion Research12(1): 3–28.
41.
ScheufeleDAShanahanJEunjungL (2001) Real talk: manipulating the dependent variable in spiral of silence research. Communication Research28(3): 304–324.
42.
SchulzARösslerP (2012) The spiral of silence and the internet: selection of online content and the perception of the public opinion climate in computer-mediated communication environments. International Journal of Public Opinion Research24(3): 346–367.
43.
SchulzARösslerP (2013) Schweigespirale Online. Die Theorie der öffentlichen Meinung und das Internet. Baden-Baden: Nomos.
44.
SchwarzNBlessHStrackF. (1991) Ease of retrieval as information: another look at the availability heuristic. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology61(2): 195–202.
45.
ShamirJ (1995) Information cues and indicators of the climate of opinion: the spiral of silence theory in the Intifada. Communication Research22(2): 24–53.
46.
ShiRMessarisPCappellaJN (2014) Effects of online comments on smokers’ perception of antismoking public service announcements. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication19(4): 975–990.
47.
TverskyA (1977) Features of similarity. Psychological Review84(4): 327–352.
48.
TverskyAKahnemanD (1973) Availability: a heuristic for judging frequency and probability. Cognitive Psychology5(2): 207–232.
49.
WaltherJBDeAndreaDKimJ. (2010) The influence of online comments on perceptions of antimarijuana public service announcements on YouTube. Human Communication Research36(4): 469–492.
50.
WaltherJBJangJ (2012) Communication processes in participatory websites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication18(1): 2–15.
51.
WänkeMSchwarzNBlessH (1995) The availability heuristic revisited: experienced ease of retrieval in mundane frequency estimates. Acta Psychologica89(1): 83–90.
52.
WeaverKGarciaSMSchwarzN. (2007) Inferring the popularity of an opinion from its familiarity: a repetitive voice can sound like a chorus. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology92(5): 821–833.
53.
WojcieszakMEMutzDC (2009) Online groups and political discourse: do online discussion spaces facilitate exposure to political disagreement?Journal of Communication59(1): 40–56.
54.
YeQLawRGuB. (2011) The influence of user-generated content on traveler behavior: an empirical investigation on the effects of e-word-of-mouth to hotel online bookings. Computers in Human Behavior27(2): 634–639.
55.
Yun WoongGParkS (2011) Selective posting: willingness to post a message online. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication16(2): 201–227.
56.
ZiegeleMWeberM (2015) Example, please! Comparing the effects of single customer reviews and aggregate review scores on online shoppers’ product evaluations. Journal of Consumer Behavior14(2): 103–114.
57.
ZillmannD (2002) Exemplification theory of media influence. In: BryantJZillmannD (eds) Media Effects: Advances in Theory and Research. Mahwah, NJ; London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 19–41.
58.
ZillmannDBrosiusH (2000) Exemplification in Communication: The Influence of Case Reports on the Perception of Issues. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
