In recent years, research on online impression management has received considerable scholarly attention, with an increasing focus on how the affordances of new media shape the impression management process. However, scant attention has been paid to how individuals perform their identity online in places where surveillance is the norm—and punishment for non-compliance to behavioral codes is severe. This qualitative study of Azerbaijan, an honor culture with a norm of surveillance and serious repercussions for deviating from behavioral codes, explores how young adults balance the tensions between wanting to connect, create, and interact in these spaces while still adhering to behavioral codes. Findings from interviews reveal a complex set of strategies young people employ to both adhere to and break free of the restrictions they experience in offline settings. In many ways, these strategies are similar to those identified in research on more open societies; however, the ramifications for behavioral violations are so severe that careful and controlled impression management becomes paramount for Azerbaijanis, and especially so for women, who face significantly more restrictions than men.
BaldryACPagliaroSPorcaroC (2013) The rule of law at time of masculine honor: Afghan police attitudes and intimate partner violence. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations16(3): 363–374.
2.
BraydaWCBoyceTD (2014) So you really want to interview me? Navigating “sensitive” qualitative research interviewing. International Journal of Qualitative Methods13: 318–334.
3.
BrowneK (2005) Snowball sampling: using social networks to research non-heterosexual women. International Journal of Social Research Methodology8(1): 47–60.
4.
CarrCTHayesRA (2015) Social media: defining, developing, and divining. Atlantic Journal of Communication23(1): 45–65.
5.
CharmazK (2006) Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide through Qualitative Analysis. London: SAGE.
6.
CihangirS (2013) Gender specific honor codes and cultural change. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations16(3): 319–333.
7.
EllisonNBBoydDM (2013) Sociality through social network sites. In: DuttonWH (ed.) The Oxford Handbook of Internet Studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 151–172.
8.
EllisonNBVitakJGrayR. (2014) Cultivating social resources on social network sites: Facebook relationship maintenance behaviors and their role in social capital processes. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication19(4): 855–870.
9.
FarrellH (2012) The consequences of the Internet for politics. Annual Review of Political Science15(1): 35–52.
10.
FoxJMorelandJJ (2015) The dark side of social networking sites: an exploration of the relational and psychological stressors associated with Facebook use and affordances. Computers in Human Behavior45: 168–176.
GahramanovaA (2009) Internal and external factors in the democratization of Azerbaijan. Democratization16(4): 777–803.
13.
GiordanoC (2012) Anthropology meets history: investigating European societies. Anthropological Journal of European Cultures21(2): 20–34.
14.
GoffmanE (1959) The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York: Anchor Books.
15.
GreggGS (2007) Culture and Identity in a Muslim Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
16.
GünsoyCCrossSESarıbayA. (2015) Would you post that picture and let your dad see it? Culture, honor, and Facebook. European Journal of Social Psychology45(3): 323–335.
17.
HeyatF (2002) Azeri Women in Transition. London: Routledge.
18.
HoganB (2010) The presentation of self in the age of social media: distinguishing performances and exhibitions online. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society30(6): 377–386.
19.
HomansGC (1958) Social behavior as exchange. American Journal of Sociology63(6): 597–606.
20.
KazimovaA (2011) Media in Azerbaijan: the ruling family dominates TV, the opposition has some papers. Caucasus Analytical Digest25: 4–7.
LeungAK-YCohenD (2011) Within- and between-culture variation: individual differences and the cultural logics of honor, face, and dignity cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology100(3): 507–526.
23.
LiamputtongP (2008) Doing research in a cross-cultural context: methodological and ethical challenges. In: LiamputtongP (ed.) Doing Cross-Cultural Research, Social Indicators Research Series. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 3–20.
24.
LittEHargittaiE (2014) A bumpy ride on the information superhighway: exploring turbulence online. Computers in Human Behavior36: 520–529.
25.
LittESpottswoodELBirnholtzJ. (2014) Awkward encounters of an “other” kind: collective self-presentation and face threat on Facebook. In:Proceedings of the 17th ACM conference on computer supported cooperative work & social computing—CSCW’14, Baltimore, MD, 15–19 February, pp. 449–460. New York: ACM Press.
26.
LyonD (2001) Surveillance Society: Monitoring Everyday Life. Buckingham: Open University Press.
27.
MadiniAANooyJ (2014) Cross-gender communication in a Saudi Arabian Internet discussion forum: opportunities, attitudes, and reactions. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies1–17.
28.
MarwickAE (2012) The public domain: surveillance in everyday life. Surveillance & Society9(4): 378–393.
29.
MarwickAEBoydDM (2011) To see and be seen: celebrity practice on Twitter. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies17(2): 139–158.
30.
MarxG (2002) What’s new about the “new surveillance”? Classifying for change and continuity. Surveillance & Society1(1): 9–29.
31.
MishraSBasuS (2014) Family honor, cultural norms and social networking: strategic choices in the visual self-presentation of young Indian Muslim women. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace8(2): 38.
32.
NisbettRECohenD (1996) Culture of Honor: The Psychology of Violence in the South. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
33.
NissenbaumH (2011) A contextual approach to privacy online. Daedalus140(4): 32–48.
34.
PattonMQ (2002) Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
35.
PearceKE (2015) Democratizing kompromat: the affordances of social media for state-sponsored harassment. Information, Communication & Society1–17.
RainsSABrunnerSR (2014) What can we learn about social network sites by studying Facebook? A call and recommendations for research on social network sites. New Media & Society17(1): 114–131.
38.
RuiJRStefanoneMA (2013) Strategic self-presentation online: a cross-cultural study. Computers in Human Behavior29(1): 110–118.
39.
SchlenkerBR (2012) Self-presentation. Second. In: LearyMRTangneyJP (eds) Handbook of Self and Identity. New York: Guilford Press, pp. 542–570.
40.
ShafaSHarinckFEllemersN. (2014) Who are you calling rude? Honor-related differences in morality and competence evaluations after an insult. Negotiation and Conflict Management Research7(1): 38–56.
41.
TedeschiJTRiessM (1981) Identities, the phenomenal self, and laboratory research. In: TedeschiJT (ed.) Impression Management Theory and Social Psychological Research. New York: Academic Press, pp. 3–22.
42.
TohidiN (1996) Soviet in public, Azeri in private. Women’s Studies International Forum19(1–2): 111–123.
43.
TohidiN (1997) The intersection of gender, ethnicity and Islam in Soviet and Post-Soviet Azerbaijan. Nationalities Papers25(1): 147–167.
44.
TohidiN (1999) “Guardians of the nation”: Women, Islam and the Soviet legacy of modernization in Azerbaijan. In: AfsaruddinA (ed.) Hermeneutics and Honor. Cambridge, MA: Harvard CMES, pp. 89–115.
45.
TreemJWLeonardiPM (2012) Social media use in organizations: exploring the affordances of visibility, editability, persistence, and association. In: SalmonCT (ed.) Communication Yearbook 36. London: Routledge, pp. 143–189.
46.
TrottierD (2012) Social Media as Surveillance: Rethinking Visibility in a Converging World. Surrey: Ashgate Publishing.
47.
TrottierDLyonD (2012) Key features of social media surveillance. In: FuchsCBoersmaKAlbrechtslundA. (eds) The Internet and Surveillance: The Challenge of Web 2.0 and Social Media. New York: Routledge, pp. 89–105.
48.
TufekciZ (2008) Can you see me now? Audience and disclosure regulation in online social network sites. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society28(1): 20–36.
49.
Van EckC (2003) Purified by Blood: Honour Killings amongst Turks in the Netherlands. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
50.
Van OschYBreugelmansSMZeelenbergM. (2013) A different kind of honor culture: family honor and aggression in Turks. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations16(3): 334–344.
51.
VandelloJACohenD (2003) Male honor and female fidelity: implicit cultural scripts that perpetuate domestic violence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology84(5): 997–1010.
52.
VandelloJABossonJKCohenD. (2008) Precarious manhood. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology95(6): 1325–1339.
53.
VitakJKimJ (2014) You can’t block people offline. In:Proceedings of the 17th ACM conference on computer supported cooperative work & social computing—CSCW’14, Baltimore, MD, 15–19 February, pp. 461–474. New York: ACM Press.
54.
WaltherJBParksMR (2002) Cues filtered out, cues filtered in: computer-mediated communication and relationships. In: KnappMLDalyJA (eds) Handbook of Interpersonal Communication. 3rd ed.Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, pp. 529–563.
55.
WaltherJBVan Der HeideBKimS-Y. (2008) The role of friends’ appearance and behavior on evaluations of individuals on Facebook: are we known by the company we keep?Human Communication Research34(1): 28–49.
56.
WaltorpK (2015) Keeping cool, staying virtuous: social media and the composite habitus of young Muslim women in Copenhagen. MedieKultur: Journal of Media and Communication Research31(58): 49–67.
57.
WohnDYBirnholtzJHancockJT. (2014) Impression curation: reacting to other-generated face threats on Facebook. In: International Communication Association. Seattle, WA. Available at: http://socialmedia.northwestern.edu/files/2014/01/ICA2014.pdf (accessed 29 January 2014).
58.
YoungALQuan-HaaseA (2013) Privacy protection strategies on Facebook. Information, Communication & Society16(4): 479–500.
