This study is built around the appointment of a dedicated “conversation manager” at the Flemish public broadcaster VRT. We focus on (1) the impact of the conversation manager on Twitter activity of the viewers and (2) the impact of the tweeting audience in the newsroom. Our framework combines journalistic as well as social media logics in Bourdieu’s field framework, for which we combine Twitter data and newsroom inquiry. The network analysis of Twitter activity shows the impact of the conversation manager, although his activities are primarily guided by traditional journalistic values. In turn, the tweeting audience impacts newsroom practices, predominantly as an indicator of audience appreciation. To conclude, social media data further complicate the definition and understanding of “the public.”
AndersonC (2011) Between creative and quantified audiences: web metrics and changing patterns of newswork in local US newsrooms. Journalism12(5): 550–566.
2.
AusserhoferJMairederA (2013) National politics on Twitter: structures and topics of a networked public sphere. Information, Communication & Society16(3): 291–314.
3.
D’heerEVerdegemP (2014) Conversations about the elections on Twitter: Towards a structural understanding of Twitter’s relation with the political and the media field. European Journal of Communication29(6): 720–734.
BensonRNeveuE (2005) Bourdieu and the Journalistic Field. Cambridge: Polity Press.
6.
BorgattiSPEverettMGFreemanLC (2002) Ucinet for Windows: Software for Social Network Analysis. Harvard, MA: Analytic Technologies.
7.
BourdieuP (1984) Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
8.
BourdieuP (1988) Homo Academicus. Cambridge: Polity Press.
9.
BourdieuP (1993) The Field of Cultural Production. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10.
BourdieuP (2005) The political field, the social science field, and the journalistic field. In: BensonRNeveuE (eds) Bourdieu and the Journalistic Field. Cambridge: Polity Press, pp. 29–47.
11.
BrunsA (2008) Blogs, Wikipedia, Second Life and Beyond: From Production to Produsage. New York: Peter Lang.
12.
CanterL (2013) The source, the resource and the collaborator: the role of citizen journalism in local UK newspapers. Journalism14(8): 1091–1109.
13.
ChadwickA (2013) The Hybrid Media System: Politics and Power. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
14.
ChungDS (2007) Profits and perils: online news producers’ perceptions of interactivity and uses of interactive features. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies13(1): 43–61.
15.
DellerR (2011) Twittering on: audience research and participation using Twitter. Participations8(1): 216–245.
16.
DeuzeMFortunatiL (2011) Journalism without journalists. In: GrahamMReddenG (eds) News Online Transformations and Continuities. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 164–177.
17.
DomingoD (2008) Interactivity in the daily routines of online newsrooms: dealing with an uncomfortable myth. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication13(3): 680–704.
18.
DomingoDQuandtTHeinonenA. (2008) Participatory journalism practices in the media and beyond. Journalism Practice2(3): 326–342.
19.
ElmerG (2012) Live research: Twittering an election debate. New Media & Society15(1): 18–30.
20.
EsserF (2013) Mediatization as a challenge: media logic versus political logic. In: KriesiHLavenexSEsserF. (eds) Democracy in the Age of Globalization and Mediatization. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 155–176.
21.
GansH (1979) Deciding What’s News. New York: Pantheon Books.
22.
GrahamT (2012) Talking back but is anyone listening? Journalism and comment fields. In: PetersCBroersmaM (eds) Rethinking Journalism: Trust and Participation in a Transformed News Landscape. London: Routledge, pp. 114–127.
23.
HallinDCManciniP (2004) Comparing Media Systems: Three Models of Media and Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
24.
HarringtonSHighfieldTBrunsA (2013) More than a backchannel: Twitter and television. Participations10(1): 13–17.
25.
HermidaAThurmanN (2008) A clash of cultures: the integration of user-generated content within professional journalistic frameworks at British newspaper websites. Journalism Practice2(3): 343–356.
26.
HighfieldTHarringtonSBrunsA (2013) Twitter as a technology for audiencing and fandom: the #Eurovision phenomenon. Information, Communication & Society16(3): 315–339.
27.
iMinds-iLab.o (2013) Adoption and Usage of Media & ICT in Flanders. Digimeter, Wave 6 (August–September). Ghent: iMinds-iLab.o.
28.
JönssonAMÖrnebringH (2011) User-generated content and the news: empowerment of citizens or interactive illusion?Journalism Practice5(2): 127–144.
29.
KlingerUSvenssonJ (2014) The emergence of network media logic in political communication: a theoretical approach. New Media & Society. Epub ahead of print 19February. DOI: 10.1177/1461444814522952.
LindlofTRTaylorB (2010) Qualitative Communication Research Methods. 3rd ed.Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
32.
ManovichL (2001) The Language of New Media. Cambridge: MIT Press.
33.
NapoliPM (2011) Audience Evolution: New Technologies and the Transformation of Media Audiences. New York: Columbia University Press.
34.
PapacharissiZDe Fatima OliveiraM (2012) Affective news and networked publics: the rhythms of news storytelling on #Egypt. Journal of Communication62(2): 266–282.
35.
PapacharissiZEastonE (2013) In the habitus of the new. Structure, agency and the social media habitus. In: HartleyJBurgessJBrunsA (eds) A Companion to New Media Dynamics. West Sussex: Blackwell Publishing Ltd., pp. 171–184.
36.
SchultzI (2007) The journalistic gut feeling: journalistic doxa, news habitus and orthodox news values. Journalism Practice1(2): 190–207.
37.
ShirkyC (2008) Here Comes Everybody: The Power of Organizing without Organizations. New York: Penguin Press.
38.
ShoemakerPJReeseSD (2013) Mediating the Message in the 21st Century: A Media Sociology Perspective. New York: Routledge.
39.
SingerJB (2005) The political j-blogger: “Normalizing” a new media form to fit old norms and practices. Journalism6(2): 173–198.
40.
SongFW (2010) Theorizing web 2.0. Information, Communication & Society13(2): 249–275.
41.
StephansenHCCouldryN (2014) Understanding micro-processes of community building and mutual learning on Twitter: a “small data” approach. Information, Communication & Society17(10): 1212–1227.
42.
StraussALCorbinJM (1998) Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
43.
TandocEC (2014) Journalism is twerking? How web analytics is changing the process of gatekeeping. New Media & Society16(4): 559–575.
Van DijckJPoellT (2013) Understanding social media logic. Media and Communication1(1): 2–14.
46.
Van DijckJPoellT (2014) Making public television social? Public service broadcasting and the challenges of social media. Television & New Media16(2): 148–164.
WilliamsAWahl-JorgensenKWardleC (2011) Studying user-generated content at the BBC. A multi-site ethnography. In: DomingoDPatersonC (eds) Making Online News: Newsroom Ethnographies in the Second Decade of Internet Journalism. New York: Peter Lang Publishing, pp. 115–139.
49.
WilliamsAWardleCWahl-JorgensenK (2011) “Have they got news for us?”: audience revolution or business as usual at the BBC?Journalism Practice5(1): 85–99.
