This article considers the centrality of short message system (SMS) texting in the communication repertoires of young Danes. Recent years have seen dramatic changes in the mediascape with a multitude of new possibilities for text-based communication; Facebook, in particular, has become popular among young Danes. Some have suggested that the role of SMS texting, a technology that was previously an entrenched part of young people’s communication repertoires, has changed in this diversified media environment. Based on interviews with 31 Danish high school students and drawing on the domestication approach, this article examines the use practices and meanings associated with SMS texting in today’s complex and evolving mediascape. This article argues that SMS texting is becoming re-domesticated, its meanings changing, and the technology finding a new position in the communication repertoires of users.
AarupLNielsenESteenbergM. (2012) Rapport 217-Børn og mobiltelefoner [Report 217-Children and Mobile Phones]. Copenhagen: FDB Analyse.
2.
Association of Danish Media (2012) Danskernes brug af internettet [Use of the Internet in the Danish Population]. Copenhagen: Association of Danish Media.
3.
BakardjievaM (2006) Domestication running wild. From the moral economy of the household to the mores of a culture. In: BerkerTHartmannMPunieY. (eds) Domestication of Media and Technology. Berkshire: McGraw Hill/Open University Press, pp. 62–79.
4.
BertelTFStaldG (2013) From SMS to SNS: the use of the internet on the mobile phone among young Danes. In: CumiskeyKHjorthL (eds) Mobile Media Practices, Presence and Politics: The Challenge of Being Seamlessly Mobile. New York: Routledge, pp. 198–213.
5.
BilleTFridbergTStorgaardS. (2005) Danskernes kultur- og fritidsaktiviteter 2004 [The Culture and Leisure Activities of the Danish Population 2004]. Copenhagen: The Danish Ministry of Culture.
6.
BuchtCLivingstoneSMHaddonL (2009) Young People in the European Digital Media Landscape: A Statistical Overview. Göteborg: International Clearinghouse on Children, Youth and Media, NORDICOM, University of Gothenburg.
7.
CampbellSWParkYJ (2008) Social implications of mobile telephony: the rise of personal communication society. Sociology Compass: Electronic Edition2(2): 371–387.
8.
CaronAHCaroniaL (2007) Moving Cultures: Mobile Communication in Everyday Life. Montréal, QC, Canada: McGill-Queen’s University Press.
9.
CharmazK (2006) Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide through Qualitative Analysis. London: SAGE.
10.
DR Medieforskning (2013) Medieudviklingen 2012 [Media Developments 2012]. Copenhagen: Danmarks Radio.
11.
DrotnerK (2001) Medier for fremtiden: Børn, unge og det nye medielandskab [Media for the Future: Children, Youth, and the New Media Environment]. Copenhagen: Høst & Søns Forlag.
12.
GeserH (2004) Towards a Sociological Theory of the Mobile Phone. University of Zürich. Available at: http://socio.ch/mobile/t_geser1.pdf (accessed 7 September 2013)
13.
GogginG (2006) Cell Phone Culture—Mobile Technology in Everyday Life. Oxon: Routledge.
14.
GogginGCrawfordK (2011) Moveable types: youth and the emergence of mobile social media in Australia. Media Asia Journal37(4): 224–231.
15.
GreenN (2003) Outwardly mobile: young people and mobile technologies. In: KatzJE (ed.) Machines That Become Us: The Social Context of Personal Communication Technology. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers, pp. 201–217.
16.
GreenNHaddonL (2009) Mobile Communications: An Introduction to New Media. Oxford: Berg.
17.
GreenNHarperRHRMurtaghG. (2001) Configuring the mobile user: sociological and industry views. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing5: 146–156.
18.
GrinterREldridgeM (2001) y do tngrs luv 2 txt msg? In: PrinzWJarkeYRogersK. (eds) Proceedings of the seventh European conference on computer supported cooperative work, Bonn, 16–20 September 2001, pp. 219–238. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
19.
HaddonL (2006) The contribution of domestication research to in-home computing and media consumption. The Information Society22(4): 195–203.
20.
HaddonL (2011) Domestication analysis, objects of study, and the centrality of technologies in everyday life. Canadian Journal of Communication36(2): 311–323.
21.
HarperRHamillL (2005) Kids will be kids: the role of mobiles in teenage life. In: HamillLLasenA (eds) Mobile World. New York: Springer, pp. 61–74.
22.
HellesR (2013) Mobile communication and intermediality. Mobile Media & Communication1(1): 14–19.
23.
JensenJLSørensenAS (2013) “Nobody has 257 friends”: strategies of friending, disclosure and privacy on Facebook. Nordicom Review34(1): 49–62.
24.
JohnsenT (2003) The social context of the mobile phone use of Norwegian teens. In: FortunatiLKatzJERicciniR (eds) Mediating the Human Body: Technology, Communication and Fashion. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 161–170.
25.
KasesniemiE-L (2003) Mobile Messages: Young People and a New Communication Culture. Tampere: Tampere University Press.
26.
KasesniemiE-LRautiainenP (2004) Mobile culture of children and teenagers in Finland. In: KatzJEAakhusM (eds) Perpetual Contact: Mobile Communication, Private Talk, Public Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 170–192.
27.
KobbernagelCSchrøderKCDrotnerK (2011a) Unges medie- og museumsbrug: Sammenhænge og perspektiver [The Use of Media and Museums among Young People: Trends and Perspectives]. Odense: DREAM.
28.
KobbernagelCSchrøderKCDrotnerK (2011b) Unges medie- og museumsbrug: Sammenhænge og perspektiver, bilag [The Use of Media and Museums among Young People: Trends and Perspectives, Appendix]. Odense: DREAM.
29.
LarsenJUrryJAxhausenK (2008) Coordinating face-to-face meetings in mobile network societies. Information, Communication, and Society11(5): 640–658.
30.
LarsenMC (2009) Sociale netværkssider og digital ungdomskultur: når unge praktiserer venskab på nettet [Social network sites and digital youth culture: when young people practice friendship online]. MedieKultur. Journal of Media and Communication Research25(47): 45–65.
31.
LicoppeC (2004) Connected presence: the emergence of a new repertoire for managing social relationships in a changing communications technoscape. Environment and Planning: Society and Space22: 135–156.
32.
LindlofTRTaylorBC (2011) Qualitative Communication Research Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
33.
LingR (2000) Direct and mediated interaction in the maintenance of social relationships. In: SloaneAvan ReijnF (eds) Home Informatics and Telematics: Information, Technology, and Society. Boston, MA: Kluwer, pp. 61–86.
34.
LingR (2004) The Mobile Connection. San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers.
35.
LingR (2008) New Tech, New Ties. London: MIT Press.
36.
LingR (2012) Taken for Grantedness: The Embedding of Mobile Communication into Society. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
37.
LingRBertelT (2013) Mobile culture among children and adolescents. In: LemishD (ed.) The Routledge Handbook on Children, Adolescents, and Media. London; New York: Routledge, pp. 127–133.
38.
LingRCampbellSW (2011) Mobile Communication: Bringing Us Together and Tearing Us Apart. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
39.
LingRStaldG (2010) Mobile communities: are we talking about a village, a clan, or a small group?American Behavioral Scientist53(8): 1133–1147.
40.
LingRYttriB (2002) Hyper-coordination via mobile phones in Norway. In: KatzJEAakhusM (eds) Perpetual Contact: Mobile Communication, Private Talk, Public Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 139–169.
41.
LingRYttriB (2006) Control, emancipation, and status: the mobile phone in the teen’s parental and peer group control relationships. In: BryninMKieslerSKrautRE (eds) Computers, Phones, and the Internet: Domesticating Information Technology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 219–234.
42.
LingRBertelTFSundsøyPR (2012) The socio-demographics of texting: an analysis of traffic data. New Media & Society14(2): 281–298.
43.
MadianouMMillerD (2013) Polymedia: towards a new theory of digital media in interpersonal communication. International Journal of Cultural Studies16(2): 169–187.
44.
MeschGSTalmudI (2010) Wired Youth: The Social World of Adolescence in the Information Age. London: Routledge.
45.
OksmanVRautiainenP (2002) “I’ve got my whole life in my hand”: mobile communication in the everyday life of children and teenagers in Finland. Revista de Estudios de Juventud57: 25–32.
46.
OksmanVTurtiainenJ (2004) Mobile communication as a social stage: meanings of mobile communication in everyday life among teenagers in Finland. New Media & Society6(3): 319–339.
47.
ReidDJReidFJM (2005) Textmates and text circles: insights into the social ecology of SMS text messaging. In: HamillLLasenA (eds) Mobile World. New York: Springer, pp. 105–118.
48.
SilverstoneRHirschEMorleyD (1992) Information and communication technologies and the moral economy of the household. In: SilverstoneRHirschE (eds) Consuming Technologies. London: Routledge, pp. 15–31.
49.
SørensenAS (2012) Facebook—selvfremstilling, small talk og social regulering [Facebook: self representation, small talk, and social regulation]. MedieKultur. Journal of Media and Communication Research28(52): 132–152.
50.
SørensenKH (1994) Technology in use: two essays on the domestication of artifacts. STS Working Paper 2/94, Centre for Technology and Society, University of Trondheim, Trondheim.
51.
Statistics Denmark (2012a) Anvendelse af internet på mobiltelefonen efter type og formål [Use of internet via mobile phone by type and activity]. Available at: http://www.statistikbanken.dk/bebrit15
52.
Statistics Denmark (2012b) Familiernes adgang til pc og internet i hjemmet [Families’ in-home access to computers and the Internet]. Danmarks Statistik. Available at: http://www.statistik-banken.dk/FABRIT01
The Danish Business Authority (2013) Telestatistik 2012 andet halvår—Mobil baggrundsark [Telecom statistics second half-year 2012-Mobile data sheet]. Available at: http://erhvervsstyrelsen.dk/telestatistik-2012-2/0/7
