This article uses the case of video game commentators and examples from research to highlight implications for conceptualizing the concept of “architectures of digital labor.” The concept draws attention not only to the social practices that position activities straddling labor/leisure into a commercial framework but also to the technological platforms that make that possible in a seemingly invisible fashion. The main analytical lens is that of “affordances.” It is used to map how technological features designed into YouTube create a set of probable uses/meanings/practices for users while serving YouTube’s business interests. The analysis is transferable to other social web platforms whose central business model focuses on user-generated content (UGC).
AndrejevicM (2009) Exploiting YouTube: contradiction of User-Generated Labor. In: VonderauPSnickarsPBurgessG (eds) The YouTube Reader. Stockholm: National Library of Sweden, pp. 406–423.
2.
ArvidssonAColleoniE (2012) Value in informational capitalism and on the Internet. The Information Society28(3): 135–150.
3.
BanksJDeuzeM (2009) Co-creative labour. International Journal of Cultural Studies12: 419–431.
4.
BanksJHumphreysS (2008) The labour of user co-creators. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies14(4): 401–418.
5.
BenklerY (2006) The wealth of networks : How social production transforms markets and freedom. New Haven [Conn.]: Yale University Press.
6.
BermejoF (2009) Audience manufacture in historical perspective: from broadcasting to Google. New Media & Society11(1–2): 133–154.
boydd (2010) Social network sites as networked public: affordances, dynamics, and implications. In: PapacharissiZ (ed.) A Networked Self: Identity, Community, and Culture on Social Network Sites. London, UK: Routledge, pp. 39–58.
9.
BurgessJ (2009) YouTube: Online Video and Participatory Culture. Cambridge and Malden, MA: Polity Press.
10.
BurgessJGreenJ (2009) The entrepreneurial vlogger: participatory culture beyond the professional-amateur divide. In: VonderauPSnickarsPBurgessG (eds) The YouTube Reader. Stockholm: National Library of Sweden, pp. 89–107.
CampbellJ (2011) It takes an iVillage: gender, labor, and community in the age of television-Internet convergence. International Journal of Communication5(11): 492–510.
EarlJKimportK (2011) Digitally Enabled Social Change: Activism in the Internet Age (Acting with Technology). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
15.
FishASrinivasanR (2012) Digital labor is the new killer app. New Media & Society14(1): 137–152.
16.
FuchsC (2012a) Dallas Smythe today: the audience commodity, the digital labour debate, Marxist political economy and critical theory. Prolegomena to a digital labour theory of value. tripleC: Cognition, Communication, Co-operation10(2): 692–740.
17.
FuchsC (2012b) With or without Marx? With or without capitalism? A rejoinder to Adam Arvidsson and Eleanor Colleoni. tripleC: Cognition, Communication, Co-operation10(2): 633–645.
18.
GaverWW (1991) Technology affordances. In: CHI ’91 Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems: Reaching through technology, New Orleans, LA, 27 April–2 May, pp. 79–84. New York: ACM.
19.
GlasserBStraussA (1967) The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
20.
GravesL (2007) The affordances of blogging. Journal of Communication Inquiry31(4): 331–346.
21.
HallS (1991) Encoding/decoding. In: HallSHobsonDLoweA. (eds) Culture, Media, Language: Working Papers in Cultural Studies, 1972–79. London, UK: Routledge, pp. 128–138.
Patricia Mooney Lange (2007) Commenting on comments: investigating responses to antagonism on YouTube. Presented at the Society for Applied Anthropology Conference, Tampa, FL, 31 March.
33.
PostigoH (2003) From Pong to planet quake: Post-Industrial transitions from liesure to work. Information, Communication & Society6(4): 593–607.
34.
PostigoH (2009) America online volunteers: Lessons from an early co-production community. International Journal of Cultural Studies12(5): 451–469.
SenftTM (2008) Camgirls. Peter Lang Publishing. New York, NY.
37.
SmytheD (1977) Communications: blindspots of western Marxism. Canadian Journal of Political and Social Theory1(3): 1–27.
38.
SmytheD (2001) On the audience commodity and its work. In: DurhamMGKellnerDM (eds) Media and Cultural Studies. 1st ed. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 230–256.
39.
StrangeNBennettJ (eds) (2011) User-created content and everyday cultural practice: lessons from YouTube. In: BurgessJ (ed.) Television as Digital Media, Console-ing Passions: Television and Cultural Power. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, pp. 311–331.
WaskoJEricksonM (2009) The political economy of YouTube. In: VonderauPSnickarsPBurgessG (eds) The YouTube Reader. Stockholm: National Library of Sweden, pp. 372–386.
