Implications of the family expert role for parental rules regarding adolescent use of social technologies

Abstract

We conducted individual semi-structured qualitative interviews with a diverse group of 40 adolescents to assess their perceptions related to (a) the location of expert power within their families with respect to social technology use (cell phones and social networking sites) and (b) the implications of such power for parental rule setting and enforcement related to adolescent use of these technologies. Results indicated substantial variability in who adolescents perceived to be the family experts. Rules regarding access to social technologies existed in most families regardless of the technology type and regardless of whether parents or youth were perceived as technology experts. In contrast, family expert status had implications for the types of content rules that parents set regarding adolescents’ use of social technologies and the manner in which such rules were enforced.

Keywords

Adolescence cell phones parenting power social networking technology

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Barker

(2009) Older adolescents’ motivations for social network site use: the influence of gender group identity, and collective self-esteem. Cyberpsychology & Behavior 12: 209–213.

Baron

Hård

Segerstad

(2010) Cross-cultural patterns in mobile-phone use: public space and reachability in Sweden, the USA and Japan. New Media & Society 12: 13–34.

Eastin

Greenberg

Hofschire

(2006) Parenting the Internet. Journal of Communication 56: 486–504.

Flemming

Greentree

Cocotti-Muller

. (2006) Safety in Cyberspace: adolescents’ safety and exposure on-line. Youth & Society 38: 135–154.

Fletcher

Blair

(2014) Maternal authority regarding early adolescents’ social technology use. Journal of Family Issues 20: 54-75.

French

JRP

Raven

(1959) The bases of social power. In: Cartwright

Zander

(eds) Group Dynamics. New York: Harper & Row.

Henry

Peterson

Wilson

(1997) Adolescent social competence and parental satisfaction. Journal of Adolescent Research 12: 389–409.

Laupa

Turiel

(1993) Children’s concepts of authority and social contexts. Journal of Educational Psychology 85: 191–197.

Lee

S-J

(2013) Parental restrictive mediation of children’s Internet use: effective for what and for whom? New Media & Society 15: 466–481.

10.

Lee

S-J

Chae

Y-G

(2012) Balancing participation and risks in children’s Internet use: the role of Internet literacy and parental mediation. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking 15: 257–262.

11.

Lenhart

(2012) Teens, smartphones, and texting. Pew Internet & American Life Project. Available at: http://www.pewinternet.org/~/media//Files/Reports/2012/PIP_Teens_Smartphones_and_Texting.pdf (accessed 15 October 2012).

12.

Lenhart

Madden

Hitlin

(2005) Teens and technology. Pew Internet & American Life Project. Available at: http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2005/Teens-and-Technology.aspx (accessed 6 May 2009).

13.

Lenhart

Madden

Smith

. (2011) Teens, kindness and cruelty on social network sites. Pew Internet & American Life Project. Available at: http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2011/Teens-and-social-media.aspx (accessed 14 December 2013).

14.

Ling

(2010) Texting as a life phase medium. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 15: 277–292.

15.

Livingstone

Helsper

(2008) Parental mediation of children’s Internet use. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 52: 581–599.

16.

Macgill

(2007) Parent and teenager Internet use. Pew Internet & American Life Project. Available at: http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2007/Parent-and-Teen-Internet-Use.aspx (accessed 3 July 2008).

17.

Mesch

(2006) Family relations and the Internet: exploring a family boundaries approach. Journal of Family Communication 6: 119–138.

18.

Miles

Huberman

Saldana

(2014) Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.

19.

Mitchell

Finkelhor

Wolak

(2003) The exposure of youth to unwanted sexual material on the Internet: a national survey of risk, impact, and prevention. Youth & Society 34: 300–358.

20.

Nielsen Company (2010) U.S. teen mobile report calling yesterday, texting today, using apps tomorrow. Available at: http://www.nielsen.com/us/en/newswire/2010/u-s-teen-mobile-report-calling-yesterday-texting-today-using-apps-tomorrow.html (accessed 4 June 2014).

21.

Pfeil

Arjan

Zaphiris

(2009) Age differences in online social networking: a study of user profiles and the social capital divide among teenagers and older users in MySpace. Computers in Human Behavior 25: 643–654.

22.

Rideout

(2007) Parents, children, and media. Kaiser Family Foundation. Available at: http://www.kff.org/entmedia/upload/7638.pdf (accessed 22 January 2008).

23.

Rosen

Cheever

Carrier

(2008) The association of parenting style and child age with parental limit setting and adolescent MySpace behavior. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology 29: 459–471.

24.

Rosenthal

Rosnow

(1975) The Volunteer Subject. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

25.

Schumm

Bugaighis

Jurich

. (1986) Example and explanation as predictors of adolescent compliance with parental instructions. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality 1: 465–470.

26.

Shin

(2013) Parental socialization of children’s Internet use: a qualitative approach. New Media & Society. Epub ahead of print 15 December 2013. DOI: 10.1177/1461444813516833.

27.

Shin

Huh

(2011) Parental mediation of teenagers’ video game playing: antecedents and consequences. New Media & Society 13: 945–962.

28.

Smetana

(2000) Middle-class African American adolescents’ and parents’ conceptions of parental authority and parenting practices: a longitudinal investigation. Child Development 71: 1672–1686.

29.

Smith

(2011) Americans and text messaging. Pew Internet & American Life Project. Available at: http://pewinternet.org/Reports/2011/Cell-Phone-Texting-2011.aspx (accessed 15 October 2012).

30.

Sook-Jung

Young-Gil

(2007) Children’s Internet use in a family context: influence on family relationships and parental mediation. Cyberpsychology & Behavior 10: 640–644.

31.

Stattin

Kerr

(2000) Parental monitoring: a reinterpretation. Child Development 71: 1072–1085.

32.

Van den Eijnden

RJJM

Spijkerman

Vermulst

. (2010) Compulsive Internet use among adolescents: bidirectional parent-child relationships. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology 38: 77–89.

33.

Wang

Bianchi

Raley

(2005) Teenagers’ Internet use and family rules: a research note. Journal of Marriage and Family 67: 1249–1258.