Rumors and factitious informational blends: The role of the web in speculative politics

Abstract

The World Wide Web has changed the dynamics of information transmission and agenda-setting. Facts mingle with half-truths and untruths to create factitious informational blends (FIBs) that drive speculative politics. We specify an information environment that mirrors and contributes to a polarized political system and develop a methodology that measures the interaction of the two. We do so by examining the evolution of two comparable claims during the 2004 presidential campaign in three streams of data: (1) web pages, (2) Google searches, and (3) media coverage. We find that the web is not sufficient alone for spreading misinformation, but it leads the agenda for traditional media. We find no evidence for equality of influence in network actors.

Keywords

Intermedia agenda-setting partisan homophily partisan networks rumors Web 2.0

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Adamic

Glance

(2005) The political blogosphere and the 2004 U.S. election: divided they blog. HP Labs. Available at: http://www2.scedu.unibo.it/roversi/SocioNet/AdamicGlanceBlogWWW.pdf

Allport

Postman

(1946) An analysis of rumor. Public Opinion Quarterly 10: 501–517.

Allport

Postman

(1947) The Psychology of Rumor. New York: Henry Holt Company.

Amberland

(2014) Google Semantic Search: Search Engine Optimization (SEO) Techniques That Get Your Company More Traffic, Increase Brand Impact and Amplify Your Online Presence. Indianapolis, IN: Que Publishing.

Bakshy

Hofman

Mason

. (2011) Everyone’s an influencer: quantifying influence on twitter. In: Proceedings of the fourth ACM international conference on Web search and data mining, Hong Kong,9–12 February. New York: ACM.

Baumeister

Zhang

Vohs

(2004) Gossip as cultural learning. Review of General Psychology 8(2): 111–121.

Berinsky

(2011) Rumors, truths, and reality: a study of political misinformation. Unpublished Manuscript.

Borge-Holthoefer

Moreno

(2012) Absence of influential spreaders in rumor dynamics. Physical Review E 85(2): 026116.

Boyle

(2001) Intermedia agenda setting in the 1996 presidential primaries. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 78: 26–44.

10.

Brin

Page

Motwani

. (1999) The PageRank citation ranking: bringing order to the web. Technical report, Stanford Digital Library Technologies Project. Available at: http://ilpubs.stanford.edu:8090/422/1/1999-66.pdf

11.

Bruns

(2008) Blogs, Wikipedia, Second Life and Beyond: From Production to Produsage. New York: Peter Lang.

12.

DiFonzo

Bourgeoi

Suls

. (2013) Rumor clustering, consensus, and polarization: dynamic social impact and self-organization of hearsay. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 49: 378–399.

13.

Doer

Fouz

Friedrich

(2011) Social networks spread rumors in sublogarithmic time. Electronic Notes in Discrete Mathematics 38: 303–308.

14.

Dreier

Martin

(2010) How ACORN was framed: political controversy and media agenda setting. Perspectives on Politics 8(3): 761–792.

15.

Easley

Kleinberg

(2010) Networks, Crowds, and Markets: Reasoning about a Highly Connected World. New York: Cambridge University Press.

16.

Entman

(2012) Scandal and Silence: Media Responses to Presidential Misconduct. Cambridge: Polity Press.

17.

Francheschet

(2011) PageRank: standing on the shoulders of giants. Communications of the ACM 54: 92–101.

18.

Garrett

(2009a) Echo chambers online? Politically motivated selective exposure among Internet users. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 14(2): 265–285.

19.

Garrett

(2009b) Politically motivated reinforcement seeking: reframing the selective exposure debate. Journal of Communication 59(4): 676–699.

20.

Garrett

(2011) Troubling consequences of online political rumoring. Human Communication Research 37: 255–274.

21.

Garrett

Danziger

(2011) Internet electorate. Communications of the ACM 54: 117–123.

22.

Garrett

Carnahan

Lynch

(2013) A turn toward avoidance? Selective exposure to online political information, 2004–2008. Political Behavior 35: 113–134.

23.

Granger

CWJ

(1969) Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods. Econometrica 37(3): 424–438.

24.

Groshek

(2013) Agenda trending: reciprocity and the predictive capacity of social networking sites in intermedia agenda setting across topics over time. Media and Communication 1(1): 15–27.

25.

Harsin

(2006) The rumor bomb: a convergence theory of contemporary mediated American politics. Southern Review: Communication, Politics & Culture 39: 84–110.

26.

Jacques

Dunlap

Freeman

(2008) The organisation of denial: conservative think tanks and environmental scepticism. Environmental Politics 17: 349–385.

27.

Knapp

(1944) A psychology of rumor. Public Opinion Quarterly 8: 22–37.

28.

Kurtz

(2004) After blog got hits, CBS got a black eye. Washington Post, 20 September, p. C01.

29.

Lazersfeld

Merton

(1954) Friendship as a social process: a substantive and methodological analysis. In: Berger

Abel

Page

(eds) Freedom and Control in Modern Society. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold, pp. 18–66.

30.

Leskovec

Adamic

Huberman

(2007) The dynamics of viral marketing. ACM Transactions on the Web 1(1): 1–39.

31.

Lodge

Taber

(2000) Three steps toward a theory of motivated political reasoning. In: Lupia

McCubbins

Popkin

(eds) Elements of Reason: Cognition, Choice, and the Bounds of Rationality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press., pp. 183–213.

32.

Lopez-Escobar

Pablo

McCombs

. (1998) Two levels of agenda setting among advertising and news in the 1995 Spanish general elections. Political Communication 15: 225–238.

33.

McCombs

(2004) Setting the Agenda: The Mass Media and Public Opinion. Cambridge: Policy Press.

34.

McPherson

Smith-Lovin

Cook

(2001) Birds of a feather: homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology 27: 415–444.

35.

Meraz

(2011a) The fight for how to think: traditional media, social networks, and issue interpretation. Journalism: Theory, Practice & Criticism 12: 107–127.

36.

Meraz

(2011b) Using time series analysis to measure intermedia agenda setting influence in traditional media and blog networks. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 88: 176–194.

37.

Meraz

(2013) Media agenda setting in a competitive environment: examining the role of sources in setting the topical discussant agenda in the tea party patriots’ facebook group. In: Johnson

(ed.) Agenda Setting in a 2.0 World: New Agendas in Communication. New York, NY: Routledge, pp. 1–27.

38.

Meraz

Papacharissi

(2013) Networked gatekeeping and networked framing on #Egypt. International Journal of Press/Politics 18(2): 138–166.

39.

Messner

Garrison

(2011) Study shows some blogs affect traditional news media agendas. Newspaper Research Journal 32(3): 112–126.

40.

Optify (2012) The changing face of serps: organic click through rate. Available at: http://freepdfhosting.com/19e14f3244.pdf

41.

Redlawsk

(2002) Hot cognition or cool consideration? Testing the effects of motivated reasoning on political decision-making. The Journal of Politics 64: 1021–1044.

42.

Reese

Danielian

([1989] 1991) Inter-media influence and the drug issue: converging on cocaine. In: Shoemaker

(ed.) Communication Campaigns About Drugs: Government, Media and the Public. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 29–45.

43.

Roberts

McCombs

(1994) Agenda setting and political advertising: origins of the news media. Political Communication 11: 249–262.

44.

Rosnow

(1991) Inside rumor: a personal journey. American Psychologist 46: 484–496.

45.

Seelye

(2004) Democratic chief says “AWOL” Bush will be an issue after a nominee emerges. New York Times, 10 February.

46.

Simon

(2004) Kerry condemns anti-Bush ad. Los Angeles Times, 18 August.

47.

Soroka

(2002) Agenda Setting Dynamics in Canada. Vancouver, BC, Canada: UBC Press.

48.

Stroud

(2011) Niche News: The Politics of News Choice. New York: Oxford University Press.

49.

Sunstein

(2010) Believing false rumors. In: Levmore

Nussbaum

(eds) The Offensive Internet. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, pp. 91–106.

50.

Tremayne

Zheng

Lee

. (2006) Issue publics on the web: applying network theory to the war blogosphere. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 12(1). Available at: http://jcmc.indiana.edu/

51.

Turner

(1987) Church’s fried chicken and the Klan: a rhetorical analysis of rumor in the black community. Western Folklore 46: 294–306.

52.

Vargo

Guo

McCombs

. (2014) Network issue agendas on Twitter during the 2012 US presidential election. Journal of Communication 64: 296–316.

53.

Wallsten

(2007) Agenda setting and the blogosphere: an analysis of the relationship between mainstream media and political blogs. Review of Policy Research 24: 567–587.

54.

Watts

Dodds

(2007) Influentials, networks, and public opinion formation. Journal of Consumer Research 34: 441–458.

55.

Weeks

Southwell

(2010) The symbiosis of news coverage and aggregate online search behavior: Obama, rumors, and presidential politics. Mass Communication and Society 13: 341–360.