Every little helps? YouTube,sousveillance and the ‘anti-Tesco’ riot in Stokes Croft

Abstract

On 21 April 2011, violence flared in the Stokes Croft area of Bristol following a police raid on a squat. Media coverage suggested that this riot was a manifestation of the campaign against the opening of a Tesco supermarket in the area. Footage later emerged on YouTube, which appeared to support claims by local residents that the violence was caused by heavy-handed police tactics rather than the anti-Tesco campaign. This study uses a critical thematic analysis to explore the comments left by those who viewed these acts of ‘inverse surveillance’, or sousveillance. Results indicate that YouTube provided a space in which alternative views on the Stokes Croft riot were seen and heard but the views of many commentators still appeared to be influenced by the news media.

Keywords

Citizen journalism public sphere sousveillance YouTube

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Allan

Sonwalkar

Carter

(2007) Bearing witness: citizen journalism and human rights issues. Globalisation, Societies and Education 5(3): 373–389.

Antony

Thomas

(2010) ‘This is citizen journalism at its finest’: YouTube and the public sphere in the Oscar Grant shooting incident. New Media & Society 12(8): 1280–1296.

Bakir

(2010) Sousveillance, Media and Strategic Political Communication: Iraq, USA, UK. New York: Continuum.

Beier

(2007) Grave misgivings: allegory, catharsis, composition. Security Dialogue 38(2): 251–269.

Benkler

(2007) The Wealth of Networks: How Social Production Transforms Market Production. New Haven and London:Yale University Press.

Bowman

Willis

(2003) We Media: How Audiences Are Shaping the Future of News and Information. The Media Center, The American Press Institute. Available at: http://www.hypergene.net/wemedia/ (accessed 10 September 2012).

Bristol Evening Post (2011) I warned Tesco and Bristol’s council about violence, says Stokes Croft campaigner. Bristol Evening Post, 23 April. Available at: http://thisisbristol.co.uk/TOLD/story-11304219-detail/story.html (accessed 10 May 2012).

Bristol Indymedia (2011) Battle of Stokes Croft: eyewitness/local resident report. Available at: http://bristol.indymedia.org/article/704202 (accessed 10 June 2011).

Cho

Lee

(2008) Collaborative information seeking in intercultural computer-mediated communication groups: testing the influence of social context using social network analysis. Communication Research 35(4): 548–573.

10.

Chu

(2009) Collective behavior in YouTube: a case study of ‘Bus Uncle’ on-line videos. Asian Journal of Communication 19(3): 337–353.

11.

City Interhacktives (2011) It all started on social media: #bristol’s #stokescroft riots. City Interhacktives. Retrieved from http://cityinterhacktives.wordpress.com/2011/12/30/it-all-started-on-social-media-bristols-stokescroft-riots/ (accessed 10 May 2012).

12.

Conner

(2011) Observing the Stokes Croft Riot. openDemocracy. Available at: http://opendemocracy.net/ourkingdom/local-boy/observing-stokes-croft-riot (accessed 10 May 2011).

13.

Deuze

(2009) The future of citizen journalism. In: Allan

Thorsen

(eds) Citizen Journalism: Global Perspectives. New York: Peter Lang, pp. 255–264.

14.

Dutta

Duff

(2011) Police raid over ‘petrol bomb plot’ sparks Tesco riot. The Independent, 23 April.

15.

Ess

and AoIR Ethics Working Committee (2002) Ethical decision making and Internet research. Available at: http://aoir.org/reports/ethics.pdf (accessed 10 April 2012).

16.

Gallagher

(2011) Reporting a riot in Britain: how the police spun the battle of Stokes Croft. openDemocracy, 23 April. Available at: http://opendemocracy.net/ourkingdom/ryan-gallagher/reporting-riot-in-britain-how-police-spun-battle-of-stokes-croft (accessed 10 May 2011).

17.

Habermas

(1996) Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. Cambridge: Polity Press.

18.

Hall

(2011) Police hurt in violent anti-Tesco protests. BBC News, 22 April. Available at: http://bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-bristol-13167041 (accessed 10 May 2011).

19.

Harrington

Lane

Donohue

. (2006) An extension of the activation model of information exposure: the addition of a cognitive variable to a model of attention. Media Psychology 8: 139–164.

20.

Häyhtiö

Rinne

(2009) Little brothers and sisters are watching? Reflexive civic watch through ICTs. Information, Communication & Society 12(6): 840–859.

21.

Hindman

(2009) The Myth of Digital Democracy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

22.

Hogg

Tindale

(2005) Social identity, influence and communication in small groups. In: Harwood

Giles

(eds) Intergroup Communication: Multiple Perspectives. New York: Peter Lang, pp.141-164.

23.

Lax

(2009) Media and Communication Technologies: A Critical Introduction. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

24.

Lee

(2012) Exploring emotional expressions on YouTube through the lens of media system dependency theory. New Media & Society 14(3): 457–475.

25.

Mann

(2004) Sousveillance: inverse surveillance in multimedia imaging. In: Proceedings of the 12th annual ACM international conference on multimedia, New York, AMC Multimedia, 10-16 October, pp. 620–627.

26.

Mann

Nolan

Wellman

(2003) Sousveillance: inventing and using wearable computing devices for data collection in surveillance environments. Surveillance and Society 1(3): 331–355.

27.

Markham

(2012) Fabrication as ethical practice: qualitative inquiry in ambiguous Internet contexts. Information, Communication & Society 15(3): 334–353.

28.

Morrell

Scott

McNeish

. (2011) The August Riots in England. Understanding the Involvement of Young People. London: NatCen. Available at: http://www.cabinetoffice.gov.uk/sites/default/files/resources/The%20August%20Riots%20in%20England%20(pdf,%201mb).pdf (accessed 10 January 2013).

29.

Neuhaus

Webmoor

(2012) Agile ethics for massified research and visualization. Information, Communication & Society 15(1): 43–65.

30.

No Tesco in Stokes Croft (2010) The campaign so far. Available at: http://notesco.wordpress.com/thecampaign/the-campaign-so-far/ (accessed 10 April 2012).

31.

Orbe

Kinefuchi

(2008) Crash under investigation: engaging complications of complicity, coherence, and implicature through critical analysis. Critical Studies in Media Communication 25(2): 135-156.

32.

Papacharissi

(2010) A Networked Self: Identity, Community and Culture on Social Network Sites. London: Routledge.

33.

Pax

(2003) The Baghdad Blog. London: Guardian Books.

34.

People’s Republic of Stokes Croft (PRSC) (2011) Mission statement. Available at: http://prsc.org.uk/politics.htm (accessed 10 April 2012).

35.

Postmes

Baym

(2005) Intergroup dimensions of the Internet. In: Harwood

Giles

(eds) Intergroup Communication: Multiple Perspectives. New York: Peter Lang, pp. 213–240.

36.

Procter

Vis

Voss

(2011) How riot rumours spread on Twitter. Available at: http://guardian.co.uk/uk/interactive/2011/dec/07/london-riots-twitter (accessed 10 February 2012).

37.

Riots Communities and Victims Panel (2012) After the riots. Available at: http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20121003195935/http:/riotspanel.independent.gov.uk/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/Riots-Panel-Final-Report1.pdf (accessed 10 January 2013).

38.

Singer

Ashman

(2009) User-generated content and journalistic values. In: Allan

Thorsen

(eds) Citizen Journalism: Global Perspectives. New York: Peter Lang, pp. 233–242.

39.

Stanley

Steinhardt

(2003) Bigger monster, weaker chains: the growth of an American surveillance society. Washington: Technology and Liberty Program, American Civil Liberties Union.

40.

Sunstein

(2007) Republic.com 2.0. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

41.

The British Psychological Society (2007) Guidelines for ethical practice in psychological research online. Available at: http://www.admin.ox.ac.uk/media/global/wwwadminoxacuk/localsites/curec/documents/internetresearch.pdf (accessed 10 April 2012).

42.

Thelwall

Sud

Vis

(2012) Commenting on YouTube videos: from Guatemalan rock to El Big Bang. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 63: 616–629.

43.

Van Zoonen

Vis

Mihelj

(2011) Performing citizenship on Youtube: activism, satire and online debate around the anti-Islam video Fitna. Critical Discourse Studies 7(4):249-262.

44.

Walther

DeAndrea

Kim

. (2010) The influence of online comments on perceptions of anti-marijuana public service announcements on YouTube. Human Communication Research 36: 469–492.

45.

Whiteman

(2012) Undoing Ethics: Rethinking Practice in Online Research. New York: Springer.

46.

YouTube (2012) Terms of service. Available at: www.youtube.com/static?gl=US&;template=terms (accessed 10 May 2012).

47.

Zimmer

(2010) ‘But the data is already public’: on the ethics of research in Facebook. Ethics and Information Technology 12(4): 313–325.