On 21 April 2011, violence flared in the Stokes Croft area of Bristol following a police raid on a squat. Media coverage suggested that this riot was a manifestation of the campaign against the opening of a Tesco supermarket in the area. Footage later emerged on YouTube, which appeared to support claims by local residents that the violence was caused by heavy-handed police tactics rather than the anti-Tesco campaign. This study uses a critical thematic analysis to explore the comments left by those who viewed these acts of ‘inverse surveillance’, or sousveillance. Results indicate that YouTube provided a space in which alternative views on the Stokes Croft riot were seen and heard but the views of many commentators still appeared to be influenced by the news media.
AllanSSonwalkarPCarterC (2007) Bearing witness: citizen journalism and human rights issues. Globalisation, Societies and Education5(3): 373–389.
2.
AntonyMGThomasRJ (2010) ‘This is citizen journalism at its finest’: YouTube and the public sphere in the Oscar Grant shooting incident. New Media & Society12(8): 1280–1296.
3.
BakirV (2010) Sousveillance, Media and Strategic Political Communication: Iraq, USA, UK. New York: Continuum.
BenklerY (2007) The Wealth of Networks: How Social Production Transforms Market Production. New Haven and London:Yale University Press.
6.
BowmanSWillisC (2003) We Media: How Audiences Are Shaping the Future of News and Information. The Media Center, The American Press Institute. Available at: http://www.hypergene.net/wemedia/ (accessed 10 September 2012).
ChoHLeeJ (2008) Collaborative information seeking in intercultural computer-mediated communication groups: testing the influence of social context using social network analysis. Communication Research35(4): 548–573.
10.
ChuD (2009) Collective behavior in YouTube: a case study of ‘Bus Uncle’ on-line videos. Asian Journal of Communication19(3): 337–353.
DeuzeM (2009) The future of citizen journalism. In: AllanSThorsenE (eds) Citizen Journalism: Global Perspectives. New York: Peter Lang, pp. 255–264.
14.
DuttaKDuffO (2011) Police raid over ‘petrol bomb plot’ sparks Tesco riot. The Independent, 23April.
15.
EssC and AoIR Ethics Working Committee (2002) Ethical decision making and Internet research. Available at: http://aoir.org/reports/ethics.pdf (accessed 10 April 2012).
HarringtonNGLaneDRDonohueL. (2006) An extension of the activation model of information exposure: the addition of a cognitive variable to a model of attention. Media Psychology8: 139–164.
20.
HäyhtiöTRinneJ (2009) Little brothers and sisters are watching? Reflexive civic watch through ICTs. Information, Communication & Society12(6): 840–859.
21.
HindmanM (2009) The Myth of Digital Democracy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
22.
HoggMATindaleRS (2005) Social identity, influence and communication in small groups. In: HarwoodJGilesH (eds) Intergroup Communication: Multiple Perspectives. New York: Peter Lang, pp.141-164.
23.
LaxS (2009) Media and Communication Technologies: A Critical Introduction. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
24.
LeeCS (2012) Exploring emotional expressions on YouTube through the lens of media system dependency theory. New Media & Society14(3): 457–475.
25.
MannS (2004) Sousveillance: inverse surveillance in multimedia imaging. In:Proceedings of the 12th annual ACM international conference on multimedia, New York, AMC Multimedia, 10-16 October, pp. 620–627.
26.
MannSNolanJWellmanB (2003) Sousveillance: inventing and using wearable computing devices for data collection in surveillance environments. Surveillance and Society1(3): 331–355.
27.
MarkhamA (2012) Fabrication as ethical practice: qualitative inquiry in ambiguous Internet contexts. Information, Communication & Society15(3): 334–353.
OrbeMPKinefuchiE (2008) Crash under investigation: engaging complications of complicity, coherence, and implicature through critical analysis. Critical Studies in Media Communication25(2): 135-156.
32.
PapacharissiZ (2010) A Networked Self: Identity, Community and Culture on Social Network Sites. London: Routledge.
33.
PaxS (2003) The Baghdad Blog. London: Guardian Books.
34.
People’s Republic of Stokes Croft (PRSC) (2011) Mission statement. Available at: http://prsc.org.uk/politics.htm (accessed 10 April 2012).
35.
PostmesTBaymN (2005) Intergroup dimensions of the Internet. In: HarwoodJGilesH (eds) Intergroup Communication: Multiple Perspectives. New York: Peter Lang, pp. 213–240.
SingerJBAshmanI (2009) User-generated content and journalistic values. In: AllanSThorsenE (eds) Citizen Journalism: Global Perspectives. New York: Peter Lang, pp. 233–242.
39.
StanleyJSteinhardtB (2003) Bigger monster, weaker chains: the growth of an American surveillance society. Washington: Technology and Liberty Program, American Civil Liberties Union.
40.
SunsteinC (2007) Republic.com 2.0. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
ThelwallMSudPVisF (2012) Commenting on YouTube videos: from Guatemalan rock to El Big Bang. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology63: 616–629.
43.
Van ZoonenLVisFMiheljS (2011) Performing citizenship on Youtube: activism, satire and online debate around the anti-Islam video Fitna. Critical Discourse Studies7(4):249-262.
44.
WaltherJBDeAndreaDKimJ. (2010) The influence of online comments on perceptions of anti-marijuana public service announcements on YouTube. HumanCommunication Research36: 469–492.
45.
WhitemanN (2012) Undoing Ethics: Rethinking Practice in Online Research. New York: Springer.
