This study developed a research model of mobile voice communication on the basis of the social skills deficit hypothesis. In the model, poor social skills were related to less face-to-face and mobile voice communication, which was linked to greater loneliness. Structural equation modeling analyses of survey responses from 374 adults supported the social skills deficit hypothesis in that poor social skills were related to less involvement in face-to-face communication and greater loneliness. Also, as expected, more face-to-face interactions were associated with lower levels of loneliness; however, more cell phone calling was associated with greater loneliness. Additional regression analyses revealed that the positive relationship between mobile voice communication and loneliness was more pronounced for those who have more friends than those who have fewer friends.
AxelssonA-S (2010) Perpetual and personal: Swedish young adults and their use of mobile phones. New Media & Society12: 35–54.
2.
BeidelDCTurnerSMDancuCV (1985) Physiological, cognitive and behavioral aspects of social anxiety. Behaviour Research and Therapy23: 109–117.
3.
BeidelDCTurnerSMMorrisTL (1999) Psychopathology of social phobia. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry38: 643–650.
4.
BussAH (1997) A dual conception of shyness. In: DalyJAMcCroskeyJCAyresJ. (eds) Avoiding Communication: Shyness, Reticence, and Communication Apprehension. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press, pp. 109–128.
5.
CacioppoJTHughesMEWaiteLJ. (2006) Loneliness as a specific risk factor for depressive symptoms: Cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses. Psychology and Aging21: 140–151.
6.
CampbellSWKelleyMJ (2006) Mobile phone use in AA networks: An exploratory study. Journal of Applied Communication Research34: 191–208.
7.
CampbellSWKwakN (2010) Mobile communication and social capital: An analysis of geographically differentiated usage patterns. New Media & Society12: 435–451.
8.
CaplanSE (2005) A social skill account of problematic Internet use. Journal of Communication55: 721–736.
9.
CaplanSE (2007) Relations among loneliness, social anxiety, and problematic Internet use. CyberPsychology & Behavior10: 234–242.
10.
CheekJMBuschCM (1981) Influence of shyness on loneliness in a new situation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin7: 573–577.
11.
CheekJMBussAH (1981) Shyness and sociability. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology41: 330–339.
12.
DaughertyTLeeW-NKimK. (2005) Organizational virtual communities: Exploring motivations behind online panel participation. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication10(4). Available at: http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol10/issue4/daugherty.html (accessed 3 May 2010).
13.
DePauloBMEpsteinJALeMayCS (1990) Responses of the socially anxious to the prospect of interpersonal evaluation. Journal of Personality58: 623–640.
14.
EllisonNBHeinoRDGibbsJL (2006) Managing impressions online: Self-presentation processes in the online dating environment. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication11: 415–441.
15.
GibbsJLEllisonNBHeinoRD (2006) Self-presentation in online personals: The role of anticipated future interaction, self-disclosure, and perceived success in Internet dating. Communication Research33: 152–177.
16.
GrecoLAMorrisTL (2005) Factors influencing the link between social anxiety and peer acceptance: Contributions of social skills and close friendships during middle childhood. Behavior Therapy36: 197–205.
17.
HabuchiI (2005) Accelerating reflexivity. In: ItoMOkabeDMatsudaM (eds) Personal, Portable, Pedestrian: Mobile Phones in Japanese Life. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 165–182.
18.
HarperRPalenLTaylorA (eds) (2005) The Inside Text: Social, Cultural and Design Perspectives on SMS. Dordrecht: Springer.
19.
InderbitzenHMWaltersKSBukowskiAL (1997) The role of social anxiety in adolescent peer relations: Differences among sociometric status groups and rejected subgroups. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology26: 338–348.
20.
IshiiK (2006) Implications of mobility: The uses of personal communication media in everyday life. Journal of Communication56: 346–365.
21.
JinBParkN (2010) In-person contact begets calling and texting: Interpersonal motives for cell phone use, face-to-face interaction, and loneliness. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking13: 611–618.
22.
JinBPeñaJ (2010) Mobile communication in romantic relationships: The relationship between mobile phone use and relational uncertainty, intimacy, and attachment styles. Communication Reports23: 39–51.
23.
JonesWHHobbsSAHockenburyO (1982) Loneliness and social skill deficits. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology42: 682–689.
24.
KimHKimGJParkHW. (2007) Configurations of relationships in different media: FtF, email, instant messenger, mobile phone, and SMS. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication12: 1183–1207.
25.
KrausLADavisMHBazziniD. (1993) Personal and social influences on loneliness: The mediating effect of social provisions. Social Psychology Quarterly56: 37–53.
26.
KrautRLundmarkVPattersonM. (1998) Internet paradox: A social technology that reduces social involvement and psychological well-being?American Psychologist53: 1017–1031.
27.
LearyMR (1983) Social anxiousness: The construct and its measurement. Journal of Personality Assessment47: 66–75.
28.
LicoppeC (2004) ‘Connected’ presence: The emergence of a new repertoire for managing social relationships in a changing communication technoscape. Environment and Planning D: Society & Space22: 135–156.
29.
LingR (2008) New Tech, New Ties: How Mobile Communication is Reshaping Social Cohesion. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
30.
LingR (2010) Texting as a life phase medium. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication15: 277–292.
31.
LingRYttriB (2002) Hyper-coordination via mobile phones in Norway. In: KatzJEAakhusM (eds) Perpetual Contact: Mobile Communication, Private Talk, Public Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 139–169.
32.
LittleTDCunninghamWAShaharG. (2002) To parcel or not to parcel: Exploring the question, weighing the merits. Structural Equation Modeling9: 151–173.
33.
Morahan-MartinJSchumacherP (2003) Loneliness and social uses of the Internet. Computers in Human Behavior19: 659–671.
34.
PeplauLARussellDHeimM (1979) The experience of loneliness. In: FriezeIBar-TalDCarrollJS (eds) New Approaches to Social Problems: Applications of Attribution Theory. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, pp. 53–78.
35.
PerlmanDPeplauLA (1981) Toward a social psychology of loneliness. In: DuckSGilmourR (eds) Personal Relationships 3: Personal Relationships in Disorder. New York: Academic Press, pp. 31–56.
RamirezAJrDimmickJFeasterJ. (2008) Revisiting interpersonal media competition: The gratification niches of instant messaging, e-mail, and the telephone. Communication Research35: 529–547.
39.
ReidDJReidFJM (2007) Text or talk? Social anxiety, loneliness, and divergent preferences for cell phone use. CyberPsychology & Behavior10: 424–435.
40.
RenshawPDBrownPJ (1993) Loneliness in middle childhood: Concurrent and longitudinal predictors. Child Development64: 1271–1284.
41.
RobertsLDSmithLMPollockCM (2000) “U r a lot bolder on the net”: Shyness and Internet use. In: CrozierWR (ed.) Shyness: Development, Consolidation and Change. New York: Routledge, pp. 121–138.
42.
RussellDW (1996) UCLA loneliness scale (version 3): Reliability, validity, and factor structure. Journal of Personality Assessment66: 20–40.
43.
RussellDWPeplauLACutronaCE (1980) The revised UCLA loneliness scale: Concurrent and discriminant validity evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology39: 472–480.
44.
SchroederJE (1995) Self-concept, social anxiety, and interpersonal perception skills. Personality and Individual Differences19: 955–958.
45.
SegrinC (1998) Interpersonal communication problems associated with depression and loneliness. In: AndersenPAGuerreroLH (eds) Handbook of Communication and Emotion: Research, Theory, Applications, and Contexts. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, pp. 215–242.
46.
SegrinCFloraJ (2000) Poor social skills are a vulnerability factor in the development of psychosocial problems. Human Communication Research26: 489–514.
47.
SegrinCKinneyT (1995) Social skills deficits among the socially anxious: Rejection from others and loneliness. Motivation and Emotion19: 1–24.
48.
SloanWWSolanoCH (1984) The conversational styles of lonely males with strangers and roommates. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin10: 293–301.
49.
SpenceSHDonovanCBrechman-ToussaintM (1999) Social skills, social outcomes, and cognitive features of childhood social phobia. Journal of Abnormal Psychology108: 211–221.
50.
SpitzbergBHCanaryDJ (1985) Loneliness and relationally competent communication. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships2: 387–402.
51.
SpitzbergBHHurtHT (1989) The relationship of interpersonal competence and skills to reported loneliness across time. In: HojatMCrandallR (eds) Loneliness: Theory, Research, and Applications. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE, pp. 157–172.
52.
StaffordLKlineSLDimmickJ (1999) Home e-mail: Relational maintenance and gratification opportunities. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media43: 659–669.
53.
StritzkeWGKNguyenADurkinK (2004) Shyness and computer-mediated communication: A self-presentational theory perspective. Media Psychology6: 1–22.
54.
TsaiF-FReisHT (2009) Perceptions by and of lonely people in social networks. Personal Relationships16: 221–238.
WeiRLoV-H (2006) Staying connected while on the move: Mobile phone use and social connectedness. New Media & Society8: 53–72.
57.
WhittyMT (2007) Manipulation of self in cyberspace. In: SpitzbergBHCupachWR (eds) The Dark Side of Interpersonal Communication. 2nd ed. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 93–118.
58.
ZakahiWRDuranRL (1985) Loneliness, communicative competence, and communication apprehension: Extension and replication. Communication Quarterly33: 50–60.
