A system of scholarly monograph publishing, primarily under the auspices of university presses, coalesced only 50 years ago as part of the final stage of the professionalization of US institutions of higher education. The resulting analogue publishing system supplied the authorized print monographs that academic institutions newly required for faculty tenure and promotion. That publishing system – as each of its components – was bounded, stable, identifiable, well ordered, and well policed. As successive financial shocks battered both the country in general and scholarly publishing in particular, just a decade after its final formation, the analogue system went into extended decline. Finally, it is now giving way to a digital scholarly publishing system whose configuration and components are still obscure and in flux, but whose epistemological bases differ from the analogue system in almost all important respects: it will be relatively unbounded and stochastic, composed of units that are inherently amorphous and shape shifting, and marked by contested authorization of diverse content. This digitally driven, epistemic system shift in scholarly publishing may well be an extended work in progress, since the doomed analogue system is still fiscally dominant with respect to monographs, and the nascent digital system has not yet coalesced around a multitude of emerging digital affordances.
AntoniouGVan HarmelenF (2008) A Semantic Web Primer. 2nd ed.Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
5.
AtkinsDDroegenmeierKKFeldmanSI. (2003) Revolutionizing science and engineering through cyberinfrastructure. Report of the National Science Foundation Blue-Ribbon Advisory Panel on Cyberinfrastructure. Available at: http://www.nsf.gov/od/oci/reports/atkins.pdf (accessed 10 November 2011).
6.
BorgmanCL (2007) Scholarship in the Digital Age: Information, Infrastructure, and the Internet. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
DarntonR (1982/2009) What is the history of books? In: DarntonR (ed.) The Case for Books. New York: Public Affairs, pp. 175–206.
16.
DawkinsR (2005) The Ancestor’s Tale: A Pilgrimage to the Dawn of Evolution. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Company.
17.
EisenbergD (1992) Word processing (history of). In: Encyclopedia of Library and Information Science, vol. 49. New York: Dekker. Available at: http://tinyurl.com/7p8f47e (accessed 4 December 2011).
LorimerR (2012) Libraries, Scholars, and Publishers in Digital Journal and Monograph Publishing. Scholarly and Research Communication4(1):010136. Available at: http://www.src-online.ca/index.php/src/article/view/43/117 (accessed 20 October 2012).
PattenBCAubleGT (1981) System theory of the ecological niche. American Naturalist117(6): 893–922. Available at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/pdfplus/2460571 (accessed 29 February 2012).
ShirkyC (2008) Here Comes Everybody: The Power of Organizing without Organizations. New York: Penguin Books.
41.
ThatcherS (2000) Fair use: the double-edged sword. Journal of Scholarly Publishing32(1): 3–8.
42.
ThompsonJB (2005) Books in the Digital Age: The Transformation of Academic and Higher Education Publishing in Britain and the United States. Cambridge: Polity Press.
WeinbergerD (2011) Too Big to Know: Rethinking Knowledge Now That the Facts Aren’t the Facts, Experts Are Everywhere, and the Smartest Person in the Room Is the Room. New York: Basic Books.
45.
WienerN (1948 and 1961) Cybernetics: or Control and Communication in the Animal and the Machine. 2nd ed.Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
46.
WillinskyJ (2006) The access principle: The case for open access to research and scholarship. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
47.
ZittrainJ (2008) The Future of the Internet and How to Stop It. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
