Research on the aspirations of people with intellectual disabilities documents the importance of alternative zones of inclusion where they can assert their own definitions of ability and normality. This stands in contrast to assumptions concerning technology and disability that position technology as ‘normalizing’ the disabled body. This paper reports on the role of a digital music jamming tool in providing access to creative practice by people with intellectual disabilities. The tool contributed to the development of a spatio-temporal zone to enable aesthetic agency within and beyond the contexts of deinstitutionalized care. The research identifies the interactions between tools, individuals and groups that facilitated participants’ agency in shaping the form of musical practice. Furthermore, we document the properties of emergent interaction − supported by a tool oriented to enabling music improvisation − as potentially resisting assumptions regarding normalization.
BourdieuP (1984) Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgment of Taste, trans.NiceR. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
2.
BrownARDillonSKerrT. (2009) Evolving interactions: agile design for networked media performance. In: JesperKPaayJVillerS. (eds) OzCHI. Melbourne, VIC: CHISIG, pp. 41–48.
3.
DelaFuenteE (2007) The “new sociology of art”: putting art back into social science approaches to the arts. Cultural Sociology1(3): 409–425.
4.
DelaFuenteE (2010) The artwork made me do it: introduction to the new sociology of art. Thesis Eleven103(1): 3–9.
5.
DeNoraT (2003) After Adorno: Rethinking Music Sociology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
6.
DillonS (2006) jam2jam: networked improvisational musical environments. In: MooreMLeungBW (eds) School Music and Teacher Education: A Global Perspective in the New Century. Hong Kong: ISME, pp. 19–30.
7.
DuffyBFullerR (2000) Role of music therapy in social skills development in children with moderate intellectual disability. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities13(2): 77–89.
8.
EdgertonCI (1994) The effect of improvisational music therapy on the communicative behaviors of autistic children. Journal of Music Therapy31(1): 31–62.
9.
FinlayWMLAntakiCWaltonC (2007) On not being noticed: intellectual disabilities and the non-vocal register. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities45(4): 227–245.
10.
GogginGNewellC (2003) Digital Disability: The Social Construction of Disability in New Media. Lanham, MD and Oxford: Rowan & Littlefield.
11.
HallE (2004) Social geographies of learning disability: narratives of exclusion and inclusion. Area36(3): 298–306.
12.
HallEKearnsA (2001) Making space for the ‘intellectual’ in geographies of disability. Health & Place7: 237–246.
13.
HamlinAOakesP (2008) Reflections on deinstitutionalization in the United Kingdom. Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities5(1): 47–55.
14.
HendricksDRWehmanP (2009) Transition from school to adulthood for youth with autism spectrum disorders: review and recommendations. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities24(2): 77–88.
15.
HickeyM (2009) Can improvisation be ‘taught’?: A call for free improvisation in our schools. International Journal of Music Education27(4): 285–299.
16.
HooperJWigramTCarsonD. (2008a) A review of the music and intellectual disability literature (1943−2006): part one − descriptive and philosophical writing. Music Therapy Perspectives26(2): 66–79.
17.
HooperJWigramTCarsonD. (2008b) A review of the music and intellectual disability literature (1943−2006): part two − experimental writing. Music Therapy Perspectives26(2): 80–96.
18.
HughesB (2007) Being disabled: towards a critical social ontology for disability studies. Disability & Society22(7): 673–684.
19.
KlotzJ (2004) Sociocultural study of intellectual disability: moving beyond labelling and social constructionist perspectives. British Journal of Learning Disabilities32(2): 93–104.
20.
McClimensAGordonF (2009) People with intellectual disabilities as bloggers: what’s social capital got to do with it anyway?Journal of Intellectual Disabilities13(1): 19–30.
21.
MansellJ (2006) Deinstitutionalisation and community living: progress, problems and priorities. Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability31: 65–76.
22.
MarmandeFJohnsonC (1996) The laws of improvisation, or the nuptial destruction of jazz. Yale French Studies89: 155–159.
23.
MetzelDS (2005) Places of social poverty and service dependency of people with intellectual disabilities: a case study in Baltimore, Maryland. Health & Place11: 93–105.
24.
MoserI (2000) Against normalisation: subverting norms of ability and disability. Science as Culture9(2): 201–240.
25.
MoserI (2006) Disability and the promises of technology: technology, subjectivity and embodiment within an order of the normal. Information, Communication & Society9(3): 373–395.
26.
NindMSealeJ (2009) Concepts of access for people with learning difficulties: towards a shared understanding. Disability & Society24(3): 273–287.
27.
PhiloCMetzelDS (2005) Introduction to theme section on geographies of intellectual disability: ‘outside the participatory mainstream?’Health & Place11: 77–85.
28.
RenbladK (2000) Persons with intellectual disability, social interaction and video telephony: an interview study. Technology and Disability13: 55–65.
29.
RicoeurP (2005) The Course of Recognition. Cambridge, MA and London: Harvard University Press.
30.
RubinSBiklenDKasa-HendricksonC. (2001) Independence, participation, and the meaning of intellectual ability. Disability & Society16(3): 415–429.
31.
SawyerK (2000) Improvisation and the creative process: Dewey, Collingwood, and the aesthetics of spontaneity. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism58(2): 149–161.
32.
SawyerK (2006) Group creativity: musical performance and collaboration. Psychology of Music34: 148–165.
33.
SchalockRL (2010) International perspectives on intellectual disability. In: KeithKD (ed.) Cross-Cultural Psychology: Contemporary Themes and Perspectives. New York: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 312–328.
34.
SchellyD (2008) Problems associated with choice and quality of life for an individual with intellectual disability: a personal assistant’s reflexive ethnography. Disability & Society23(7): 719–732.
35.
ScottA (2004) ‘Sittin’ in: Barry Harris’s use of the jam session as a jazz pedagogical device. Journal of Popular Music Studies16(3): 283–290.
36.
SkewesKWigramT (2002) A review of current practice in group music therapy improvisations. British Journal of Music Therapy16(1): 46–55.
37.
StephensonJ (2006) Music therapy and the education of students with severe disabilities. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities41(3): 290–299.
38.
ThriftNFrenchS (2002) The automatic production of space. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, n.s. 27(3): 309–335.
39.
WalkerP (1999) From community presence to sense of place: community experiences of adults with developmental disabilities. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps24(1): 23–32.
40.
WardeA (2004) Practice and Field: Revising Bourdieusian Concepts. Manchester: University of Manchester Centre for Innovation and Competition.
41.
ZbikowskiL (2009) Music, language and multimodal metaphor. In: ForcevilleCUrios-AparisiE (eds) Multimodal Metaphor. Berlin: Mouton-de Gruyter, pp. 359−381.
42.
ZornJ (2004) The game pieces. In: CoxCWarnerD (eds) Audio Culture: Readings in Modern Music. New York: Continuum Press, pp. 196−200.
