This introduction provides a brief overview of developments in research on political campaigning on the Internet. It presents state-of-the-art research in the field of political communication and the Internet, after which summaries of the studies in this special issue are provided. Finally, the article suggests a number of future research concerns.
AncuMCozmaR (2009) MySpace politics: uses and gratifications of befriending candidates. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media53(4): 567–583.
2.
AnsteadN (2008) The Internet and campaign finance in the US and the UK: an institutional comparison. Journal of Information Technology & Politics5(3): 285–302.
3.
BrundidgeJRiceRE (2009) Political engagement online: do the information rich get richer and the like-minded more similar? In: ChadwickAHowardPN (eds) The Routledge Handbook of Internet Politics. London: Routledge., pp. 144–156.
4.
ChadwickA (2009) Web 2.0: new challenges for the study of e-democracy in an era of informational exuberance. I/S: A Journal of Law and Policy for the Information Society5(2): 9–42.
5.
ChadwickA (2011) Britain’s first live televised party leaders’ debate: from the news cycle to the political information cycle. Parliamentary Affairs64(1): 24–44.
6.
ChadwickAHowardPN (2009) Introduction: new directions in internet politics research. In: ChadwickAHowardPN (eds) Routledge Handbook of Internet Politics. London: Routledge, pp. 1–9.
7.
ChristensonDPSmidtCD (2011) Riding the waves of money: contribution dynamics in the 2008 presidential nomination campaign. Journal of Political Marketing10(1–2): 4–26.
HallinDCManciniP (2004) Comparing Media Systems: Three Models of Media and Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
12.
JohnsonTJZhangWBichardSL (2011) Voices of convergence or conflict? A path analysis investigation of selective exposure to political websites. Social Science Computer Review29(4): 449–469.
13.
JonesRJJr (2008) The state of presidential election forecasting: the 2004 experience. International Journal of Forecasting24(2): 310–321.
14.
JungherrAJürgensPSchoenH (2011) Why the Pirate Party won the German election of 2009 or the trouble with predictions: a response to Tumasjan A, Sprenger TO, Sander PG, Welpe IM, ‘Predicting elections with Twitter: what 140 characters reveal about political sentiment’. Social Science Computer Review30(2): 229–234.
15.
KayeBKJohnsonTJ (2002) Online and in the know: uses and gratifications of the Web for political information. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media46: 54–71.
16.
MongePRContractorNS (2003) Theories of Communication Networks. New York: Oxford University Press.
17.
ParmeleeJHBichardSL (2011) Politics and the Twitter Revolution: How Tweets Influence the Relationship between Political Leaders and the Public. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
SamsSLimYSParkHW (2011) E-research applications for tracking online socio-political capital in the Asia-Pacific region. Asian Journal of Communication21(5): 450–466.
TumasjanASprengerTOSandnerPG. (2011) Election forecasts with Twitter: how 140 characters reflect the political landscape. Social Science Computer Review29(4): 402–418.
23.
VergeerMHermansL (in press) Campaigning on Twitter: micro-blogging and online social networking as campaign tools in the 2010 general elections in the Netherlands. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication.
24.
VergeerMHermansLSamsS (in press) Online social networks and micro-blogging in political campaigning: the exploration of a new campaign tool and a new campaign style. Party Politics, doi: 10.1177/1354068811407580.
25.
WeaverDHBeamRABrownleeBJ. (2007) The American Journalist in the 21st Century: US News People at the Dawn of a New Millennium. Mahwah, NJ: LEA.
26.
WellmanB (2001) Computer networks as social networks. Science293: 2031–2034.
27.
WilliamsD (2007) The impact of time online: social capital and cyberbalkanization. Cyberpsychology & Behavior10: 398–406.
28.
WrightS (2012) Politics as usual? Revolution, normalization and a new agenda for online deliberation. New Media & Society14(2): 244–261.
