This study examines elderly people’s innate moral foundations in influencing decisions, and their subsequent enjoyment in an interactive media environment. The Moral Foundation Questionnaire was used to distinguish between the moral intuitions of elderly US and German respondents, who were believed to have divergent yet stable moral codes that would be salient in a novel virtual world. In an experimental design, participants (N=116) were confronted with a computer simulation in which they could decide to violate or uphold each of five moral intuitions. Germans and Americans differed in their moral foundations, yet for both groups higher moral salience led to a decrease in decisions to commit moral violations in a virtual world. Results for enjoyment were mixed.
CzajaSJLeeCC (2007) The impact of aging on access to technology. Universal Access in the Information Society5(4): 341–349.
4.
EdenATamboriniR (2010) Moral intuitions: morality subcultures in disposition formation. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association, Singapore. Available at: www.allacademic.com/meta/p404535_index.html (accessed 30 October 2010).
5.
EdenATamboriniRGrizzardMN. (2010) Maintaining morality: repeated exposure to narrative entertainment and the salience of moral intuitions. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association, Singapore.
6.
EsserH (1980) Aspekte der Wanderungssoziologie: Assimilation und Integration von Wanderern, ethnischen Gruppen und Minderheiten: Eine Handlungstheoretische Analyse [Aspects of Migration Sociology: Assimilation and Integration of Migrants, Ethnic Groups and Minorities: An Action Theory based Approach]. Darmstadt: Luchterhand.
7.
FeatherNT (1979) Assimilation of values in migrant groups. In: RokeachM (ed.) Understanding Human Value: Individual and Societal. New York: Free Press, pp. 97–128.
8.
GrahamJHaidtJ (2010) Beyond beliefs: religions bind individuals into moral communities. Personality and Social Psychology Review14(1): 140–150.
9.
GrahamJHaidtJNosekBA (2009) Liberals and conservatives use different sets of moral foundations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (96): 1029–1046.
10.
HaidtJ (2001) The emotional dog and its rational tail: a social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychological Review108(4): 814–834.
11.
HaidtJGrahamJ (2007) When morality opposes justice: conservatives have moral intuitions that liberalsmaynot recognize. Social Justice Research (20): 98–116.
12.
HaidtJJosephC (2007) The moral mind: how 5 sets of innate moral intuitions guide the development of many culture-specific virtues, and perhaps even modules. In: CarruthersPLaurenceSStichS (eds) The Innate Mind, vol. 3. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 367–392.
13.
HaidtJKesebirS (2010) Morality. In: FiskeSTGilbertDTLindzeyG (eds) Handbook of Social Psychology, 5th edn.Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons, pp. 797–832.
14.
HaidtJKollerSHDiasMG (1993) Affect, culture, and morality, or is it wrong to eat your dog?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology65(4): 613–628.
15.
HartmannTVordererP (2010) It’s okay to shoot a character: moral disengagement in violent video games. Journal of Communication60(1): 94–119.
16.
HofstedeG (2001) Culture’s Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions and Organizations Across Nations, 2nd edn.Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
17.
HunterJD (1991) Culture Wars: The Struggle to Define America. New York: Basic Books.
18.
JensenLA (1995) Habits of the heart revisited: autonomy, community and divinity in adults’ moral language. Qualitative Sociology18(1): 71–86.
19.
JensenLA (1997) Culture wars: American moral divisions across the adult lifespan. Journal of Adult Development4(2): 107–121.
20.
KlimmtC (2005) Computerspielen als Handlung: Dimensionen und Determinanten des Erlebens interaktiver Unterhaltungsangebote [Computer Games as Action: Dimensions and Determinants of Interactive Entertainment Enjoyment]. Cologne: Halem.
21.
KlimmtCSchmidHNosperA. (2006) How players manage moral concerns to make video game violence enjoyable. Communications: European Journal of Communication Research31(4): 309–328.
22.
KohlbergL (1969) Stage and sequence: the cognitive-developmental approach to socialization. In: GolsinAD (ed.) Handbook of Socialization Theory and Research. Chicago, IL: Rand McNally, pp. 346–380.
23.
LevittPJaworskyN (2007) Transnational migration studies: past developments and future trends. Annual Review of Sociology33: 129–156.
24.
McDonaldLStuart-HamiltonI (1996) Older and more moral: age-related changes in performance on Piagetian moral reasoning tasks. Age and Ageing25: 402–404.
25.
MaltiTGummerumMBuchmannM (2007) Contemporaneous and 1-year longitudinal prediction of children’s prosocial behavior: from sympathy and moral motivation. Journal of Genetic Psychology168(3): 277–299.
26.
NauckB (2008) Acculturation: theoretical approaches and perspectives in psychology and sociology. In: KalterF (ed.) Migration und Integration. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag, pp. 108–133.
27.
PrenskyM (2001) Digital natives, digital immigrants. Horizon9(5): 1–6.
28.
QuandtTvon PapeT (2010) Living in the mediatope: a multi-method study on the evolution of media technologies in the domestic environment. The Information Society26(5): 330–345.
29.
RammstedtB (2010) Reliabilität, Validität, Objektivität [Reliability, validity, objectivity]. In: WolfCBestH (eds) Handbuch der sozialwissenschaftlichen Datenanalyse. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag, pp. 239–258.
30.
RaneyAA (2010) A media-specific moral lens: hypothesizing a new paradigm for considering morality in entertainment reception. Presentation at the conference of the International Society for the Empirical Study of Literature and Media, Utrecht.
31.
RosenLDMaguireP (1990) Myths and realities of computerphobia: a meta-analysis. Anxiety Stress and Coping3(3): 175–191.
32.
SchmierbachMBoyleMPXuQ. (2011) Exploring third-person differences between gamers and nongamers. Journal of Communication61(2): 307–327.
33.
SchmittN (1996) Uses and abuses of coefficient alpha. Psychological Assessment8(4): 350–353.
34.
SchubertTFriedmannFRegenbrechtH (2001) The experience of presence: factor analytic insights. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments10(3): 266–281.
35.
SchwartzSA (2006) A theory of cultural value orientations: explication and applications. Comparative Sociology5: 137–182.
36.
ShwederRA (1993) Cultural psychology: who needs it?Annual Review of Psychology44: 497–523.
37.
ShwederRAMuchNCMahapatraMM. (1997) The ‘big three’ of morality (autonomy, community, and divinity), and the ‘big three’ explanations of suffering, as well. In: BrandtARozinP (eds) Morality and Health. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, pp. 119–169.
38.
SinkovicsRRStöttingerBSchlegelmilchBB. (2002) Reluctance to use technology-related products: development of a technophobia scale. Thunderbird International Business Review44(4): 474–494.
39.
TamboriniR (2011) Moral intuition and media entertainment. Journal of Media Psychology23(1): 39–45.
40.
TamboriniREdenABowmanN. (2009) Predicting media appeal from instinctive moral values. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the NCA 95th Annual Convention, Chicago, IL. Available at: www.allacademic.com/meta/p367643_index.html (accessed 30 October 2010).
41.
TurielE (1983) The Development of Social Knowledge: Morality and Convention. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
42.
VauclairCM (2009) Measuring cultural values at the individual level: considering morality in cross-cultural value research. RAM – Revista de Administração Mackenzie10(3): 61–83.
43.
VoigtKD (2007) Religion und Politik: ein Vergleich zwischen der Situation in Deutschland und den USA [Religion and politics: a comparison between Germany and the US]. In: PruinDSchiederRZachhuberJ (eds) Religion und Politik in Deutschland und den USA: traditionelle Differenzen und neue Herausforderungen [Religion and Politics in the United States and Germany: Old Divisions and New Frontiers]. Berlin: Lit Verlag, pp. 17–34.
44.
WainrybC (2006) Moral development in culture: diversity, tolerance, and justice. In: KillenMSmetanaJ (eds) Handbook of Moral Development. Mahwah, NJ and London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 299–387.
ZillmannD (2000) Basal morality in drama appreciation. In: BondebjergI (ed.) Moving Images, Culture, and the Mind. Luton: University of Luton, pp. 53–63.
47.
ZillmannDCantorJR (1976) A disposition theory of humor and mirth. In: HapmanAJFootHC (eds) Humour and Laughter: Theory, Research, and Applications. London: Wiley, pp. 93–115.
