The purpose of this study is to examine how demographics, addiction symptoms, information literacy, parenting styles and internet activities can predict ‘internet risks’. Data were gathered from a probability sample of 718 adolescents and teenagers, aged 9–19 in Hong Kong, using face-to-face interviews. Results show that adolescents who are often targets of harassment tend to be older boys with a high family income. They are targets probably because they spend a lot of time on social networking sites (SNSs) and prefer the online setting. Adolescents who encounter a lot of unwelcome solicitation of personal or private information online tend to be older girls. In information literacy, they are generally very competent with publishing tools but are not structurally literate, especially in understanding how information is socially situated and produced. Implications and recommendations for future research are discussed.
American Psychiatric Association (1994) Diagnostic and Statistical Manual for Mental Disorders (4th edn). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.
BantaTWMzumaraHR (2004) Assessing information literacy and technological competence. Assessment Update16(5): 3–5.
4.
BianchiAPhillipsJG (2005) Psychological predictors of problem mobile phone use. CyberPsychology & Behavior8(1): 39–51.
5.
BuckinghamDWillettR (2006) Digital Generations: Children, Young People, and New Media. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
6.
ByunSRuffiniCMillsJEDouglasACNiangMStepchenkovaSLeeSKLoutfiJLeeJAtallahMBlantonM (2009) Internet addiction: Metasynthesis of 1996–2006 quantitative research. CyberPsychology & Behavior12(2): 203–207.
7.
CaplanSE (2003) Preference for online social interaction: A theory of problematic Internet use and psychosocial well-being. Communication Research30(6): 625–648.
8.
CarlssonU (2006) Violence and pornography in the media: Public views on the influence media violence and pornography exert on young people. In: CarlssonUFeilitzenC (eds) In the Service of Young People? Studies and Reflections on Media in the Digital Age. Goteborg: UNESCO, 288–305.
9.
Center for Media Education (2001) Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act: The First Year. Washington, DC: Center for Media Education.
10.
Common Sense Media (2006) 9 out of 10 Parents Think They Should Have Prime Responsibility for Children’s Internet Safety. Available at: http://www.commonsensemedia.org (accessed May 2010).
11.
DornbuschSCarlsmithJBushwallSRitterPLeidermanPHastorfAGrossR (1985) Single parents, extended households, and the control of adolescents. Child Development56: 326–341.
12.
DunnK (2002) Assessing information literacy skills in the California State University: A progress report. The Journal of Academic Librarianship28(1): 26–35.
13.
DupuisE (1997) The information literacy challenge: Addressing the changing needs of our students. Internet Reference Services Quarterly2(2&3): 93–111.
14.
FarmerLSHenriJ (2008) Information Literacy Assessment in K-12 Settings. Lanham, MD: Scarecrow Press.
15.
FinkelhorDMitchellKWolakJ (2000) Online Victimization: A Report on the Nation’s Young People. Washington, DC: National Center for Missing & Exploited Children.
16.
FujiokaYAustinEW (2007) The relationship of family communication patterns to parental mediation styles. Communication Research34: 212–230.
17.
GriffithsMD (1996) Gambling on the Internet: A brief note. Journal of Gambling Studies12: 471–473.
18.
GriffithsMD (1998) Internet addiction: Does it really exist? In: GackenbachJ (ed.) Psychology and the Internet. New York: Academic Press, 61–75.
19.
GriffithsMDHuntN (1998) Dependence on computer games by adolescents. Psychological Reports82: 475–480.
20.
HoweNStraussW (2007) Millennials Go to College: Implementation Guide. Great Falls: LifeCourse Associates.
21.
JordanAB (2001) Public policy and private practice. In: SingerDGSingerJL (eds) Handbook of Children and the Media. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 651–662.
22.
KeithSMartinME (2005) Cyber-bullying: Creating a culture of respect in a cyber world. Reclaiming Children and Youth13(4): 224–228.
23.
LarsonR (1995) Secrets in the bedroom: Adolescents’ private use of media. Journal of Youth and Adolescents24(5): 535–550.
24.
LemonJ (2002) Can we call behaviors addictive?Clinical Psychologist6: 44–49.
25.
LeungL (2004) Net-generation attributes and seductive properties of the Internet as predictors of online activities and Internet addiction. CyberPsychology & Behavior7(3): 333–348.
26.
LeungL (2008) Leisure boredom, sensation seeking, self-esteem, and addiction: Symptoms and patterns of cell phone use. In KonijnEAUtzSTanisMBarnesSB (eds) Mediated Interpersonal Communication. New York: Routledge, 359–381.
27.
LeungL (2009) Users-generated content on the Internet: An examination of gratifications, civic engagement, and psychological empowerment. New Media & Society11(8): 1327–1347.
28.
LiauAKKhooAAngPH (2005) Factors influencing adolescents’ engagement in risky internet behavior. CyberPsychology & Behavior8(6): 513–520.
29.
LinCAAtkinsDJ (1989) Parental mediation and rulemaking for adolescent use of television and VCRs. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media33(1): 53–67.
30.
LivingstoneS (2002) Young People and New Media. London: Sage.
31.
LivingstoneS (2008a) Taking risky opportunities in youthful content creation: Teenagers’ use of social networking sites for intimacy, privacy, and self-expression. New Media & Society10(3): 393–411.
32.
LivingstoneS (2008b) Parental mediation of children’s Internet use. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media52(4): 581–599.
33.
LivingstoneSHelsperE (2007) Taking risks when communicating on the internet: The role of offline social-psychological factors in young people’s vulnerability to online risks. Information, Communication and Society10(5): 619–643.
34.
LivingstoneSHelsperE (2010) Balancing opportunities and risks in teenagers’ use of the internet: The role of online skills and internet self-efficacy. New Media & Society12(2): 309–329.
35.
LivingstoneSBoberMHelsperEJ (2005) Internet Literacy among Children and Young People: Findings from the UK Children Go Online Project. London: LSE. Available at: http://www.lse.ac.uk/collections/children-go-online/ (accessed January 2011).
36.
MeschGS (2009) Parental mediation, online activities, and cyberbullying. Cyberpsychology and Behavior12(4): 387–393.
37.
MurrayJ (2003) Contemporary literacy: Essential skills for the 21st century. MultiMedia Schools10(2): 14–18.
38.
NathansonAIEvelandWPParkHSPaulB (2002) Perceived media influence and efficacy as predictors of caregivers’ protective behaviors. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media46(3): 385–410.
39.
PalfreyJGasserU (2008) Born Digital: Understanding the First Generation of Digital Natives. New York: Basic Books.
40.
PeterJValkenburgP (2006) Adolescents’ exposure to sexually explicit material on the internet. Communication Research33(2): 178–204.
41.
RockmanIF (2002) Strengthening connections between information literacy, general education, and assessment efforts. Library Trends51(2): 185–198.
42.
ShafferHJ (1996) Understanding the means and objects of addiction: Technology, the Internet and gambling. Journal of Gambling Studies12: 461–469.
ThayerSERayS (2006) Online communication preferences across age, gender, and duration of Internet use. CyberPsychology & Behavior9(4): 432–440.
47.
TurkleS (1995) Life on the Screen: Identity in the Age of the Internet. New York: Simon & Schuster.
48.
YbarraMLDiener-WestMLeafPJ (2007) Examining the overlap in Internet harassment and school bullying: Implications for school intervention. Journal of Adolescent Health41: S42–50.
49.
YoungKS (1998a) Caught in the Net: How to Recognize the Signs of Internet Addiction and a Winning Strategy for Recovery. New York: Wiley.
50.
YoungKS (1998b) Internet Addiction: The Emergence of a New Clinical Disorder. CyberPsychology and Behavior1: 237–244.
