Aufderheide P. ( 2007) How documentary filmmakers overcame their fear of quoting and learned to employ fair use: A tale of scholarship in action. International Journal of Communication1: 26-36.
2.
Aufderheide P. and Jaszi P. ( 2007) Fair use and best practices: Surprising success. Intellectual Property Today. Available at: http://www.iptoday.com/articles/2007-10-aufderheide.asp (downloaded on 4 February, 2011.
3.
Baker CE ( 2002a) First Amendment limits on copyright. Vanderbilt Law Review55: 891-951.
4.
Baker CE ( 2002b) Media, Markets, and Democracy. Cambridge , UK: Cambridge University Press.
5.
Balkin JM ( 2004) Digital speech and democratic culture: A theory of freedom of expression for the information society. New York University Law Review79: 1-58.
6.
Bollinger Jr. LC ( 1976) Freedom of the press and public access: Toward a theory of partial regulation of the mass media. Michigan Law Review75: 1-42.
7.
Boulton C.(2009) Code of best practices in fair use for media literacy education ( 2008). Journal of Media Literacy Education1: 81-82.
8.
Center for Social Media (2010). Best Practices. Available at: http://www.centerforsocialmedia.org/fair-use/best-practices (consulted 3 December 2010).
9.
Digital Millennium Copyright Act, Pub. L. No. 105-304 (1998).
10.
Electronic Privacy Information Center (nd) Public Opinion on Privacy. Available at: http://epic.org/privacy/survey/ (consulted 29 November 2010).
11.
Fowler MS and Brenner DL ( 1982) A marketplace approach to broadcast regulation. Texas Law Review60: 207-257.
12.
Gandy OH ( 1995) The role of theory in the policy process: A response to Professor Westin. In: Firestone C and Schement J (eds). Toward an Information Bill of Rights and Responsibilities. Washington, DC: Aspen Institute.
13.
Gibbons T (ed.) (2009a) Free Speech in the New Media. Farnham, Surrey, UK: Ashgate.
Hacker JS and Pierson P. ( 2010) Winner-Take-All Politics: How Washington Made the Rich Richer - and Turned Its Back on the Middle Class. New York : Simon & Schuster.
16.
International Communication Association Ad Hoc Committee on Fair Use and Academic Freedom. (2010). Code of best practices in fair use for scholarly research in communication. Available at: http://www.centerforsocialmedia.org/fair-use/related-materials/codes/code-best-practices-fair-use-scholarly-research-communication (consulted 5 December 2010).
17.
Kelly v. Arriba Soft Corp., 336 F.3d 811 (9th Cir. 2003).
18.
Krattenmaker TG and Powe Jr. LA ( 1995) Converging First Amendment principles for converging communications media. Yale Law Journal104: 1719-1741.
19.
LaFrance M. ( 2008) Copyright Law in a Nutshell. St. Paul, MN: Thomson/West.
20.
Lakoff G. ( 2004) Don’t Think of an Elephant! Know Your Values and Frame the Debate: The Essential Guide for Progressives. White River Junction, VT: Chelsea Green Pub. Co.
21.
Lamoureux EL, Baron SL and Stewart C. ( 2009) Intellectual Property Law and Interactive Media: Free for a Fee. New York: Peter Lang .
22.
Lessig L. ( 2001) The Future of Ideas: The Fate of the Commons in a Connected World. New York: Random House.
23.
Nissenbaum HF ( 2009) Privacy in Context: Technology, Policy, and the Integrity of Social Life. Stanford, CA: Stanford Law Books.
24.
Price M. ( 2001) The newness of new technology. Cardozo Law Review22: 1885-1913.
25.
Reno v. ACLU, 521 US 844 (1997).
26.
Rosen J. ( 2010) The TSA is invasive, annoying - and unconstitutional. The Washington Post, 28 November, p. B1.
27.
Sony Corp. of America v. Universal City Studios, Inc., 464 U.S. 417 (1984).
28.
Weinberg J. ( 1993) Broadcasting and speech. California Law Review81: 1103-1206.
29.
Westin AF ( 1996) Privacy in the workplace: How well does American law reflect American values?Chicago-Kent Law Review72: 271-283.
30.
Westin AF ( 2003) Social and political dimensions of privacy. Journal of Social Issues59: 431-453.
31.
Universal City Studios v. Reimerdes, 111 F. Supp. 2d 294 (S.D.N.Y. 2000).
32.
Zittrain J. ( 2008) The Future of the Internet - and How to Stop It, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
