There is currently a diversity of understandings of digital democracy being deployed within popular commentary, research, policy making, and practical initiative. However, there is a lack of resources clearly outlining this diversity; this article undertakes such an outline. It provides a reconstruction of four digital democracy positions. These four positions are referred to here as liberal-individualist, deliberative, counter-publics, and autonomist Marxist. The delineation of each position draws from critical-interpretative research and has been developed with respect to three elements: the democratic subject assumed, the related conception of democracy promoted, and the associated democratic affordances of digital media technology. The aim is to draw attention to different understandings of what extending democracy through digital media means, and to provide a framework for further examination and evaluation of digital democracy rhetoric and practice.
Ackerly B. ( 2006) Deliberative democratic theory for building global civil society: Designing a virtual community of activists. Contemporary Political Theory5(2): 113-141.
2.
Benkler Y. ( 2006) The Wealth of Networks. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
3.
Benson TW ( 1996) Rhetoric, civility, and community: Political debate on computer bulletin boards. Communication Quarterly44(3): 359-378.
4.
Berardi F. ( 2009) The Soul at Work: From Alienation to Autonomy (trans. Cadel F and Giuseppina M). New York: Semiotext(e) .
5.
Bickel B. ( 2003) Weapons of magic: Afghan women asserting voice via the Net. Journal of Computer-mediated Communication8(2). Available at: http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol8/issue2/bickel.html (consulted November 2009).
6.
Bohman J. ( 1998) The coming of age of deliberative democracy. The Journal of Political Philosophy6(4): 400-425.
7.
Bohman J. ( 2004) Expanding dialogue: The Internet, the public sphere and prospects for transnational democracy. In: Crossley N and Roberts JM (eds) After Habermas: New Perspectives on the Public Sphere. Oxford: Blackwell/The Sociological Review, 131-155.
8.
Cammaerts B. ( 2007) Jamming the political: Beyond counter-hegemonic practices . Continuum: Journal of Media and Cultural Studies21(1): 71-90.
9.
Chadwick A. ( 2009) Web 2.0: New challenges for the study of e-democracy in an era of informational exuberance. I/S: A Journal of Law and Policy for the Information Society5(1): 10-42.
10.
Cleaver H. ( 1999) Computer linked Social Movements and the Global Threat to Capitalism. Available at: www.cseweb.org.uk/downloads/cleaver.pdf (consulted November 2009).
11.
Coleman S. ( 2005) New mediation and direct representation: Reconceptualizing representation in the digital age. New Media & Society7(2): 177-198.
12.
Coleman S. and Blumler J. ( 2009) The Internet and Democratic Citizenship. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
13.
Coté M. and Pybus J. ( 2007) Learning to immaterial labour 2.0: MySpace and social networks. Ephemera: Theory and Politics in Organization7(1): 88-106.
14.
Dahlberg L. ( 2001a) Democracy via cyberspace: Examining the rhetorics and practices of three prominent camps. New Media & Society3(2): 187-207.
15.
Dahlberg L. ( 2001b) The internet and democratic discourse: Exploring the prospects of online deliberative forums extending the public sphere. Information, Communication & Society4(4): 615-633.
16.
Dahlberg L. ( 2004) Internet research tracings: Towards non-reductionist methodology . Journal of Computer-mediated Communications9(3). Available at: http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol9/issue3/dahlberg.html (consulted September 2010).
17.
Dahlberg L. ( 2007a) The Internet and discursive exclusion. In: Dahlberg L and Siapera E (eds) Radical Democracy and the Internet: Exploring Theory and Practice. London: Palgrave, 128-147.
18.
Dahlberg L. ( 2007b) Rethinking the fragmentation of the cyber-public: From consensus to contestation. New Media & Society9(5): 829-849.
19.
Dahlberg L. ( 2010) Cyber-libertarianism 2.0: A Discourse theory/critical political economy examination. Cultural Politics6(3): 331-356.
20.
Dahlgren P. ( 2007) Civic identity and net activism: The frame of radical democracy. In: Dahlberg L and Siapera E (eds) Radical Democracy and the Internet: Interrogating Theory and Practice. New York: Palgrave, 55-72.
21.
Dietz M. ( 1992) Context is all, feminism and theories of citizenship. In: Mouffe C (ed.) Dimensions of Radical Democracy. London: Verso , 63-85.
22.
Downey J. and Fenton N. ( 2003) New media, counter publicity and the public sphere. New Media & Society5(2): 185-202.
23.
Dyer-Witheford N. ( 2002) The new combinations. The New Centennial Review1(3): 155-200.
24.
Dyer-Witheford N. ( 2006) Species-being and the new commonism: Notes on an interrupted cycle of struggles. The Commoner11(Spring): 15-32.
25.
Dyer-Witheford N. ( 2007) Hegemony or multitude? Two versions of radical democracy for the net. In: Dahlberg L and Siapera E (eds), Radical Democracy and the Internet. New York: Palgrave, 191-206.
26.
Fang N.-H (1995) The Internet as a public sphere: A Habermasian approach. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, State University of New York, Buffalo.
27.
Fernandez M, Wilding F and Wright M (eds) (2004) Domain Errors! Cyberfeminist Practices. London: Pluto Press.
28.
Fraser N. ( 1992) Rethinking the public sphere: A contribution to the critique of actually existing democracy. In: Barker F, Hulme P and Iversen M (eds) Postmodernism and the Re-reading of Modernity. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 197-231.
29.
Friedland LA, Hove T. and Rojas H. ( 2006) The networked public sphere. Javnost - the Public13(4): 5-26.
30.
Fuller M. ( 2004) Behind the Blip: Essays on the Culture of Software. London: Pluto Press.
31.
Gallo J. ( 2003) Online Oppositional Communities as Discursive Counterpublics . Paper presented at the Association of Internet Researchers Conference, Toronto, October.
32.
Gibson JJ ( 1977) The theory of affordances. In: Shaw R and Bransford J (eds) Perceiving, Acting, and Knowing: Toward an Ecological Psychology. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 67-82.
33.
Gillet J. ( 2007) Internet web logs as cultural resistance: A case study of the SARS Arts Project. Journal of Communication Inquiry31(1): 28-43.
34.
Gimmler A. ( 2001) Deliberative democracy, the public sphere and the internet . Philosophy and Social Criticism27(4): 21-39.
35.
Glynos J. and Howarth D. ( 2007) Logics of Critical Explanation in Social and Political Theory. London: Routledge.
36.
Gore A. ( 1994) The global information infrastructure: Forging a new Athenian age of democracy. Intermedia22(2): 4-7.
37.
Graham T. ( 2009) What’s wife swap got to do with it? Talking politics in the net-based public sphere. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam School of Communications .
38.
Habermas J. ( 1984) The Theory of Communicative Action (trans. Thomas McCarthy). (Vol. 1, Reason and the Rationalization of Society). Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
39.
Habermas J. ( 1989) The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society (trans. Thomas Burger). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
40.
Habermas J. ( 1996) Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy (trans. William Rehg). Cambridge , UK: Polity Press.
41.
Habermas J. ( 2006) Political communication in media society: Does democracy still enjoy an epistemic dimension? The impact of normative theory on empirical research. Communication Theory16(4): 411-426.
42.
Hall K. ( 1996) Cyberfeminism. In: Herring SC (ed.) Computer-mediated Communication: Linguistic, Social and Cross-cultural Perspectives. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 147-170.
43.
Hardt M. and Negri A. ( 2004) Multitude: War and Democracy in the Age of Empire. New York: Penguin.
44.
Hardt M. and Negri A. ( 2009) Commonwealth. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
45.
Hindman M. ( 2009) The Myth of Digital Democracy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press
46.
Janssen D. and Kies R. ( 2005) Online forums and deliberative democracy. Acta Politica40(3): 384-392.
47.
Johnston J. and Laxer G. ( 2003) Solidarity in the age of globalization: Lessons from the anti-MAI and Zapitista struggles. Theory and Society32(1): 39-91.
48.
Jordan T. ( 2007) Online direct action: Hactivism and radical democracy . In: Dahlberg L and Siapera E (eds) Radical Democracy and the Internet. New York: Palgrave, 73-88.
49.
Kahn R. and Kellner D. ( 2005) Oppositional politics and the internet: A critical/reconstructive approach Cultural Politics: An International Journal1(1): 75-100.
50.
Kahn R. and Kellner D. ( 2007) Globalization, technopolitics and radical democracy. In: Dahlberg L and Siapera E (eds) The Internet and Radical Democracy: Interrogating Theory and Practice. London: Palgrave , 17-36.
51.
Kidd D. ( 2003) Indymedia.org: A new communications commons. In: McCaughey M and Ayers MD (eds) Cyberactivism: Online Activism in Theory and Practice . New York: Routledge, 47-70.
52.
Kowal D.M. ( 2002) Digitizing and globalizing indigenous voices: The Zapatista movement. In: Elmer G (ed.) Critical Perspectives on the Internet. Lanham, MA: Rowman and Littlefield, 105-126.
53.
Kroker A and Kroker M (eds) (1997) Digital Delirium. New York: New World Perspectives.
54.
Kroker A. and Weinstein MA ( 1994) Data Trash: The Theory of the Virtual Class. New York: St Martin’s Press.
55.
Langman L. ( 2005) From virtual public spheres to global justice: A critical theory of internet-worked social movements. Sociological Theory23(1): 42-74.
56.
Lessig L. ( 2001) The Future of Ideas: The Fate of the Commons in a Connected World. New York: Random House.
57.
London S. ( 1995) Teledemocracy vs deliberative democracy: A comparative look at two models of public talk. Journal of Interpersonal Computing and Technology3(2): 33-35.
58.
McDorman T.F. ( 2001) Crafting a virtual counterpublic: Right-to-die advocates on the internet. In: Asen R and Brouwer DC (eds) Counterpublics and the State . Albany, NY: SUNY Press, 187-210.
59.
Mitra A. ( 2004) Voices of the marginalized on the internet: Examples from a website for women of South Asia. International Journal of Communication54(3): 492-510.
60.
Mouffe C. ( 2005) For an agonistic public sphere. In: Tønder L and Thomassen L (eds) Radical Democracy: Politics Between Abundance and Lack. Manchester: University of Manchester Press, 123-132.
61.
Negri A. ( 2008a) The Porcelain Workshop: For a New Grammar of Politics . New York: Semiotext(e).
62.
Negri A. ( 2008b) Empire and Beyond. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
63.
Negt O. and Kluge A. ( 1993) Public Sphere and Experience: Toward an Analysis of the Bourgeois and Proletarian Public Sphere (trans. Labanyi P, Daniel JO and Oksiloff A). Minneapolis, MN: UMN Press.
64.
Nguyen DT and Alexander J. ( 1996) The coming of cyberspacetime and the end of the polity . In: Sheilds R (ed.) Cultures of Internet: Virtual Spaces, Real Histories, Living Bodies. London: Sage, 99-124.
65.
Norman DA ( 1999) Affordances, conventions and design. Interactions6(3): 38-43.
66.
Palczewski CH ( 2001) Cyber-movements, new social movements, and counter-publics . In: Brouwer D and Asen R (eds) Counterpublics and the State. New York: SUNY Press, 9-27.
67.
Plant S. ( 1996) On the matrix: Cyberfeminist simulations. In: Sheilds R (ed.) Cultures of Internet: Virtual Spaces, Real Histories, Living Bodies. London: Sage, 170-183.
68.
Poster M. ( 2001) What’s the Matter with the Internet?Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
69.
Ramírez de la Piscina T. (2006) Another model of communication is possible. Javnost - the Public13(2): 5-20.
70.
Reagle J. ( 2007) Equality, gender, and speech in open communities, Re-Public: Re-Imagining Democracy. Available at: http://www.re-public.gr/en/?p=131 (consulted February 2010).
71.
Salazar J.F. ( 2003) Articulating an activist imaginary: Internet as counter public sphere in the Mapuche movement, 1997/2002. Media International Australia Incorporating Culture and Policy107 (May):19-30.
72.
Schumpeter JA ( 1976) Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy (5th edn). London: Allen & Unwin .
73.
Siapera E. ( 2004) Asylum politics, the internet and the public sphere: The case of UK refugee support groups online. Javnost - the Public11(1): 449-519.
74.
Tanner E. ( 2001) Chilean conversations: Internet forum participants debate Augusto Pinochet’s Detention. Journal of Communication51(2): 383-403.
75.
Terranova T. ( 2000) Free labor, producing culture for the global economy. Social Text18(2): 33-57.
76.
Terranova T. ( 2004) Network Culture: Politics for the Information Age. London: Pluto.
77.
Torsson P. ( 2005) Copy that floppy!, MetaMute: Culture and Politics after the Net, 30 (December). Available at: http://www.metamute.org/en/Copy-That-Floppy (consulted February 2010).
78.
Warf B. and Girmes J. ( 1997) Counterhegemonic discourses and the internet. Geographical Review87(2): 259-274.
79.
Wilhelm AG ( 2000) Democracy in the Digital Age: Challenges to Political Life in Cyberspace. London: Routledge .
80.
Wimmer J. ( 2008) The publics behind political web campaigning: The digital transformation of ‘classic’ counter-public spheres. In: Baringhorst S, Kneip V and Niesyto J (eds) Political Campaigning on the Web. Bielefeld: Transcript Verlag, 31-52.
81.
Wright S. ( 2008). Mapping pathways within Italian autonomist marxism: A preliminary survey. Historical Marxism16(4): 111-140.
82.
Zhang W. ( 2006) Constructing and disseminating subaltern public discourse in China. Javnost - the Public, 13(2): 41-64.
