The 2008 US presidential election was called the ‘YouTube Election’. However, scholars know little about how the internet influences attitudes toward politics. To address this, we conduct an experiment to test the effects of exposure to the YouTube channel, ‘YouChoose’08’, on young adults during the 2008 US presidential election. We find that those exposed to YouChoose’08 exhibit more cynicism toward the US government, yet also had a heightened sense that they influence the political system. Exposure to YouChoose’08 had no influence on attitudes toward candidates or internet sources.
Andrews P. ( 2003) Is blogging journalism? Nieman Reports57(3): 63-64.
2.
Aronson E., Ellsworth PC, Carlsmith JM and Gonzales MH ( 1990) Methods of Research in Social Psychology (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
3.
Arndt J. ( 1967) Role of product-related conversations in the diffusion of a new product. Journal of Marketing Research4(3): 291-295.
4.
Baumgartner JC and Morris JS(2010) MyFaceTube politics: Social networking web sites and political engagement of young adults. Social Science Computer Review28(1): 24-44.
5.
Bennett WL ( 1996) An introduction to journalism norms and representations of politics. Political Communication13(4): 373-384.
6.
Bimber B. and Davis R. ( 2003) Campaigning Online: The Internet in the US Elections . New York: Oxford.
7.
Campbell A., Converse PE, Miller WE and Stokes DE ( 1960) The American Voter. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
8.
Castells M. ( 2001) The Internet Galaxy: Reflections on the Internet, Business and Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
9.
Clayton DM ( 2010) The Presidential Campaign of Barack Obama: A Critical Analysis of a Racially Transcendent Strategy. New York : Routledge.
10.
Corrado A. and Firestone CM ( 1996) Elections in Cyberspace: Toward a New Era in American Politics. Washington, DC: The Aspen Institute.
11.
Flanagin AJ and Metzger MJ ( 2000) Perceptions of internet information credibility . Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly77(3): 515-540.
12.
Gans H. ( 1979) Deciding What’s News. New York : Pantheon Books.
13.
Garrett RK(2009a) Echo chambers online?: Politically motivated selective exposure among internet users. Journal of Computer-mediated Communication14(2): 265-285.
14.
Garrett RK(2009b) Politically motivated reinforcement seeking: Reframing the selective exposure debate. Journal of Communication59(4): 676-699.
15.
Germany JB ( 2009) The online revolution. In: Johnson DW (ed.) Campaigning for President 2008: Strategy and Tactics, New Voices and New Techniques. New York: Routledge, 147-160.
16.
Grossman L. ( 1995) The Electronic Commonwealth. New York : Penguin.
17.
Gueorguieva V. ( 2008) Voters, MySpace, and YouTube: The impact of alternative communication channels on the 2006 election cycle and beyond. Social Science Computer Review26(3): 288-300.
18.
Herr PM, Kardes FR and Kim J. ( 1991) Effects of word-of-mouth and product attribute information on persuasion: An accessibility-diagnosticity perspective. Journal of Consumer Research17(4): 454-462.
19.
Iyengar S. and Hahn KS(2009) Red media, blue media: Evidence of ideological selectivity in media use. Journal of Communication59(1): 19-39.
20.
Iyengar S., Hahn KS, Krosnick JA and Walker J. ( 2007) Selective exposure to campaign communication: The role of anticipated agreement and issue public membership. The Journal of Politics70(1): 186-200.
21.
Johnson TJ and Kaye BK ( 2004) Wag the blog: How reliance on traditional media and the internet influence perceptions of credibility of weblogs among blog users . Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly81(3): 622-642.
22.
Kaid LL, Towers WM and Myers SL ( 1981) Television docudrama and political cynicism: A study of ‘Washington: Behind Closed Doors’. Social Science Quarterly62(1): 161-168.
23.
Kaye BK and Johnson TJ ( 2002) Online and in the know: Uses and gratifications of the web for political information. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media46(1): 54-71.
24.
Kerbel MR and Bloom JD ( 2005) Blog for America and civic involvement. The Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics10(4): 3-27.
25.
Kim D. ( 2006) Abandoning Traditional News? Examining Factors Influencing the Displacement Effects of Online News on Traditional News Media. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Southern Illinois University .
26.
Kinder DR and Palfrey TR ( 1993) Experimental Foundations of Political Science. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press .
27.
Lazarsfeld PF, Berelson B. and Gaudet H. ( 1948) The People’s Choice. New York : Columbia University Press.
28.
Lowin A. ( 1967) Approach and avoidance: Alternative modes of selective exposure to information. ournal of Personality and Social Psychology6(1): 1-9.
29.
Madden M. ( 2007) ‘Online Video’. Available at: http://www.pewinternet.org/~/media//Files/Reports/2007/PIP_Online_Video_2007.pdf
30.
Mook DG ( 1983) In defense of external invalidity. American Psychologist38(4): 379-387.
31.
Murray KB ( 1991) A test of services marketing theory: Consumer information acquisition activities. Journal of Marketing55(1): 10-25.
32.
Mutz DC and Martin PS ( 2001) Facilitating communication across lines of political difference: The role of the mass media. American Political Science Review95(1): 97-114.
33.
Owen D. ( 2009) Media mash-up: The press in the YouTube election . In: Sabato L (ed.) Get in the Booth . New York: Longman , 91-99.
34.
Owen D. ( 2010) Media in the 2008 election: 21st century campaign, same old story. In: Sabato L (ed.) The Year of Obama. New York: Longman , 167-186.
35.
Paletz DL, Koon J., Whitehead E. and Hagens RB ( 1972) Selective exposure: The potential boomerang effect . Journal of Communication22(1): 48-53.
36.
Pew Research Center (2008) Audience segments in a changing news environment. Available at: http://people-press.org/reports/pdf/444.pdf
37.
Price T. ( 2004) Cyberpolitics. CQ Researcher Online . Available at: http://cqpress.com/cqresearcher
38.
Project for Excellence in Journalism (2008 ) The state of the news media 2008: An annual report on American journalism. Available at: http://www.stateofthemedia.org/2008/narrative_overview_intro.php?media=1
39.
Rainie L., Cornfield M. and Horrigan J. ( 2005) The internet and campaign 2004. Available at: http://www.pewinternet.org/~/media//Files/Reports/2005/PIP_2004_Campaign.pdf.pdf
40.
Regan T. ( 2003) Weblogs threaten and inform traditional journalism . Nieman Reports57(3): 68-70.
41.
Schramm W. and Carter RF ( 1959) Effectiveness of a political telethon. Public Opinion Quarterly23(1): 121-126.
42.
Sears DO ( 1986) College sophomores in the laboratory: Influence of a narrow data base on social psychology’s view of human nature. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology51(3): 515-530.
43.
Sears DO and Freedman JL ( 1967) Selective exposure to information: A critical review . Public Opinion Quarterly31(2): 194-213.
44.
Shah DV, McLeod JM and Yoon S. ( 2001) Communication, context, and community: An exploration of print, broadcast, and internet influences. Communication Research28(4): 464-506.
45.
Singer JB ( 2006) Journalists and news bloggers: Complements, contradictions, and challenges. In: Bruns A and Jacobs J (eds) Uses of Blogs. New York: Peter Lang, 23-32.
46.
Smith A. ( 2009) The internet’s role in campaign 2008. Available at: http://www.pewinternet.org/~/media//Files/Reports/2009/The_Internets_Role_in_Campaign_2008.pdf
47.
Stroud NJ ( 2007) Media effects, selective exposure, and fahrenheit 9/11 . Political Communication24(4): 415-432.
48.
Stroud NJ ( 2008) Media use and political predispositions: Revisiting the concepts of selective exposure. Political Behavior30(3): 341-366.
49.
Sweeney PD and Gruber KL ( 1984) Selective exposure: Voter information, preferences, and the Watergate affair. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology46(6): 1208-1221.
50.
Sweetser KD and Kaid LL ( 2008) Stealth soapboxes: Political information efficacy, cynicism and uses of celebrity weblogs among readers. New Media & Society10(1): 67-91.
51.
Tewksbury D. and Althaus SL ( 2000) Differences in knowledge acquisition among readers of the paper and online versions of a national newspaper. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly77(3): 457-479.
52.
Towner TL and Dulio DA ( 2010) The web 2.0 election: Voter learning in the 2008 presidential campaign. In: Kaid LL and Hendricks JA, (eds) Techno-politics in Presidential Campaigning: New Voices, New Technologies, and New Voters. New York: Routledge.
53.
Vargas JA ( 2007) YouTube gets serious with links to candidates. The Washington Post. Available at: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/03/01/AR2007030101849.html
54.
Vargas JA ( 2008) Campaigns experimenting online to see what works . Washington Post. Available at: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/02/02/AR2008020202073.html
55.
Wall M. ( 2006) Blogging Gulf War II. Journalism Studies7(1): 111-126.
56.
Xenos MA and Kyoung K. ( 2008) Rocking the vote and more: An experimental study of the impact of youth political portals. Journal of Information Technology & Politics5(2): 175-189.
57.
Zuniga HGD, Puig-I-Abril E. and Rojas H. ( 2009) Weblogs, traditional sources online and political participation: An assessment of how the internet is changing the political environment. New Media & Society11(4): 533-574.
