This article aims to re-examine the main ideas of traditional diffusion study in the context of the internet. Two news stories, one initiated by an established news organization and one uploaded by an individual internet user, were selected for our case study. The study analyzed how a news story gets carried on through various websites of media organizations and individuals.We found that the original stories undergo transformations in terms of content and form over time in the diffusion process. The authors hence introduce a new concept, ‘seed news’, in order to explain this transformative online news diffusion phenomenon. The concept of seed news may subsume the manifold and dynamic process of diffusion, addition, displacement, evolution, and decline of the news story. It also comes to terms with the multifarious dimensions of transmission and the active interplay between the media and users, or among the users themselves.
Basil M. and Brown W. ( 1994) Interpersonal communication in news diffusion: A study of ‘Magic’ Johnson’s announcement. Journalism Quarterly71: 305-320.
2.
Briggs A. and Burke P. ( 2005) A Social History of the Media. Cambridge , UK: Polity Press.
3.
Bruns A. ( 2008) Blogs, Wikipedia, Second Life, and Beyond: From Production to Produsage. New York: Peter Lang .
4.
Burgess J. ( 2006) Hearing ordinary voices: Cultural studies, vernacular creativity and digital story-telling. Continuum20(2): 201-214.
5.
Choe S. (30 June 2008) Beef protest turns violent in South Korea. New York Times. Available at: http://www.nytimescom/2008/06/30/world/asia/30koreahtml?_r=2&scp=9&sq=Korea,%20US%20beef&st=cse (consulted January 2010).
6.
Cohen E. ( 2002) Online journalism as market-driven journalism. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 46(4): 532-548.
7.
De Fleur M. ( 1987) The growth and decline of research on the diffusion of the news, 1945-1985. Communication Research14: 109-130.
8.
Deutschmann P. and Danielson W. ( 1960) Diffusion of knowledge of the major news story. Journalism Quarterly37: 345-355.
9.
Deuze M. ( 2006) Participation, remediation, bricolage. The Information Society22: 63-75.
10.
Entman RM ( 1993) Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm . Journal of Communication43: 51-58.
11.
Gamson W. and Modigliani A. ( 1989) Media discourse and public opinion on nuclear power: A constructivist approach. Journal of Sociology95: 1-37.
12.
Gantz W. and Tokinoya H. ( 1987) Diffusion of news about the assassination of Olof Palme: A trans-continental, two-city comparison of the process. European Journal of Communication2: 197-210.
13.
Gantz W. and Trenholm S. ( 1979) Why people pass on news: Motivations for diffusion. Journalism Quarterly56: 365-370.
14.
Gantz W., Trenholm S. and Pittman M. ( 1976) The impact of salience and altruism on diffusion of news . Journalism Quarterly53: 727-732.
15.
Greenberg BS ( 1964) Diffusion of news of the Kennedy assassination. The Public Opinion Quarterly28(2): 225-232.
16.
Greenberg BS, Hofschire L. and Lachlan K. ( 2002) Diffusion, media use and interpersonal communication behaviors . In Greenberg BS (ed.) Communication and Terrorism. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press, 3-16.
17.
Haas T. ( 2005) From ‘public journalism’ to ‘publics journalism’? Rhetoric and reality in the discourse on weblogs. Journalism Studies3: 387-396.
18.
Jenkins H. ( 2006) Convergence Culture: Where Old and New Media Collide. New York: New York University Press.
19.
Johnson-Cartee K. ( 2005) News Narratives and News Framing. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
20.
Kanihan SF and Gale KL ( 2003) Within 3 hours, 97 percent learn about 9/11 attacks. Newspaper Research Journal24(1): 78-91.
21.
Katz E. and Lazarsfeld PE ( 1955) Personal Influence: The Part Played by People in the Flow of Mass Communication. Glencoe, IL: The Free Press.
22.
Kim P. ( 2006) Is Korea a strong internet nation? The Information Society22: 41-44.
23.
Korea Agency for Digital Opportunity and Promotion ( 2009) 2008 Korea Internet White Paper (in Korean). Available at: http://www.kisaorkr/ (consulted February 2009).
24.
Lacy, S. ( 2005) American: Still the high-speed laggard. Business Week Online. Available at: http://bizyahoocom/special/broadband05_article1html (consulted January 2010).
25.
Matheson D. ( 2004) Weblogs and the epistemology of the news: Some trends in online journalism. New Media and Society6(4): 443-468.
26.
Mayer ME, Gudykunst WB, Perrill NK and Merrill WB ( 1990) A comparison of competing models of the news diffusion process. Western Journal of Speech Communication54(1): 113-123.
27.
McNair B. ( 2006) Cultural Chaos: Journalism, News and Power in a Globalized World. London: Routledge.
28.
Meyer G. ( 2004) Diffusion methodology: Time to innovate? Journal of Health Communication9: 59-69.
29.
National Information Society Agency (2008) A Study on the Portal News Service and Institutional Reform (in Korean). Seoul: NISA.
30.
Nguyen A. ( 2008) The contribution of online news attributes to its diffusion: An empirical exploration based on a proposed theoretical model for the micro-process of online news adoption/use, First Monday13(4). Available at: http://firstmondayorg/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/indexphp/fm/article/view/2127/1952 (consulted January 2010).
31.
Nguyen A. and Western M. ( 2007) Socio-structural correlates of online news and information adoption/use: Implications for the digital divide. Journal of Sociology43(2): 167-185.
32.
Oecd (2008) OECD Broadband Statistics: 2a Households with Broadband Access, 2004-8. Available at: http://www.oecdorg/document/54/0,3343,en_2649_34225_38690102_1_1_1_1,00html (consulted January 2010).
33.
Oecd (June, 2009) OECD Broadband Statistics: 3a OECD Broadband Penetration and Population Densities. Available at: http://www.oecdorg/document/54/0,3343,en_2649_34225_38690102_1_1_1_1,00html (consulted January 2010).
34.
Park J. (6 July 2006) ‘Big Three’s’ portal sites have ‘excessive’ market share of 81% (in Korean). The Hankyoreh Daily. Available at: http://www.hanicokr/arti/society/society_general/139060html (consulted February 2010).
35.
Riegner C. ( 2007) Word of mouth on the web: The impact of Web 20 on consumer purchase decisions. Journal of Advertising Research47(4): 436-447.
36.
Rogers E. ( 2000) Reflections on news event diffusion research. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly77: 561-576.
37.
Rogers E. and Seidel N. ( 2002) Diffusion of news of the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001. Prometheus20: 209-219.
38.
Rosengren KE ( 1973) News diffusion: An overview. Journalism Quarterly50: 83-91.
39.
Rosengren KE ( 1987) Conclusion: The comparative study of news diffusion. European Journal of Communication2: 227-255.
40.
Ruggiero T. and Glascock J. ( 2002) Tracking media use and gratifications. In Greenberg B S (ed.) Communication and Terrorism . Creskill, NJ: Hampton Press, 65-74.
41.
Valente T. ( 1995) Network Models of the Diffusion of Innovations. Creskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
42.
Vengerfeldt P. ( 2002) The September 11 attacks on the US in the new interactive media space in Estonia. Prometheus20: 229-236.
43.
Working Party on Indicators for the Information Society (30 January 2008) Measuring User-created Content: Implications for the "ICT Access and Use by Households and Individuals" Surveys. OECD Directorate for Science, Technology and Industry, Committee for Information, Computer and Communications Policy.
44.
Zhou Y. and Moy P. ( 2007) Parsing framing processes: The interplay between online public opinion and media coverage. Journal of Communication57: 79-98.
