This study examined the relationships between cyber and traditional bullying experiences regarding gender differences. Also, the contributions of frequent and risky usage of internet to cyberbullying experiences were examined. The participants were 276 adolescents (123 females, 151 males and 2 unknown) ranging in age from 14 to 18 years. The results revealed that 32 percent of the students were victims of both cyber and traditional bullying, while 26 percent of the students bullied others in both cyber and physical environments. Compared to female students, male students were more likely to be bullies and victims in both physical and cyber-environments.The multivariate statistical analysis indicated that cyber and traditional bullying were related for male students but not for female students. Moreover, the multiple regression analysis revealed that both frequent and risky usage of internet account for a significant variance of cyberbullying but their contributions differ based on genders.
Amichai-Hamburger, Y. and E. Ben-Artzi ( 2003) ‘Loneliness and Internet Use’, Computers in Human Behavior19(1): 71-80.
2.
Belsey, B. ( 2006) ‘Cyberbullying: An Emerging Threat to the Always On Generation’, URL (consulted October 2006): http://www.cyberbullying.ca/pdf/Cyberbullying_Article_by_Bill_Belsey.pdf
3.
Beran, T. and Q. Li ( 2005) ‘Cyber-harassment: A Study of a New Method for an Old Behavior’, Journal of Educational Computing Research32(3): 265-77.
4.
Berson, I.R., M.J. Berson and J.M. Ferron ( 2002) ‘Emerging Risks of Violence in the Digital Age: Lessons for Educators from an Online Study of Adolescent Girls in the United States’, Meridian: A Middle School Computer Technologies Journal5(2), URL (consulted August 2006): http://www.ncsu.edu/meridian/sum2002/cyberviolence/index.html
5.
Dölek, N. ( 2002) ‘İlk ve orta öğretim okullarındaki öğrenciler arasında zorbaca davranışların incelenmesi ve zorbalığı önleme tutumu geliştirilmesi Programı’nın etkisinin araştırılması’ [‘Examination of Bullying among Students and Developing and Evaluating a Prevention Program’], unpublished PhD thesis, Marmara University
6.
Erdur-Baker, Ö. and F. Kavşut ( 2007) ‘Cyberbullying: A New Face of Peer Bullying’ , Eurasian Journal of Educational Research27(7): 31-42.
7.
Erdur-Baker, Ö. and H. Yurdugül (under review) ‘The Nomological Network of Cyberbullying: The Relations of Cyberbullying to Traditional Bullying, Anger and Loneliness’.
8.
Erdur-Baker, Ö., O. Yerin-Güneri and S. Akbaba-Altun ( 2006) ‘Bilgi ve iletişim teknolojileri çocukları ve gençleri nasıl etkiliyor? [‘The Impact of Information Technologies on Children and Youth’], paper presented at Violence and School: Symposium on Preventive Measures that Can Be Taken Inside and Outside the School, Istanbul, 31 March.
9.
Green, S.B., N.J. Salkind and T.M. Akey ( 2000) Using SPSS For Windows. New York: Prentice-Hall.
10.
Greene, M.B. ( 2006) ‘Bullying in School: A Plea for Measure of Human Rights’, Journal of Social Issues62(1): 63-79.
11.
Henderson, S. and M. Gilding ( 2004) ‘I’ve Never Clicked This Much with Anyone in My Life: Trust and Hyperpersonal Communication in Online Friendships’ , New Media & Society6(4): 487-506.
12.
Hinduja, S. and J.W. Patchin ( 2008) ‘Cyberbullying: An Exploratory Analysis of Factors Related to Offending and Victimization’, Deviant Behavior29(2): 129-56.
13.
Keith, S. and M.E. Martin ( 2005) ‘Cyber-bullying: Creating a Culture of Respect in a Cyber World’, Reclaiming Children and Youth13(4): 224-8.
14.
King, J., C. Walpole and K. Lamon ( 2007) ‘Surf and Turf Wars Online: Growing Implications of Internet Gang Violence’, Journal of Adolescent Health41(6): 66-8.
15.
Kowalski, R.M. and S.P. Limber ( 2007) ‘Electronic Bullying among Middle School Students’ , Journal of Adolescent Health4(6): 22-30.
16.
Kowalski, R.M., S.P. Limber and P.W. Agatston ( 2008) Cyberbullying: Bullying in the Digital Age. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
17.
Li, Q. ( 2005) ‘New Bottle but Old Wine: A Research of Cyberbullying in Schools’, Computers in Human Behavior23: 1777-91.
18.
Li, Q. ( 2006) ‘Cyberbullying in Schools: A Research of Gender Differences’, School Psychology International27: 157-70.
19.
Liau, A.K., A. Khoo and P. Hwaang ( 2005) ‘Factors Influencing Adolescents’ Engagement in Risky Internet Behavior’, Cyberpsychology and Behavior8(6): 513-20.
20.
Mesch, G. and I. Talmud ( 2006) ‘Online Friendship Formation, Communication Channels and Social Closeness’, International Journal of Internet Science1(1): 29-44.
21.
Nelson, M. ( 2003) ‘School Bullies Going High Tech’, URL (consulted November 2005): http://canoe.ca/NewsStand/LondonFreePress/2003/09/02/174030
22.
Olweus, D. ( 1993) Bullying at School: What We Know and What We Can Do. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
23.
Patchin, J.W. and S. Hinduja ( 2006) ‘Bullies Move Beyond the Schoolyard: A Preliminary Look at Cyberbullying’, Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice4(2): 148-69.
24.
Raskauskas, J. and A.D. Stoltz ( 2007) ‘Involvement in Traditional and Electronic Bullying among Adolescents’, Developmental Psychology43(3): 564-73.
25.
Schrock, A. and boyd, d. ( 2008) ‘Online Threats to Youth: Solicitation, Harassment and Problematic Content. Literature Review by the Research Advisory Board of the Internet Safety Technical Task Force’,URL (consulted January 2009): http://cyber.law.harward.edu/research/isttf/RAB
26.
Shariff, S. and R. Gouin ( 2006) ‘Cyber-dilemmas: Gendered Hierarchies, Free Expression and Cyber-safety in Schools’, URL (consulted November 2006): www.oii.ox.ac.uk/microsites/cybersafety/extensions/pdfs/papers/shaheen_shariff.pdf
27.
Slonje, R. and P.K. Smith ( 2007) ‘Cyberbullying: Another Main Type of Bullying?’ , Scandinavian Journal of Psychology49(2): 147-54.
28.
Strom, P. and R. Strom ( 2004) ‘Bullied by Mouse’, URL (consulted June 2006): http://www.childresearch.net/RESOURCE/RESEARCH/2004/MEMBER35.HTM
29.
Syts, Y. ( 2004) ‘Beyond the Schoolyard: Examining Electronic Bullying among Canadian Youth’, unpublished master’s thesis, Carleton University.
30.
Topçu, Ç., Ö. Erdur-Baker and Y. Çapa-Aydın ( 2008) ‘Examination of Cyber Bullying Experiences among Turkish Students from Different School Types’, Cyberpsychology and Behavior11(6): 643-8.
31.
Valkenburg, P.M. and K.E. Soeters ( 2001) ‘Children’s Positive and Negative Experiences with the Internet: An Exploratory Survey’, Communication Research28(5): 652-75.
32.
Wolak, J., M.L. Ybarra, K. Mitchell and D. Finkelhor ( 2007) ‘Current Research Knowledge about Adolescent Victimization via the Internet’, Adolescent Medicine18: 325-41.
33.
Ybarra, M. and K. Mitchell ( 2004) ‘Online Aggressor/Targets, Aggressors and Targets: A Comparison of Associated Youth Characteristics’, Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry45(7): 1308-16.
34.
Ybarra, M.L., K.J. Mitchell, J. Wolak and D. Finkelhor ( 2006) ‘Examining Characteristics and Associated Distress Related to Internet Harassment: Finding from the Second Youth Internet Safety Survey’, Pediatrics118(4): 1169-77.
35.
Ybarra, M.L., M. Diener-West and P.J. Leaf ( 2007a) ‘Examining the Overlap in Internet Harassment and School Bullying: Implications for School Intervention’, Journal of Adolescent Health41(6): 42-50.
36.
Ybarra, M., K.J. Mitchell, D. Finkelhor and J. Wolak ( 2007b) ‘Internet Prevention Messages: Targeting the Right Online Behaviors’, Archives of Pediatric Adolescence Medicine161(4): 138-45.
