The study of cybercommunity is inevitably linked to the development of the internet amid other cultural phenomena, and cybercommunity as a cultural practice has clearly reached a point of critical mass. The concept of online community has become increasingly diluted as it evolves into a pastiche of elements that ostensibly ‘signify’ community. This study grapples with the concept of community in cyberspace and suggests alternative ways of characterizing online social relations that avoid the vagaries of ‘community’. Based on interviews and a theoretical consideration of online community, it finds that the metaphor of ‘community’ in cyberspace is one of convenient togetherness without real responsibility. This study suggests a symbolic interactionist approach to the examination of online social relationships that is free of the controversy and structural-functional baggage of the term ‘community’. It suggests that community is an evolving process, and that commitment is the truly desired social ideal in social interaction, whether online or offline.
Barlow, J. P. (1995) ‘Is There a There in Cyberspace?’Utne ReaderMarch-April: 53-56 .
2.
Baym, N. K. (1995) ‘From Practice to Culture on Usenet’, in S. L. Star (ed.) The Cultures of Computing, pp.29-52. Oxford: Blackwell .
3.
Baym, N. K. (1998) ‘The Emergence of On-line Community’ in S. Jones (ed.) Cybersociety 2.0: Revisiting Computer Mediated Communication and Community, pp. 35-68. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage .
4.
Baym, N. K. (2000) Tune in, Log on: Soaps, Fandom, and Online Community. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage .
5.
Bellah, R. , Madsen, R. , Sullivan, W. M. , Swidler, A. , and Tipton, S. M. (1985) Habits of the Heart: Individualism and Commitment in American Life. New York: Harper and Row .
6.
Bender, T. (1978) Community and Social Change in America. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University .
7.
Benedikt, M. (1991) ‘Cyberspace: Some Proposals’, in M. Benedikt (ed.) Cyberspace: First Steps, pp. 119-224. Cambridge, MA: MIT .
8.
Bennis, W. G. and Slater, P. E. (1968) The Temporary Society. New York: Harper and Row .
9.
Blumer, H. (1969) Symbolic Interactionism: Perspective and Method. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall .
10.
Bromberg, H. (1996) ‘Are MUDs Communities? Identity, Belonging and Consciousness in Virtual Worlds’, in R. Shields (ed.) Cultures of internet: Virtual Spaces, Real Histories, Living Bodies, pp. 143-152. London: Sage .
11.
Castells, M. (2001) The internet Galaxy: Reflections on the internet, Business, and Society. NewYork: Oxford .
12.
Chisholm, C. K. (2001) ‘Did Community Die with TheGlobe.com?’E-Commerce Times 14 August, URL (consulted Sept. 2003): http://www.ecommercetimes.com/perl/story/12742.html
13.
Cohen, A. P. (1985) The Symbolic Construction of Community. Chichester: Ellis Horwood .
14.
Cross, D. (2001) ‘Did Community Die with TheGlobe.com?, Response’, URL (consulted Sept 2003): http://www.ecommercetimes.com/perl/board/mboard.pl?board=ecttalkback&thread=1855&id=2216&display=1%23message_2216
15.
Dewey, J. (1927) The Public and Its Problems. New York: Henry Holt .
16.
Doheny-Farina, S. (1996) The Wired Neighborhood. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press .
17.
Donath, J. (1999) ‘Identity and Deception in the Virtual Community’, in M. A. Smith and P. Kollock (eds) Communities in Cyberspace, pp. 29-59. New York: Routledge .
18.
Ess, C. (1996) ‘The Political Computer: Democracy, CMC, and Habermas’, in C. Ess (ed.) Philosophical Perspectives on Computer-Mediated Communication, pp. 197-230. Albany, NY: State University of New York .
19.
Etzioni, A. (1995) ‘Old Chestnuts and New Spurs’, in A. Etzioni (ed.) New Communitarian Thinking: Persons, Virtues, Institutions, and Communities, pp. 16-34. Charlottesville, VA: University Press of Virginia .
20.
Fernback, J. (1997) ‘The Individual within the Collective: Virtual ideology and the Realization of Collective Principles’, in S. Jones (ed.) Virtual Culture: Identity and Communication in Cybersociety. London: Sage .
21.
Gattiker, U. E. , Perlusz, S. , Bohmann, K. and Sorensen, C. M. (2001) ‘The Virtual Community: Building on Social Structure, Relations and Trust to Achieve Value’, in L. Chidambaram and I. Zigurs (eds) Our Virtual World: The Transformation of Work, Play and Life via Technology, pp. 166-190. Hershey, PA: Idea Group .
22.
Glaser, B. and Strauss, A. (1967) The Discovery of Grounded Theory, Chicago: Aldine .
23.
Gurak, L. (1997) Persuasion and Privacy in Cyberspace: The Online Protests Over Lotus Marketplace and the Clipper Chip. New Haven, CT: Yale University .
24.
Hammersley M. and Atkinson P. (1992) Ethnography Principles in Practice, London: Routledge .
25.
Herman-Kinney, N. J. and Verschaeve, J. M. (2003) ‘Methods of Symbolic Interactionism’, in L. T. Reynolds and N. J. Herman-Kinney (eds) Handbook of Symbolic Interactionism, pp. 213-252. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira .
26.
Horrigan, J. , Rainie, L. and Fox, S. (2001) ‘Online Communities: Networks that Nurture Long-distance Relationships and Local Ties’, Pew internet and American Life Project , 31 October, URL (consulted Mar. 2003): http://www.pewinternet.org
27.
Howard, T. (1997) A Rhetoric of Electronic Communities. Greenwich, CT: Ablex .
28.
Jankowski, N. W. (2002) ‘Creating Community with Media: History, Theories and Scientific Investigation’, in L. Lievrouw and S. Livingstone (eds) The Handbook of New Media, pp. 34-49. London: Sage .
29.
Jankowski, N. W. and van Selm, M. (2000) ‘The Promise and Practice of Public Debate in Cyberspace’, in K. L. Hacker and J. van Dijk (eds) Digital Democracy: Issues of Theory and Practice, pp. 149-165. London: Sage .
30.
Jones, S. G. (1995) ‘Understanding Community in the Information Age’, in S. G. Jones (ed.) Cybersociety: Computer-Mediated Communication and Community, pp. 10-35. London: Sage .
31.
Kolko, B. and Reid, E. (1998) ‘Dissolution and Fragmentation: Problems in On-Line Communities’, in S. G. Jones (ed.) Cybersociety 2.0: Revisiting computer-Mediated Communication and Community, pp. 212-229. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage .
32.
Kraut, R. , Patterson, M. , Lundmark, V. , Kiesler, S. , Mukopadhyay, T. and Scherlis, W. (1998) ‘internet Paradox: A Social Technology that Reduces Social Involvement and Psychological Well-being?’American Psychologist, 53(9): 1017-1031 .
33.
Kreiling, A. and Sims, N. (1981) ‘Symbolic Interactionism, Progressive Thought, and Chicago Journalism,’ in J. Soloski (ed) Foundations for Communication Studies, pp. 5-37. Iowa City: Center for Communication Study, University of Iowa .
34.
Miller, S. E. (1996) Civilizing Cyberspace: Policy, Power, and the Information Superhighway. NewYork: ACM .
35.
Musolf, G. R. (2003) ‘The Chicago School’, in L. T. Reynolds and N. J. Herman-Kinney (eds) Handbook of Symbolic Interactionism, pp. 91-117. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira .
36.
Papacharissi, Z. (2002) ‘The Real/Virtual Dichotomy in Online Interaction: A Meta-Analysis of Research on New Media Uses and Consequences’ , paper presented at the International Association of Mass Communication Researchers annual convention, July, Barcelona, Spain.
37.
Patton, M. Q. (1990) Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage .
38.
Reid, E.M. (1991) Electropolis: Communication and Community on internet Relay Chat’, Honours thesis, University of Melbourne.
39.
Rheingold, H. (1993) Virtual Community: Homesteading on the Electronic Frontier. New York: Addison-Wesley .
40.
Robertson, R. (1992). Globalization: Social Theory and Global Culture. London: Sage .
41.
Robins, K. (1999) ‘Against Virtual Community’ , Angelaki: Journal of the Theoretical Humanities4(2): 163-170 .
42.
Scherer, J. (1972) Contemporary Community: Sociological Illusion or Reality?London: Tavistock .
43.
Schuler, D. (1996) New Community Networks: Wired for Change. New York: ACM .
44.
Sennett, R. (1977) The Fall of Public Man. New York: Alfred A. Knopf .
45.
Silver, D. (2000) ‘Cyberspace Under Construction: Design, Discourse, and Diversity in the Blacksburg Electronic Village and the Seattle Community Network’, PhD dissertation, University of Maryland.
46.
Stacey, M. (1974) ‘The Myth of Community Studies’, in C. Bell and H. Newby (eds) The Sociology of Community, pp. 13-26. London: Cass .
47.
Stewart, C. M. and Pileggi, M. S. (forthcoming) ‘Conceptualizing Community: Implications for Policymaking in a Cyberage’, in L. K. Fuller (ed.) Community Media: International Perspectives. New York: Palgrave .
48.
Turkle, S. (1995) Life on the Screen: Identity in the Age of the internet. New York: Simon & Schuster .
49.
Van Dijk, J. (1998) ‘The Reality of Virtual Communities’ , Trends in Communication1(1): 39-63 .
50.
Vidich, A. J. and Lyman, S. M. (1994) ‘Qualitative Methods: Their History in Sociology and Anthropology’, in N. K. Denzin and Y. S. Lincoln (eds) Handbook of Qualitative Research, pp. 23-59. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage .
51.
Watson, N. (1997) ‘Why We Argue About Virtual Community: A Case Study of the phish. net Fan Community’, in S. G. Jones (ed.) Virtual Culture: Identity and Communication in Cybersociety, pp. 102-132. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage .
52.
Wellman, B. (1997) ‘An Electronic Group is Virtually a Social Network’, in S. Kiesler (ed.) Culture of the internet, pp. 179-205. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates .
53.
Wellman, B. (2002) ‘Little Boxes, Glocalization, and Networked Individualism’, Center for Urban & Community Studies, University of Toronto , URL (consulted Jan. 2003): http://www.chass.utoronto.ca/%7Ewellman/publications/littleboxes/littlebox.pdf
54.
Wellman, B. and Gulia, M. (1999) ‘Virtual Communities as Communities: Net Surfers Don’t Ride Alone’, in M. A. Smith and P. Kollock (eds) Communities in Cyberspace, pp. 167-194. New York: Routledge .
55.
Wellman, B. , Salaff, J. , Dimitrova, D. , Garton, L. , Gulia, M. and Haythornthwaite, C. (1996) ‘Computer Networks as Social Networks: Collaborative Work, Telework, and Virtual Community’ , Annual Review of Sociology22: 213-238 .
56.
Whittle, D. B. (1997) Cyberspace: The Human Dimension. New York: W.H. Freeman and Company .
