Juxtaposing symbolic interactionist and postmodern interpretations of cyberself-ing, I bring data to bear on the tensions between these two theoretical stances. I argue that postmodernist accounts are no longer tenable; such studies were based on multi-user domains (MUDs), but generalized to cyberspace. I examine the evolving internet population, which has reached a critical mass of the American population, to demonstrate that MUD users no longer constitute the majority of users. After substantiating this shift in the user base, I elucidate evidence that corroborates the countervailing thesis of ‘socialized’ online selves. I argue that using a symbolic interactionist perspective to frame the cyberself-ing project allows us to understand the creation of the cyber ‘I,’‘me,’ and digital ‘generalized other,’ as well as the dynamics of interactional cuing online.
Andersen, W. (1997) The Future of the Self: Inventing the Postmodern Person. New York: Penguin Putnam .
2.
Balsamo, A. (2000) ‘The Virtual Body in Cyberspace’, in D. Bell and B. Kennedy, B. (eds) The Cybercultures Reader, pp. 489-503. London: Routledge .
3.
Chen, N. (1998) ‘Is that How You Look: Body-Image, Beauty Standards, and the Creation of Online Bodies’, PhD prospectus, UCLA Department of Sociology .
4.
Clark, N. (1995) ‘Rear-View Mirrorshades: The Recursive Generation of the Cyberbody’, in M. Featherstone and R. Burrows (eds) Cyberspace, Cyberbodies, Cyberpunk: Cultures of Technological Embodiment, pp. 113-134. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage .
5.
Cooley, C. H. (1902) Human Nature and the Social Order. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction .
6.
Curtis, P. (1993) ‘Mudding: Social Phenomena in Text-Based Virtual Realities’, URL (consulted Oct. 2004): http://www.eff.org/Net_culture/MOO_MUD_IRC/curtis_mudding.article
7.
Donath, J. (1999) ‘Identity and Deception in a Virtual Community’, in M. Smith and P. Kollock (eds) Communities in Cyberspace, pp. 29-59. London: Routledge .
8.
Fine, G. (1983) Shared Fantasy: Role Playing Games as Social Worlds. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press .
9.
Fine, G. (1993) ‘The Sad Demise, Mysterious Disappearance, and Glorious Triumph of Symbolic Interactionism’ , Annual Review of Sociology19: 61-87 .
10.
Gergen, K. (1991) The Saturated Self. New York: Basic Books .
11.
Gibson, W. (1984) Neuromancer. New York: Ace Publishing .
12.
Goffman, E. (1959) The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York: Anchor Books .
13.
Halbert, C. (2000) ‘The Presentation of the Self in Computer Mediated Communications: Managing and Challenging Gender Identity’, PhD Dissertation, University of Kentucky.
14.
Hillis, K. (1999) Digital Sensations. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press .
15.
Hoffman, D , and Novak, T. (1995) ‘internet Use in the United States: 1995 Baseline Estimates and Preliminary Market Segments’, Project 2000 Working Paper, URL (Consulted Dec. 1998): www2000.ogsm.vanderbilt.edu/baseline/1995.internet.estimates.html
16.
Holstein, J. and Gubrium, J. (2000) The Self We Live By: Narrative Identity in a Postmodern World. New York: Oxford University Press .
17.
Jauréguiberry, F. (2000) ‘Le Moi, le soi et internet’ , Sociologie et Sociétés32(2): 135-151 .
18.
Kendall, L. (1996) ‘MUDder, I Hardly Knew er’, in L. Cherny and R. Weise (eds) Wired Women, pp. 207-223. Seattle, WA: Seal Press .
19.
Kolko, B. and Reid, E. (1998) ‘Dissolution and Fragmentation: Problems in Online Communities’, in S. Jones (ed.) Cybersociety 2.0: Revisiting Computer-Mediated Communication and Community, pp. 212-230. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage .
20.
Lemert, C. and Branaman, A. (1997) The Goffman Reader. Malden, MA: Blackwell .
21.
Lenhart, A. and Horrigan, J. (2003) ‘Re-Visualizing the Digital Divide as a Digital Spectrum’ , IT & Society1(5): 23-39 .
22.
Lupton, D. (1995) ‘The Embodied Computer/User’, in M. Featherstone and R. Burrows (eds) Cyberspace, Cyberbodies, Cyberpunk: Cultures of Technological Embodiment, pp. 97-112. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage .
23.
Mead, G. H. (1934) Mind, Self, and Society. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press .
24.
Miller, H. (1995) ‘The Presentation of Self in Electronic Life: Goffman on the Internet’, URL (consulted May 2001): http//:www.ntu.ac.uk/soc/psych/miller/goffman.htm
25.
Nakamura, L. (2000) ‘Race In/For Cyberspace’, in D. Bell and B. Kennedy (eds) The Cybercultures Reader, pp. 712-721. London: Routledge .
26.
O’Brien, J. (1999) ‘Writing the Body: Gender Reproduction in Online Interaction’, in M. Smith and P. Kollock (eds) Communities in Cyberspace, pp. 29-59. London: Routledge .
27.
Rainie, H. L. (2004) ‘Forward’, in P. N. Howard and S. Jones (eds) Society Online: The internet in Context, pp. xi-xiv. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
28.
Rosenau, P. M. (1992) Postmodernism and the Social Sciences. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press .
29.
Stone, A. R. (1995) The War of Desire and Technology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press .
30.
The UCLA internet Report (2000) ‘Surveying the Digital Future’, UCLA Center for Communication Policy , URL (consulted Oct. 2004): http://www.digitalcenter.org/pdf/internetReportYearOne.pdf
31.
The UCLA internet Report (2001) ‘The UCLA internet Report 2001 Surveying the Digital Future Year Two’, UCLA Center for Communication Policy , URL (consulted Oct. 2004): http://www.digitalcenter.org/pdf/internetReportYearTwo.pdf
32.
The UCLA internet Report (2002) ‘The UCLA internet Report Surveying the Digital Future Year Three’, UCLA Center for Communication Policy , URL (consulted Oct. 2004): http://www.digitalcenter.org/pdf/internetReportYearThree.pdf
33.
The UCLA internet Report (2004) ‘The Digital Future Report Surveying the Digital Future Year Four’, USC Annenberg School Center for the Digital Future , URL (consulted Oct. 2004): http://www.digitalcenter.org/downloads/DigitalFutureReport-Year4-2004.pdf
34.
Turkle, S. (1995) Life on the Screen: Identity in the Age of the internet. New York: Simon and Schuster .
35.
Wertheim, M. (1999) The Pearly Gates of Cyberspace: A History of Space from Dante to the internet. New York: Norton .
36.
Wynn, E. and Katz, J. (1997) ‘Hyperbole over Cyberspace: Self-presentation and Social Boundaries in internet Home Pages and Discourse’ , The Information Society: an International Journal13(4): 297-328 .
