Arms, W., R. Adkins, C. Ammen and A. Hayes (2001) ‘Collecting and Preserving the Web: the MINERVA Prototype’ , RLG DigiNews, 15 April, 5(2), URL (consulted August 2003): http://www.rlg.org/preserv/diginews/diginews5-2.html
2.
Baym, N. (1999) Tune in, Log On: Soaps, Fandom and On-line Community. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage .
3.
Beaulieu, A. and H.W. Park (eds) (2003) ‘Special Issue: Internet Networks: the Form and the Feel’ , Journal of Computer-mediated Communication8(4), available online: http://www.ascusc.org/jcmc/vol8/issue4.
4.
Benoit, W.J. and P.J. Benoit (2000) ‘The Virtual Campaign: Presidential Primary Websites in Campaign 2000’ , American Communication Journal3(3), available online: http://acjournal.org/holdings/vol3/Iss3/curtain.html#4
5.
Berners-Lee, T. (2000) Weaving the Web: the Original Design and Ultimate Destiny of the World Wide Web. New York: HarperCollins .
6.
Burbules, N.C. and T.A. Callister (2000) Watch IT: the Risks and Promises of Information Technologies for Education. Boulder, CO: Westview Press .
7.
Crowston, K. and M. Williams (2000) ‘Reproduced and Emergent Genres of Communication on the World Wide Web’ , The Information Society16(3): 201–215 .
8.
D’Alessio, D. (1997) ‘Use of the World Wide Web in the 1996 US Election’ , Electoral Studies16(4): 489–500 .
9.
D’Alessio, D. (2000) ‘Adoption of the World Wide Web by American Political Candidates, 1996–1998’ , Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media44(4): 556–568 .
10.
Foot, K.A. and S.M. Schneider (2002) ‘Online Action in Campaign 2000: an Exploratory Analysis of the U.S. Political Web Sphere’ , Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media46(2): 222–244 .
11.
Foot, K.A., S.M. Schneider, M. Dougherty, M. Xenos and E. Larsen (2003) ‘Analyzing Linking Practices: Candidate Sites in the 2002 U.S. Electoral Web Sphere’ , Journal of Computer-mediated Communication8(4), available online: http://www.ascusc.org/jcmc/vol8/issue4/foot.html
12.
Gauntlett, D. (ed.) (2000) Web studies: Rewiring Media Studies for the Digital Age. New York: Oxford University Press .
13.
Hakken, D. (1999) Cyborgs@Cyberspace? An Ethnographer Looks Into the Future. London: Routledge .
14.
Hansen, G. (2000) ‘Internet Presidential Campaigning: the Influences of Candidate Internet Sites on the 2000 Elections’ , paper presented at the National Communication Association, Seattle, WA, November.
15.
Hecht, M.L., S.R. Corman and M. Miller-Rassulo (1993) ‘An Evaluation of the Drug Resistance Project: a Comparison of Film Versus Live Performance Media’ , Health Communication5(2): 75–88 .
16.
Hine, C. (2000) Virtual Ethnography. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage .
17.
Howard, P. (2002) ‘Network Ethnography and Hypermedia Organization: New Organizations, New Media, New Myths’ , New Media & Society4(4): 550–574 .
18.
Howard, P.N. and S. Jones (eds) (2003) Society Online: the Internet in Context. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage .
19.
Iyengar, S. (2002) ‘Experimental Designs for Political Communication Research: from Shopping Malls to the Internet’ , paper presented at Workshop in Mass Media Economics, Department of Political Science, London School of Economics, 25–26 June, available at: http://pcl.stanford.edu/common/docs/research/iyengar/2002/expdes2002.pdf.
20.
Jackson, M. (1997) ‘Assessing the Structure of the Communication on the World Wide Web’ , Journal of Computer-mediated Communication3(1), available online: http://www.ascusc.org/jcmc/vol3/issue1/jackson.html
21.
Jones, S. (ed.) (1999) Doing Internet Research: Critical Issues and Methods for Examining the Net. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage .
22.
Kahle, B. (1997) ‘Preserving the Internet’ , Scientific American276(3): 82–83 .
23.
Lindlof, T.R. and M.J. Shatzer (1998) ‘Media Ethnography in Virtual Space: Strategies, Limits, and Possibilities’ , Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media42(2): 170–189 .
Lyman, P. and B. Kahle (1998) ‘Archiving Digital Cultural Artifacts: Organizing an Agenda for Action’, D-Lib Magazine, URL (consulted August 2003): http://www.dlib.org/dlib/july98/07lyman.html
26.
McMillan, S.J. (1999) ‘Health Communication and the Internet: Relationships Between Interactive Characteristics of the Medium and Site Creators, Content, and Purpose’ , Health Communication11(4): 375–390 .
27.
Mann, C. and F. Stewart (2000) Internet Communication and Qualitative Research Online: a Handbook for Researching Online. London: Sage .
28.
Markham, A.N. (1998) Life Online: Researching Real Experience in Virtual Space. Walnut Creek, CA: Altamira Press .
29.
Mitra, A. (1999) ‘Characteristics of the WWW Text: Tracing Discursive Strategies’ , Journal of Computer-mediated Communication5(1), available online: http://www.ascusc.org/jcmc/vol5/issue1/mitra.html.
30.
Mitra, A. and E. Cohen (1999) ‘Analyzing the Web: Directions and Challenges’, in S. Jones (ed.) Doing Internet Research: Critical Issues and Methods for Examining the Net, pp. 179–202. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage .
Park, H.W. and M. Thelwall (2003) ‘Hyperlink Analyses of the World Wide Web: a Review’ , Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication8(4), available online: http://www.ascusc.org/jcmc/vol8/issue4/park.html
35.
Price, V. and J.N. Capella (2001) ‘Online Deliberation and its Influence: the Electronic Dialogue Project in Campaign 2000’ , paper presented at the American Assocation for Public Opinion Research, May, Canada.
36.
Rogers, R. and N. Marres (2000) ‘Landscaping Climate Change: a Mapping Technique for Understanding Science and Technology Debates on the World Wide Web’ , Public Understanding of Science9(2): 141–163 .
37.
Rogers, R. and N. Marres (2002) ‘French Scandals on the Web, and on the Streets: a Small Experiment in Stretching the Limits of Reported Reality’ , Asian Journal of Social Science30(2): 339–353 .
38.
Schmidt, W.C. (1997) ‘World Wide Web Survey Research: Benefits, Potential Problems, and Solutions’ , Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers29(2): 274–279 .
39.
Schneider, S. M. and K.A. Foot (2002) ‘Online Structure for Political Action: Exploring Presidential Web Sites from the 2000 American Election’ , Javnost (The Public)9(2): 43–60 .
40.
Schneider, S.M. and K.A. Foot (2003) ‘Crisis Communication and New Media: the Web After September 11’, in P.N. Howard and S. Jones (eds) Society Online: the Internet in Context, pp. 137–154. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage .
41.
Sillaman, L. (2000) ‘The Digital Campaign Trail: Candidate Images on Campaign Websites’, master’s thesis, Annenberg School for Communication, University of Pennsylvania.
Stowkowski, P.A. (2002) ‘Languages of Place and Discourses of Power: Constructing New Senses of Place’ , Journal of Leisure Research34(4): 368–382 .
44.
Stromer-Galley, J. and K.A. Foot (2002) ‘Citizen Perceptions of Online Interactivity and Implications for Political Campaign Communication’ , Journal of Computer-mediated Communication8(1), available online: http://www.ascusc.org/jcmc/vol8/issue1/stromerandfoot.html
45.
Warnick, B. (1998) ‘Appearance or Reality? Political Parody on the Web in Campaign ’96’ , Critical Studies on Mass Communication15(3): 306–324 .
46.
Warnick, B. (2001) Critical Literacy in a Digital Era: Technology, Rhetoric, and the Public Sphere. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates .
47.
Witte, J., L. Amoroso and P.N. Howard (2000) ‘Method and Representation in Internetbased Survey Tools: Mobility, Community, and Cultural Identity in Survey 2000’ , Social Science Computer Review18(2): 179–195 .
48.
Yun, G.W. and C. Trumbo (2000) ‘Comparative Response to a Survey Executed by Post, E-mail and Web Form’ , Journal of Computer-mediated Communication6(1), available online: http://www.ascusc.org/jcmc/vol6/issue1/yun.html