This article explores the reasons why internet researchers should contemplate their responsibility for encountering distressing disclosure in the course of their online research. `Distressing' disclosure refers specifically to information that indicates an online communicant is considering harming him/herself or another/others (e.g. online users' announcements of suicide intentions, threats to kill another person, etc). Given both the nature of online communication and research, those who study internet users and communities may find themselves particularly likely to come across distressing information in their research. Using personal homepages as a case in point, this article inquires: are researchers legally accountable for reacting in some way to the distressing online self-disclosure of those they study? Absent a legal responsibility, do researchers have any ethical or moral obligation to intervene? If an ethical responsibility does suggest itself, what are the barriers to intervention? Finally, how might online researchers prepare themselves for their encounters with distressing self-disclosure?
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Appelbaum, P. and A. Rosenbaum (1989) `Tarasoff and the Researcher: Does the Duty to Protect Apply in the Research Setting?' , American Psychologist44(6): 885-894 .
2.
Appleby, G. (2001) `Interviewing Working-Class Gay Men Over the Internet' , Journal of Gay and Lesbian Social Services: Issues in Practice, Policy and Research12(3-4): 133-151 .
3.
Basch, R. (1998) `Ring Around the Web' , Computer Life4(1): 62-64 .
4.
Baume, P., C. Cantor and A. Rolfe (1997) `Cybersuicide: the Role of Interactive Suicide Notes on the Internet' , Crisis18(2): 73-79 .
5.
Baume, P., A. Rolfe and M. Clinton (1998) `Suicide on the Internet: A Focus For Urging Intervention' , Australian and New Zealand Journal of Mental Health Nursing7(4): 131-141 .
6.
Bloom, J. (1998) `The Ethical Practice of WebCounseling' , British Journal of Guidance and Counseling26(1): 53-59 .
7.
Bromberg, H. (1996) `Are MUDS Communities? Identity, Belonging, and Consciousness in Virtual Worlds', in R. Shields (ed.), Cultures of Internet: Virtual Spaces, Real Histories, Living Bodies, pp. 143-152. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage .
8.
Chandler, D. (1998) `Personal Homepages and the Construction of Identities on the Web', URL (consulted 21 July 1999): http://www.aber.ac.uk/dgc/webident.html
9.
Childress, C. and J. Asamen (1998) `The Emerging Relationship of Psychology and the Internet: Proposed Guidelines for Conducting Internet Intervention Research' , Ethics and Behavior8(1): 19-35 .
10.
Collins, P. (2000) `Eating Disorders: A Multiple-Case Investigation of the Internet E-mail Correspondence of Women's Lived Experience' , Dissertation Abstracts International60, 11A (UMI No. AAI9951513).
11.
Dickson, D. (1998) Confidentiality and Privacy in Social Work. New York: Free Press .
12.
Ess, C. and Association of Internet Researchers (2002) `Ethical Decision-making and Internet Research: Recommendations from the AOIR Ethics Working Committee', URL (consulted 25 November 2002): http://www.aoir.org/reports/ethics.pdf
13.
Fleitas, J. (1998) `Spinning Tales from the World Wide Web: Qualitative Research in an Electronic Environment' , Qualitative Health Research8(2): 283-292 .
14.
Frankel, M. and S. Siang (1999) `Ethical and Legal Aspects of Human Subjects Research on the Internet: A Report of a Workshop', American Association for the Advancement of Science, URL (consulted 1 February 2002): http://www.aaas.org/spp/dspp/sfrl/projects/intres/main.htm
15.
Giese, M. and B. Kaufman (1998) `Being There: Using Ethnographic Methodology in the Study of Electronic Communities' , unpublished paper presented at the annual conference of the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication, Baltimore, MD, August (on file with author).
King, S.A. (1996) `Researching Internet Communities: Proposed Ethical Guidelines for the Reporting of Results' , The Information Society12(2): 119-127 .
20.
Leider, S. (1999) `Sexual Minorities on Community College Campuses', Salt Lake, UT, Salt Lake City Community College (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 427796).
21.
Lindlof, T. and M. Shatzer (1998) `Media Ethnography in Virtual Spaces: Strategies, Limits and Possibilities' , Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media42(2): 170-190 .
22.
Mann, C. and F. Stewart (2000) `An Ethical Framework', in C. Mann and F. Stewart (eds), Internet Communication and Qualitative Research, pp. 39-63. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage .
23.
Miller, J. and K. Gergen (1998) `Life on the Line: The Therapeutic Potentials of Computer-Mediated Communication' , Journal of Marital and Family Therapy24(2): 189-202 .
24.
Murray, C. and J. Sixsmith (1998) `E-mail: A Qualitative Research Medium for Interviewing?' , International Journal of Social Research Methodology1(2): 103-121 .
25.
National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research (1979) `The Belmont Report: Ethical Principles and Guidelines for the Protection of Human Subjects of Online Research', URL (consulted 25 March 2002): http://ohrp.osophs.dhhs.gov/humansubjects/guidance/belmont.htm
Paccagnella, L. (1997) `Getting the Seats of Your Pants Dirty: A Methodology for Ethnographic Research on Virtual Communities' , Journal of Computer Mediated Communication3(1), URL (consulted 5 March 2002): http://www.ascusc.org/jcmc/vol3/issue1/paccagnella.html
28.
Pennebaker, J. (1990) Opening Up: The Healing Power of Expressing Emotions. New York: Guilford .
29.
Reid, E. (1996) `Informed Consent in the Study of On-line Communities: A Reflection on the Effects of Computer-Mediated Social Research' , The Information Society12(2): 169-174 .
30.
Richard, J., J. Werth and J. Rogers (2000) `Rational and Assisted Suicidal Communication on the Internet: A Case Example and Discussion of Ethical and Practice Issues' , Ethics and Behavior10(3): 215-238 .
31.
Riva, G. (2001) `The Mind Over the Web: The Quest for the Definition of a Method for Internet Research' , Cyberpsychology and Behavior4(1): 7-16 .
32.
Sales, B. and D. Shuman (1996) Law, Mental Health, and Mental Disorder. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole .
33.
Smith, M. and B. Leigh (1997) `Virtual Subjects: Using the Internet as an Alternative Source of Subjects and Research Environment' , Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers29(4): 496-505 .
34.
Sosin, D. (1983) `The Diary as a Transitional Object in Female Adolescent Development' , Adolescent Psychiatry11: 92-103 .
35.
Stern, S.R. (1999) `Adolescent Girls' Expression on WWW Homepages: A Qualitative Analysis' , Convergence5(4): 22-41 .
36.
Stern, S.R. (2002a) `Sexual Selves on the World Wide Web: Adolescent Girls' Homepages as Sites for Sexual Self-Expression', in J. Brown, J. Steele and K. Walsh-Childers (eds), Sexual Teens/Sexual Media: Investigating Media's Influence on Adolescent Sexuality, pp. 265-286. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum .
37.
Stern, S.R. (2002b) `Virtually Speaking: Girls' Self-disclosure On the WWW' , Women's Studies in Communication25(2): 223-253 .
38.
Thompson, S. (1999) `The Internet and its Potential Influence on Suicide' , Psychiatric Bulletin23(8): 449-451 .
39.
Tiles, M. and H. Oberdiek (1995) Living in a Technological Culture. New York: Routledge .
40.
Tobin, J. (1998) `An American Otaku (Or a Boy's Virtual Life on the Net)', in J. Sefton-Green (ed.), Digital Diversions: Youth Culture in the Age of Multimedia, pp. 106-127. London: OCL Press .
41.
Turkle, S. (1995) Life on the Screen: Identity in the Age of the Internet. New York: Simon and Schuster .
42.
Waskul, D. and M. Douglass (1996) `Considering the Electronic Participant: Some Polemical Observations on the Ethics of On-line Research' , The Information Society12(2): 129-139 .
43.
Yeaworth, R. (2001) `Use of the Internet in Survey Research' , Journal of Professional Nursing17(4): 187-193 .
44.
Zhang, Y. (2000) `Using the Internet for Survey Research: A Case Study' , Journal of the American Society for Information Science51(1): 57-68 .
