When members of an online, distributed learning community revealed that understanding local patterns of communication purpose and form was key to learning how to operate in this environment, we turned to writers on genre and persistent conversation for help in understanding the basis of this community. We derive from genre literature the idea that radicals, that is root characteristics, of presentation exist in computer-mediated environments and define important aspects of conversation via such media. We propose three radicals of presentation that revolve around speaker-audience relations and identify areas of concern for communicators engaging in persistent, online conversations: visibility, addressing primarily speakers’ concerns with the means, methods and opportunites for self-presentation; relation, addressing the speaker’s concerns with the range and identity of the audience, and audience members’ concerns about relations with each other; and co-presence, addressing concerns relating to the temporal, virtual, and/or physical co-presence of speaking and listening participants.
Bakhtin, M.M. (1981/1975) The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays. ed. by M. Holquist.Austin: University of Texas Press.
2.
Bakhtin, M.M. (1986/1953) ‘The Problem of Speech Genres’, in C. Emerson and M. Holquist (eds) Speech Genres and Other Late Essays, pp. 60-102. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
3.
Baym, N.K. (1995) ‘From Practice to Culture on Usenet’, in S.L. Star (ed.) The Cultures of Computing, pp. 29-52. Oxford: Blackwell.
4.
Cherny, L. (1999) Conversation and Community: Chat in a Virtual World. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
5.
Clark, H.H. (1996) Using Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
6.
Clark, H.H. and S.E. Brennan (1991) ‘Grounding in Communication’, in L.B. Resnick, J.M. Levine and S.D. Teasley (eds) Perspectives on Socially Shared Cognition, pp. 127-149. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
7.
Cogdill, S. , T. Fanderclai, J. Kilborn and M. Williams (2001) ‘Backchannel: Whispering in Digital Conversation’, Proceedings of the 34th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society.
8.
Contractor N. , D. Zink and M. Chan (1998) ‘IKNOW: A Tool to Assist and Study the Creation, Maintenance and Dissolution of Knowledge Networks’, in Toru Ishida (ed.) Community Computing and Support Systems, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 1519, pp. 201-217. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
9.
Daft, R.L. and R. Lengel (1986) ‘Organizational Information Requirements, Media Richness, and Structural Design’, Management Science32: 554-571.
10.
DeSanctis, G. and M.S. Poole (1994) ‘Capturing the Complexity in Advanced Technology Use: Adaptive Structuration Theory’, Organization Science5(2): 121-147.
11.
Erickson, T. (1999a) ‘Rhyme and Punishment: The Creation and Enforcement of Conventions in an On-Line Participatory Limerick Genre’, Proceedings of the 32nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society Press.
12.
Erickson, T. (1999b) ‘Persistent Conversation: An introduction’, Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication4(4), URL (consulted July 2002): http://www.ascusc.org/jcmc/vol4/issue4/ericksonintro.html
13.
Erickson, T. and S. Herring (eds) (2000) ‘Persistent Conversation: Perspectives from Research and Design’, Proceedings of the 35th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society Press.
14.
Erickson, T. , S. Herring and W. Sack (2002) ‘Discourse Architectures: Designing and Visualizing Computer Mediated Conversation’, URL (consulted July 2002): http://www.pliant.org/personal/Tom_Erickson/DA_CHI02_WrkShp_Sum.html
15.
Frye, N. (1969/1957) Anatomy of Criticism: Four Essays. New York: Athanaeum.
16.
Gaver, W. (1996) ‘Situating Action II: Affordances for Interaction: The Social is Material for Design’, Ecological Psychology8(2): 111-129.
17.
Geisler, C. , E.H. Rogers and J. Tobin (1999) ‘Going Public: Collaborative System Design for Multidisciplinary Conversation’, in N.A. Streitz, J. Siegel, V. Hartkopf and S. Konomi (eds) Cooperative Buildings: Integrating Information, Organizations and Architecture, pp. 89-100. Berlin: Springer.
18.
Granovetter, M.S. (1973) ‘The Strength of Weak Ties’, American Journal of Sociology78(6): 1360-1380.
19.
Haythornthwaite, C. (2000) ‘Online Personal Networks: Size, Composition and Media Use Among Distance Learners’, New Media & Society2(2): 195-226.
20.
Haythornthwaite, C. (2001) ‘Exploring Multiplexity: Social Network Structures in a Computer-Supported Distance Learning Class’, The Information Society17(3): 211-226.
21.
Haythornthwaite, C. and M.M. Kazmer (2002) ‘Bringing the Internet home: Adult Distance Learners and their Internet, Home and Work Worlds’, in B. Wellman and C. Haythornthwaite (eds) The Internet in Everyday Life, pp. 431-463. Oxford: Blackwell.
22.
Haythornthwaite, C. , M.M. Kazmer, J. Robins and S. Shoemaker (2000) ‘Community Development Among Distance Learners: Temporal and Technological Dimensions’, Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication6(1), URL (consulted July 2002): http://www.ascusc.org/jcmc/vol6/issue1/haythornthwaite.html
23.
Heeter, C. (1992) ‘Being There: The Subjective Experience of Presence’, Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments1(2): 262-271.
24.
Herring, S. (1999) ‘Interactional Coherence in CMC’, Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication4(4), URL (consulted July 2002): http://www.ascusc.org/jcmc/vol4/issue4/herring.html
25.
Jones, S.G. (ed.) (1995) CyberSociety: Computer-Mediated Communication and Community. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
26.
Kazmer, M.M. and C. Haythornthwaite (2001) ‘Juggling Multiple Social Worlds: Distance Students On and Offline’, American Behavioral Scientist45(3): 510-529.
27.
Kazmer, M.M. (2000) ‘Coping in a Distance Environment: Sitcoms, Chocolate Cake, and Dinner with a Friend’, First Monday5(9), URL (consulted July 2002): http://www.firstmonday.dk/issues/issue5_9/kazmer/index.html
28.
Lombard, M. and T. Ditton (1997) ‘At the Heart of it All: The Concept of Presence’, Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication3(2), URL (consulted July 2002): http://www.ascusc.org/jcmc/vol3/issue2/lombard.html.
29.
Marsden, P.V. and K.E. Campbell (1984) ‘Measuring Tie Strength’, Social Forces63(2): 482-501.
30.
Miller, C. (1984) ‘Genre as Social Action’, Quarterly Journal of Speech70(2): 151-167.
31.
Miller, C. (1994) ‘Rhetorical Community: The Cultural Basis of Genre’, in A. Freedman and P. Medway (eds) Genre and the New Rhetoric, pp. 67-78. Basingstoke: Taylor and Francis.
32.
Nardi, B. , S. Whittaker, E. Isaacs, M. Creech, J. Johnson and J. Hainsworth (2002) ‘Integrating Communication and Information Through ContactMap’, Communications of the ACM45(4): 89-95.
33.
Orlikowski, W. and J. Yates (1994) ‘Genre Repertoire: The Structuring of Communicative Practices in Organizations’, Administrative Science Quarterly39(4): 541-574.
34.
Orlikowski, W.J. , J. Yates, K. Okamura and M. Fujimoto (1995) ‘Shaping Electronic Communication: The Metastructuring of Technology in the Context of Use’, Organization Science6(4): 423-444.
35.
Rafaeli, S. and F. Sudweeks (1998) ‘Interactivity on the Nets’, in F. Sudweeks, M. McLaughlin and S. Rafaeli (eds) Network & Netplay: Virtual Groups on the Internet, pp. 173-189. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
36.
Rheingold, H. (2000) The Virtual Community: Homesteading on the Electronic Frontier (2nd edn). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
37.
Robins, J. (2002) ‘Affording a Place: The Role of Persistent Structures in Social Navigation’. Information Research7(3), URL (consulted July 2002): http://informationr.net/ir/7-3/paper131.html.
38.
Short, J. , E. Williams and B. Christie (1976) The Social Psychology of Telecommunications. London: John Wiley.
39.
Smith, M.A. and P. Kollock (eds) (1999) Communities in Cyberspace. London: Routledge.
40.
Smith, C.B. , M.L. McLaughlin and K.K. Osborne (1996) ‘From Terminal Ineptitude to Virtual Sociopathy: Conduct Control on Usenet’, Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication2(4), URL (consulted July 2002): http:/www.ascusc.org/jcmc/vol2/issue4/smith.html.
41.
Sproull, L. and S. Kiesler (1991) Connections: New Ways of Working in the Networked Organization. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
42.
Strauss, A. and J. Corbin (1990) Basics of Qualitative Research Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
43.
Swales, J.M. (1990) Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
44.
Wellman, B. (1999) ‘The Network Community: An Introduction to Networks in the Global Village’, in B. Wellman (ed.) Networks in the Global Village, pp. 1-48. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
45.
Whittaker, S. , Q. Jones and L. Terveen (2002) ‘Managing Long Term Communications: Conversation and Contact Management’, Proceedings of the 35th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society.
46.
Witmer, B.G. and M.J. Singer (1998) ‘Measuring Presence in Virtual Environments: A Presence Questionnaire’, Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments7(3): 225-240.
47.
Yates, J. and W.J. Orlikowski (1992) ‘Genres of Organizational Communication: A Structurational Approach to Studying Communication and Media’, Academy of Management Journal17(2): 299-326.
48.
Yates, J. , W.J. Orlikowski and K. Okamura (1999) ‘Explicit and Implicit Structuring of Genres in Electronic Communication: Reinforcement and Change in Social Interaction’, Organization Science10(1): 83-103.
