Existing communication models and definitions of interactivity provide both background and structure for a new model of cyber-interactivity that is introduced and explored in this article. Two primary dimensions, direction of communication and level of receiver control over the communication process, provide the primary framework for this new model of computer-mediated cyber-interactivity. A study designed to explore the applicability of this model analyzed 108 health-related websites using both perception-based and feature-based measures of these two dimensions. No significant correlation was found between the perception-based and feature-based models. The perception-based model was a better predictor of attitude toward the website and perceived relevance of the subject of the website than the feature-based model. However, the feature-based model may hold greater promise as a tool for website developers who seek to incorporate appropriate levels of interactivity in their websites.
Aldersey-Williams, H. (1996) ‘Interactivity with a Human Face’, Technology Review99(2): 34-39.
2.
Barak, A. and W.A. Fisher (1997) ‘Effects of Interactive Computer Erotica on Men’s Attitudes and Behavior Toward Women: An Experimental Study’, Computers in Human Behavior13(3): 353-369.
3.
Barnouw, E. (1966) A Tower in Babel. New York: Oxford University Press.
4.
Bezjian-Avery, A., B. Calder and D. Iacobucci (1998) ‘New Media Interactive Advertising vs. Traditional Advertising’, Journal of Advertising Research38(4): 23-32.
5.
Blattberg, R.C. and J. Deighton (1991) ‘Interactive Marketing: Exploiting the Age of Addressability’, Sloan Management Review32(1): 5-14.
6.
Borden, D.L. and K. Harvey (1998) The Electronic Grapevine: Rumor, Reputation, and Reporting in the New Online Environment. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
7.
Bordewijk, J.L. and B. van Kaam (1986) ‘Towards a New Classification of Tele-Information Services’, InterMedia14(1): 16-21.
8.
Bretz, R. (1983) Media for Interactive Communication. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
9.
Chesebro, J.W. (1985) ‘Computer Mediated Interpersonal Communication’, in B.D. Ruben (ed.) Information and Behavior Vol. 1, pp. 202-222. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.
10.
Chesebro, J.W. and D.G. Bonsall (1989) Computer Mediated Communication: Human Relationships in a Computerized World. Tuscaloosa, AL: University of Alabama Press.
11.
Cooley, T. (1999) ‘Interactive Communication - Public Relations on the Web’, Public Relations Quarterly44(2): 41-42.
12.
D’Ambra, J. and R.E. Rice (1994) ‘Multimedia Approaches for the Study of Computer-Mediated Communication, Equivocality, and Media Selection’, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication37(4): 231-239.
13.
Duncan, S. Jr (1989) ‘Interaction, Face-to-face’, International Encyclopedia of Communications, pp. 325-327. New York: Oxford University Press.
14.
Durlak, J.T. (1987) ‘A Typology for Interactive Media’, in M.L. McLaughlin (ed.) Communication Yearbook 10, pp. 743-757. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
15.
Fidler, R. (1997) Mediamorphosis: Understanding New Media. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
16.
Finn, T.A. (1998) ‘A Conceptual Framework for Organizing Communication and Information Systems’, paper presented at the International Communication Association Conference, Jerusalem, Israel, July.
17.
Fisher, L.M. (1996) ‘Health Online: Doctor is in, and His Disk is Full’, New York Times, 24 June, p. 1.
18.
Fredin, E.S. (1997) ‘Rethinking the News Story for the Internet: Hyperstory Prototypes and a Model of the User’, Journalism Monographs163: 1-48
19.
Garramone, G.M., A.C. Harris and G. Pizante (1986) ‘Predictors of Motivation to Use Computer-Mediated Political Communication Systems’, Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media30(4): 445-457.
20.
Gibson, W. (1984) Neuromancer. New York: Ace.
21.
Grunig, J.E. and D.M. Dozier (1992) Excellence in Public Relations and Communication Management. Hillsdale, NJ: Laurence Erlbaum.
22.
Grunig, J.E. and L.A. Grunig (1989) ‘Toward a Theory of Public Relations Behavior of Organizations: Review of a Program of Research’, in J.E. Grunig and L.A. Grunig (eds) Public Relations Research Annual Vol. 1, pp. 27-63. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
23.
Guedj, R.A., P.J.W. ten Hagen, F.R. Hopgood, H.A. Tucker and D.A. Duce (1980) Methodology of Interaction. Amsterdam: North Holland Publishing.
24.
Ha, L. and L. James (1998) ‘Interactivity Re-examined: A Baseline Analysis of Early Business Websites’, Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media42(4): 457-474.
25.
Heeter, C. (1989) ‘Implications of New Interactive Technologies for Conceptualizing Communication’, in J.L. Salvaggio and J. Bryant (eds) Media Use in the Information Age: Emerging Patterns of Adoption and Computer Use, pp. 217-235. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
26.
Holsti, O. (1969) Content Analysis for the Social Sciences and Humanities. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
27.
Hunt, P. (2000) ‘Futures for Children’s Literature: Evolution or Radical Break’, Cambridge Journal of Education30(1): 111-119.
28.
Iser, W. (1989) ‘Interaction Between Text and Reader’, in J. Corner and J. Hawthorn (eds) Communication Studies: An Introductory Reader, pp. 160-164. London: Edward Arnold.
29.
Jensen, J.F. (1998) ‘Interactivity: Tracing a New Concept in Media and Communication Studies’, Nordicom Review19(1): 185-204.
30.
Johnson, R.R. (1998) User-centered Technology: A Rhetorical Theory for Computers and Other Mundane Artifacts. Albany: State University of New York Press.
31.
Jones, C. (1996) ‘The Great Chain of Buying: Medical Advertisement, the Bourgeois Public Sphere, and the Origins of the French Revolution’, American Historical Review101(1): 13-40.
32.
Kay, A. (1990) ‘User Interface: A Personal View’, in B. Laurel (ed.) The Art of Human- Computer Interface Design, pp. 191-207. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
33.
Kayany, J.M., C.E. Wotring and E.J. Forrest (1996) ‘Relational Control and Interactive Media Choice in Technology-mediated Communication Situations’, Human Communication Research22(3): 399-421.
34.
Kirsh, D. (1997) ‘Interactivity and Multimedia Interfaces’, Instructional Science25(2): 79-96.
35.
Landow, G.P. (1992) Hypertext: The Convergence of Contemporary Critical Theory and Technology. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
36.
Laurel, B. (ed.) (1990) The Art of Human-Computer Interface Design. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
37.
Lieb, T. (1998) ‘Inactivity on Interactivity’, Journal of Electronic Publishing3(3) (available online) http://www.press.umich.edu/jep/03-03/lieb0303.html.
38.
McMillan, S.J. (1998) ‘Who Pays for Content? Funding in Interactive Media’, Journal of Computer Mediated Communication4(1) (available online) http://www.ascusc.org/jcmc/vol4/issue1/mcmillan.html
39.
McMillan, S.J. (1999) ‘Four Models of Cyber-interactivity: Individual Perceptions of Interactivity in Computer-mediated Environments’, paper presented at the International Communication Association Annual Conference, San Francisco, CA, May.
40.
McMillan, S.J. (2000a) ‘Interactivity is in the Eye of the Beholder: Function, Perception, Involvement, and Attitude Toward the Website’, in M.A. Shaver (ed.) Proceedings of the 2000 Conference of the American Academy of Advertising, pp. 71-78. East Lansing: Michigan State University.
41.
McMillan, S.J. (2000b) ‘Permanence and Change Online: A Longitudinal Study of Health-related Websites’, paper presented at the International Communication Association Conference, Acapulco, Mexico, 1-5 June.
42.
McMillan, S.J. and E.J. Downes (2000) ‘Defining Interactivity: A Qualitative Identification of Key Dimensions’, New Media & Society2(2): 157-179.
43.
McQuail, D. (1994) Mass Communication Theory: An Introduction, 3rd edn.London: Sage.
44.
Massey, B.L. and M.R. Levy (1999) ‘Interactivity, Online Journalism, and English-Language Web Newspapers in Asia’, Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly76(1): 138-151.
45.
Mayburry, M. (2000) ‘News on Demand’, Communications of the ACM43(2): 33-34.
46.
Morrison, M. (1998) ‘A Look at Interactivity from a Consumer Perspective’, in J.B. Ford and E.J.D. Honeycutt (eds) Developments in Marketing Science Vol. 21, pp. 149-154). Norfolk, VA: Academy of Marketing Science.
47.
Murray, J.H. (1995) ‘The Pedagogy Of Cyberfiction: Teaching a Course on Reading and Writing Interactive Narrative’, in E. Barrett and M. Redmond (eds) Contextual Media: Multimedia and Interpretation, pp. 129-162. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
48.
Murray, J.H. (1997) Hamlet on the Holodeck: The Future of Narrative in Cyberspace. New York: Free Press.
49.
Newhagen, J.E. (1998) ‘Hitting the Agenda Reset Button for the Internet: The Problem of Matching Research with Development’, paper presented at the International Communication Association Conference, Jerusalem, Israel, July.
50.
Oginanova, E. (1998) ‘Effects of the Content Provider’s Perceived Credibility and Identity on Ad Processing in Computer-mediated Environments’, paper presented at the America Academy of Advertising Annual Conference, Lexington, KY, March.
51.
Pavlik, J.V. (1998) New Media Technology: Cultural and Commercial Perspectives (2nd edn). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
52.
Pingree, S., R.P. Hawkins, D.H. Gustafson, E. Boberg, E. Bricker, M. Wise, H. Berhe and E. Hsu (1996) ‘Will the Disadvantaged Ride the Information Highway? Hopeful Answers from a Computer-based Health Crisis System’, Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media40(3): 331-353.
53.
Rafaeli, S. (1988) ‘Interactivity: From New Media to Communication’, in R.P. Hawkins, J.M. Wiemann and S. Pingree (eds) Advancing Communication Science: Merging Mass and Interpersonal Process, pp. 110-134. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
54.
Rafaeli, S. (1990) ‘Interacting With Media: Para-social Interaction and Real Interaction’, in B.D. Ruben and L.A. Lievrouw (eds) Mediation, Information and Communication: Information and Behavior Vol. 3, pp. 125-181. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
55.
Rafaeli, S. and R.J. LaRose (1993) ‘Electronic Bulletin Boards and “Public Goods” Explanations of Collaborative Mass Media’, Communication Research20(2): 277-297.
56.
Rafaeli, S. and F. Sudweeks (1997) ‘Networked Interactivity’, Journal of Computer Mediated Communication2(4) (available online) http://www.usc.edu/dept/annenberg/vol2/issue4/rafaeli.sudweeks.html
57.
Rice, R.E. (1984) ‘New Media Technology: Growth and Integration’, in R.E. Rice (ed.) The New Media: Communication, Research, and Technology, pp. 33-54. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
58.
Rodgers, S. and E. Thorson (2000) ‘The Interactive Advertising Model: How Users Perceive and Process Online Ads’, Journal of Interactive Advertising1(1): (available online) http://jiad.org/vol1/no1/rodgers/index.html.
59.
Rogers, E.M. (1995) Diffusion of Innovations (4th edn). New York: Free Press.
60.
Salzman, H. and S.R. Rosenthal (1994) Software by Design: Shaping Technology and the Workplace. New York: Oxford University Press.
61.
Sims, R. (1997) ‘Interactivity: A Forgotten Art?’, Computers in Human Behavior13(2): 157-180.
62.
Singh, S.N. and N.P. Dalal (1999) ‘Web Pages as Advertisements’, Communications of the ACM42(8): 91-98.
63.
Steuer, J. (1992) ‘Defining Virtual Reality: Dimensions Determining Telepresence’, Journal of Communication42(4): 73-93.
64.
Straubhaar, J. and R. LaRose (1996) Communications Media in the Information Society. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Press.
65.
Sundar, S.S., S. Narayan, R. Obregon and C. Uppal (1998) ‘Does Web Advertising Work? Memory for Print vs. Online media’, Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly75(4): 822-835.
66.
Szuprowicz, B.O. (1995) Multimedia Networking. New York: McGraw-Hill.
67.
Trevino, L.K., R.L. Daft and R.H. Lengel (1990) ‘Understanding Managers’ Media Choices: A Symbolic Interactionist Perspective’, in J. Fulk and C. Steinfeld (eds) Organizations and Communication Technology, pp. 71-94. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
68.
Williams, F., R.E. Rice and E.M. Rogers (1988) Research Methods and the New Media. New York: Free Press.
69.
Williams, F., S. Strover and A.E. Grant (1994) ‘Social Aspects of New Media Technologies’, in J. Bryant and D. Zillman (eds) Media Effects: Advances in Theory and Research, pp. 463-482. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
70.
Wu, G. (1999) ‘Perceived Interactivity and Attitude Toward Websites’, paper presented at the American Academy of Advertising annual conference, Albuquerque, NM, March.
71.
Xie, H. (2000) ‘Shifts of Interactive Intentions and Information-Seeking Strategies in Interactive Information Retrieval’, Journal of the American Society for Information Science51(9): 841-857.
72.
Zack, M.H. (1993) ‘Interactivity and Communication Mode Choice in Ongoing Management Groups’, Information Systems Research4(3): 207-239.
