This study looked into the way in which Singapore implemented the use of information technology in its schools. It adopted a process framework in using the diffusion approach to study the issue. Instead of focusing primarily on the outcome of adoption it also looked at context and actors' dimensions. The study found that the communication process was persuasion-oriented instead of interaction-oriented as intended by the new communication model. The communication process was outcome-oriented; communication was pro-innovation-biased and the message preoccupied with persuasion. Little room was given for the active interpretation of recipients and involvement of the recipients in planning. The study found that the practical operation of the two-way communication model was limited by the inherent top-down approach of the diffusion approach. It also found that the integration of IT into lessons was best achieved by granting autonomy to the schools.
Ang, P.H. and S. Dalmia (2000) `Operational, Not Theoretical: A Critique of the Current Paradigm in Development Communication', Asian Journal of Communication10(1): 18-32.
2.
Becker, H.J. (1985) `How Schools Use Microcomputers: Results From A National Survey', in M. Chen and W. Paisley (eds) Children and Microcomputers: Research On the Newest Medium, pp. 87-109. Beverly Hills, California: Sage Publications.
3.
Becker, H.J. (1990) `Computer Use in United States Schools: 1989. An Initial Report of U.S. Participation in the I.E.A. Computers in Education Survey', paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Boston, MA (April).
4.
Bucko, R.L. (1995) `Conditions for Change', International Journal of Educational Management8(5): 4-6.
5.
Chen, M. (1985) `A Macro Focus on Microcomputers: Eight Utilisation and Effects Issues', in M. Chen and W. Paisley (eds) Children and Microcomputers: Research On the Newest Medium, pp. 37-59. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
6.
Cohen, D.K. (1988) `Educational Technology and School Organization', in R.S. Nickerson, and P.P. Zodhiates (eds) Technology in Education: Looking Toward 2020, pp. 231-264. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
7.
Dalin, P. (1978) Limits to Educational Change. New York: St. Martin's Press.
8.
DeFleur, M.L. and E.E. Dennis (1988) Understanding Mass Communication, 3rd edn.Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
9.
Dervin, B. (1989) `Audience as Listener and Learner, Teacher and Confidante: The Sense-Making Approach', in R.E. Rice and C.K. Atkin (eds) Public Communication Campaigns, 2nd edn, pp. 67-85. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
10.
Dervin, B. (1994) `Whose Effects Are They, Anyway? Or How Can You Locate Effects in All This Fog?', in C.J. Hamelink and O. Linne (eds) Mass Communication Research: On Problems and Policies, pp. 121-129. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing.
11.
Ely, D.P. (1995) Technology is the Answer! But What was the Question? US Department of Education. Office of Educational Research and Improvement. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. 381152 at http://ericir.syr.edu/Eric/adv_search.shtml)
12.
Ghani, Z. (1988) `Curricular Decision-making in the Diffusion of Educational Innovation in Malaysia', PhD thesis. Southampton: University of Southampton.
13.
Hathaway, W.E. (1990) Education and Technology at the Crossroads - Choosing a New Direction. North York, Ontario: Captus Press.
14.
Havelock, G. and A.M. Huberman (1978) Solving Educational Problems: The Theory and Reality of Innovations in Developing Countries. New York: Praeger.
15.
Hawkridge, D. (1983) New Information Technology in Education. London: Croom Helm.
16.
Heeter, C. (1989) `Implications of New Interactive Technologies for Conceptualizing Communication', in J.L. Salvaggio and J. Bryant (eds) Media Use in the Information Age: Emerging Patterns of Adoption and Consumer Use, pp. 217-233. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
17.
Jayaweera, N. and S. Amunugama (eds) (1987) Rethinking Development Communication. Singapore: Asian Media Information and Communication Centre.
18.
Kao, H.F. , J. Wedman and P. Placier (1995) `Lessons Relearned: Another Faculty Implementation of An Educational Innovation', International Journal of Instructional Media22(3): 201-215.
19.
Kearl, B.E. (1976) `Communication for Agricultural Development', in W. Schramm and D. Lerner (eds) Communication and Change: The Last Ten Years - and the Next, pp. 163-184. Honolulu: University Press of Hawaii.
20.
Kulik, J.A. , R.L. Bangert and G.W. Williams (1983) `Effects of Computer-Based Teaching on Secondary School Students', Journal of Educational Psychology75(1): 19-26.
21.
Kumar, K.J. (1994) `Communication Approaches to Participation and Development: Challenging the Assumptions and Perspectives', in S.A. White, K.S. Nair and J. Ascroft (eds) Participatory Communication: Working for Change and Development, pp. 76-95. New Delhi: Sage.
22.
Kuo, E.C.Y. , Loh, C.M. and K. S. Raman (eds) (1990) Information Technology and Singapore Society: Trends, Policies and Applications: Symposium Proceedings. Singapore: Singapore University Press.
23.
Lieberman, D. (1985) `Research on Children and Microcomputers: A Review of Utilisation and Effects Studies', in M. Chen and W. Paisley (eds) Children and Microcomputers: Research On the Newest Medium. pp. 59-87. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
24.
McKenzie, J. (1995) `Did Anybody Learn Anything? The Sad and Sorry State of Technology Program Assessment', From Now On 5(6). URL (consulted 23 May 2000): http://fromnowon.org/dec95/sad.html.
25.
McLaughlin, M.W. (1984) Implementation Realities and Evaluation Design. Stanford, CA: Institute for Research on Education Finance and Governance.
Means, B. (ed.) (1994) Technology and Education Reform: The Reality Behind the Promise. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
28.
Melkote, S.R. (1991) Communication for Development in the Third World. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
29.
Mowlana, H. and L.J. Wilson (1990) The Passing of Modernity: Communication and the Transformation of Society. New York and London: Longman.
30.
Nirmala, M. and A. Desovza (1997) `All Schools to be Fitted with Computers by 2002', p. 22, The Straits Times, 29 April.
31.
Office of Technology Assessment (OTA) US Congress (1995) Teacher and Technology: Making the Connection (OTA-EH-R-616). Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
32.
Oppenheimer, T. (1997) `The Computer Delusion', The Atlantic Monthly, 280(1): 45-62. URL (consulted 23 May 2000): http://www2.TheAtlantic.com/atlantic/issues/97jul/computer.htm.
33.
Papagiannis, G.J. , D.N. Williamson and R.L. Mon (eds) (1987) Information Technology and Education: Implications for Theory, Research, and Practice. Ottawa: International Development Research Centre.
34.
Rayburn, J.D., II (1996) `Uses and Gratifications', in Michael B. Salwen and Don W. Stacks (eds) An Integrated Approach to Communication Theory and Research, pp. 145-163. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
35.
Rogers, E.M. (1977) `Network Analysis of the Diffusion of Innovation: Family Planning in Korean Villages', in D. Lerner and L.M. Nelson (eds) Communication Research - a Half-Century Appraisal, pp. 117-141. Honolulu: University Press of Hawaii.
Rogers, E.M. (1993) `Perspectives on Development Communication', in K.S. Nair and S.A. White (eds) Perspectives on Development Communication, pp. 35-47. New Delhi: Sage.
Rogers, E.M. and D.K. Kincaid (1981) Communication Networks: Towards a New Paradigm of Research. New York: Free Press.
40.
Rogers, E.M. and S.H. Chaffee (1983) `Communication as an Academic Discipline: A Dialogue', Journal of Communication33(3): 18-30.
41.
Servaes, J. (1995) `Development Communication Approaches in an International Perspective', in M. Oepen (ed.) Media Support and Development Communication in a World of Change: New Answers to Old Questions?, pp. 24-39, proceedings from an international conference, Berlin. Bad Honnef: Horlemann. 19-20 November 1993.
42.
Severin, W.J. and J.W. Tankard, Jr. (1992) Communication Theories: Origins, Methods, and Uses in the Mass Media, 3rd edn.New York: Longman.
43.
Shahrom bin Shahdan (1994) `The Implementation of a National Computer Education Project in Secondary Schools in Malaysia: Teachers' Perceptions', PhD thesis, University of Georgia. Ann Arbor, MI: University Microfilms International.
44.
Sheingold, K. , J. Kane, M. Endreweit and K. Billings (1981) Study of Issues Related to Implementation of Computer Technology in Schools. National Institute of Education. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED319370 at http://ericir.syr.edu/Eric/adv_search.shtml)
45.
Stoll, C. (1995) Silicon Snake Oil: Second Thoughts on the Information Highway. New York: Bantam Doubleday Dell Publishing Group.
46.
White, R. (1983) `Mass Communication And Culture: Transition To A New Paradigm', Journal of Communication33(3): 279-301.
47.
Williams, F. , R.E. Rice and E.M. Rogers (1988) Research Methods and the New Media. New York: Free Press.
48.
Windahl, S. , B. Signitzer and J.T. Olson (1992) Using Communication Theory: An Introduction to Planned Communication. London: Sage.
49.
Yin, R.K. and J.L. White (1985) `Microcomputers Implementation in Schools: Findings from Twelve Case Studies', in M. Chen and W. Paisley (eds) Children and Microcomputers: Research On the Newest Medium, pp. 109-129. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
