This article discusses the findings of an evaluation of the co-location of a domestic violence specialist embedded in a regional police station in Queensland, Australia. With widespread police failures in the response to domestic and family violence (DFV), innovation is critical. There is mounting evidence that DFV victim-survivors are more satisfied when police respond collaboratively with specialist DFV workers, but police support is critical for translation to broad practice. Using a range of data sources, our evaluation found three key benefits of co-location: strengthening of victim support, improved integrated response and enhancement of police practice. This article adds new knowledge about integrated responses to domestic violence, particularly where there are evidence gaps in police perspectives. In view of these findings, implications for practice support further implementation of co-locational responses in Australia.
AllenNEBybeeDSullivanCM (2004) Battered women’s multitude of needs: evidence supporting the need for comprehensive advocacy. Violence Against Women10(9): 1015–1035.
2.
AmaralSBhalotrazSPrakashN (2018) Gender, Crime and Punishment: Evidence from Women Police Stations in India. Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) through the Research. Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) through the Research Centre on Micro-Social Change (MiSoC) at the University of Essex.
3.
AsquithNLBartkowiak-ThéronI (2021) Policing Practices and Vulnerable People. Cham: Springer Nature.
4.
Australian Bureau of Statistics (2016) 1270.0.55.005 - Australian Statistical Geography Standard (ASGS): Volume 5 - Remoteness Structure. Available at: https://www.abs.gov.au/AUSSTATS/abs@.nsf/Latestproducts/1270.0.55.005Main%20Features15July%202016 (accessed 07 October 2022).
5.
Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (2019) Family, Domestic and Sexual Violence in Australia: Continuing the National Story 2019.
6.
Blake Stevenson Limited (2017) Report on the national scoping exercise of advocacy services relating to the criminal justice system for victims of violence against women and girls. Scottish Government.
7.
BreckenridgeJReesSValentineK, et al. (2016) Meta-evaluation of Existing Interagency Partnerships, Collaboration, Coordination and/or Integrated Interventions and Service Responses to Violence Against Women: Key Findings and Future Directions. Alexandria, NSW: ANROWS.
8.
BrownJSilvestriM (2020) A police service in transformation: implications for women police officers. Police Practice and Research21(5): 459–475.
9.
CampoMTaytonS (2015) Domestic and Family Violence in Regional, Rural and Remote Communities: An Overview of Key Issues. Child Family Community Australia, Information Exchange.
10.
CarlsonEBDalenbergCJ (2000) A conceptual framework for the impact of traumatic experiences. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse1(1): 4–28.
11.
CarringtonKSozzoM, Puyol MV, et al (2019) The Role of Women’s Police Stations in Responding to and Preventing Gender Violence: Buenos Aires, Argentina: Final Report of Field Research. QUT Centre for Justice, Queensland University of Technology: Brisbane. https://eprints.qut.edu.au/134041/
12.
CarringtonKBullMFerreiraG, et al (2020) Reimagining the policing of gender violence: Lessons from Women’s Police Stations in Brasil and Argentina. Brazilian Journal of Public Policy10(2): 320–338.
13.
ChappellATMacDonaldJMManzPW (2006) The organizational determinants of police arrest decisions. Crime & Delinquency52(2): 287–306.
14.
ChungDHodgsonDWattsL, et al. (2018) Research for the Development of Two ‘One Stop Hubs’: Prepared for the Department of Communities. Perth, WA: Curtin University.
15.
CokerALSmithPHThompsonMP, et al. (2002) Social support protects against the negative effects of partner violence on mental health. Journal of Women's Health & Gender-Based Medicine11(5): 465–476.
16.
Commission of Inquiry into Queensland Police Service Responses to Domestic and Family Violence (2022) A call for change: Commission of Inquiry into Queensland Police Service responses to domestic and family violence.
17.
CooperLAnafJBowdenM (2008) Can social workers and police be partners when dealing with bikie-gang related domestic violence and sexual assault?European Journal of Social Work11(3): 295–311.
18.
CórdovaAKrasH (2020) Addressing violence against women: the effect of women’s police stations on police legitimacy. Comparative Political Studies53(5): 775–808.
19.
CórdovaAKrasH (2021) State action to prevent violence against women: the effect of women’s police stations on men’s attitudes toward gender-based violence. The Journal of Politics84(1): 1–17.
20.
CoyMKellyL (2011) Islands in the Stream: An Evaluation of Four London Independent Domestic Violence Advocacy Schemes. Child and Woman Abuse Studies Unit, London Metropolitan University. London: Trust for London.
21.
DekeseredyWRennisonC (2020) Thinking theoretically about male violence against women in rural places: a review of the extant sociological literature and suggestions for future theorizing. International Journal of Rural Criminology5: 162–180.
22.
Department of Communities, Child Safety and Disability Services (2017) Domestic Violence Information Sharing Guidelines. Brisbane: Government of Queensland.
23.
DoornbosAJSimonsR-JDenessenE (2008) Relations between characteristics of workplace practices and types of informal work-related learning: a survey study among Dutch Police. Human Resource Development Quarterly19(2): 129–151.
24.
DouglasH (2018a) Domestic and family violence, mental health and well-being, and legal engagement. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law25(3): 341–356.
25.
DouglasH (2018b) Domestic violence protection orders and their role in ensuring personal security. In: Fitz-GibbonKWalklateSMcCullochJ, etal (eds) Intimate Partner Violence, Risk and Security: Securing Women's Lives in a Global World. UK: Routledge, 216–232.
26.
DouglasHFitzgeraldR (2018) The domestic violence protection order system as entry to the criminal justice system for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people. International Journal for Crime, Justice and Social Democracy7(3): 41–57.
GomesAOAvellanedaCN (2021) The role of pro-women institutions in addressing violence reports against women. Global Public Policy and Governance1(1): 39–60.
HamiltonGHarrisLPowellA (2021) Policing repeat and high-risk family violence: police and service-sector perceptions of a coordinated model. Police Practice & Research22(1): 141–156.
HautzingerS. (2007) Violence in the City of Women Police and Batterers in Bahia, BrazilUniversity of California Press.
35.
HautzingerS (2002) Criminalising male violence in Brazil's Women's Police Stations: from flawed essentialism to imagined communities. Journal of Gender Studies11(3): 243–251.
36.
KavanaughGSviatschiMMTrakoI (2018) Female officers, gender violence and human capital: Evidence from all-women's justice centers in Peru. PSE Working Papers, halshs-01828539. Available at: https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-01828539 (accessed 16 September 2019).
37.
LaingL (2013) ‘It’s like this maze that you have to make your way through.’ Women’s experiences of seeking a domestic violence protection order in NSW [Pre-print]. Available at: http://hdl.handle.net/2123/9267 (accessed 6 July 2022).
38.
LangtonMSmithKEastmanTON, et al. (2020) Improving Family Violence Legal and Support Services for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Women.
39.
LinKSunIYWuY, et al. (2021) Chinese Police officers’ attitudes toward domestic violence interventions: do training and knowledge of the Anti-Domestic Violence Law matter?Policing and Society31(7): 878–894.
40.
MapleEKebbellM (2021) Responding to domestic and family violence: a qualitative study on the changing perceptions of frontline police officers. Violence Against Women27(12-13): 2377–2398.
41.
MikakosJ (2018) Minister's Statement: Wyndham Multidisciplinary Centre, 20 June. Available at: https://tinyurl.com/cacckehk (accessed 16 September 2019).
42.
MundyTSeuffertN (2021) Integrated domestic violence services: a case study in police/NGO co-location. Alternative Law Journal46(1): 27–33.
43.
NatarajanM (2005) Women police stations as a dispute processing system. Women & Criminal Justice16(1-2): 87–106.
44.
NatarajanMBabuD (2020) Women police stations: have they fulfilled their promise?Police Practice and Research21(5): 442–458.
45.
NowellLSNorrisJMWhiteDE, et al. (2017) Thematic analysis: striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods16: n.p (accessed 07 October 2020).
46.
OwenO (2016) Policing after colonialism. In: BradfordB (eds) The SAGE Handbook of Global Policing. London: Sage, 303–319.
47.
OwenSCarrington K (2015) Domestic violence service provision and the architecture of rural life: An Australian case study. Journal of Rural Studies,39: 229–238.
48.
PalaszczukPRyanM (2022) Watershed investment to support victims of Domestic Violence [Press release], Queensland Government.
49.
PasinatoW (2016) The Maria Da Penha Law: 10 years on. Sur International Journal on Human Rights13(24): 155–163.
50.
PerovaEReynoldsSA (2017) Women's police stations and intimate partner violence: evidence from Brazil. Social Science & Medicine174: 188–196.
Queensland Police Service (QPS) (2021c) Queensland Police Service Submission to the Women’s Safety and Justice Taskforce. Brisbane: The State of Queensland.
58.
ReulandMSchaefer MorabitoMPrestonC, et al. (2006) Police-Community Partnerships to Address Domestic Violence. Office of Community Oriented Policing Services, U.S. Department of Justice.
59.
RizoCFVan DeinseTDurantS, et al. (2022) Systematic review of research on co-location models for serving intimate partner and sexual violence survivors. Journal of Family Violence37: 23–41.
60.
Royal Commission into Family Violence (2016) Report and recommendations, Vol III. State of Victoria.
61.
RodgersJCarringtonKRyanV (2022a) Australia police perceptions of women’s police stations. Police Practice and Research23(6): 700–721.
62.
RodgersJCarringtonK, Ryan V, et al (2022b)Evaluation of an Embedded Specialist Domestic Violence Worker: A Partnership Between Queensland Police Service and Domestic Violence Action Centre. Queensland University of Technology Centre for Justice Research Report Series. QUT Centre for Justice, Brisbane, Qld. https://research.qut.edu.au/centre-for-justice/wp-content/uploads/sites/304/2022/04/Evaluation-of-an-Embedded-Specialist-Domestic-Violence-Worker-QPS-DVAC-Report.pdf
63.
RodgersJCarringtonK, Ryan V, et al (2022c) Evaluation of a specialist domestic violence worker embedded in a police station. QUT Centre for Justice Briefing Papers, 31 May. https://eprints.qut.edu.au/232020/1/Briefing_Paper_23_Toowoomba_co_location_FINAL.pdf
64.
SchubertE (2018) Hope Lives Here: Impact of the Family Peace Centre.
65.
SegraveMWilsonDFitz-GibbonK (2018) Policing intimate partner violence in Victoria (Australia): examining police attitudes and the potential of specialisation. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology51(1): 99–116.
66.
SeuffertNMundyT (2020) Law, society and domestic violence: best practice methodologies for evaluating integrated domestic violence services. In: AshfordCMaineA (eds) Research Handbook on Gender, Sexuality and the Law. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, 301–316 (accessed 31 March 2021).
Special Taskforce on Domestic and Family Violence in Queensland (2015) Not Now, Not Ever: Volume 1, Report and Recommendations.Brisbane: Government of Queensland
69.
The Police Association of Victoria (2015) Submission to the Royal Commission into Family Violence.Victoria: Royal Commission of Family Violence.
VallelyCRobinsonABurtonM, et al. (2005) Evaluation of Domestic Violence Pilot Sites at Caerphilly (Gwent) and Croydon 2004/05 Final Report. DV Project Team, Crown Prosecution Service.
72.
Victoria Police (2017) Information Sheet: Multidisciplinary Centres (MDCs). Melbourne: Victoria.
73.
WendtSChungDElderA, et al. (2017) Seeking Help for Domestic and Family Violence: Exploring Regional, Rural, and Remote Women’s Coping Experiences. NSW: ANROWS.
74.
WesteraNJPowellMB (2017) Prosecutors’ perceptions of how to improve the quality of evidence in domestic violence cases. Policing and Society27(2): 157–172.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
