Certain aspects of optimal forager theory (OFT), which is drawn from ecology, have shown positive results in predicting areas at risk of future domestic burglary offending. This led to police services developing analysis methods that embraced OFT to underpin their deployment of resources to prevent or reduce domestic burglary. There has been limited examination, using quantitative approaches, of how individual police services have implemented such crime reduction schemes. This study broadens this literature by qualitatively exploring OFT strategies within five police services. By interviewing participants involved in the programmes the study gathers views and perspectives of the implementations, identifying many positive by-products of the strategies. By contrast, factors affecting the implementation and application of the theoretical framework are also identified. Both good and bad are discussed in the context of their practical implications for police services globally looking to implement crime reduction plans that embrace OFT.
AddisN (2012, December) Exploring the impact and effectiveness of the ‘Project Optimal’burglary reduction initiative in Leeds: A spatio-temporal approach. In: International Crime and Intelligence Analysis Conference. Manchester, UK: Manchester Central Convention Centre, 13–14.
2.
AddisNEvansAMallesonN (2021) Burglars as optimal foragers: exploring modern-day tricks of the trade. Crime Prevention and Community Safety23: 359–380.
3.
AthreyaKBAthreyaSRIyerSK (2010) Critical age-dependent branching Markov processes and their scaling limits. Proceedings – Mathematical Sciences120(3): 363–385.
4.
BarriballKWhileA (1994) Collecting data using a semi-structured interview: a discussion paper. Journal of Advanced Nursing19(2): 328–335.
5.
BeckC (2014) Predictive policing: what can we learn from Wal-Mart and Amazon about fighting crime in a recession?Police Chief Magazine7: 1–7.
6.
BernascoW (2008) Them again? Same-offender involvement in repeat and near repeat burglaries. European Journal of Criminology5(4): 411–431.
7.
BettingerRGroteN (2016) Marginal value theorem, patch choice, and human foraging response in varying environments. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology42: 79–87.
8.
BoydCGrunbaumD,Hunt JrG et al. (2016) Effects of variation in the abundance and distribution of prey on the foraging success of central place foragers. Journal of Applied Ecology54: 1362–1372.
9.
BragaAATurchanBS,PapachristosAV et al. (2019) Hot spots policing and crime reduction: an update of an ongoing systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Experimental Criminology15: 289–311.
10.
BrantinghamPJBrantinghamPL (1991) Environmental Criminology. Long Grove, IL, USA: Waveland Press.
11.
ChaineySPda SilvaBF (2016) Examining the extent of repeat and near repeat victimisation of domestic burglaries in Belo Horizonte, Brazil. Crime Science5(1): 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40163-016-0049-6.
12.
CharnovEL (1976) Optimal foraging, the marginal value theorem. Theoretical Population Biology9(2): 129–136.
13.
ClarkeRV (1997) Introduction. In: ClarkeR.V. (ed.), Situational Crime Prevention: Successful Case Studies. Guilderland, NY: Harrow and Heston.
14.
ClarkeRVEckJE (2003) Become a Problem Solving Crime Analyst in 55 Small Steps. Jill Dando Institute of Crime Science, University College London. Available at: https://popcenter.asu.edu/sites/default/files/55stepsuk_0_0.pdf on 22/05/20213
15.
ClarkeRVHesselingR (1994) Displacement: a review of the empirical literature. In: Crime Prevention Studies. Lake Havasu, AZ, USA: ASU Center for Problem Oriented Policing, 97–203.
16.
CohenLEFelsonM (1979) Social change and crime rate trends: A routine activity approach. American Sociological Review44(4): 588–608. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2094589
17.
CopeN (2004) ‘Intelligence led policing or policing led intelligence?’ Integrating volume crime analysis into policing. British Journal of Criminology44(2): 188–203.
18.
CornishDBClarkeRV (1987) Understanding crime displacement: an application of rational choice theory. Criminology; An Interdisciplinary Journal25(4): 933–948.
19.
EckJE (1994) Drug markets and drug places: a case–control study of the spatial structure of illicit drug dealing. PhD thesis, University of Maryland,USA.
20.
FarrellGPeaseK (2017) Preventing repeat and near repeat crime concentrations. In: FarrellGPeaseK (eds) Handbook of Crime Prevention and Community Safety. Abingdon, UK: Routledge, 143–156.
21.
FelsonM (1986) Routine activities, social controls, rational decisions, and criminal outcomes. In: CornishDClarkeRVG (eds), The Reasoning Criminal. New York, NY: Springer, 302–327.
22.
FelsonMBobaR (2010) Crime and Everyday Life. London, UK: Sage.
23.
FergusonAG (2011) Predictive policing and the future of reasonable suspicion. SSRN Electronic Journal259: 62–259. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1965226.
24.
FieldingMJonesV (2012) ‘Disrupting the optimal forager’: predictive risk mapping and domestic burglary reduction in Trafford, Greater Manchester. International Journal of Police Science & Management14(1): 30–41.
25.
HalfordE (2022a) Linking foraging domestic burglary: an analysis of crimes committed within police-identified optimal forager patches. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology38: 127–140. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11896-022-09497-8.
26.
HalfordE (2022b) A case study of police-identified foraging burglary offenders. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11896-022-09512-y.
27.
HeringASBairS (2013) Characterizing spatial and chronological target selection of serial offenders. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series C (Applied Statistics)63(1): 123–140.
28.
Hollis-PeelMEReynaldDM,van BavelM et al. (2011) Guardianship for crime prevention: a critical review of the literature. Crime, Law and Social Change56(1): 53–70.
29.
Home Office (2003) National Intelligence Model: Code of Practice. London, UK: Home Office. Available at: https://library.college.police.uk/docs/npia/NIM-Code-of-Practice.pdf
30.
HopeTMurphyDJ (1983) Problems of implementing crime prevention: the experience of a demonstration project. The Howard Journal of Criminal Justice22(1–3): 38–50.
31.
HugieD (1994) Fish and game: a game theoretic approach to habitat selection by predators and prey. Journal of Fish Biology45: 151–169.
32.
JohnTMaguireM (2004) National Intelligence Model: Key Lessons From Early Research. Office of Justice Programs. Available at: https://www.ojp.gov/ncjrs/virtual-library/abstracts/national-intelligence-model-key-lessons-early-research (accessed 10 March 2022).
33.
JohnsonEJPayneJW (1985) Effort and accuracy in choice. Management Science31(4): 395–414.
34.
JohnsonSD (2014) How do offenders choose where to offend? Perspectives from animal foraging. Legal and Criminological Psychology19(2): 193–210.
35.
JohnsonSDBowersKJ (2004) The stability of space–time clusters of burglary. British Journal of Criminology44(1): 55–65.
36.
JohnsonSDGueretteRTBowersK (2014) Crime displacement: what we know, what we don’t know, and what it means for crime reduction. Journal of Experimental Criminology10(4): 549–571.
37.
JohnsonSDSummersL (2015) Testing ecological theories of offender spatial decision making using a discrete choice model. Crime and Delinquency61(3): 454–480.
38.
JohnsonSDSummersLPeaseK (2009) Offender as forager? A direct test of the boost account of victimization. Journal of Quantitative Criminology25(2): 181–200.
39.
KallioHPietiläA-M,JohnsonM et al. (2016) Systematic methodological review: developing a framework for a qualitative semi-structured interview guide. Journal of Advanced Nursing72(12): 2954–2965.
40.
KirbyS (2013) Effective Policing? Implementation in Theory and Practice. London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
41.
LangbeinLJorstadC (2004) Productivity in the workplace: cops, culture, communication, cooperation, and collusion. Political Research Quarterly57(1): 65.
42.
LimaSL (2002) Putting predators back into behavioural predator–prey interactions. Trends in Ecology & Evolution17(2): 70–75.
43.
MaguireMJohnT (1995) Intelligence, surveillance and informants: integrated approaches. Police Research Group: Crime Detection and Prevention Series, Paper64: 1–58.
44.
MastrofskiSD (1998) Systematic Observation of Public Police: Applying Field Research Methods to Policy Issues. Washington, DC, USA: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, National Institute of Justice.
45.
MayC (2013) Towards a general theory of implementation. Implementation Science, 8, 1–14.
46.
MillerGJWhitfordAB (2002) Trust and incentives in principal-agent negotiations. Journal of Theoretical Politics14(2): 231–267.
47.
NeeCMeenaghanA (2006) Expert decision making in burglars. The British Journal of Criminology, 46(5): 935–949.
48.
OppK-D (1999) Contending conceptions of the theory of rational action. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 11(2): 171–202.
49.
OriansGHPearsonNEHornDJ, et al. (1979) Analysis of ecological systems. In Biosciences Colloquium 1977: Ohio State University. Ohio State University Press.
PeaseK (1998) Repeat Victimisation: Taking Stock, Vol. 90. London: Home Office Police Research Group.
52.
PerryWMcInnisB,PriceC et al. (2013) Predictive policing: The role of crime forecasting in law enforcement operations. https://doi.org/10.7249/rr233.
53.
PitcherABJohnsonSD (2011) Exploring theories of victimization using a mathematical model of burglary. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 48(1): 83–109.
54.
PlankMJAuger-MéthéMCodlingEA (2013) Lévy or not? Analysing positional data from animal movement paths. In: Lewis MA, Maini PK and Petrovskii SV (eds) Dispersal, Individual Movement and Spatial Ecology: A Mathematical Perspective. Manhattan, NY, USA: Springer, 33–52.
55.
RatcliffeJ (2002) Intelligence-led policing and the problems of turning rhetoric into practice. Policing and Society12(1): 53–66.
56.
RatcliffeJH (2004) The hotspot matrix: a framework for the spatio-temporal targeting of crime reduction. Police Practice and Research5(1): 5–23.
57.
RatcliffeJHRengertGF (2008) Near-repeat patterns in Philadelphia shootings. Security Journal21(1–2): 58–76.
58.
RennisonCM (2019) Interactive: Introduction to Criminal Justice (International Student Edition) (3rd edn). Newbury Park, CA, USA: Sage.
59.
ReynaldDM (2011) Factors associated with the guardianship of places: assessing the relative importance of the spatio-physical and sociodemographic contexts in generating opportunities for capable guardianship. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency48(1): 110–142.
60.
RoachJCartwrightA,WeirK et al. (2020) Reducing student burglary victimisation using the nudge approach. Crime Prevention and Community Safety22, 364–380.
61.
RosserGDaviesT,BowersKJ et al. (2016) Predictive crime mapping: arbitrary grids or street networks?Journal of Quantitative Criminology33(3): 569–594.
62.
Rozen-RechelsDVan BeestF,RichardE et al. (2015) Density-dependent, central-place foraging in a grazing herbivore: competition and trade-offs in time allocation near water. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology42: 79–88.
63.
SagovskyAJohnsonSD (2007) When does repeat burglary victimisation occur?Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology40(1): 1–26.
64.
SampsonREckJEDunhamJ (2009) Super controllers and crime prevention: a routine activity explanation of crime prevention success and failure. Security Journal23(1): 37–51.
65.
SchneiderMTeskeP,MarschallM et al. (1997) Institutional arrangements and the creation of social capital: the effects of public school choice. American Political Science Review91(1): 82–93.
66.
ShermanLW (2015) A tipping point for “totally evidenced policing.”International Criminal Justice Review25(1): 11–29.
67.
ShortMBBrantinghamPJ,BertozziAL et al. (2010) Dissipation and displacement of hotspots in reaction-diffusion models of crime. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences107(9): 3961–3965.
StokesNClareJ (2019) Preventing near-repeat residential burglary through cocooning: post hoc evaluation of a targeted police-led pilot intervention. Security Journal32: 45–62.
70.
SummersLJohnsonSDRengertG (2010) The use of maps in offender interviews. In: BernascoW (ed.) Offender on Offending: Learning about Crime from Criminals. Cullompton, UK: Willan, 268–294.
71.
TownsleyMHomelRChaselingJ (2000) Repeat burglary victimisation: spatial and temporal patterns. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology33(1): 37–63.
72.
TownsleyMHomelRChaselingJ (2003) Infectious burglaries. A test of the near repeat hypothesis. British Journal of Criminology43(3): 615–633.
WangZLiuX (2017) Analysis of burglary hot spots and near-repeat victimization in a large Chinese city. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information6(5): 48.
75.
WatersN (2017) Tobler's first law of geography. In: Richardson D, Castree N, Goodchild MF, et al. (eds) International Encyclopedia of Geography. Hoboken, New Jersey, USA: John Wiley Online.
76.
WeemsJ (2014) Testing PCSO cocooning of near repeat burglary locations. MSc thesis, University of Cambridge,UK.
