The current study examines the relationship between the extent of, and various types of, empathy and of questions on suspects’ provision of information in 16 real-life police interviews. Multiple linear regressions were conducted to: predict suspects’ information provision in relation to (a) open questions, (b) the extent of displayed empathy and (c) each of the empathy types. Verbatim transcriptions of police interviews with suspects of sexual offences were coded for: (a) the extent and types of interviewer empathy, (b) the proportionality of interviewer open versus closed questions, and (c) suspects’ information provision. It was found that the proportion of open (versus closed) questions and the amount of empathy demonstrated by interviewers had a positive relationship with suspects’ information provision. The latter supports a recent finding by the authors involving a different sample of police interviews. Whereas in a growing number of countries the training of police interviewers has been emphasizing use of open questions, the current study aids weight to the small amount of research literature on the importance of interviewer empathy. Indeed, the effectiveness of open questions might be influenced by the amount of interviewer empathy in an interview.
AlisonLAlisonENooneGet al. (2013) Why touch tactics fail and rapport gets results: Observing rapport-based interpersonal techniques (ORBIT) to generate useful information from terrorists. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law19(4): 411–431.
2.
AlmeidaFDrewP (2020) The fabric of law-in-action: ‘Formulating’ the suspect’s account during police interviews in England. International Journal of Speech Language and the Law27: 1.
3.
AlmerigognaJOstJBullRet al. (2007) A state of high anxiety: How non-supportive interviewers can increase the suggestibility of child witnesses. Applied Cognitive Psychology12: 963–974.
4.
Baker-EckBBullRWalshD (2020) Investigative empathy: Five types of cognitive empathy in a field study of investigative interviews with suspects of sexual offences. Investigative Interviewing: Research and Practice, 11: 28–38.
5.
Baker-EckBBullRWalshD (2021) Investigative empathy: A strength scale of empathy based on European police perspectives. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law.
6.
BrimbalLMeissnerCKleinmanS, et al. (2021) Evaluating the benefits of a rapport-based approach to investigative interviews: A training study with law enforcement investigators. Law and Human Behavior45(1): 55–67.
7.
BrubacherSBensionMPowellMet al. (2020) An overview of best practice investigative interviewing of child sexual assault. In: Child Sexual Abuse: Forensic Issues in Evidence, Impact, and Management. Academic Press, 445–458.
8.
BullR (2013) What is ‘believed’ or actually ‘known’ about characteristics that may contribute to being a good/effective interviewer?Investigative Interviewing: Research and Practice5: 128–143.
9.
BullR (2019) Roar or PEACE: Is it a tall story? In: BullRBlandon-GitlinI (eds) Routledge International Handbook of Legal and Investigative Psychology. London: Routledge.
10.
BullRBakerB (2020) Obtaining from suspects valid discourse ‘PEACE’-fully: What role for rapport and empathy? In: MasonMRockF (eds) The Discourse of Police Interviews. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
11.
BullRGriffithsA (2019) Advocating the ‘PEACE’ method: Will it make people cross? In: CooperPHuntingL (eds) Access to Justice for Vulnerable People. London: Wiley.
12.
BullRRachlewA (2019) Investigative interviewing: From England to Norway and beyond. In: BarelaSFallonMGaggioliGOhlinJ (eds) Interrogation and Torture: Research on Efficacy, and its Integration with Morality and Legality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
13.
BullRSoukaraS (2010) A set of studies of what really happens in police interviews with suspects. In: LassiterGDMeissnerC (eds) Interrogations and Confessions. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
14.
CollinsKCarthyN (2018) No rapport, no comment: The relationship between rapport and communication during investigative interviews with suspects. Journal of Investigative Psychology Offender Profiling16(1): 18–31.
15.
DandoCOxburghG (2016) Empathy in the field: towards a taxonomy of empathic communication in information gathering interviews with suspected sex offenders. The European Journal of Psychology Applied to Legal Context8(1): 27–33.
16.
DaviesGMWestcottHLHoranN (2000) The impact of questioning style on the content of investigative interviews with suspected child sexual abuse victims. Psychology, Crime and Law6(2): 81–97.
17.
EdlundJHeldnerMPelcéA (2010) Prosodic features of very short utterances in dialogue. Conference: Nordic Prosody – Proceedings of the Xth Conference, Helsinki.
18.
FeldB (2013) Behind closed doors: What really happens when cops question kids. Cornell Journal of Law and Public Policy23: 395–462.
19.
FisherRPGeiselmanRE (1992) Memory enhancing techniques for investigative interviewing: The cognitive interview. Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas.
20.
GabbertFHopeLLutherKet al. (2021) Exploring the use of rapport in professional information-gathering contexts by systematically mapping the evidence base. Applied Cognitive Psychology35(2): 329–341.
21.
GeiselmanRE (2012) The cognitive interview for suspects (CIS). American Journal of Forensic Psychology30(3): 5–20.
22.
GriffithsAMilneR (2006) Will it all end in tiers? Police interviews with suspects in Britain. In: WilliamsonT (ed) Investigative Interviewing: Rights, Research and Regulation. Cullompton, UK: Willan, 167–189.
23.
HolmbergUChristiansonS (2002) Murderers’ and sexual offenders’ experience of police interviews and their inclination to admit or deny crimes. Behavioral Sciences and the Law20(1–2): 31–45.
JakobsenK (2021) Empathy in investigative interviews of victims: How to understand it, how to measure it, and how to do it?Police Practice and Research22(2): 1155–1170.
26.
JohnstoneKPrenticeKWhiteheadHet al. (2016) Assessing effective participation in vulnerable juvenile defendants. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry and Psychology27(6): 802–818.
27.
KassinSGudjonssonG (2004) The psychology of confessions: A review of the literature and issues. Psychological Science in the Public Interest5(2): 35–67.
28.
KebbellMAlisonLHurrenE (2008) Sex offenders’ perceptions of the effectiveness and fairness of humanity, dominance, and displaying an understanding of cognitive distortions in police interviews: A vignette study. Psychology, Crime & Law14(5): 435–449.
29.
KebbellMAlisonLHurrenEet al. (2010) How do sex offenders think the police should interview to elicit confessions from sex offenders?Psychology, Crime & Law16: 567–584.
30.
KellyCValenciaE (2021) You ask and do not receive, because you ask wrongly. International Journal of Police Science & Management23(1): 42–54.
31.
KellyCERussanoMBMillerJCet al. (2019) On the road (to admission): Engaging suspects with minimization. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law25(3): 166–180.
32.
LambME (2016) Difficulties translating research on forensic interview practices to practitioners: Finding water, leading horses, but can we get them to drink?American Psychologist71(8): 710–718.
33.
LaunayCPyJBrunelMet al. (2021) Beyond investigation-relevant information: A content analysis of police questioning. Police Practice and Research22(4): 1341–1355.
34.
Leahy-HarlandSBullR (2017) Police strategies and suspect responses in real-life serious crime interviews. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology32: 138–151.
35.
LyonTHendersonH (2021) Increasing true reports without increasing false reports: Best practice interviewing methods and open-ended wh-questions. American Professional Society on the Abuse of Children Advisor. Advanced online publication.
36.
MillerJCRedlichADKellyCE (2018) Accusatorial and information-gathering interview and interrogation methods: A multi-country comparison. Psychology, Crime & Law24(9): 935–956.
37.
MilneRBullR (1999) Investigative Interviewing: Psychology and Practice. Chichester: Wiley.
38.
OrlovA (1992) Carl Rogers and contemporary humanism. Journal of Russian and East European Psychology30(1): 36–41.
OxburghGMyklebustTGrantT (2010) The question of question types in police interviews: A review of the literature from a psychological and linguistic perspective. International Journal of Speech, Language & the Law17(1): 45–66.
41.
OxburghGOstJCherrymanJ (2012) Police interviews with suspected child sex offenders: Does use of empathy and question type influence the amount of investigation relevant information obtained?Psychology, Crime & Law18(3): 259–273.
42.
PatelSPelletier-BuiASmithSet al. (2019) Curricula for empathy and compassion training in medical education: A systematic review. PLoS One14(8): e0221412.
43.
PauloRAlbuquerquePBullR (2013) The enhanced cognitive interview: Towards a better use and understanding of this procedure. International Journal of Police Science and Management15: 190–199.
44.
PlaceCReid-MaloyJ (2018) Overcoming resistance in clinical and forensic interview. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health17(4): 362–376.
45.
PooleDLambM (1998) Investigative Interviews of Children: A Guide for Helping Professionals. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
46.
PoundsG (2019) Rapport-building in suspects’ police interviews: The role of empathy and face. Pragmatics and Society10(1): 95–121.
47.
PowellM. B. (2013) An overview of current initiatives to improve child witness interviews about sexual abuse. Current issues in criminal justice25(2): 711–720.
48.
ReadJPowellMKebbellMet al. (2009) Investigative interviewing of suspected sex offenders: A review of what constitutes best practice. International Journal of Police Science & Management11(4): 442–459.
49.
RivardJFisherRRobertsonBet al. (2014) Testing the cognitive interview with professional interviewers: Enhancing recall of specific details of recurring events. Applied Cognitive Psychology28(6), 917–925.
RussanoMMeissnerCNarchetFet al. (2005) Investigating true and false confessions within a novel experimental paradigm. Psychological Science16: 481–486.
52.
SchegloffE (1982) Discourse as an interactional achievement: Some uses of ‘uh huh’ and other things that come between sentences. In: TannenD (ed) Analyzing Discourse: Text and Talk. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press, 71–93.
53.
SkrifvarsJKorkmanJSuiVet al. (2020) An analysis of question style and type in official Finnish asylum interview transcripts. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling.
54.
Teding van BerkhoutEMalouffJM (2016) The efficacy of empathy training: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Journal of Counseling Psychology63(1): 32–42.
55.
VerkamptFDodierOMilneRet al. (2019) An analysis of the quality of investigative interviews with children in France: Age of the witness does matter. Police Practice and Research20(1): 1–25.
56.
WardNTsukaharaW (2000) Prosodic features which cue back-channel responses in English and Japanese. Journal of Pragmatics32(8): 1177–1207.
57.
WaterhouseGRidleyABullRet al. (2018) Mapping repeated interviews. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology34(4): 392–409.
58.
WebsterW, 2019. The impact of investigative interviews on rape/sexual assault victims: Towards a more effective framework for police interviewers. PhD thesis, Newcastle University, UK. Retrieved on May 13, 2022, https://theses.ncl.ac.uk/jspui/handle/10443/4694.
59.
WebsterWOxburghGDandoC (2020) The use and efficacy of question type and an attentive interviewing style in adult rape interview. Psychology, Crime & Law27(7): 656–677.
60.
WesteraNJPowellMBMilneBet al. (2019) Police interviewing of sexual assault victims: current organizational responses and recommendations for improvement. In: BullRBlandon-GitlinI (eds) The Routledge International Handbook of Legal and Investigative Psychology. London: Routledge, 182–196.
61.
WinerdalUCederborgACLindholmJ (2019) The quality of question types in Swedish police interviews with young suspects of serious crimes. The Police Journal92(2): 136–149.
62.
WuY (2021) Empathy in nurse-patient interaction: A conversation analysis. BMC Nursing20(1): 18.
63.
YoungSAdamouMBoleaBet al. (2011) The identification and management of ADHD offenders within the criminal justice system: A consensus statement from the UK adult ADHD network and criminal justice agencies. BMC Psychiatry11(1): 32.
64.
ZengFHuangC-YBullR (2021) Police interviews of suspects in China: Developments and analyses. International Journal of Police Science and Management23(1): 29–41.
