Despite the emphasis on community relations in recent developments in policing, the importance of social distance between citizens and the police has not been explored. In the current study, we examine the effect of social distance on public attitudes toward the police using data from a sample of college students in a mid-sized State university. The findings from path analysis suggest that students’ familiarity with and interest in the police promote confidence in the police, even when controlling for variables such as negative contacts and exposure to media coverage of police misconduct. The findings are discussed in reference to recent policing initiatives that are designed to facilitate amicable citizen–police relationships.
AnagnostopoulosFHantzA (2011) Familiarity with and social distance from people with mental illness: testing the mediating effects of prejudiced attitudes. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology21: 451–460.
2.
BogardusES (1947) Measurement of personal–group relations. Sociometry10(4): 306–311.
3.
BradfordB (2011) Convergence, not divergence. Trends and trajectories in public contact and confidence in the police. British Journal of Criminology51: 179–200.
4.
BradfordBJacksonJStankoEA (2009) Contact and confidence: revisiting the impact of public encounters with the police. Policing & Society19: 20–46.
5.
BrownBBenedictWR (2002) Perceptions of the police: past findings, methodological issues, conceptual issues and policy implications. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management25(3): 543–580.
6.
BrunsonRK (2007) Police don’t like black people: African-American young men’s accumulated police experiences. Criminology & Public Policy6(1): 71–102.
7.
DowlerKSparksR (2008) Victimization, contact with police, and neighborhood conditions: reconsidering African American and Hispanic attitudes toward the police. Police Practice & Research9(5): 395–415.
GauJM (2010) A longitudinal analysis of citizens’ attitudes about police. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management33(2): 236–252.
10.
GauJMBrunsonRK (2010) Procedural justice and order maintenance policing: a study of inner-city young men’s perceptions of police legitimacy. Justice Quarterly27(2): 255–279.
11.
GranovetterMS (1973) The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology78(6): 1360–1380.
12.
HindsLMurphyK (2007). Public satisfaction with police: using procedural justice to improve police legitimacy. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology40(1): 27–42.
HuangCVaughnM (1996) Support and confidence: public attitudes towards the police. In: FlanaganTJLongmireDR (eds), Americans View Crime and Justice: A National Public Opinion Survey. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 31–45.
15.
JacksonJBradfordB (2009) Crime, policing and social order: on the expressive nature of public confidence in policing. British Journal of Sociology60(3): 493–521.
16.
KarakayaliN (2009) Social distance and affective orientations. Sociological Forum24(3): 538–562.
17.
LeesonPT (2008) Social distance and self-enforcing exchange. Journal of Legal Studies37(1): 161–188.
18.
ManningPK (1992) Organizational Communication. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
19.
MacDonaldJStokesRJRidgewayGRileyKJ (2007) Race, neighborhood context and perceptions of injustice by the police in Cincinnati. Urban Studies44(13): 2567–2585.
20.
MillerJDavisRC (2008) Unpacking public attitudes to the police: contrasting perceptions of misconduct with traditional measures of satisfaction. International Journal of Police Science & Management10(1): 9–22.
21.
MurphyKMazerolleLBennettS (2014) Promoting trust in police: findings from a randomised experimental field trial of procedural justice policing. Policing & Society24(4): 405–424.
22.
ReisigMD (2010) Community and problem-oriented policing. Crime & Justice39: 1–53.
23.
ReisigMDParksRB (2000) Experience, quality of life, and neighborhood context: a hierarchical analysis of satisfaction with police. Justice Quarterly17(3): 607–630.
24.
RosenbaumDPSchuckAMCostelloSKHawkinsDFRingMK (2005) Attitudes toward the police: the effects of direct and vicarious experiences. Police Quarterly8(3): 343–365.
25.
SchuckAMRosenbaumDP (2005) Global and neighborhood attitudes toward the police: differentiation by race, ethnicity and type of contact. Journal of Quantitative Criminology21(4): 391–418.
26.
SchuckAMRosenbaumDPHawkinsDF (2008) The influence of race/ethnicity, social class, and neighborhood context on residents’ attitudes toward the police. Police Quarterly11(4): 496–519.
27.
SkoganWG (2006) Asymmetry in the impact of encounters with police. Policing & Society16(2): 99–126.
28.
SkoganWG (2009) Concern about crime and confidence in the police. Police Quarterly12(3): 301–318.
29.
StewartEABaumerEPBrunsonRKSimonsRL (2009) Neighborhood racial context and perceptions of police-based racial discrimination among Black youth. Criminology47(3): 847–887.
30.
TaylorRBLawtonBA (2012) An integrated contextual model of confidence in local police. Police Quarterly15(4): 414–445.
31.
TylerTRFaganJ (2008) Legitimacy and cooperation: why do people help the police fight crime in their communities?Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law6: 231–275.
32.
WeitzerR (2000) White, Black, or blue cops? Race and citizen assessments of police officers. Journal of Criminal Justice28(4): 313–324.
33.
WeitzerR (2002) Incidents of police misconduct and public opinion. Journal of Criminal Justice30(5): 397–408.
34.
WeitzerRTuchS (2004) Race and perceptions of police misconduct. Social Problems51(3): 305–325.
35.
ZimbardoPG (1971) ‘The power and pathology of imprisonment’. Congressional Record (Serial No. 15, 1971-10-25). Hearings before Subcommittee No. 3, of the United States House Committee on the Judiciary, Ninety-Second Congress, First Session on Corrections, Part II, Prisons, Prison Reform and Prisoner’s Rights: California. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
