Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

A nonlinear dynamic model of angular contact ball bearing under combined external loads is established based on the nonlinear elastic Hertz contact theory and raceless control theory. The established dynamic model is solved by employing variable step size Newton Raphson iteration method and the validation of model is verified by comparing the proposed results with the corresponding results come from the existing literatures. The solution of the presented model has high accuracy compared with the existing experimental results. In addition, the computational efficiency of the proposed model is improved significantly by introducing iteration step size adjustment factor. According to the proposed model, the dynamic contact and stiffness characteristics of angular contact ball are studied systematically by investigating the effects of combined external load working conditions on the contact parameters including contact angle and contact force and the stiffness parameters including diagonal stiffness and off-diagonal stiffness. This research can provide the theoretical basis and technique guidance for the designation and manufacture of angular contact ball bearing under combined external loads.

Keywords

angular contact ball bearing contact angle contact force diagonal stiffness off-diagonal stiffness

Introduction

As the typical representative of ball bearing, angular contact ball bearing is applied to rotating machinery fields universally due to it have high-speed ratio and withstand combined load working conditions. In addition, it can meet the requirements of high reliability and low power of rotating machinery in some degree. As the crucial component of rotating machinery, the dynamic behaviors including dynamic contact and stiffness characteristics of angular contact ball bearing have influence on the stability and reliability of rotating machinery. Therefore, the dynamic behaviors of angular contact ball bearing have been investigated systematically from different perspectives in the past several decades. With the unremitting efforts of many scholars, a series of remarkable results have been achieved.

When talking above the establishment of dynamic model of angular contact ball bearing, it has to be mentioned the works done by Jones, Harris and Gupta.^1–5 Among the proposed dynamic model of angular contact ball bearing, the quasi-static dynamic model of angular contact ball bearing is representative and it is presented by Jones based on raceway control hypothesis and Hertz contact theory. De Mul et al.^6,7 presented a general five degree of freedom dynamic model for calculating the load distribution and deflection of rolling element bearings based on the Jones model. However, the internal friction between ball and raceway is neglected. Cao et al. ⁸ established a general model with regard to angular contact ball bearing on the basis of Jone’s model and raceway control hypothesis, the centrifugal force and gyroscopic moment are taken into account. The raceway control hypothesis contains inner raceway control and outer raceway control. Wang et al.^9,10 analyzed the contact characteristics and spin-to-roll ratios of angular contact ball bearing subjected to external combined loads by discarding the traditional raceway control hypothesis. Cheng et al.¹¹ investigated the influences of structural and material parameters on the vibration characteristics of bearing-rotor system based on quasi-static model of bearings. Zhou et al.^12,13 established a five degrees of freedom quasi-static dynamic model of angular contact ball bearing for determining the raceway tolerance of high-precision rolling bearing and the waviness conducted by manufacture error is considered. Gao et al.¹⁴ proposed an analytical calculation model of high-speed ball bearing based on the Jones raceway control hypothesis model. The clearance, centrifugal displacement and thermal deformation are taken into account.

Many researchers focused on the dynamic performances including contact characteristics, load distributions and bearing stiffness characteristics of angular contact ball bearing. Zhang et al.^15–18 deduced the expressions of bearing stiffness matrix of angular contact ball bearing under preload by using iterative algorithm, meanwhile, studied the influences of external load condition and rotating on the bearing stiffness. Chu et al.^19,20 established a comprehensive dynamic model of angular contact ball bearing based on the extended Jones-Harris model for analyzing the load distribution and stiffness of angular contact ball bearing. The effects of external force, numbers of ball and bearing waviness on bearing stiffness are taken into account. Zhuo et al.²¹ established a three degrees of freedom dynamic model of double-row self-aligning ball bearings system by using fourth-order Runge–Kutta method based on Hertzian elastic contact theory and deformation compatibility theory. Zhao et al.²² studied the load characteristics and coefficient of friction of angular contact ball bearing at high-speed working condition. Shi et al.²³ proposed a combined numerical algorithm for analyzing the quasi-dynamics and thermal elastohydrodynamic lubrication characteristics of angular contact ball bearing at heavy-load and high-speed working conditions. Li et al.²⁴ established a mechanical model of angular contact ball bearing with localized defect and the influences of some parameters on the contact angles and load distributions are analyzed systematically. Deng et al.²⁵ investigated the effects of raceway diameters and guiding clearances on the bearing stiffness by integrating the stiffness matrix to the dynamic model of ball bearing. Luo et al.²⁶ established a mathematical model for analyzing the static and dynamic stiffness of angular contact ball bearing based on ball-raceway Hertz point contact theory by employing Newton–Raphson algorithm method. Xu et al.²⁷ proposed a general analytical stiffness model of ball bearings in rotor system for analyzing the influence the radial force, bearing clearance and fit clearance on the contact and stiffness characteristics of ball bearing. Fang et al.²⁸ analyzed the nonlinear stiffness of double-row angular contact ball bearing considering three different configurations on the basis of the improved quasi-static model.

In addition, the solution methods of the nonlinear dynamic model of angular contact ball bearing have gained many experts attention. Wang et al.^29,30 set up an improved nonlinear dynamic model of angular contact ball bearing, the factors including preload condition, lubrication, waviness and Hertz contact are considered. Xi et al. ³¹ proposed a novel contact probability model of angular ball bearing subjected to axial and radial loads by employing multi-body dynamics and a spherical grid division approach. Liu et al.^32,33 developed a novelty analytical method for analyzing the variations of contact angle, load distribution and stiffness under the combined loads. Meanwhile, it is worth noting that the calculation time and computational resource of the established dynamic model are less than the traditional quasi-static model. Liao et al.^34–36 deduced the three-dimensional expressions of elastic deformation at different position angle by using Newton method for analyzing the deformation and load of ball bearing according to the geometry shape of inner and outer raceway. Wang et al.³⁷ proposed a general model for investigating the skidding between ball and raceways of angular contact ball bearing at high-speed by employing fourth-order Runge-Kutta algorithm. Kang et al.³⁸ determined the bearing stiffness of angular contact ball bearing based on the geometry features angular contact ball bearing by employing back-propagation neural network method. Wang et al.³⁹ proposed a nonlinear dynamic model of ball bearing considering bearing deformation and ball-inner raceway separation and the predict method of the initial iterative value is selected to calculate the dynamic properties of ball bearing. Wang et al.⁴⁰ presented a comprehensive model of ball bearing subjected to different preload mechanisms for studying the effects of initial interference value, shaft rotation speed and angular ring misalignment on the dynamic performances of bearing by utilizing the finite difference method.

According to the above introduction, it is not hard to see that the dynamic models of angular contact ball bearing have been investigated deeply from different perspectives by using iterative methods. However, the existing investigations have some deficiencies and they can be summarized as follow: The existing iterative solving methods need consume a calculation time and computational resources, the stability of iterative solving results are largely depend on the selection of initial value of iteration and the iterative solving results are prone to divergence when the external load working conditions are changed; The investigations of bearing stiffness focused on diagonal stiffness and neglected the influences of off-diagonal stiffness on the dynamic characteristics of angular contact ball bearing at high speed in the existing literatures. In order to compensate the mentioned deficiencies, this paper intend to establish a general five degrees of freedom dynamic model of angular contact ball bearing based on nonlinear elastic Hertz contact theory and raceless control theory which can avoid the judgment of inner and outer raceway control theory effectively. The established dynamic model is solved by employing variable step size Newton–Raphson method which is realized by introducing the iteration step size adjustment factors. The variable step size Newton–Raphson method can enhance the stability, accuracy and calculation efficiency of iterative solution of angular contact ball bearing under combined loads working conditions. Then, according to the established dynamic model, the effects of combined external loads on the dynamic contact angle and contact force of angular contact ball bearing under combined external loads investigated systematically. Finally, the influences of combined external loads on the diagonal stiffness and off-diagonal stiffness of angular contact ball bearing under combined external loads are analyzed thoroughly. The above investigations with regard to dynamic contact and stiffness characteristics can provide reference for the vibration characteristic analysis of angular contact ball bearing and the establishment of rotor-bearing system.

Theoretical formulations

The model description of angular contact ball bearing

In order to establish a general five degrees of freedom dynamic model of angular contact ball bearing advantageously, the geometric model of angular contact ball bearing is described in Figure 1. As one can see from Figure 1, the Cartesian coordinate is selected as global coordinate system, the five degrees of freedom of angular contact ball bearing including three translation displacements x, y and z and two rotate displacements θ_y and θ_z. In practical engineering application, the angular contact ball bearing consists of inner raceway, outer raceway, rolling element (ball) and cage, the outer raceway and bearing house are connected by using interference fit and the inner raceway and rotor are connected by applying interference fit. According to the above interference fits, the outer raceway is assumed as static, the inner raceway is assumed as rotating with rotor and it rotates x axis and the rotating speed is described by using ω_i in this paper.

Figure 1.

The geometric model of angular contact ball bearing.

Where o_i, o_o and o_b denote inner raceway curvature center, outer raceway curvature center and ball center respectively, the above three centers are collinear when the rotating speed of angular contact ball bearing is 0; r_i and r_o represent inner raceway curvature radius and outer raceway curvature radius respectively; R_p and z_p express the radial distance and axial distance between inner outer raceway curvature center and inner ring center o of angular contact ball bearing; R_m, R_i, and R_o denote pitch radius, inner raceway, and outer raceway contact radius respectively. The inner raceway contact ellipse and outer raceway contact ellipse are caused by the contact between ball and the inner and outer raceway, a_i and a_o denote the major axis radius of inner raceway and outer raceway contact ellipses, b_i and b_o represent the minor axis radius of inner raceway and outer raceway contact ellipses. α_o represents the free contact angle of angular contact ball bearing and it can be determined by the following expression.

α_{o} = arcos (\frac{A - 0.5 P_{d}}{A})

(1)

Where A is the distance between inner raceway curvature center and outer raceway curvature center; P_d denotes radial clearance. The expressions of A and P_d can be written as follow:

A = r_{i} + r_{o} - D P_{d} = 2 (R_{i} + R_{o}) - 2 D

(2)

Where D denotes ball diameter.

The geometric analysis of angular contact ball bearing

According to the above model introduction of angular contact ball bearing, the relation position relationships of three centers including inner raceway curvature center, outer raceway curvature center and ball center have been determined when angular contact ball bearing is at rest. However, the relation position relationships of three centers change with the rotating speed of angular contact ball bearing increased. Due to the outer raceway is assumed as static in this paper, the location of outer raceway curvature center keeps constant with rotating speed increased. The location of inner raceway curvature center and ball center vary with rotating speed increased and the variations of location relationship of inner raceway curvature center and ball center are shown in Figure 2.

Figure 2.

The relative position relationship of angular contact ball bearing internal structure.

Where O_ii, O_oo and O_bb denote the final location of inner raceway curvature center, outer raceway curvature center, and ball center; A_1j and A_2j express the axial and radial distances between the final location of inner raceway curvature center and the final location of outer raceway curvature center; B_1j and B_2j denote the axial and radial distances between the final location of inner raceway curvature center and the initial location of inner raceway curvature center; O_bi and O_bo represent the distance between the final location of ball center and the location locations of inner and outer raceway curvature center; α_ij and α_oj denote the contact angle of inner raceway and outer raceway; X_1j and X_2j are variables which express the axial and radial distances between the final location of ball center and the final location of outer raceway curvature center. The expressions of the above symbols can be written as follow:

{\begin{cases} O_{i i} O_{b b} = (f_{i} - 0.5) D + δ_{i j} \\ O_{b b} O_{o o} = (f_{o} - 0.5) D + δ_{o j} \end{cases}

(3)

Where δ_ij and δ_oj are variables which denote the contact deformation resulting from inner and outer raceway contact; f_i and f_o represent the inner and outer raceway curvature coefficients which can be determined by the following formulation.

{\begin{cases} f_{i} = r_{i} / D \\ f_{o} = r_{o} / D \end{cases}

(4)

According to the existing literature¹⁷, the specific expressions of A_1j, A_2j, B_1j and B_2j can be written as follow:

{\begin{cases} A_{1 j} = A \sin α_{o} + B_{1 j} = A \sin α_{o} + δ_{x} + R_{p} (θ_{y} \sin φ_{j} - θ_{z} \cos φ_{j}) \\ A_{2 j} = A \cos α_{o} + B_{2 j} = A \cos α_{o} + δ_{y} \cos φ_{j} + δ_{z} \sin φ_{j} \end{cases}

(5)

Where δ_x, δ_y and δ_z denote translational displacement along x, y and z axes; θ_y and θ _z express the rotational displacement around y and z axes. The meaning of R_p has been introduced in the above discussion and it can be expressed as the following form.

R_{p} = R_{m} + (r_{i} - D / 2) \cos α_{o}

(6)

The symbol of φ_j denotes ball azimuth angle of angular contact ball bearing and it depends on the number of ball and the angular velocity of cage. The expression of φ_j can be written as follow:

φ_{j} = ω_{c} t + \frac{2 π}{N} (j - 1); ω_{c} = \frac{1}{2} ω_{i} (1 - \frac{D}{2 R_{m}} \cos α_{o})

(7)

Where N denotes the number of balls; j represents the serial number of jth ball and the value range of j from one to N; ω_c is the angular velocity of cage and t is time variable. In order to describe the distribution of ball intuitively, the ball distribution of angular contact ball bearing is shown in Figure 3.

Figure 3.

The ball distribution diagram of angular contact ball bearing.

The inner and outer raceway contact angles α_i and α_o can be ascertained by analyzing the geometric relationship of internal structure of angular contact ball bearing and the corresponding expression can be written as follow:

{\begin{cases} \sin α_{i j} = \frac{A_{1 j} - X_{1 j}}{(f_{i} - 0.5) D + δ_{i j}} \\ \cos α_{i j} = \frac{A_{2 j} - X_{2 j}}{(f_{i} - 0.5) D + δ_{i j}} \end{cases}; {\begin{cases} \sin α_{o j} = \frac{X_{1 j}}{(f_{o} - 0.5) D + δ_{o j}} \\ \cos α_{o j} = \frac{A_{2 j} - X_{2 j}}{(f_{o} - 0.5) D + δ_{o j}} \end{cases}

(8)

According to the law of sines and cosines, a set of equilibrium equations with regard to the geometric relative position of internal structure of angular contact ball bearing can be determined as follow:

{\begin{cases} {(\sin α_{i j})}^{2} + {(\cos α_{i j})}^{2} = 1 \\ {(\sin α_{o j})}^{2} + {(\cos α_{o j})}^{2} = 1 \end{cases}

(9)

{\begin{cases} F_{1 j} = {(A_{1 j} - X_{1 j})}^{2} + {(A_{2 j} - X_{2 j})}^{2} - {[(f_{i} - 0.5) D + δ_{i j}]}^{2} = 0 \\ F_{2 j} = {(X_{1 j})}^{2} + {(X_{2 j})}^{2} - {[(f_{o} - 0.5) D + δ_{o j}]}^{2} = 0 \end{cases}

(10)

The force analysis of angular contact ball bearing

In order to get a set of equilibrium equations with regard to ball, the jth ball is selected as object and the force analysis of ball is described in Figure 4.

Figure 4.

The jth ball of force analysis.

Where Q_ij and Q_oj denote the contact forces resulting from the contact between ball and the inner and outer raceway respectively; T_ij and T_oj represent the friction forces caused by the rolling friction between ball and the inner and outer raceway; F_cj and M_gj express the centrifugal force and gyroscopic moment. After force balance analysis, a set of equilibrium equations with regard to ball can be determined as the following form.

{\begin{cases} F_{3 j} = Q_{i j} \sin α_{i j} - T_{i j} \cos α_{i j} - Q_{o j} \sin α_{o j} + T_{o j} \cos α_{o j} = 0 \\ F_{4 j} = Q_{i j} \cos α_{i j} + T_{i j} \sin α_{i j} - Q_{o j} \cos α_{o j} - T_{o j} \sin α_{o j} + F_{c j} = 0 \end{cases}

(11)

According to nonlinear elastic Hertz contact theory, the contact forces Q_ij and Q_oj can be written as follow:

{\begin{cases} Q_{i j} = K_{i j} δ_{i j}^{3 / 2} \\ Q_{o j} = K_{o j} δ_{o j}^{3 / 2} \end{cases}

(12)

Where K_ij and K_oj denote the contact coefficients, the specific expressions of K_ij and K_oj can be found in Appendix A. The specific expressions of T_ij and T_oj can be written as the following form.

{\begin{cases} T_{i j} = \frac{2 M_{g j}}{D} \frac{Q_{i j}}{Q_{i j} + Q_{o j}} \\ T_{o j} = \frac{2 M_{g j}}{D} \frac{Q_{o j}}{Q_{i j} + Q_{o j}} \end{cases}

(13)

According to the published literature,¹⁷ the expressions of F_cj and M_gj are described as follow:

F_{c j} = m_{b} R_{m} ω_{i}^{2} {(\frac{ω_{m}}{ω_{i}})}_{j}^{2}; M_{g j} = J_{b} ω_{i}^{2} {(\frac{ω_{m}}{ω_{i}})}_{j} {(\frac{ω_{b}}{ω_{i}})}_{j} \sin β_{j}

(14)

Where m and J denote mass and inertia moment of ball, the concrete expressions of m and J are written as follow according to the existing literature.⁹

m_{b} = \frac{ρ π D^{3}}{6}; J_{b} = \frac{ρ π D^{5}}{60}

(15)

Where ρ denotes density of ball; ω_b denotes the spin angular velocity. Based on without raceway control hypothesis, the expressions of ω_i, ω_m and ω_b can be written as follows.

{(\frac{ω_{m}}{ω_{i}})}_{j} = \frac{1}{1 + \frac{1 + γ \cos α_{o j}}{1 - γ \cos α_{i j}} \times \frac{\cos α_{i j} + \tan β_{j} \sin α_{i j}}{\cos α_{o j} + \tan β_{j} \sin α_{o j}}} {(\frac{ω_{b}}{ω_{i}})}_{j} = \frac{- 1}{\frac{\cos α_{i j} + \tan β_{j} \sin α_{i j}}{1 - γ \cos α_{i j}} + \frac{\cos α_{o j} + \tan β_{j} \sin α_{o j}}{1 - γ \cos α_{i j}}} γ = \frac{D}{D_{m};} D_{m} = 2 R_{m}

(16)

Where β_j is the angle between ball angular velocity vector and bearing axis and it can be determined by the following form according to D’Alembert principle.

β_{j} = \arctan [\frac{C_{j} (S_{j} + 1) \sin α_{i j} + 2 \sin α_{o j}}{C_{j} (S_{j} + 1) \cos α_{i j} + 2 (\cos α_{o j} + γ) + G_{j}}]; {\begin{cases} C_{j} = \frac{Q_{i j} a_{i j} L_{i j}}{Q_{o j} a_{o j} L_{o j}} \\ S_{j} = \frac{1 + γ \cos α_{o j}}{1 - \cos α_{i j}} \\ G_{j} = γ C_{j} [\cos (α_{i j} - α_{o j}) - S_{j}] \end{cases}

(17)

Where L_ij and L_oj are the second kind elliptic integral with regard to contact ellipses resulting from the contact between ball and the inner and outer raceway, the expressions of L_ij and L_oj can be determined by the existing literature.⁹ According to the above discussion, it is not hard to find that two sets equilibrium equations have been ascertained and there are four variables X_1j, X_2j, δ_ij and δ_oj in the above equilibrium equations.

{\begin{cases} F_{1 j} = {(A_{1 j} - X_{1 j})}^{2} + {(A_{2 j} - X_{2 j})}^{2} - {[(f_{i} - 0.5) D + δ_{i j}]}^{2} = 0 \\ F_{2 j} = {(X_{1 j})}^{2} + {(X_{2 j})}^{2} - {[(f_{o} - 0.5) D + δ_{o j}]}^{2} = 0 \\ F_{3 j} = Q_{i j} \sin α_{i j} - T_{i j} \cos α_{i j} - Q_{o j} \sin α_{o j} + T_{o j} \cos α_{o j} = 0 \\ F_{4 j} = Q_{i j} \cos α_{i j} + T_{i j} \sin α_{i j} - Q_{o j} \cos α_{o j} - T_{o j} \sin α_{o j} + F_{c j} = 0 \end{cases}

(18)

Due to the above two sets equilibrium equations have strong nonlinearity and it cannot be solved by employing the conventional numerical method. Thus, this paper intends to solve four variables X_1j, X_2j, δ_ij and δ_oj by using variable step size Newton Raphson iterative method.

x_{j}^{i + 1} = x_{j}^{i} - h_{1} \frac{f_{j}}{d f_{j}} x_{j} = {[\begin{array}{l} X_{1 j} & X_{2 j} & δ_{i j} & δ_{o j} \end{array}]}^{T}; f_{j} = {[\begin{array}{l} F_{1 j} & F_{2 j} & F_{3 j} & F_{4 j} \end{array}]}^{T} d f_{j} = [\begin{array}{l} \frac{\partial F_{1 j}}{\partial X_{1 j}} & \frac{\partial F_{1 j}}{\partial X_{2 j}} & \frac{\partial F_{1 j}}{\partial δ_{i j}} & \frac{\partial F_{1 j}}{\partial δ_{o j}} \\ \frac{\partial F_{2 j}}{\partial X_{1 j}} & \frac{\partial F_{2 j}}{\partial X_{2 j}} & \frac{\partial F_{2 j}}{\partial δ_{i j}} & \frac{\partial F_{2 j}}{\partial δ_{o j}} \\ \frac{\partial F_{3 j}}{\partial X_{1 j}} & \frac{\partial F_{3 j}}{\partial X_{2 j}} & \frac{\partial F_{3 j}}{\partial δ_{i j}} & \frac{\partial F_{3 j}}{\partial δ_{o j}} \\ \frac{\partial F_{4 j}}{\partial X_{1 j}} & \frac{\partial F_{4 j}}{\partial X_{2 j}} & \frac{\partial F_{4 j}}{\partial δ_{i j}} & \frac{\partial F_{4 j}}{\partial δ_{o j}} \end{array}]

(19)

Where h₁ denotes iteration step adjustment factor which is introduced for enhancing the convergence and stability of the iteration solving of the above equilibrium equations; i represents the number of iteration.

In order to solve the global displacement δ_x, δ_y, δ_z, θ_y and θ_z of inner ring of angular contact bearing under external loads, the force analysis of angular contact ball bearing inner ring are carried out in the following discussion and the corresponding force analysis results can be found in Figure 5. According to the above force analysis, a set of equilibrium equations with regard to angular contact ball bearing inner ring can be written as the following form.

F_{x} = \sum_{j = 1}^{N} (Q_{i j} \sin α_{i j} - T_{i j} \cos α_{i j}) F_{y} = \sum_{j = 1}^{N} (Q_{i j} \cos α_{i j} + T_{i j} \sin α_{i j}) \cos φ_{j} F_{z} = \sum_{j = 1}^{N} (Q_{i j} \cos α_{i j} + T_{i j} \sin α_{i j}) \sin φ_{j} M_{y} = \sum_{j = 1}^{N} [R_{p} (Q_{i j} \cos α_{i j} - T_{i j} \sin α_{i j}) \cos φ_{j} + T_{i j} r_{i}] \sin φ_{j} M_{z} = - \sum_{j = 1}^{N} [R_{p} (Q_{i j} \cos α_{i j} - T_{i j} \sin α_{i j}) \cos φ_{j} + T_{i j} r_{i}] \cos φ_{j}

(20)

Where F_x, F_y and F_z denote external forces which are applied at the inner ring of angular contact ball bearing along x, y and z axes respectively; M_y and M_z denote external torques which are applied at the inner ring of angular contact ball bearing about y and z axes respectively. From equation (20), it can be found that the above equilibrium equations have strong nonlinear. Thus, this paper intends to solve the five displacement variables δ_x, δ_y, δ_z, θ_y and θ_z by employing variable step size Newton Raphson iterative method and the corresponding iterative formulation can be expression as follow:

d^{i + 1} = d^{i} - h_{2} \frac{F}{K} d = {[\begin{array}{l} x & y & z & θ_{y} & θ_{z} \end{array}]}^{T}; F = {[\begin{array}{l} F_{x} & F_{y} & F_{z} & M_{y} & M_{z} \end{array}]}^{T} K = [\begin{array}{l} \frac{\partial F_{x}}{\partial δ_{x}} & \frac{\partial F_{x}}{\partial δ_{y}} & \frac{\partial F_{x}}{\partial δ_{z}} & \frac{\partial F_{x}}{\partial θ_{y}} & \frac{\partial F_{x}}{\partial θ_{z}} \\ \frac{\partial F_{y}}{\partial δ_{x}} & \frac{\partial F_{y}}{\partial δ_{y}} & \frac{\partial F_{y}}{\partial δ_{z}} & \frac{\partial F_{y}}{\partial θ_{y}} & \frac{\partial F_{y}}{\partial θ_{z}} \\ \frac{\partial F_{z}}{\partial δ_{x}} & \frac{\partial F_{z}}{\partial δ_{y}} & \frac{\partial F_{z}}{\partial δ_{z}} & \frac{\partial F_{z}}{\partial θ_{y}} & \frac{\partial F_{z}}{\partial θ_{z}} \\ \frac{\partial M_{y}}{\partial δ_{x}} & \frac{\partial M_{y}}{\partial δ_{y}} & \frac{\partial M_{y}}{\partial δ_{z}} & \frac{\partial M_{y}}{\partial θ_{y}} & \frac{\partial M_{y}}{\partial θ_{z}} \\ \frac{\partial M_{z}}{\partial δ_{x}} & \frac{\partial M_{z}}{\partial δ_{y}} & \frac{\partial M_{z}}{\partial δ_{z}} & \frac{\partial M_{z}}{\partial θ_{y}} & \frac{\partial M_{z}}{\partial θ_{z}} \end{array}]

(21)

Where h₂ denotes iteration step adjustment factor which has the same function as h₁. K represents stiffness matrix of angular contact ball bearing. Meanwhile, it is necessary to point out that the local variables X_1j, X_2j, δ_ij and δ_oj is solved before the global variables δ_x, δ_y, δ_z, θ_y and θ_z.

Figure 5.

The schematic diagram of flexible shaft segment.

The solution of angular contact ball bearing

After the above discussion, the 4N + 5 nonlinear equilibrium equations have been determined. In the process of model solution, the implicit relationship between the local variables X_1j, X_2j, δ_ij and δ_oj and the global variables δ_x, δ_y, δ_z, θ_y and θ_z need to be deduced furtherly in the following discussion. According to the existing literature,¹⁷ this paper intends to employ two different calculation forms to deduce the above implicit relationship.

The implicit relationship is expressed by using first form:

[\begin{array}{l} \frac{\partial X_{1 j}}{\partial d_{k}} \\ \frac{\partial X_{2 j}}{\partial d_{k}} \\ \frac{\partial δ_{i j}}{\partial d_{k}} \\ \frac{\partial δ_{o j}}{\partial d_{k}} \end{array}] = - \frac{1}{d f_{j}} [\begin{array}{l} \frac{\partial (F_{1 j}, F_{2 j}, F_{3 j}, F_{4 j})}{\partial (d_{k}, X_{2 j}, δ_{i j}, δ_{o j})} \\ \frac{\partial (F_{1 j}, F_{2 j}, F_{3 j}, F_{4 j})}{\partial (X_{1 j}, d_{k}, δ_{i j}, δ_{o j})} \\ \frac{\partial (F_{1 j}, F_{2 j}, F_{3 j}, F_{4 j})}{\partial (X_{1 j}, X_{2 j}, d_{k}, δ_{o j})} \\ \frac{\partial (F_{1 j}, F_{2 j}, F_{3 j}, F_{4 j})}{\partial (X_{1 j}, X_{2 j}, δ_{i j}, d_{k})} \end{array}]; \frac{\partial (F_{1 j}, F_{2 j}, F_{3 j}, F_{4 j})}{\partial (d_{k}, X_{2 j}, δ_{i j}, δ_{o j})} = [\begin{array}{l} \frac{\partial F_{1 j}}{\partial d_{k}} & \frac{\partial F_{1 j}}{\partial X_{2 j}} & \frac{\partial F_{1 j}}{\partial δ_{i j}} & \frac{\partial F_{1 j}}{\partial δ_{o j}} \\ \frac{\partial F_{2 j}}{\partial d_{k}} & \frac{\partial F_{2 j}}{\partial X_{2 j}} & \frac{\partial F_{2 j}}{\partial δ_{i j}} & \frac{\partial F_{2 j}}{\partial δ_{o j}} \\ \frac{\partial F_{3 j}}{\partial d_{k}} & \frac{\partial F_{3 j}}{\partial X_{2 j}} & \frac{\partial F_{3 j}}{\partial δ_{i j}} & \frac{\partial F_{3 j}}{\partial δ_{o j}} \\ \frac{\partial F_{4 j}}{\partial d_{k}} & \frac{\partial F_{4 j}}{\partial X_{2 j}} & \frac{\partial F_{4 j}}{\partial δ_{i j}} & \frac{\partial F_{4 j}}{\partial δ_{o j}} \end{array}]

(22)

{\begin{cases} \frac{\partial F_{1 j}}{\partial d_{k}} = \frac{\partial F_{1 j}}{\partial A_{1 j}} \frac{\partial A_{1 j}}{\partial d_{k}} + \frac{\partial F_{1 j}}{\partial A_{2 j}} \frac{\partial A_{2 j}}{\partial d_{k}} \\ \frac{\partial F_{2 j}}{\partial d_{k}} = \frac{\partial F_{2 j}}{\partial A_{1 j}} \frac{\partial A_{1 j}}{\partial d_{k}} + \frac{\partial F_{2 j}}{\partial A_{2 j}} \frac{\partial A_{2 j}}{\partial d_{k}} \\ \frac{\partial F_{3 j}}{\partial d_{k}} = \frac{\partial F_{3 j}}{\partial A_{1 j}} \frac{\partial A_{1 j}}{\partial d_{k}} + \frac{\partial F_{3 j}}{\partial A_{2 j}} \frac{\partial A_{2 j}}{\partial d_{k}} \\ \frac{\partial F_{4 j}}{\partial d_{k}} = \frac{\partial F_{4 j}}{\partial A_{1 j}} \frac{\partial A_{1 j}}{\partial d_{k}} + \frac{\partial F_{4 j}}{\partial A_{2 j}} \frac{\partial A_{2 j}}{\partial d_{k}} \end{cases} (k = 1, 2, 3, 4, 5)

(23)

The implicit relationship is expressed by using second form:

\frac{\partial X_{1 j}}{\partial d_{k}} = - \frac{J_{j}}{J J_{1 j}}; \frac{\partial X_{2 j}}{\partial d_{k}} = - \frac{J_{j}}{J J_{2 j}}; \frac{\partial δ_{i j}}{\partial d_{k}} = - \frac{J_{j}}{J J_{3 j}}; \frac{\partial δ_{o j}}{\partial d_{k}} = - \frac{J_{j}}{J J_{4 j}} J_{j} = | \begin{array}{l} \frac{\partial F_{1 j}}{\partial X_{1 j}} & \frac{\partial F_{1 j}}{\partial X_{2 j}} & \frac{\partial F_{1 j}}{\partial δ_{i j}} & \frac{\partial F_{1 j}}{\partial δ_{o j}} \\ \frac{\partial F_{2 j}}{\partial X_{1 j}} & \frac{\partial F_{2 j}}{\partial X_{2 j}} & \frac{\partial F_{2 j}}{\partial δ_{i j}} & \frac{\partial F_{2 j}}{\partial δ_{o j}} \\ \frac{\partial F_{3 j}}{\partial X_{1 j}} & \frac{\partial F_{3 j}}{\partial X_{2 j}} & \frac{\partial F_{3 j}}{\partial δ_{i j}} & \frac{\partial F_{3 j}}{\partial δ_{o j}} \\ \frac{\partial F_{4 j}}{\partial X_{1 j}} & \frac{\partial F_{4 j}}{\partial X_{2 j}} & \frac{\partial F_{4 j}}{\partial δ_{i j}} & \frac{\partial F_{4 j}}{\partial δ_{o j}} \end{array} |; J J_{1 j} = | \begin{array}{l} \frac{\partial F_{1 j}}{\partial d_{k}} & \frac{\partial F_{1 j}}{\partial X_{2 j}} & \frac{\partial F_{1 j}}{\partial δ_{i j}} & \frac{\partial F_{1 j}}{\partial δ_{o j}} \\ \frac{\partial F_{2 j}}{\partial d_{k}} & \frac{\partial F_{2 j}}{\partial X_{2 j}} & \frac{\partial F_{2 j}}{\partial δ_{i j}} & \frac{\partial F_{2 j}}{\partial δ_{o j}} \\ \frac{\partial F_{3 j}}{\partial d_{k}} & \frac{\partial F_{3 j}}{\partial X_{2 j}} & \frac{\partial F_{3 j}}{\partial δ_{i j}} & \frac{\partial F_{3 j}}{\partial δ_{o j}} \\ \frac{\partial F_{4 j}}{\partial d_{k}} & \frac{\partial F_{4 j}}{\partial X_{2 j}} & \frac{\partial F_{4 j}}{\partial δ_{i j}} & \frac{\partial F_{4 j}}{\partial δ_{o j}} \end{array} |

(24)

Due to the proposed dynamic model with regard to angular contact ball bearing involves many variables, the flow chart of variable transmission is shown as Figure 6 for the subsequent programming conveniently. Meanwhile, the flow chart of model solution is given in Figure 7 for describing the solution process of dynamic characteristics of angular contact ball bearing under combined external loads by using variable step size Newton Raphson iteration method. According to the above proposed dynamic model with angular contact ball bearing, the dynamic contact and stiffness characteristics can be solved.

Figure 6.

The flow chart of variable transmission of angular contact ball bearing.

Figure 7.

The flow chart of model solution of angular contact ball bearing.

Results and discussions

After the above theoretical analysis, the dynamic model of angular contact ball bearing is established by employing variable step size Newton Rapson method. In order to demonstrate the proposed model can be used to solve the dynamic contact and stiffness characteristics of angular contact ball bearing subjected to combined external loads, the model validation is carried out firstly; Secondly, the influences of combined external load working conditions on the dynamic contact angle and contact force are investigated systematically; Finally, the effects of combined external load working conditions on the dynamic stiffness including diagonal and off-diagonal stiffness are analyzed thoroughly.

Model validation

The model validation of angular contact ball bearing is realized by comparing the calculation results of the proposed model with the corresponding results come from the existing literatures. The model validation can be divided into three parts in the following discussion.

First of all, the calculation results with regard to static stiffness of the established model is compared with the corresponding experimental results come from the published literatures. The type of angular contact ball bearing is selected as RPF7039 in this article and the corresponding structure parameters can be seen in Table 1. Meanwhile, the combined external load working conditions are assumed as follow: axial load F_x = 2000 N; radial load F_y = F_z = 500 N; torque load M_y = M_z = 1N⸱m; rotating speed n = 0 r/min. The comparison results with regard to stiffness are shown in Table 2.

Table 1.

The model parameters with regard to RPF7039.

Structure parameter	Parameter unit	Value
Ball diameter D	mm	17.7
Total number of ball N	-	12
Free contact angle α_o	°	40
Elastic modulus E	Pa	2.06e11
Poisson’s ratio ν	-	0.3
Density ρ	kg/m³	7850
Inner raceway curvature radius r_i	mm	9.16
Outer raceway curvature radius r_o	mm	9.38
Pitch radius R_m	mm	36.25

Table 2.

Comparison results with regard to static stiffness of angular contact ball bearing under combined external loads.

Stiffness type	Stiffness term	Parameter unit	Present	Experiment	Relative error (%)
Diagonal stiffness	K _xx	N/mm	226160.0	226011.1	0.07
	K _yy	N/mm	155669.9	155520.7	0.10
	K _zz	N/mm	172409.3	172131.6	0.16
	K _θ _y _θ _y	N⸱mm/rad	141803146.8	139304365.4	1.79
	K _θ _z _θ _z	N⸱mm/rad	158913290.0	157160958.5	1.11
Off-diagonal stiffness	K_xy = K_yx	N/rad	11382.6	11399.1	0.14
	K_xz = K_zx	N/rad	−4260.2	−4283.6	0.55
	K_x _θ _y = K _θ _xy	N/rad	−876665.1	−885433.0	0.99
	K_x _θ _z = K _θ _zx	N/rad	1560463.7	1550500.8	0.64
	K_yz = K_zy	N/rad	53893.8	53698.3	0.36
	K_y _θ _y = K _θ _yy	N/rad	1484348.3	1471843.7	0.85
	K_y _θ _z = K _θ _zy	N/rad	−1489266.7	−1474665.0	0.99
	K_z _θ _z = K _θ _zz	N/rad	−4946606.9	−4903232.7	0.88
	K_z _θ _y = K _θ _yz	N/rad	4442893.6	4414719.7	0.64
	K _θ _x _θ _y = K _θ _y _θ _x	N⸱mm/rad	−50534298.5	−49563464.7	1.96

As shown in Table 2, the comparison results of static stiffness contain diagonal and off-diagonal stiffness. According to the relative error between the results calculated by the proposed model and the corresponding experiment results come from the existing literature (The maximum relative error is less than 2%, the calculation formulation is shown in equation (25)), it is not hard to find that the calculation results of presented model have good agreement with the corresponding experiment results. Meanwhile, it is necessary to point out that the iteration step size adjustment factor is selected as h₁ = h₂ = 0.1 in the process of model comparison. The value of iteration step size adjustment factor is determined by debugging the established dynamic model of angular contact ball bearing. After the iteration step size adjustment factor is introduced, the convergence and computational efficiency of the established dynamic model are improved significantly. The time of model solution is controlled within 2s and the computational efficiency of model is improved by 10 times compared with the Newton Rapson method without introducing the iterative step size adjustment factor. In addition, the model iteration solution precision is assumed as ε₁ = ε₂ = 10⁻⁹ mm and the maximum number related to iteration is selected as i10000 for predicting the occurrence of non-convergence of iteration.

R E = | \frac{(P - E)}{E} | \times 100 %

(25)

where RE denotes the relative error; p expresses the results calculated by the proposed model; E represents the experiment results come from the published literature.

Second, the calculation results with regard to dynamic contact parameters including contact angles and contact force of the proposed model are compared with the corresponding results come from the existing literatures. For the comparison of contact angles, the model parameters of angular contact ball bearing are shown in Table 3 and the comparison results can be found in Figure 8(a); For the comparison of contact force, the model parameters of angular contact ball bearing are described in Table 4 and the comparison results can be seen in Figure 8(b).

Table 3.

The model parameters with regard to FAG B7014AC.

Structure parameter	Parameter unit	Value
Ball diameter D	mm	12.5
Total number of ball N	-	19
Elastic modulus E	Pa	2.06e11
Poisson’s ratio ν	-	0.3
Density ρ	kg/m³	7850
Inner raceway curvature radius r_i	mm	6.54
Outer raceway curvature radius r_o	mm	6.54
Inner raceway contact radius R_i	mm	38.5
Inner raceway contact radius R_o	mm	51
Pitch radius R_m	mm	44.75

Figure 8.

The comparison results with regard to contact parameters of angular contact ball bearing. (a) Contact angle and (b) Contact force.

Table 4.

The model parameters with regard to B218.

Structure parameter	Parameter unit	Value
Ball diameter D	mm	30.162
Total number of ball N	-	12
Elastic modulus E	Pa	2.06e11
Poisson’s ratio ν	-	0.3
Density ρ	kg/m³	7850
Inner raceway curvature radius r_i	mm	16
Outer raceway curvature radius r_o	mm	15.96
Inner raceway contact radius R_i	mm	68.6245
Inner raceway contact radius R_o	mm	98.874
Pitch radius R_m	mm	83.75

As shown in Figure 8(a), it describes that the variation tendency of inner and outer raceway contact angles of under purely axial load with axial force F_x and rotating speed increased. The inner raceway contact angle increases under certain axial force F_x with rotating speed increased and decreases under certain rotating speed with axial force F_x increased. The outer raceway contact angle decreases under certain axial force F_x with rotating speed increased and increases under certain rotating speed with axial force F_x increased. It is evident that the calculation results of contact angle of the presented model have good consistent with the corresponding results come from the published literature. As shown in Figure 8(b), it can be seen that the inner raceway contact force increases with axial force F_x increased and decreases with rotating speed increased. Meanwhile, it also can be seen that the comparison results with regard to inner raceway contact force demonstrate the calculation results from the presented model have good consistent with the published literature.

Finally, the calculation results with regard to dynamic stiffness including axial stiffness and radial stiffness of the proposed model is compared with the corresponding results come from the existing literatures. The comparison results with regard to dynamic stiffness of ball bearing under purely axial load and different radial clearances are shown in Figure 9. The model parameters of ball bearing which is used for the above comparison can be found in Table 5 and the axial force F_x is selected as 100 N in the following discussion.

Figure 9.

The comparison results with regard to dynamic stiffness of angular contact ball bearing. (a) Axial stiffness and (b) Radial stiffness.

Table 5.

The model parameters with regard to SKF 6205.

Structure parameter	Parameter unit	Value
Ball diameter D	mm	7.9
Total number of ball N	-	9
Elastic modulus E	Pa	2.06e11
Poisson’s ratio ν	-	0.3
Density ρ	kg/m³	7850
Inner raceway curvature radius r_i	mm	4.108
Outer raceway curvature radius r_o	mm	4.108
Inner raceway contact radius R_i	mm	15.295
Inner raceway contact radius R_o	mm	23.205
Pitch radius R_m	mm	19.25

As one can see from Figure 9, the dynamic stiffness including axial and radial stiffness of angular contact ball bearing under certain axial force F_x decrease with rotating speed increased. With radial clearance increased, the axial stiffness increases when the rotating speed is less than 12000r/min and decreases when the rotating speed is large than 15000r/min. When the rotating speed is less than 5000r/min, the calculation results with regard to dynamic stiffness of the presented model have good consistent with the corresponding results come from the existing literature. However, when the rotating speed is large than 5000r/min, there are obvious errors between the dynamic stiffness of the proposed model and the corresponding results come from the existing literature, it is worth noting that the variation tendency of the presented model and the existing literature has good consistency. The above evident error can be attributed to the difference of calculation formulations with regard to centrifugal and gyroscopic moment, the above differences is caused by raceway control hypothesis.

According to the above comparison results with regard to dynamic contact angle, contact force and stiffness, the accuracy, stability and versatility of the proposed dynamic model of angular contact ball bearing have been confirmed, it can be used to solve the dynamic characteristics of angular contact ball bearing under combined external loads.

The dynamic contact characteristic analysis of angular contact ball bearing

In this section, the contact characteristic analysis is carried out by investigating the influences of combined external working conditions including external force, torque and rotating speed on the dynamic contact parameters including contact angle and contact force of angular contact ball bearing. The type of angular contact ball bearing is selected as B7005 C/P4 and the corresponding model parameters of angular contact ball bearing can be found in Table 6.

Table 6.

The model parameters with regard to B7005 C/P4.

Structure parameter	Parameter unit	Value
Ball diameter D	mm	5.5
Total number of ball N	-	16
Free contact angle α_o	°	15
Elastic modulus E	Pa	2.06e11
Poisson’s ratio ν	-	0.3
Density ρ	kg/m³	7850
Inner raceway curvature radius r_i	mm	2.97
Outer raceway curvature radius r_o	mm	3.135
Pitch radius R_m	mm	18

Firstly, the influences of torque M_z on the contact angle and contact force of angular contact ball bearing under axial force F_x = 1000 N, radial force F_y = 200 N and different rotating speed are investigated, the variations of contact angle and contact force are shown in Figure 10 and Figure 11, respectively.

Figure 10.

The circumferential variation tendency of contact angle and contact force with torque M_z under static state. (a) Contact angle and (b) Contact force.

Figure 11.

The circumferential variation tendency of contact angle and contact force with torque M_z under rotating state. (a) Inner raceway contact angle, (b) Inner raceway contact force, (c) Outer raceway contact angle, and (d) Outer raceway contact force.

As described in Figure 10, the inner and outer raceway contact angles and contact forces change synchronously as the torque M_z increase when the angular contact ball bearing is at rest. For contact angle, as the azimuth angle increase, the inner and outer raceway contact angles vary by means of cosine curve, the amplitude of cosine curve increases with the increase of torque M_z. In addition, the variation tendency of the inner and outer raceway contact angles is opposite when the direction of torque M_z changes. The symbols “ $•$ ”and “ $•$ ” denote the nodes which depend on the direction of external loads and which can be interpreted as fixed point which keeps constant with the size of external loads changed. The nodes caused by torque M_z are distributed near the positions of 90^° and 270^°, respectively. The peak values are distributed at the positions of 0^°, 180^° and 360^°, respectively. For contact force, as the azimuth angle increase, the inner and outer raceway contact forces vary by means of W shape curve, the amplitude of W shape curve increases with the increase of torque M_z. The variation tendency of the inner and outer raceway contact forces is consistent when the direction of torque M_z changes. The symbols “ $•$ ” indicates the node which keeps unchanged with the size and direction of external loads changed. The positions of “ $•$ ”and “ $•$ ” are distributed near 150^° and 240^°, respectively. The position of “ $•$ ” are distributed near 50^°and 340^°, respectively. The positions of peak values are distributed near 0^°, 90^°, 180^°, 270^° and 360^°, respectively.

When the rotating speed of angular contact ball bearing increase to 20000r/min, the variation tendencies of contact angle and contact force are given in Figure 11. The inner and outer raceway contact angles and contact forces appear bifurcation phenomenon and the variation tendencies are consistent basically when the angular contact ball bearing is in a rotating state. The cosine curves of inner and outer raceway contact angles move up and down with the appearance of rotating speed, respectively. However, the W shape curve of inner and outer raceway contact forces move down and up with the appearance of rotating speed, respectively. The numbers of nodes including “ $•$ ”, “ $•$ ” and “•” keep unchanged with the appearance of rotating speed and the positions of nodes move left and right slightly caused by the movements of cosine curve and W shape curve.

Secondly, the effects of torque M_y on the contact angle and contact force of angular contact ball bearing under axial force F_x = 1000N, radial force F_z = 200N and different rotating speed are discussed, the variations of contact angle and contact force are shown in Figure 12 and Figure 13, respectively.

Figure 12.

The circumferential variation tendency of contact angle and contact force with torque M_y under static state. (a) Contact angle and (b) Contact force.

Figure 13.

The circumferential variation tendency of contact angle and contact force with torque M_y under rotating state. (a) Inner raceway contact angle, (b) Inner raceway contact force, (c) Outer raceway contact angle, and (d) Outer raceway contact force.

As shown in Figure 12, the inner and outer raceway contact angles and contact forces change synchronously as the torque M_y increase when the angular contact ball bearing is at rest. For contact angle, as the azimuth angle increase, the inner and outer raceway contact angles vary by means of sine curve, the amplitude of sine curve increases with the increase of torque M_y. In addition, the variation tendency of the inner and outer raceway contact angles is opposite when the direction of torque M_y changes. The positions of node “ $•$ ”and “ $•$ ” caused by torque M_y are distributed near 180^°, respectively. The peak values are distributed at the positions of 90^° and 270^°, respectively. For contact force, as the azimuth angle increase, the inner and outer raceway contact forces vary by means of M shape curve, the amplitude of M shape curve increases with the increase of torque M_y. The variation tendency of the inner and outer raceway contact forces is consistent when the direction of torque M_z changes. The positions of node “ $•$ ”and “ $•$ ” caused by torque M_y are distributed near 240^° and 330^°, respectively. The positions of node “ $•$ ” caused by torque M_y are distributed near 60^° and 150^°, respectively. The positions of peak values are distributed near 0^°, 90^°, 180^°, 270^° and 360^°, respectively.

When the rotating speed of angular contact ball bearing increase to 20000r/min, the variation tendencies of contact angle and contact force are displayed in Figure 13. The inner and outer raceway contact angles and contact forces appear bifurcation phenomenon and the variation tendencies are consistent basically when the angular contact ball bearing is in a rotating state. The sine curve of inner and outer raceway contact angle move up and down with the appearance of rotating speed, respectively. However, the M shape curve of inner and outer raceway contact forces move down and up with the appearance of rotating speed, respectively. The variation tendency of nodes including “ $•$ ”, “ $•$ ” and “ $•$ ” are consistent with Figure 11.

Finally, the effects of torques M_y and M_z on the contact angle and contact force of angular contact ball bearing under axial force F_x = 1000 N, radial force F_y = F_z = 200 N and different rotating speed are discussed, the variations of contact angle and contact force are shown in Figure 14 and Figure 15 respectively.

Figure 14.

The circumferential variation tendency of contact angle and contact force with torques M_y and M_z under static state. (a) Contact angle and (b) Contact force.

Figure 15.

The circumferential variation tendency of contact angle and contact force with torques M_y and M_z under rotating state. (a) Inner raceway contact angle, (b) Inner raceway contact force, (c) Outer raceway contact angle, and (d) Outer raceway contact force.

As one can see from Figure 14, the inner and outer raceway contact angles and contact forces change synchronously as the torques M_y and M_z increase when the angular contact ball bearing is at rest. For contact angle, as the azimuth angle increase, the inner and outer raceway contact angles vary by means of irregular curve, the amplitude of irregular curve increase with the increase of torques M_y and M_z. In addition, the variation tendency of the inner and outer raceway contact angles is opposite when the direction of torques M_y and M_z change. The positions of node “ $•$ ”and “ $•$ ” caused by torques M_y and M_z are distributed near 240^° and the position of node “ $•$ ” caused by torques M_y and M_z are distributed near 60^°. For contact force, as the azimuth angle increase, the inner and outer raceway contact forces vary by means of irregular curve, the amplitude of irregular curve increase with the increase of torques M_y and M_z. The variation tendency of the inner and outer raceway contact forces appears obvious translation phenomenon when the direction of torques M_y and M_z change. The positions of node “ $•$ ”and “ $•$ ” caused by torques M_y and M_z are distributed near 90^°, 180^°, and 270^°, respectively. The positions of peak values are distributed near 60^°, 150^°, 240^° and 360^°, respectively.

When the rotating speed of angular contact ball bearing increase to 20000r/min, the variation tendencies of contact angle and contact force are displayed in Figure 15. The irregular curves of inner and outer raceway contact angle move up and down with the appearance of rotating speed, respectively. The positions and number of nodes “ $•$ ”, “ $•$ ” and “ $•$ ” caused by torques M_y and M_z change obviously when the angular contact ball bearing is in a rotating state. The positions of node are distributed near 60^° and 240^°, respectively. The irregular curves of inner and outer raceway contact force move down and up with the appearance of rotating speed, respectively. The variation tendency of nodes including “ $•$ ” and “ $•$ ” is consistent with Figure 14.

The dynamic stiffness characteristic analysis of angular contact ball bearing

In this section, the dynamic stiffness characteristic analysis is carried out by investigating the influences of combined external working conditions including external force, torque and rotating speed on the diagonal and off-diagonal stiffness of angular contact ball bearing. The model parameters of angular contact ball bearing are the same as section 3.2.

Firstly, the effects of rotating speed and torque M_z on the diagonal and off-diagonal stiffness of angular contact ball bearing under F_x = 1000 N, F_y = 200 N are investigated and the corresponding results are shown in Figure 16.

Figure 16.

The variation tendency of diagonal and off-diagonal stiffness with rotating speed and torque M_z. (a) Diagonal stiffness (M_z = 3000N⸱mm), (b) Diagonal stiffness (M_z = −3000N⸱mm), (c) off-diagonal stiffness (M_z = 3000N⸱mm), and (d) off-diagonal stiffness (M_z = −3000N⸱mm).

As one can see from Figure 16, when the torque M_z is set as 3000 N⸱mm, the diagonal stiffness including K_xx, K_yy, K_zz, K_θyθy and K_θzθz decreases in varying degrees with rotating speed increased and the decline of axial stiffness K_xx is smallest compared with other terms of diagonal stiffness. The radial stiffness K_yy is large than K_zz and the angle stiffness K_θzθz is large than K_θyθy. With the increase of rotating speed, the K_xy and K_yθz of off-diagonal stiffness increases and the values of them are negative, the K_xθz and K_zθy of off-diagonal stiffness decrease and the values of them are positive. When the torque M_z is set as −3000 N⸱mm, the radial stiffness K_yy and K_zz are very close, the differences of angle stiffness K_θyθy and K_θzθz decline compared with the results of original direction of torque M_z. With rotating speed increased, the K_xy of off-diagonal stiffness decreases and the K_xθz of off-diagonal stiffness increases slightly, the variation tendency of K_yθz and K_zθy of off-diagonal stiffness is consistent with the results of original direction of torque M_z.

Secondly, the effects of rotating speed and torque M_y on the diagonal and off-diagonal stiffness of angular contact ball bearing under F_x = 1000 N, F_z = 200 N are analyzed and the corresponding results are shown in Figure 17.

Figure 17.

The variation of diagonal and off-diagonal stiffness with rotating speed and torque M_y. (a) Diagonal stiffness (M_y = 3000N⸱mm), (b) Diagonal stiffness (M_y = −3000N⸱mm), (c) off-diagonal stiffness (M_y = 3000N⸱mm), and (d) off-diagonal stiffness (M_y = −3000N⸱mm).

As shown in Figure 17, when the torque M_y is set as 3000 N⸱mm, the variation tendency of diagonal stiffness is consistent with the corresponding results of M_z = −3000 N⸱mm. However, the values of radial stiffness and angle stiffness are opposite to the corresponding results of M_z = −3000 N⸱mm. The variation tendency of K_xz, K_yθz and K_zθy of off-diagonal stiffness is the same as the K_xy, K_yθz and K_zθy of M_z = −3000 N⸱mm. The variation tendency of K_yθz of off-diagonal stiffness decreases slightly. When the torque M_y is set as −3000 N⸱mm, the variation tendency of diagonal stiffness is the same as the corresponding results of M_z = 3000 N⸱mm. However, the values of radial stiffness and angle stiffness are opposite to the corresponding results of M_z = 3000 N⸱mm. The variation tendency of K_xz, K_yθz and K_zθy of off-diagonal stiffness is the same as the K_xy, K_yθz and K_zθy of M_z = 3000 N⸱mm. The K_xθy of off-diagonal stiffness increases with rotating speed increased.

Finally, the influences of rotating speed and torques M_y = M_z on the diagonal and off-diagonal stiffness of angular contact ball bearing under F_x = 1000N, F_y = F_z = 200 N are investigated and the corresponding results can be found in Figure 18.

Figure 18.

The variation of diagonal and off-diagonal stiffness with rotating speed and torque M_z. (a) Diagonal stiffness (M_y = M_z = 3000N⸱mm), (b) Diagonal stiffness (M_y = M_z = −3000N⸱mm), (c) Off-diagonal stiffness 1 (M_y = M_z = 3000N⸱mm), (d) Off-diagonal stiffness 1 (M_y = M_z = −3000N⸱mm), (e) Off-diagonal stiffness 2 (M_y = M_z = 3000N⸱mm), and (f) Off-diagonal stiffness 2 (M_y = M_z = −3000N⸱mm).

As shown in Figure 18(a) and (b), the variation tendencies of diagonal stiffness are consistent with the corresponding results of Figure 16(a) and Figure 17(b). Due to the external loads is very complex, the terms of off-diagonal stiffness are divided into off-diagonal stiffness 1 and off-diagonal stiffness 2 in the following discussion. When the torques M_y = M_z are set as 3000 N⸱mm, with the increase of rotating speed, the K_xy of off-diagonal stiffness 1 increases and the value of K_xy is negative, the variation tendency of K_xz and K_yz is symmetric. With rotating speed increased, the K_xθy, K_xθz, K_yθy and K_yθz of off-diagonal stiffness 2 decrease. The K_θy _θz of off-diagonal stiffness 2 increases first and then decreases, the variation tendency of K_zθy and K_zθz is symmetric. When the torques M_y = M_z are set as −3000N⸱mm, with the increase of rotating speed, the K_xz of off-diagonal stiffness 1 increases and the value of K_xz is negative, the variation tendency of K_xy and K_yz is symmetric. With rotating speed increased, the K_xθy, K_xθz and K_yθy of off-diagonal stiffness 2 increase, the variation tendencies of K_yθz, K_θyθz, K_zθy and K_zθz of off-diagonal stiffness 2 is are consistent with Figure 18(e).

Conclusions

This article proposes a unified dynamic model of angular contact ball bearing under combined external loads based on nonlinear elastic Hertz contact theory and raceless control hypothesis by employing variable step size Newton Raphson iteration method. The validation of established model is confirmed by comparing with the existing literatures and the comparison results demonstrate the proposed model has better solution accuracy and higher computational efficiency. According to the above established dynamic model, the dynamic contact and stiffness characteristics of angular contact ball bearing under combined external loads are analyzed by investigating the influences of combined external working conditions on the dynamic contact parameters including contact angle and contact force and stiffness including diagonal and off-diagonal stiffness. Based on the above analysis, some conclusions can be concluded as follow:

(1) The inner and outer raceway contact angles vary by means of different shape curves with azimuth angle under different external load working conditions and the amplitude of the above curves increase with the increase external loads (torque) and there are some nodes in the above curves. When the direction of external loads (torque) is changed, the curves with regard to contact angle appear symmetric transformation. The inner and outer raceway contact angles separate with rotating speed increased, the inner and outer raceway contact angles increase and decrease respectively.

(2) The variation tendency of inner and outer raceway contact forces is consistent with the above contact angles. However, when the direction of external loads (torque) is changed, the variation tendency of curves with regard to contact force keeps constant and the amplitude of curves increases evidently. The inner and outer raceway contact forces separate with rotating speed increased, the inner and outer raceway contact forces decrease and increase respectively.

(3) The K_xx, K_yy, K_zz, K_θyθy and K_θzθz diagonal stiffness of angular contact ball under combined external load working conditions decrease in varying degrees with rotating speed increased. When the direction of external loads (torque M_y or M_z) is changed, the differences of radial stiffness and angle stiffness decrease. When the external loads change from M_z to -M_y and from M_y to -M_z, the K_yy and K_zz of radial stiffness are converted to each other, the K_θyθy and K_θzθz of angle stiffness are converted to each other. The above conversion can also be produced when the direction of external loads torques M_y = M_z are changed. For off-diagonal stiffness of angular contact ball bearing, with rotating speed increased, the off-diagonal stiffness decreases when the value of off-diagonal stiffness is positive and the off-diagonal stiffness increases when the value of off-diagonal stiffness is negative. However, under combined external working condition (As shown in Figure 18), the off-diagonal stiffness term produce the coupling angle stiffness term of K_θyθz, the variations of K_zθy and K_zθz of off-diagonal stiffness are symmetric with rotating speed increased.

In summary, the proposed model can be used to analyze the dynamic contact and stiffness characteristics of angular contact ball bearing under combined external load working conditions for the vibration behaviors analysis and fatigue prediction of angular contact ball bearing provide theoretical basis and technical guidance.

Footnotes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the anonymous reviewers for their very valuable comments.

Declaration of conflicting interests

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Funding

The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This work was supported by the the State Key Laboratory of High Performance Complex Manufacturing (ZZYJKT2021-07), Key Laboratory of Vibration and Control of Aero-Propulsion System; (VCAME202006), National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 52075554), the Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province of China (2021JJ30841 and 2022JJ20070), and Central South University Innovation-Driven Research Program, China (Grant No. 2023CXQD049).

ORCID iD

Qingshan Wang

Appendix A

The appendix contains the derivation process of contact deformation coefficient of ACBB. (A-1)

K_{i j} = \frac{π E}{1 - ν^{2}} {\bar{k}}_{i j} {(\frac{{\bar{R}}_{i j} • {\bar{E}}_{i j}}{4.5 • {\bar{F}}_{i j}^{3}})}^{1 / 2}; K_{o j} = \frac{π E}{1 - ν^{2}} {\bar{k}}_{o j} {(\frac{{\bar{R}}_{o j} • {\bar{E}}_{o j}}{4.5 • {\bar{F}}_{o j}^{3}})}^{1 / 2}

(A-2)

{\bar{k}}_{i j} = 1.0339 • {(\frac{R_{y i j}}{R_{x i j}})}^{0.6360}; {\bar{k}}_{o j} = 1.0339 • {(\frac{R_{y o j}}{R_{x o j}})}^{0.6360}

(A-3)

{\bar{E}}_{i j} = 1.0003 + 0.5968 • \frac{R_{x i j}}{R_{y i j}}; {\bar{E}}_{o j} = 1.0003 + 0.5968 • \frac{R_{x o j}}{R_{y o j}}

(A-4)

{\bar{F}}_{i j} = 1.5277 + 0.6023 • I n (\frac{R_{y i j}}{R_{x i j}}); {\bar{F}}_{o j} = 1.5277 + 0.6023 • I n (\frac{R_{y o j}}{R_{x o j}})

(A-5)

{\bar{R}}_{i j} = \frac{R_{x i j} R_{y i j}}{R_{x i j} + R_{y i j}}; {\bar{R}}_{o j} = \frac{R_{x o j} R_{y o j}}{R_{x o j} + R_{y o j}}

(A-6)

R_{x i j} = \frac{D • (D_{m} - D • \cos α_{i j})}{2 D}; R_{x o j} = \frac{D • (D_{m} + D • \cos α_{o j})}{2 D}

(A-7)

R_{y i j} = \frac{r_{i}}{2 \frac{r_{i}}{D - 1}}; R_{y o j} = \frac{r_{o}}{2 \frac{r_{o}}{D - 1}}

Appendix B

The partial derivatives of equilibrium equations with respect to the variables X_1j, X_2j, δ_ij, δ_oj (B-1)

a_{31} = - \frac{M_{g j}}{D} (\frac{1}{O_{b}^{'} O_{i}} + \frac{1}{O_{o} O_{b}^{'}})

(B-2)

a_{32} = \frac{Q_{i j}}{O_{b}^{'} O_{i}} + \frac{Q_{o j}}{O_{o} O_{b}^{'}}

(B-3)

a_{33} = \frac{3}{2} K_{o j} δ_{o j}^{1 / 2} \cos α_{o j} - Q_{o j} \frac{X_{2 j}}{O_{o} {O_{b}^{'}}^{2}} + \frac{M_{g j}}{D} \frac{X_{1 j}}{O_{o} {O_{b}^{'}}^{2}}

(B-4)

a_{34} = - \frac{3}{2} K_{i j} δ_{i j}^{1 / 2} \cos α_{i j} + Q_{o j} \frac{A_{2 j} - X_{2 j}}{O_{b}^{'} {O_{i}}^{2}} - \frac{M_{g j}}{D} \frac{A_{1 j} - X_{1 j}}{O_{b}^{'} {O_{i}}^{2}}

(B-5)

a_{41} = \frac{Q_{i j}}{O_{b}^{'} O_{i}} + \frac{Q_{o j}}{O_{o} O_{b}^{'}}

(B-6)

a_{42} = \frac{M_{g j}}{D} (\frac{1}{O_{b}^{'} O_{i}} + \frac{1}{O_{o} O_{b}^{'}})

(B-7)

a_{43} = \frac{3}{2} K_{o j} δ_{o j}^{1 / 2} \sin α_{o j} - Q_{o j} \frac{X_{1 j}}{O_{o} {O_{b}^{'}}^{2}} - \frac{M_{g j}}{D} \frac{X_{2 j}}{O_{o} {O_{b}^{'}}^{2}}

(B-8)

a_{44} = - \frac{3}{2} K_{i j} δ_{i j}^{1 / 2} \sin α_{i j} + Q_{i j} \frac{A_{1 j} - X_{1 j}}{O_{b}^{'} {O_{i}}^{2}} + \frac{M_{g j}}{D} \frac{A_{2 j} - X_{2 j}}{O_{b}^{'} {O_{i}}^{2}}

References

Jones

. A general theory for elastically constrained ball and radial roller bearings under arbitrary load and speed conditions, 1960. [J].

Harris

. An analytical method to predict skidding in thrust-loaded, angular-contact ball bearings[J]. 1971.

Gupta

. Dynamics of rolling-element bearings—Part III: ball bearing analysis[J]. 1979.

Harris

. Ball motion in thrust-loaded, angular contact bearings with coulomb friction[J]. 1971.

Lim

Singh

. Vibration transmission through rolling element bearings, part I: bearing stiffness formulation[J]. J Sound Vib, 1990, 139(2): 179-199.

De Mul

Vree

Maas

. Equilibrium and associated load distribution in ball and roller bearings loaded in five degrees of freedom while neglecting friction—Part II: application to roller bearings and experimental verification[J]. 1989.

Cao

Altintas

. A general method for the modeling of spindle-bearing systems[J]. J Mech Des, 2004, 126(6): 1089-1104.

Wang

Zhang

, et al. Modeling angular contact ball bearing without raceway control hypothesis[J]. Mech Mach Theor, 2014, 82: 154-172.

Liu

Zhang

. Parameters research on time-varying stiffness of the ball bearing system without race control hypothesis[J]. Proc IME C J Mech Eng Sci, 2022, 236(3): 1334-1351.

10.

Cheng

Zhang

, et al. Research on the effect of structural and material parameters on vibrations based on quasi-static model of bearings[J]. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng, 2020, 42: 1-24.

11.

Chang

Cao

. Economic tolerance design of the P2 raceway based on the quasi-static model of aerospace ball bearings[J]. Sci Rep, 2024, 14(1): 3657.

12.

Lee

Design tolerance of high speed spindle considering the variation of ball contact angle in the angular contact ball bearings[J]. Journal of the Korean Society of Manufacturing Technology Engineers, 2010, 19(5): 609-615.

13.

Gao

Wang

Zhang

. Modeling and dynamic characteristic analysis of high speed angular contact ball bearing with variable clearance[J]. Tribol Int, 2023, 182: 108330.

14.

Zhang

Fang

Hong

, et al. Effect of preload on ball-raceway contact state and fatigue life of angular contact ball bearing[J]. Tribol Int, 2017, 114: 365-372.

15.

Fang

Yan

Hong

, et al. A comprehensive study on the off-diagonal coupling elements in the stiffness matrix of the angular contact ball bearing and their influence on the dynamic characteristics of the rotor system[J]. Mech Mach Theor, 2021, 158: 104251.

16.

Zhang

Fang

Hong

, et al. A general model for preload calculation and stiffness analysis for combined angular contact ball bearings[J]. J Sound Vib, 2017, 411: 435-449.

17.

Fang

Zhang

Yan

, et al. A comprehensive study on the speed-varying stiffness of ball bearing under different load conditions[J]. Mech Mach Theor, 2019, 136: 1-13.

18.

Zhang

Han

Peng

, et al. Stability analysis of a rotor–bearing system with time-varying bearing stiffness due to finite number of balls and unbalanced force[J]. J Sound Vib, 2013, 332(25): 6768-6784.

19.

Zhuo

Zhou

Yang

. Dynamic analysis of double-row self-aligning ball bearings due to applied loads, internal clearance, surface waviness and number of balls[J]. J Sound Vib, 2014, 333(23): 6170-6189.

20.

Chunjiang

Xiaokai

Qingxue

, et al. Analysis on the load characteristics and coefficient of friction of angular contact ball bearing at high speed[J]. Tribol Int, 2015, 87: 50-56.

21.

Shi

Wang

Mao

, et al. Coupling study on dynamics and TEHL behavior of high-speed and heavy-load angular contact ball bearing with spinning[J]. Tribol Int, 2015, 88: 76-84.

22.

, et al. Analysis of varying contact angles and load distributions in defective angular contact ball bearing[J]. Eng Fail Anal, 2018, 91: 449-464.

23.

Deng

Shen

Yang

. A nonlinear dynamic approach for analyzing dynamic stiffness of ball bearings at different raceway diameters and guiding clearances[J]. Int J Non Lin Mech, 2024, 160: 104632.

24.

Luo

, et al. Numerical and experimental analysis of nonlinear static and dynamic stiffness of angular contact ball bearing[J]. Nonlinear Dynam, 2023, 111(3): 2281-2309.

25.

Wang

, et al. Dynamic behaviors and contact characteristics of ball bearings in a multi-supported rotor system under the effects of 3D clearance fit[J]. Mech Syst Signal Process, 2023, 196: 110334.

26.

Fang

Zhang

Hong

, et al. Research on the nonlinear stiffness characteristics of double-row angular contact ball bearings under different working conditions[J]. Lubricants, 2023, 11(2): 44.

27.

Wang

Han

Zhou

. Nonlinear dynamic modeling of rotor system supported by angular contact ball bearings[J]. Mech Syst Signal Process, 2017, 85: 16-40.

28.

Zhang

Han

Peng

, et al. A new nonlinear dynamic model of the rotor-bearing system considering preload and varying contact angle of the bearing[J]. Commun Nonlinear Sci Numer Simul, 2015, 22(1-3): 821-841.

29.

Lin

Wang

, et al. Contact probabilities of an angular ball bearing under a combined axial and radial load[J]. Mech Mach Theor, 2021, 157: 104196.

30.

Liu

Tang

, et al. An analytical calculation method of the load distribution and stiffness of an angular contact ball bearing[J]. Mech Mach Theor, 2019, 142: 103597.

31.

Liu

Tang

Shao

. An innovative dynamic model for vibration analysis of a flexible roller bearing[J]. Mech Mach Theor, 2019, 135: 27-39.

32.

Liao

Lin

. A new method for the analysis of deformation and load in a ball bearing with variable contact angle[J]. J Mech Des, 2001, 123(2): 304-312.

33.

Parker

Lin

. Mesh phasing relationships in planetary and epicyclic gears[J]. J Mech Des, 2004, 126(2): 365-370.

34.

Liao

Lin

. A new method developed for the analysis of ball bearing fatigue life considering variable contact angles[J]. Tribol Trans, 2003, 46(3): 435-446.

35.

Wang

Zhang

, et al. Investigation of skidding in angular contact ball bearings under high speed[J]. Tribol Int, 2015, 92: 404-417.

36.

Kang

Huang

Lin

, et al. Stiffness determination of angular-contact ball bearings by using neural network[J]. Tribol Int, 2006, 39(6): 461-469.

37.

Wang

Yan

Zhang

, et al. A comprehensive study on dynamic performance of ball bearing considering bearing deformations and ball-inner raceway separation[J]. Mech Syst Signal Process, 2023, 185: 109826.

38.

Wang

Yan

Zhang

, et al. Effects of deformations and angular ring misalignment on dynamic properties for ball bearing under different preload mechanisms[J]. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng, 2023, 45(5): 274.

39.

Dietl

. Damping and stiffness characteristics of rolling element bearings-theory and experiment. of Vienna: Technical University, 1997. Ph.D. Thesis.

40.

El-Saeidy

FMA

. Time varying total stiffness matrix of a rigid machine spindle angular contact ball bearings assembly: theory and analytical/experimental verifications[J]. Shock Vib, 2011, 18(5): 641-670.

Dynamic contact and stiffness characteristic analysis of angular contact ball bearings under combined external loads

Abstract

Keywords

Introduction

Theoretical formulations

The model description of angular contact ball bearing

The geometric analysis of angular contact ball bearing

The force analysis of angular contact ball bearing

The solution of angular contact ball bearing

Results and discussions

Model validation

The dynamic contact characteristic analysis of angular contact ball bearing

The dynamic stiffness characteristic analysis of angular contact ball bearing

Conclusions

Footnotes

Acknowledgments

Declaration of conflicting interests

Funding

ORCID iD

Appendix A

Appendix B

References