Good quality health-related information on the Internet is important for patients and their carers, enabling them to take greater responsibility in healthcare decisions. Carers of people with Alzheimer's disease require access to high quality medical, personal, practical and financial information. The Internet contains large quantities of health-related information and potentially has an important role to play in providing information for carers of people with Alzheimer's disease. The aim of the study was to evaluate a sample of Websites that provide information about Alzheimer's disease for carers of people with this condition using a selection of Website evaluation tools. A sample of 15 Websites providing information on Alzheimer's disease were evaluated using each of four evaluation tools. The Websites were ranked according to the scores they achieved with each tool. The correlation coefficient of the rankings of the Websites for each pair of tools was determined. There was a significant correlation between four of the six pairs of evaluation tools. Several Websites were ranked highly across the evaluation tools. The study identified problems in using generic health-information Website evaluation tools for sites providing information about specific diseases. The need to develop specific health-information Website evaluation tools and possibilities of how they might be further refined in the future were highlighted.
2 Cayton H, Graham N, Warner J. Alzheimer's at your fingertips. London: Class Publishing , 1998.
3.
3 Jee M, Reason L. Who cares? Information and support for the carers of confused people. London: Health Education Council , 1997.
4.
4 Micklewood P. Caring for confusion. London: Scutari Press , 1991.
5.
5 Hellawell G O, Turner K J, Le Monnier K J, Brewster S F. Urology and the Internet: an evaluation of Internet use by urology patients and of information available on urological topics (Clinical papers) . British Journal of Urology International2000; 86 (3): 191-194 . Available from: http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/Journals/toc.asp?IssuesID=3300 (accessed 3 July 2001).
7 Silberg W M, Lundberg G D, Musacchio R A. Assessing, controlling and assuring the quality of medical information on the Internet: caveat lector et viewor - Let the reader and viewer beware . JAMA1997; 277 (15): 1244-1245 . Available from: http://biomed.niss.ac.uk/ovidweb/ovidweb.cgiDatabase=Medline:1995-mid-1998 (accessed 29 June 2001).
8.
8 Griffiths K M, Christensen H. Quality of web based information on treatment of depression: cross sectional survey . BMJ2000; 321: 1511-1515 . Available from: http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/321/7275/1511 (accessed 18 June 2001).
9.
9 Eysenbach G, Diepgen T. Towards quality management of medical information on the internet: evaluation, labelling, and filtering of information . BMJ1998; 317: 1496-1502 . Available from: http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/317/7171/1496 (accessed 27 June 2001).
10.
10 Winker M A, Flanagin A, Chi-Lum B, White J, Andrews K, Kennett R L, DeAngelis C D, Musacchio R A. Guidelines for medical and health information sites on the Internet . JAMA2000; 283: 1600-1606 . Available from: http://jama.ama-assn.org/issues/v283n12/ffull/jsc00054.html (accessed 9 May 2001).
11.
11 Department of Health. An information strategy for the modern NHS 1998-2005: A national strategy for local implementation. Wetherby: Department of Health , 1998. Available from: http://www.nhsia.nhs.uk/def/pages/info4health/contents.asp (accessed 24 August 2001).
12.
12 Department of Health. Information strategies: mental health and older people. Wetherby: Department of Health , 2000. Available from: http://www.doh.gov.uk/nhsexipu/strategy/nsf.index.htm (accessed 24 August 2001).
14 Crandall C. Health information on the Internet: how will it affect patient care? Journal of Gender-Specific Medicine Online2000; 3 (3 - special issue). Available from: http://www.mmhc.com/igsm/articles/JGSM0003/crandall.htm (accessed 27 June 2001).
19 Adelhard K, Obst O. Evaluation of medical internet sites . Methods of Information in Medicine1999; 38 (2): 75-79 .
20.
20 Eysenbach G. A framework for evaluating e-health: systematic review of studies assessing the quality of health information and services for patients on the Internet . Journal of Medical Internet Research2000; 2 (Suppl. 2): e9. Available from: http://www.jmir.org/2000/3/suppl2/e9 (accessed 13 July 2001).
21.
21 Pealer L N, Dorman S M. Evaluating health-related websites . Journal of School Health1997; 67: 232-235 .
24 Eysenbach G, Sa E R, Diepgen T L. Shopping around the internet today and tomorrow: towards the millennium of cybermedicine . BMJ1999; 319: 1294 . Available from: http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/319/7220/1294 (accessed 13 July 2001).
25.
25 Gottlieb S. Health information on internet is often unreliable . BMJ2000; 321: 136 . Available from: http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/321/136 (accessed 13 July 2001).
27 Impicciatore P, Pandolfini C, Casella N, Bonati M. Reliability of health information for the public on the world wide web: systematic survey of advice on managing fever in children at home . BMJ1997; 314: 1875 . Available from: http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/314/7098/1875 (accessed 17 June 2001).
28.
28 Shepperd S, Charnock D, Gann B. Helping patients access high quality health information . BMJ1999; 319: 764-766 . Available from: http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/319/7212/764 (accessed 18 June 2001).
29.
29 Eysenbach G, Jadad A. Evidence-based patient choice and consumer health informatics in the Internet age . Journal of Medical Internet Research2001; 3 (2) e19 . Available from: http://www.jmir/org/2001/2/e19/ (accessed 22 August 2001).
30.
30 Eysenbach G, Yihune G, Lampe K, Cross P, Brickley D. Quality management, certification and rating of health information on the Net with MedCERTAIN: using a medPICS/RDF/XML metadata structure for implementing eHealth ethics and creating trust globally . Journal of Medical Internet Research2000; 2 (1 Suppl. 2). Available from: http://www.jmir.org/2000/3/suppl2/e1/ (accessed 22 June 2001).
31.
31 Kim P, Eng T R, Deering M J, Maxfield A. Published criteria for evaluating health related Websites: review . BMJ1999; 318: 647-649 . Available from http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/318/7184/647/ (accessed 21 February 20010.
32.
32 McNab A, Anagnostelis B, Cooke A. Never mind the quality, check the badge-width! Ariadne1997; 9. Available from: http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue9/quality-ratings (accessed 22 August 2001).
33.
33 Terry N P. Rating the `raters': legal exposure of trustmark authorities in the context of consumer health informatics . Journal of Medical Internet Research2000; 2 (3): e18 . Available from: http://www.jmir.org/2000/3/e18/ (accessed 22 June 2001).
34.
34 Hettler B, Randolfi E A. Can you believe it? Evaluating health/medical information on the Internet, 1999. Available from: http://www.imt.net/~randolfi/believeit/ (accessed 13 July 2001).
35.
35 DISCERN background, general instructions and instrument, 1997. Available from: http://www.discern.org.uk (accessed 5 July 2001).
36.
36 BIOME Special Advisory Group on Evaluation. Factors affecting the quality of an information source, 2001. Available from: http://biome.ac.uk/guidelines/eval/factors.html (accessed 22 June 2001).
37.
37 Rippen H, Risk A. e-Health code of ethics (May 24) . Journal of Medical Internet Research2000; 2 (2): e9 . Available from: http://www.jmir.org/2000/2/e9/ (accessed 22 June 2001).
39 Berland G K, Elliott M N, Morales L S, Algazy J I, Kravitz R L, Broder M S, Kanouse D E, Munoz J A, Puyol J-A, Lara M, Watkins K E, Yang H, McGlynn E A. Health information on the Internet: accessibility, quality, and readability in English and Spanish . JAMA2001; 285 (20): 2612-2621 . Available from: http://biomed.niss.ac.uk/ovidweb/ovidweb.cgiDatabase=Medline:mid-1998-August2001 (accessed 22 August 2001).
41 Jellinek D, Lambden P, Lilley R. Your health and the Internet. Norwich: The Stationery Office , 2000.
42.
42 Jones J. Development of a self-assessment method for patients to evaluate health information on the Internet . AMIA Symposium 1999, pp. 540-544 . Available from http://www.amia.org/pubs/symposia/D005629.PDF (accessed 28 February 2001).
43.
43 Health on the Net Foundation. HON Code of Conduct (HONcode) for medical and health Web sites. Version 1.6, 1997. Available from http://www.hon.ch/HONcode/Conduct.html (accessed 21 February 2001).
44.
44 Health Summit Working Group. Criteria for assessing the quality of health information on the Internet - policy paper, 1999. Available from: http://hitiweb.mitretek.org/docs/policy.html (accessed 16 May 2001).
45.
45 eAccessHealth.org New opportunities for accessing health information in the twin tiers: issues and concerns in using medical information on evaluating information, 2001. Available from: http://eaccesshealth.org/training/issues.html (accessed 9 May 2001).
46.
46 Alzheimer's Association Website. Available from: http://www.alz.org (accessed 6 June 2001).
47.
47 The Alzheimer's Society Website: Alzheimer's dementia care and research. Available from: http://www.alzheimers.org.uk (accessed 6 June 2001).
48.
48 Alzheimer's disease international website. Available from: http://www.alz.co.uk (accessed 6 June 2001).
