The middle third of the facial skeleton is one of the most complex areas of the human body. A critical factor determining the successful treatment of midfacial fractures is an early and correct diagnosis. Assessment and management of the traumatized patient requires rapid evaluation and decision making. Imaging for the evaluation of patients with midfacial fractures has contributed to achieving an accurate diagnosis and a subsequent successful management. It requires a knowledge of those imaging modalities and projections that provide the most information with the least exposure of radiation to the patient. Conventional radiography has been used successfully for many years although advanced imaging methods such as—three-dimensional computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and cone beam computed tomography have been applied more recently. In this article, we will take a relook at various modalities to image midfacial fractures, and discuss the rationale for selection of those procedures that offer the greatest diagnostic information.
SuomalainenAPakbaznejad EsmaeiliERobinsonS. Dentomaxillofacial imaging with panoramic views and cone beam CT. Insights Imag2015; 6: 1–16.
7.
White SC, Pharoah MJ. Oral radiology principles and interpretation. 7th ed. Canada: Elsevier Health Science, 2014.
8.
MoilanenA. Midfacial fractures in dental panoramic radiography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol1984; 57: 106–110.
9.
AltonenM. Pantomographic examinations of the bones and fractures in the middle third of the facial skeleton. An experimental study. Acta Odontol Scand Suppl1971; 30: 1–76.
SidebottomAJLordTC. Single view radiographic screening of midfacial trauma. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg1998; 27: 356–357.
12.
PanjnoushMShiraniGJozghanbariP. A comparative study of the diagnostic accuracy on Waters view with CT scan in detecting midface fractures. J Dent Med2006; 19: 53–58.
13.
BurmJSChungCHOhSJ. Pure orbital blowout fracture: new concepts and importance of medial orbital blowout fracture. Plast Reconstr Surg1999; 103: 1839–1849.
14.
ForrestCRLataACMarcuzziDW. The role of orbital ultrasound in the diagnosis of orbital fractures. Plast Reconstr Surg1993; 92: 28–34.
15.
McCannPJBrocklebankLMAyoubAF. Assessment of zygomatico-orbital complex fractures using ultrasonography. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg2000; 38: 525–529.
16.
OrdRALe MayMDuncanJG. Computerized tomography and B-Scan ultrasonography in the diagnosis of fractures of the medial orbital wall. Plast Reconstr Surg1981; 67: 281–288.
17.
AkizukiHYoshidaHMichiK. Ultrasonographic evaluation during reduction of zygomatic arch fractures. J Craniomaxillofac Surg1990; 18: 263–266.
18.
GülicherDKrimmelMReinertS. The role of intraoperative ultrasonography in zygomatic complex fracture repair. Int J Oral Maxillofacial Surg2006; 35: 224–230.
19.
KimDHKimKS. Usefulness of ultrasonography-assisted closed reduction for nasal fracture under local anesthesia. Archiv Craniofac Surg2015; 16: 151–153.
20.
BlessmannMPohlenzPBlakeFA. Validation of a new training tool for ultrasound as a diagnostic modality in suspected midfacial fractures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg2007; 36: 501–506.
21.
FriedrichREHeilandMBartel-FriedrichS. Potentials of ultrasound in the diagnosis of midfacial fractures. Clin Oral Invest2003; 7: 226–229.
22.
TanrikuluRErolB. Comparison of computed tomography with conventional radiography for midfacial fractures. Dentomaxillofac Radiol2001; 30: 141–146.
23.
Hardt N and Kuttenberger J. Craniofacial trauma: diagnosis and management. Berlin. Heidelberg: Springer Science & Business Media, 2010.
24.
HopperRASalemySSzeRW. Diagnosis of midface fractures with CT: What the surgeon needs to know. RadioGraphics2006; 26: 783–793.
25.
AgarwalAKumarNSharmaN. 2D and 3D CT scan–A diagnostic adjunct or necessity in maxillofacial trauma. Ind J Dent2012; 3: 185–189.
26.
BettsAMO’BrienWTDaviesBW. A systematic approach to CT evaluation of orbital trauma. Emerg Radiol2014; 21: 511–531.
27.
CaranciFCicalaDCappabiancaS. Orbital fractures: role of imaging. Semin Ultrasound CT MR2012; 33: 385–391.
28.
HwangKYouSHKimSG. Analysis of nasal bone fractures; a six-year study of 503 patients. J Craniofac Surg2006; 17: 261–264.
29.
FoxLAVannierMWWestOC. Diagnostic performance of CT, MPR and 3DCT imaging in maxillofacial trauma. Comput Med Imaging Graph1995; 19: 385–395.
30.
SaigalKWinokurRSFindenS. Use of three-dimensional computerized tomography reconstruction in complex facial trauma. Facial Plast Surg2005; 21: 214–220.
31.
AnsariMKAhmedSSKumarR. Diagnostic efficacy of 3D CT vs conventional radiographs in maxillofacial trauma - A comparative study. Asian Pac J Health Sci2015; 2: 42–50.
32.
SinghVMalkunjeLMohammadS. The maxillofacial injuries: A study. Natl J Maxillofac Surg2012; 3: 166–171.
33.
MayerJSWainwrightDJYeakleyJW. The role of three-dimensional CT in the management of maxillofacial trauma. J Trauma1988; 28: 1043–1053.
34.
AlderMEDeahlSTMattesonSR. Clinical usefulness of two-dimensional reformatted and three- dimensionally rendered computerized tomographic images. J Oral Maxillofac Surg1995; 53: 375–386.
35.
GillespieJEIsherwoodIBarkerGR. Three-dimensional reformations of computed tomography in the assessment of facial trauma. Clin Radiol1987; 38: 523–526.
36.
Buitrago-TéllezCHSchilliWBohnertM. A comprehensive classification of craniofacial fractures: postmortem and clinical studies with two- and three-dimensional computed tomography. Injury2002; 33: 651–668.
37.
SchulzeDHeilandMThurmannH. Radiation exposure during midfacial imaging using 4- and 16-slice computed tomography, cone beam computed tomography systems and conventional radiography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol2004; 33: 83–86.
38.
SaigalKWinokurRSFindenS. Use of three-dimensional computerized tomography reconstruction in complex facial trauma. Facial Plast Surg2005; 21: 214–220.
39.
HandePCTalwarI. Multimodality imaging of the orbit. Indian J Radiol Imaging2012; 22: 227–239.
40.
LinKYNgaiPEchegoyenJC. Imaging in orbital trauma. Saudi J Ophthalmol2012; 26: 427–432.
41.
CaranciFCicalaDCappabiancaS. Orbital fractures: role of imaging. Semin Ultrasound CT MR2012; 33: 385–391.
42.
MafeeMFKarimiAShahJ. Anatomy and pathology of the eye: role of MR imaging and CT. Neuroimaging Clin N Am2005; 15: 23–47.
43.
LudlowJBDavies-LudlowLEBrooksSL. Dosimetry of 3 CBCT devices for oral and maxillofacial radiology: CB Mercuray, NewTom 3G and i-CAT. Dentomaxillofac Radiol2006; 35: 219–226.
44.
HeilandMSchulzeDBlakeF. Intraoperative imaging of zygomaticomaxillary complex fractures using a 3D C-arm system. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg2005; 34: 369–375.
45.
BoeddinghausRWhyteA. Current concepts in maxillofacial imaging. Eur J Radiol2008; 66: 396–418.
46.
ShintakuWHVenturinJSAzevedoB. Applications of cone-beam computed tomography in fractures of the maxillofacial complex. Dent Traumatol2009; 25: 358–366.
47.
StuckBAHülseRBarthTJ. Intraoperative cone beam computed tomography in the management of facial fractures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg2012; 41: 1171–1175.
48.
BriscoJFullerKLeeN. Cone beam computed tomography for imaging orbital trauma—image quality and radiation dose compared with conventional multislice computed tomography. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg2014; 52: 76–80.
49.
KamburogluKMuratSKolsuzE. Comparative assessment of subjective image quality of cross-sectional cone-beam computed tomography scans. J Oral Sci2011; 53: 501–508.
50.
HatcherDC. Operational principles for cone-beam computed tomography. J Am Dent Assoc2010; 141: 3–6.
51.
PalomoJMRaoPSHansMG. Influence of CBCT exposure conditions on radiation dose. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod2008; 105: 773–782.
52.
WenzelAHaiter-NetoFFrydenbergM. Variable-resolution cone-beam computerized tomography with enhancement filtration compared with intraoral photostimulable phosphor radiography in detection of transverse root fractures in an in vitro model. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod2009; 108: 939–945.
53.
MeloSLBortoluzziEAAbreuMJr. Diagnostic ability of a cone-beam computed tomography scan to assess longitudinal root fractures in prosthetically treated teeth. J Endod2010; 36: 1879–1882.
54.
SunZSmithTKortamS. Effect of bone thickness on alveolar bone-height measurements from cone-beam computed tomography images. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop2011; 139: 117–127.
55.
VeldhoenSSchöllchenMHankenH. Performance of cone-beam computed tomography and multidetector computed tomography in diagnostic imaging of the midface: A comparative study on Phantom and cadaver head scans. Eur Radiol2017; 27: 790–800.
