PapakostidisCGiannoudisPV. Pelvic ring injuries with haemodynamic instability: efficacy of pelvic packing, a systematic review. Injury2009; 40(Suppl 4): S53–S61.
2.
ChesserTJCrossAMWardAJ. The use of pelvic binders in the emergent management of potential pelvic trauma. Injury2012; 43: 667–669.
3.
LeeCPorterK. The prehospital management of pelvic fractures. Emerg Med J2007; 24: 130–133.
4.
D’AlleyrandJCDuttonRPPollakAN. Extrapolation of battlefield resuscitative care to the civilian setting. J Surg Orthop Adv2010; 19: 62–69.
5.
GrantPT. The diagnosis of pelvic fractures by ‘springing’. Arch Emerg Med1990; 7: 178–182.
6.
den BoerTAGeurtsMvan HulsteijnLT. The value of clinical examination in diagnosing pelvic fractures in blunt trauma patients: a brief review. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg2011; 37: 373–377.
7.
SauerlandSBouillonBRixenD. The reliability of clinical examination in detecting pelvic fractures in blunt trauma patients: a meta-analysis. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg2004; 124: 123–128.
8.
BottlangMKriegJCMohrM. Emergent management of pelvic ring fractures with use of circumferential compression. J Bone Joint Surg Am2002; 84-A(Suppl 2): 43–47.
9.
BottlangMSimpsonTSiggJ. Noninvasive reduction of open-book pelvic fractures by circumferential compression. J Orthop Trauma2002; 16: 367–373.
10.
BonnerTJEardleyWGNewellN. Accurate placement of a pelvic binder improves reduction of unstable fractures of the pelvic ring. J Bone Joint Surg Br2011; 93: 1524–1528.
11.
SimpsonTKriegJCHeuerF. Stabilization of pelvic ring disruptions with a circumferential sheet. J Trauma2002; 52: 158–161.
12.
TanECvan StigtSFvan VugtAB. Effect of a new pelvic stabilizer (T-POD(R)) on reduction of pelvic volume and haemodynamic stability in unstable pelvic fractures. Injury2010; 41: 1239–1243.
13.
WarmeWJToddMS. The circumferential antishock sheet. Mil Med2002; 167: 438–441.
14.
JowettAJBowyerGW. Pressure characteristics of pelvic binders. Injury2007; 38: 118–121.
15.
KnopsSPvan RielMPGoossensRH. Measurements of the exerted pressure by pelvic circumferential compression devices. Open Orthop J2010; 4: 101–106.
16.
KnopsSPVan LieshoutEMSpanjersbergWR. Randomised clinical trial comparing pressure characteristics of pelvic circumferential compression devices in healthy volunteers. Injury2011; 42: 1020–1026.
17.
KriegJCMohrMMirzaAJ. Pelvic circumferential compression in the presence of soft-tissue injuries: a case report. J Trauma2005; 59: 470–472.
