This review describes the various components of a trauma team, and emphasises its value as one of many parts of a trauma system. The evidence for the team is weak and based on expert opinion and experience. Nevertheless, the evidence that high quality trauma systems improve survival, and that a trauma team is a vital component of all such systems is compelling. There is no evidence that a particular component of the team is essential. The trauma team is likely to have most impact on patients with moderate severity of trauma and probability of survival.
AhmedJMTallonJMPetrieDA (2007) Trauma management outcomes associated with nonsurgeon versus surgeon trauma team leaders. Annals of Emergency Medicine50(1): 7–12.
2.
AtkinCFreedmanIRosenfeldJVFitzgeraldMKossmannT (2005) The evolution of an integrated state trauma system in Victoria, Australia. Injury36(11): 1277–1287.
3.
CherryRAKingTSCarneyDEBryantP (2007) Trauma team activation and the impact on mortality. The Journal of Trauma63(2): 326–330.
4.
DavisKACabbadNCSchusterKMKaplanLJCarusoneCLearyT (2008) Trauma team oversight improves efficiency of care and augments clinical and economic outcomes. The Journal of Trauma65(6): 1236–1242, discussion 1242–1244.
5.
DemetriadesDSavaJAloK (2001) Old age as a criterion for trauma team activation. The Journal of Trauma51(4): 754–757.
6.
DiRussoSHollyCKamathRCuffSSullivanTScharfH (2001) Preparation and achievement of American college of surgeons level I trauma verification raises hospital performance and improves patient outcome. The Journal of Trauma51(2): 294–300.
7.
FranklinGABoazPWSpainDA (1999) Prehospital hypotension as a valid indicator of trauma team activation. The Journal of Trauma48(6): 1034–1039.
8.
HjortdahlMRingenAHNaessACWisborgT (2009) Leadership is the essential non-technical skill in the trauma team results of a qualitative study. Scandinavian Journal ofTrauma,Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine17(1): 48–48.
9.
KhetarpalSSteinbrunnBSMcGonigalM (1999) Trauma faculty and trauma team activation: impact on trauma system function and patient outcome. The Journal of Trauma47(3): 576–581.
10.
KohnMAHammelJMBretzSWStangbyA (2004) Trauma team activation criteria as predictors of patient disposition from the emergency department. Academic Emergency Medicine11(1): 1–9.
11.
LehmannRKArthursZMCuadradoDG (2007) Trauma team activation : simplified criteria safely reduces overtriage. The American Journal of Surgery193(5): 630–635.
12.
MockCNguyenDQuansahTArreola-RisaCViradiaRJoshipuraM (2006) Evaluation of trauma care capabilities in four countries using the WHO-IATSIC guidelines for essential trauma care world. The American Journal of Surgery30(6): 946–956.
13.
NorwoodSHMcAuleyCEBerneJD (2002) A pre-hospital Glasgow coma scale score ≤ 14 accurately predicts the need for full trauma team activation and patient hospitalisation after motor vehicle collisions. Journal of Trauma53(3): 503–507.
14.
RainerTHDe Villiers SmitP (2003) Trauma systems and emergency medicine. Emergency Medicine15(1): 11–17.
15.
RainerTHCheungNKYeungJHHGrahamCA (2007) Do trauma teams make a difference? A single centre registry study. Resuscitation73(3): 374–381.
16.
SimonsREliopoulosVLaflammeDBrownDR (1999) Impact on process of trauma care delivery 1 year after the introduction of a trauma program in a provincial trauma center. The Journal of Trauma46(5): 811–816.
17.
SavaJAloKVelmahosGCDemetriadesD (2002) All patients with truncal gunshot wounds deserve trauma team activation. The Journal of Trauma52(2): 276–279.
18.
ScaleaTMSimonHMDuncanAO (1990) Geriatric blunt multiple trauma: improved survival with early invasive monitoring. The Journal of Trauma30(2): 129–136.
19.
SchwabCWKauderDR (1992) Trauma in the geriatric patient. Archives of Surgery127(6): 701–705.
20.
SmithJCaldwellESugrueM (2005) Difference in trauma team activation criteria between hospitals within the same region. Emergency Medicine Australasia17(5–6): 480–487.
21.
WyattJPHenryJBeardD (1999) The association between seniority of accident and emergency doctor and outcome following trauma. Injury30(3): 165–168.
