Anonymous (1986) [1952]: Twelve Steps and Twelve Traditions.New York: Alcoholics Anonymous World Services
2.
ArminenI. (1994): Elämäkerrat etnometodina. Kokemusten organisointi nimettömien alkoholistien piirissä. (Personal histories as an ethnographic method. Experiences from alcoholics anonymous). Helsinki: The Finnish Foundation for Alcohol Studies. Research report no. 188.
3.
ArminenI. (1996a): On the moral and interactional relevancy of self-repairs for life-stories of Alcoholics Anonymous.Text16: 4
4.
ArminenI. (1999): Negotiating Rules for group Therapy. Paper presented at the conference Pragma99. Tel Aviv, June 1999
5.
ArminenI. (2000): Conversation analysis and social theory. Paper presented at the conference Text and Talk at Work. Gent, August 2000.
6.
ArminenI. (2000b): On the context sensitivity of institutional interaction.Discourse & Society11(4): 435–458
7.
ArminenI., & HalonenM. (forthcoming): Conversation Analysis: studying talk at work in addiction treatment. In: RhodesTim (ed.): Qualitative Methods in Drugs and Alcohol Research.London: Sage
8.
ArminenI., & LeppoA. (2001): The dilemma of two cultures in the 12-step treatment: the professional responses for clients who act against their best interests.Prepared for Listening to the welfare state – Social work practices in Nordic countries ed. by C. Kullberg, I. Rostila & M. Seltzer. Ashgate
9.
AtkinsonJ.M., & HeritageJ. (eds.) (1984): Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
10.
DrewP. (1992) “Contested evidence in courtroom cross-examination: The case of a trial for rape.” Pp. 418–469 in Talk at work – Interaction in institutional settings edited by DrewP., & HeritageJ.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
11.
DrewP., & Sorjonen,M-L. (1997): Institutional dialogue. In: van DijkT.A. (ed.): Discourse as social interaction: Discourse Studies 2 – A multidisciplinary introduction.London: Sage 92–118
12.
FreudSigmund (1989) [1913]: Toteemi ja tabu. (Totem and taboo) Helsinki: Love Kirjat
13.
GillM., & HoffmanI. (1982): Analysis of Transference, Vol II. Studies of nine audio-recorded psychoanalytic sessions.New York: International Universities Press
14.
HalonenM. (in press): Terapeutti elämäkerran tulkitsijana myllyhoidon ryhmäterapiassa (The therapist as an interpreter of personal histories in myllyhoito group therapy). In: HaakanaInstitutionaalinen vuorovaikutus (Institutional interaction)Helsinki: SKS
15.
HeritageJ. (1997): Conversation analysis and institutional talk: analysing data. In: SilvermanD. (ed.): Qualitative research: Theory, method and practice.London: Sage
16.
Houtkoop-SteenstraH. (2000): Interaction and the standardized interview. The living questionnaire.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
17.
HutchbyI. (1996): Power in discourse: the case of arguments on a British talk radio show.Discourse & Society7(4): 481–497
18.
Koski-JännesA. (1992): Alcohol Addiction and Self-regulation. A controlled trial of a relapse prevention program for Finnish inpatient alcoholics.Helsinki: The Finnish Foundation for Alcohol Studies
19.
LeppoA. (1999): Vakaumuksen ja vastarinnan näyttämöt. Etnografinen tutkimus AA-perustaisesta päihderiippuvuuden laitoshoidosta (An ethnographic study of the institutional treatment of substance abuse, based on the AA model) Master's thesis in sociology, University of Helsinki, September 1999
20.
MäkeläK. (1996): Alcoholics Anonymous as a mutual help movement – A study in eight countries.Wisconsin: Wisconsin University Press
21.
PeräkyläA. (1996): Vuorovaikutus, valta ja instituutiot (Interaction, power and institutions).Sosiologia33(2): 89–102
22.
PeyrotM. (1995): Psychological Testing and Forensic Decision Making: The Properties-In-Use of the MMPI.Social Problems42(4): 574–586
23.
PomerantzA. (1984): Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes. In: AtkinsonJ.M., & HeritageJ. (eds.): Structures of Social Action. Studies in Conversation Analysis.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
24.
PomerantzAnita (1984b): Giving a source or basis: the practice in conversation of telling “how I know”.Journal of Pragmatics8: 607–625
25.
PuhakkaA. (2000): Hoitoonohjaus hoitoon ohjatun silmin – subjektiivinen totuus ja sen tulkinta (Referral to treatment from the viewpoint of the referree – the subjective truth and its interpretation).Joensuu: Joensuun yliopiston yhteiskuntatieteellisiä julkaisuja Nro 44
26.
RaevaaraL. (2000): Potilaan diagnoosiehdotukset lääkärin vastaanotolla. Keskustelunanalyyttinen tutkimus potilaan institutionaalisista tehtävistä (Patients' diagnostic suggestions during a physician's consultation. A discussion analytic study of the institutional tasks of patients)Helsinki: SKS.
27.
SilvermanD. (2000): Doing Qualitative Research. A Practical Handbook.London: Sage
28.
ToiviainenS. (1997): Kantapöydän imu. Juoppokulttuuri valintana ja pakkona (The attraction of the familiar pub table. Drunkard culture as a choice and obligation)Helsinki: Tammi
29.
ViljanenA. M. (1994): Psykiatria ja kulttuuri. Tutkimus oikeuspsykiatrisesta argumentaatiosta (Psychiatry and culture. A study of forensic psychiatric argumentation)Helsinki: Stakes research paper no. 37
30.
WhalenJ., & VinkhuyesenE. (2000): Expert systems in (inter)action: diagnosing document machine problems over the telephone. In: LuffP., & HindmarshJ., & HeathChristian (eds.): Workplace Studies: Recovering Work Practice and Informing System Design.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
31.
WiederD.L. (1974): Language and social reality. The telling of the convict code.The Hague: Mouton
32.
WisemanJacqueline (1970): Stations of the lost. The treatment of skid row alcoholics.Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall
33.
YalisoveDaniel (1998): The Origins and Evolution of the Disease Concept of Treatment.Journal of Studies on Alcohol59: 469–476.