Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Background:

Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) carries a risk of perioperative stroke, particularly during carotid cross-clamping. While neurological monitoring is reliable for patients under regional anesthesia, alternative options are needed for those unsuitable for regional anesthesia. Near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) is commonly used during CEA, but its diagnostic accuracy varies, particularly under general anesthesia.

Methods:

A systematic review with meta-analysis was performed to assess the diagnostic accuracy of intraoperative NIRS in detecting clamp-associated hemodynamic cerebral ischemia in patients under general anesthesia. MEDLINE, Google Scholar, and Web of Science were searched for studies that compared NIRS with the occurrence of immediate or early postoperative neurological deficits in patients undergoing CEA under GA. Meta-regression was performed to explore causes of heterogeneity.

Results:

A total of 28 studies involving 5729 patients were included. The results show that NIRS has a summary sensitivity of 47.5% and a summary specificity of 90.3% in diagnosing clamp-associated cerebral ischemia under general anesthesia, with an area under the ROC curve (AUC-ROC) of 0.85. The presence of a contralateral carotid occlusion (CCO) increased summary sensitivity while smoking history the presence of CCO and smoking history decreased summary specificity. For postoperative stroke prediction, NIRS has a summary sensitivity of 49.5% and summary specificity of 88.5%, with an AUC-ROC of 0.85.

Conclusions:

NIRS is a specific but not highly sensitive tool for detecting cerebral ischemia during CEA, and its use in combination with more sensitive neuromonitoring methods is recommended, in order to guide intraoperative neuroprotective strategies.

Keywords

Carotid endarterectomy near-infrared spectroscopy neurological monitoring general anesthesia

Context and Relevance

The meta-analysis included 28 studies involving 5729 patients undergoing CEA under general anesthesia. NIRS demonstrated a summary sensitivity of 47.5% and a summary specificity of 90.3% in diagnosing clamp-associated hemodynamic cerebral ischemia. The area under the ROC curve (AUC-ROC) for NIRS was 0.85. The presence of contralateral carotid occlusion (CCO) increased sensitivity.

What this paper adds

There is no gold standard for intraoperative neurological monitoring during carotid endarterectomy under general anesthesia. Non-invasive cerebral perfusion measurements have been considered since not every patient is a candidate for intervention under regional anesthesia. Near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) quantifies the regional oxygen saturation in the frontal lobe, which correlates with brain perfusion. Its accuracy in detecting brain ischemia has only been reported in a few studies and is highly variable across the literature. This study systematically reviews the diagnostic accuracy of intraoperative NIRS in patients submitted to carotid endarterectomy under general anesthesia. Meta-analysis was performed to determine the summary sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratios, and diagnostic odds ratio. The reference standard used was the occurrence of neurological deficits during recovery from anesthesia. A secondary meta-analysis was performed to determine the accuracy of NIRS in predicting postoperative stroke. This study used clinically meaningful reference standards, highlighting the performance of NIRS as a monitoring tool in carotid endarterectomy in everyday practice.

Introduction

Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is the gold-standard procedure used to treat both symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis.^1,2 However, there is a potential risk of perioperative stroke during CEA, with up to 1.2%–3% of previously asymptomatic patients being affected.^3,4 The majority of these strokes are embolic in nature, while 10% are believed to be hemodynamic strokes occurring due to cerebral ischemia during carotid cross-clamping.⁵ Intolerance to carotid cross-clamping may occur in up to 12% of patients undergoing CEA under regional anesthesia.⁶

In patients undergoing CEA under regional anesthesia, the most reliable method to identify critical cerebral ischemia during carotid cross-clamping is clinical neurological monitoring, commonly known as the “awake” test.^1,7 Nevertheless, regional anesthesia is not suitable for all patients, and some surgeons prefer operating patients on general anesthesia, thus alternative options for neuromonitoring are required. Several monitoring techniques have been used with general anesthesia, but none is as accurate as the “awake” test.⁸

Near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) measures the absorption of light in the infrared spectrum to determine the levels of oxygenated hemoglobin.⁹ Although widely used during CEA, alone or in conjunction with other strategies, it has been shown not to be particularly accurate, despite its high specificity in detecting cerebral ischemia during CEA under regional anesthesia.^10,11 In the case of general anesthesia, its diagnostic accuracy is harder to determine, given the lack of a gold-standard.¹²

The primary aim of this study is to perform a systematic review of the literature on the diagnostic accuracy of intraoperative NIRS in detecting clamp-associated hemodynamic cerebral ischemia in patients undergoing CEA under general anesthesia. Furthermore, a meta-analysis was performed to determine the pooled diagnostic accuracy of intraoperative NIRS in detecting clamp-associated hemodynamic cerebral ischemia in CEA under general anesthesia. The occurrence of neurological deficits during recovery from anesthesia (NDRA) was used as the reference test. Secondary aims included the determination of the pooled diagnostic accuracy of NIRS using other neuromonitoring tests as the reference, and the ability of intraoperative NIRS to predict postoperative ischemic stroke.

Methods

This systematic review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies (PRISMA-DTA) statement.¹³ The review protocol has been registered at https://www.Crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, ID: CRD42021231782.

Eligibility criteria

Prospective or retrospective observational studies assessing patients submitted to CEA under general anesthesia with intraoperative NIRS (index test) were included. Eligible studies had to provide data on the number of patients who presented with immediate or early postoperative neurological deficits (reference test); the intraoperative NIRS cutoff for the detection of cerebral ischemia; and the number of patients with a positive and negative reference test who had a positive and negative index test (to compute diagnostic accuracy parameters).

Search strategy

The electronic databases MEDLINE, Google Scholar, and Web of Science were searched up to 1 June 2022. The following query was used for MEDLINE (with adaptations for other databases): (“Endarterectomy” (MeSH Terms) OR “Endarterectomy, Carotid” (MeSH Terms) OR “carotid endarterectomy” (Text Word) OR “Carotid Endarterectomies” (MeSH Terms)) AND (“NIRS” (All Fields) OR “near infra-red spectroscopy” (All Fields) or “NIS” (All Fields) or “Oximetry”). No language restrictions were applied.

After duplicate removal, two reviewers (L.D.G. and J.R.N.) independently screened the titles and abstracts of preselected studies. Subsequently, references were selected for inclusion based on full-text evaluation by the same reviewers. Any disagreements were resolved by a third independent reviewer (M.F.M.). The search strategy further included cross-referencing.

Data extraction

Data concerning study design, patient characteristics, procedural variables and results were independently extracted by two reviewers using a purpose-built form. Variables whose data were extracted included the year of publication, country and center of recruitment, study design, recruitment time, sample size, participants’ age and gender distribution, frequency of cardiovascular comorbidities, and carotid symptomatic status. In addition, data related to procedural protocols was retrieved, as well as the diagnostic cutoff value of NIRS used in each study, number of participants with positive and negative NIRS test, and number of participants submitted to CEA. Further collected variables include the number of patients with NDRA and number of patients with postoperative stroke or transient ischemic attack.

Assessment of study quality

Study quality was assessed by two independent authors (J.R.N. and L.D.G.) based on the QUADAS-2 risk-of bias-tool for diagnostic test accuracy.¹⁴ Discrepancies were resolved by a third author (M.F.M.).

Statistical analysis

Heterogeneity was evaluated through the I² Q statistic-related measure of variance, and a diagnostics random-effects model was preferred to obtain summary sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratios, and diagnostic odds ratio. Forest plots were used to display results from the meta-analysis, where the measure of effect for each study is represented by a square and the respective areas are proportional to study weight. A random-effects model was performed to compute the diagnostic test’s summary ROC curve. Meta-regression was used to explore heterogeneity through a random-effects model, with the diagnostic odds ratio as the dependent variable. A p value inferior to 0.05 was considered statistically significant for all analyses. Computations were conducted using Stata 16.1, OpenMeta [Analyst], and MetaDiSc 1.4.¹⁵

Results

Search results

The search yielded 504 references, of which 363 were screened by abstract and title after elimination of duplicates. Through screening, 69 references were deemed eligible for full text appraisal, and 28 were selected for inclusion in this review (Fig. 1), comprising a total of 5729 patients and 5760 interventions under general anesthesia.^13,16
–39

Fig. 1.

PRISMA flow diagram illustrating reference selection process.

The characteristics of each study are displayed in Table 1. Study sample size varied between 19 and 654 patients. Mean patient age ranged between 59 and 73.5 years. The percentage of male patients across studies varied between 59% and 86%. The prevalence of symptomatic carotid stenosis across studies varied between 0% and 100%. The percentage of patients with contralateral carotid occlusion (CCO) ranged between 0% and 51% (Table 1).

Table 1.

Characteristics of the studies and summary clinical data of the patients included in the systematic revision and meta-analysis.

Author	Study Design	Continent	Pub. Year	Sample Size (patients)	No. Interv.	Mean age	Male (%)	AHT (%)	DLD (%)	DM (%)	SH (%)	CAD (%)	Sym (%)	CCO (%)
Al-Rawi and Kirkpatrick¹³	Prospective	North America	2006	167	167	69	72%	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A
Beese et al.¹⁶	Prospective	Europe	1998	317	317	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	66.6%	12.9%
Bissacco et al.¹⁷	Retrospective	Europe	2021	355	372	73.5	N/A	94.1%	59.7%	28.5%	67.6%	9.3%	22.8%	30.4%
Botes et al.¹⁸	Retrospective	Africa	2007	100	100	66	72%	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A
Ceyhan and Ovali¹⁹	Retrospective	Asia	2019	68	68	70.4	71%	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A
Cura et al.²⁰ (Sevoflurane cohort)	Retrospective	Asia	2022	17	17	71.1	59%	58.8%	N/A	11.8%	N/A	N/A	47.1%	N/A
Cura et al.²⁰ (Propofol cohort)	Retrospective	Asia	2022	16	16	66.1	63%	62.5%	N/A	43.8%	N/A	N/A	37.5%	N/A
De Letter et al.²¹	Prospective	Europe	1998	102	102	N/A	69%	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A
Duffy et al.²²	Retrospective	North America	1997	72	72	67	74%	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A
Findlay et al.²³	Prospective	North America	2017	300	300	69	73%	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	72%	N/A
Friedell et al.²⁴	Retrospective	North America	2008	323	323	69	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A
Grubhofer et al.²⁵	Prospective	Europe	2000	59	59	67	76%	55.9%	N/A	28.8%	N/A	N/A	77.9%	N/A
Hirofumi et al.²⁶	Prospective	Asia	2003	19	20	69.6	68%	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	52.6%	10.5%
Kamenskaya et al.²⁷	Prospective	Asia	2017	466	466	63	68%	N/A	N/A	23.4%	24.9%	36.5%	77.4%	51.3%
Kondov et al.²⁸	Retrospective	Europe	2019	413	413	70.1	76%	99%	83.5%	27.1%	29.8%	32.7%	79.6%	0%
Kuzhuget et al.²⁹	Prospective	Asia	2017	84	84	59	75%	89.3%	84.5%	10.7%	92.9%	67.9%	0%	N/A
Manwaring et al.³⁰	Prospective	Europe	2010	91	91	65.4	59%	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	52.7%	N/A
Mauermann et al.³¹	Prospective	North America	2013	73	73	71	73%	83.6%	80.8%	26%	17.8%	46.6%	5.5%	N/A
Michel et al.³²	Prospective	Europe	2000	41	41	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	85.4%	19.5%
Mille et al.³³	Prospective	Europe	2004	594	594	70.4	70%	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	100%	6.6%
Park et al.³⁴ (Sevoflurane cohort)	Prospective	Asia	2019	36	36	69	86%	83.3%	N/A	36.1%	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A
Park et al.³⁴ (Propofol cohort)	Prospective	Asia	2019	34	34	67	79%	70.6%	N/A	44.1%	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A
Pedrini et al.³⁵	Prospective	Europe	2012	473	473	73.3	64%	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	29.6%	28.3%
Pennekamp et al.³⁶	Prospective	Europe	2013	151	151	70	77%	84.1%	88.7%	23.8%	N/A	32.5%	88.1%	12.6%
Sihotsky et al.³⁷	Prospective	Europe	2020	654	654	70.1	63%	93%	N/A	27.1%	15%	46.9%	59.1%	3.1%
Tambakis et al.³⁸	Prospective	Europe	2011	60	60	71	82%	75%	38.3%	21.7%	76.7%	58.3%	76.7%	N/A
Uchino et al.³⁹	Prospective	Asia	2012	20	20	72	80%	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	30%	35%
Uno et al.⁴⁰	N/A	Asia	2007	118	131	67.1	81%	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	61.9%	9.3%
Wang et al.⁴¹	Prospective	Asia	2019	84	84	63	82%	78.6%	N/A	38.1%	52.4%	29.8%	83.3%	34.5%
Yucel et al.⁴²	Prospective	Europe	2022	50	50	69	68%	74%	N/A	46%	66%	32%	58%	N/A

Pub. Year: publication year; No. Interv.: number of interventions; AHT: arterial hypertension; DLD: dyslipidemia; SH: smoking history; CAD: coronary artery disease; Sym: Symptomatic carotid stenosis; CCO: contralateral carotid occlusion; N/A: not available.

While most studies used a selective shunting protocol (n = 23), only one study used routine shunting, and three studies reported a “never shunt” protocol or excluded shunted patients from the sample. The rate of shunt use in the studies which used it selectively varied between 0% and 32%.

The majority of studies (n = 23) reported using the INVOS™ (Somanetics Corp, Troy. MI, USA) system. Other NIRS systems used included the NIRO 300 (Hamamatsu Photonics, Shizuoka, Japan), Masimo Cerebral Oxymeter (Masimo Corporation, Irvine, CA, USA), Equanox 7600 (Nonin Medical Inc, Plymouth, MN, USA) and Foresight (CAS Medical Systems, Irvine, CA, USA). The location of the oximetry probes was the frontal or frontoparietal region in 21 studies and the temporal region in one study. Bilaterally placed probes were used in 16 studies, while six studies reported using only one probe ipsilateral to the side of the intervention (Supplemental Table S1).

Risk of bias

The QUADAS-2 risk of bias assessment is displayed on Fig. 2. Overall, most studies were considered as having a low risk of bias in the index test and flow and timing domains. In the patient selection domain, approximately half of the studies were considered as having an unclear risk of bias, mostly due to the authors not specifying whether patients had been consecutively selected. Most studies were deemed as having high risk of bias in the standard reference domain, as only one study specified whether NDRA or stroke had a hemodynamic or an atherothrombotic cause.⁴⁰

Fig. 2.

QUADAS-2 risk of bias assessment.

Diagnostic accuracy of NIRS

Neurological deficits during recovery from anesthesia

Eight studies^{17,23,24,33,35,39,40,42} were used to determine summary sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratios and diagnostic odds ratio of NIRS compared to the occurrence of NDRA. Ten studies were included in the calculation of the summary ROC curve and 15 studies in the meta-regression.^{17,19,22
–24,26,28,33,35,36,38
–42}

The reported NIRS decrease cutoff (∆NIRS) for the diagnosis of carotid clamping-related cerebral ischemia reported varied between 10% and 25% across all studies, and the incidence of NDRA ranged from 0% to 5.6%. Overall, there were a total of 49 patients who presented NDRA, of which 24 had NIRS drop beyond the cutoff values defined in each study. The sensitivity and specificity of NIRS varied between 0%–100% and 26.3%–99.2% among all studies when using NDRA as reference. The positive and negative predictive values varied between 0%–40% and 80.9%–100%, respectively. The positive and negative likelihood ratios and the diagnostic odds ratio ranged 0–47.6 and 0–1.07, and 0–24.8, respectively (Supplemental Table S2).

Meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy was performed for studies with a diagnostic cutoff ∆NIRS of 20%. The partial AUC-sROC was 0.85 (Fig. 3A) with a summary sensitivity of 47.5% (95% confidence interval (CI) 31.9–63.7, I² = 0, p = 0.456) and a summary specificity of 90.3%, (95% CI 71.8–97.1, I² = 97.94%, p < 0.001). The summary positive likelihood ratio (LR+) was 6.121 (95% CI 2.327–16.100, I² = 89%, p < 0.001), while the summary negative likelihood ratio (LR−) was 0.472 (95% CI 0.364–0.613, I² = 0%, p = 0.860) (Fig. 4). The summary diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) was 12.218 (95% CI 5.242–28.469, I² = 12.43%, p = 0.333) (Fig. 5A).

Fig. 3.

Summary receiver operating characteristic curves for the performance of NIRS in diagnosing clamp-associated cerebral ischemia (A) and predicting postoperative stroke (B).

Fig. 4.

Forest-plots of sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratios of NIRS in diagnosing clamp-associated cerebral ischemia.

Fig. 5.

Forest plots of diagnostic odds ratio of NIRS in diagnosing clamp-associated cerebral ischemia (A) and predicting postoperative stroke (B).

Meta-regression was performed to assess variables accounting for heterogeneity in diagnostic accuracy across studies. There was no considerable threshold effect observed (β = 0.02 (95% CI –0.16 to 0.21), p = 0.814). Only the NIRS equipment used accounted for interstudy heterogeneity in DOR (β = –0.81 (95% CI –1.53 to –0.09), p = 0.028). The presence of CCO was associated with higher summary sensitivity (β = 6.03 (95% CI 0.56–11.50), p = 0.031). Variables accounting for interstudy heterogeneity in specificity included smoking history (β = –2.94 (95% CI –4.86 to –1.01), p = 0.003) and the presence of CCO (β = –8.43 (95% CI –14.03 to –2.82), p = 0.003), both of which decreased summary specificity (Supplemental Table S4).

Postoperative stroke

Eleven studies^{18,20,23,24,27,29,33
–35,39,42} were included in the determination of summary sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratios and diagnostic odds ratio of NIRS compared to postoperative stroke. Nine studies were included in the calculation of the summary ROC curve and nineteen in the meta-regression.^{18
–20,22
–24,26
–30,33
–36,38,39,41,42}

Overall, there were 53 postoperative strokes, of which 30 had non-positive NIRS diagnostic values, according to the threshold defined in each study. The sensitivity and specificity of NIRS for the prediction of postoperative strokes varied between 0%–100% and 75%–100%, respectively. Positive and negative predictive value varied between 0%–19% and 76%–100%, respectively. The positive and negative likelihood ratios and diagnostic odds ratio varied between 0–49.9 and 0–1.2, and 0–44.2, respectively (Supplemental Table S3).

Meta-analysis was performed in order to determine the value of NIRS in predicting postoperative stroke. Studies with a diagnostic cutoff ∆NIRS of 20% were included. The partial AUC-sROC was 0.85 (Fig. 3B) with a summary sensitivity of 49.5% (95% confidence interval (CI) 30.9 to 68.3, I² = 0, p = 0.727) and a summary specificity of 88.5% (95% CI 74.6–95.3, I² = 96.22%, p < 0.001). The summary LR+ was 4.742 (95% CI 1.965–11.439, I² = 80.02%, p < 0.001), while the summary negative LR− was 0.812 (95% CI 0.220–3.002, I² = 92.03%, p < 0.001) (Fig. 6). The summary diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) was 7.750 (95% CI 2.441–24.606, I² = 37.4%, p = 0.085) (Fig. 5B).

Fig. 6.

Forest-plots of sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative likelihood ratios of NIRS in predicting postoperative stroke.

There was no considerable threshold effect observed (β = 0.02 (95% CI –0.17 to 0.28), p = 0.625). The presence of a symptomatic carotid stenosis was associated with higher DOR (β = 3.96 (95% CI 0.83–7.08), p = 0.013). The type of study design was the only factor accounting for heterogeneity in summary sensitivity (β = –1.35 (95% CI –3.39 to –0.51), p = 0.008). Variables accounting for interstudy heterogeneity in specificity included arterial hypertension (β = 3.07 (95% CI 0.90–5.23), p = 0.006) and the presence of CCO (β = –6.07 (95% CI –11.41 to –0.72), p = 0.026) (Supplemental Table S4).

Other neuromonitoring tests

A total of 16 studies compared NIRS against other neuromonitoring tests (Supplemental Table S5). Due to the small number of studies for each neuromonitoring modality, it was not possible to perform meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy.

Five studies compared NIRS against electroencephalography (EEG).^{18,21,31,36,40} Two studies utilized a ∆NIRS diagnostic cutoff value of 20%, yielding sensitivity and specificity values of 0% and 100% and 87.2%–99.1%, respectively. One study, utilizing a ∆NIRS cutoff of 16%, obtained a sensitivity and specificity of 94% and 96%, respectively.³⁶

When compared against sensory evoked potentials (SEP), two studies using a ∆NIRS cutoff of 10% obtained sensitivity values of 50% and 83%, and specificities of 94% and 96%, respectively.^22,32 With a ∆NIRS cutoff of 20%, two studies found a sensitivity of 0% and 7% and a specificity of 99% in both studies.^16,40 Friedell et al.²⁴ compared NIRS against changes in EEG and/or SEP, reporting a sensitivity of 75% and a specificity of 98%.

In addition, two studies compared NIRS against transcranial Doppler (TCD), using a ∆NIRS cutoff of 12% and 13%, respectively.^25,41 The sensitivity obtained was 75% and 100%, while the specificity was 92% and 87%, respectively. Uno et al.⁴⁰ reported a sensitivity and specificity of 0% and 99%, respectively, for a ∆NIRS cutoff of 20%.

Stump pressure was used in the standard reference in two studies, yielding sensitivity values of 86% and 76%, and specificity values of 91% and 81%, respectively.^30,38 Finally, one study compared NIRS with cerebral function monitoring (CFM) and reported a sensitivity and specificity of 100% and 93.2%, respectively.¹³

Discussion

This study suggests that intraoperative NIRS has an estimated meta-analytical summary sensitivity of 47.5% and summary specificity of 90.3% in diagnosing clamp-associated hemodynamic cerebral ischemia in patients undergoing CEA under general anesthesia.

The present findings are similar to the results on patients undergoing intervention under regional anesthesia from two previous meta-analyses.^10,11 These studies demonstrated that NIRS has a low sensitivity and high specificity in regional anesthesia. However, no previous study has focused on its diagnostic accuracy in patients under general anesthesia.

Heterogeneity was negligible for sensitivity and considerable for specificity, which was addressed through meta-regression. The presence of a contralateral carotid occlusion both increased summary sensitivity and decreased summary specificity. The most plausible explanation for this finding is the compromised collateral network and compensatory mechanism that comes into play during carotid cross-clamping.^43,44 In a previous study, patients undergoing CEA with a contralateral carotid occlusion had greater drops in oximetry values ipsilateral to the intervention side after clamping.⁴⁵ Therefore, local hemispheric oxygen saturation seems to be more sensitive to a sudden decrease in perfusion. Contralateral carotid occlusion has also been associated with adverse postoperative events, including in-hospital death, stroke, and myocardial infarction.^8,46 One study has shown that patients with an incomplete Circle of Willis characterized by an isolated middle cerebral artery had an over 10-fold risk of suffering an immediate post-CEA neurologic event.^47,48 Nonetheless, it has been suggested that even in patients with a contralateral carotid occlusion, CEA can be safely performed without using a shunt.⁴⁹

Smoking accounted for a decrease in specificity. One possibility revolves around the increased carboxyhemoglobin levels found in smokers.⁵⁰ Carbon monoxide has a higher affinity for hemoglobin than oxygen, which could result in lower baseline NIRS values and greater drops in NIRS after clamping, even in the absence of cerebral ischemia.⁵¹ However, one study was unable to show changes in NIRS values after CO inhalation in healthy volunteers.⁵² Smoking also leads to cerebral vasoconstriction and decreased local blood flow, which could explain this finding.⁵³

Most studies reported using different models of the INVOS^™ oximeter.^{16
–30,32
–39} Some studies have compared the INVOS^™ oximeter with other models, yielding discrepant values, although none have been performed in patients undergoing CEA.^54
–56

A selective shunting protocol was used by most studies, which were based on a varied range of indications. This field of research holds significance due to the small yet relevant number of patients who experience hemodynamic cerebral ischemia during carotid cross-clamping.⁵⁷ The implementation of shunts could theoretically mitigate this concern effectively, despite the inconclusive evidence.⁵⁸ Surprisingly, the use of shunt did not affect diagnostic accuracy in meta-regression.

The estimated summary sensitivity of intraoperative NIRS in predicting postoperative stroke was low (49.5%). It is important to note that no study provided information on the cause of stroke. As only a minority of strokes following CEA are hemodynamic in nature,^59,60 it is likely that intraoperative NIRS is not able to detect the majority of postoperative strokes. This, coupled with the relatively low incidence of postoperative strokes, accounts for the sensitivity values observed across studies. The presence of a contralateral carotid occlusion was also associated with lower specificity. Symptomatic carotid stenosis was associated with higher diagnostic odds ratio value, possibly due to microembolization from an unstable plaque and ensuing disruption of collateral networks, and lower tolerance to cross-clamping.⁶¹

This study has some limitations, mainly related to the absence a gold standard reference test to confirm the diagnosis of clamp-related cerebral ischemia. There is no information on the etiology of NDRA, some of which may not have a hemodynamic cause. Also, the definition of NDRA is not cut clear, and might vary between centers, especially in prospective and retrospective studies. The use of shunts may also affect the relation between NIRS values and the occurrence of neurologic symptoms and ischemic events. The duration of post-clamping decrease of NIRS values and magnitude of normalization with shunt insertion are often unexplored variables that could also influence perioperative outcomes. Some bias may also be present due to the impossibility of blinding reviewers to the results of the index and standard tests.

In contrast, this study has some strengths. The selection criteria were inclusive, not excluding on the basis of language or time of publication. A considerable number of studies were included, amounting to a total of 5760 interventions. The large sample of studies also enabled the evaluation of source heterogeneity in diagnostic accuracy through meta-regression.

In conclusion, NIRS is a highly specific but not sensitive neuromonitoring test to detect clamp-associated hemodynamic cerebral ischemia during CEA under general anesthesia. Therefore, it may not be reliable enough to be used as the exclusive method for this end or to guide intraoperative neuroprotective strategies. Its high specificity may be used in conjunction with more sensitive neuromonitoring methods in validated protocols.

Supplemental Material

sj-docx-1-sjs-10.1177_14574969241282611 – Supplemental material for The diagnostic accuracy of intraoperative near-infrared spectroscopy in carotid artery endarterectomy under general anesthesia: A systematic review with meta-analysis

Supplemental material, sj-docx-1-sjs-10.1177_14574969241282611 for The diagnostic accuracy of intraoperative near-infrared spectroscopy in carotid artery endarterectomy under general anesthesia: A systematic review with meta-analysis by Luís Duarte-Gamas, Mariana Fragão-Marques, Petar Zlatanovic, José P. Andrade and João Rocha-Neves in Scandinavian Journal of Surgery

Supplemental Material

sj-docx-2-sjs-10.1177_14574969241282611 – Supplemental material for The diagnostic accuracy of intraoperative near-infrared spectroscopy in carotid artery endarterectomy under general anesthesia: A systematic review with meta-analysis

Supplemental material, sj-docx-2-sjs-10.1177_14574969241282611 for The diagnostic accuracy of intraoperative near-infrared spectroscopy in carotid artery endarterectomy under general anesthesia: A systematic review with meta-analysis by Luís Duarte-Gamas, Mariana Fragão-Marques, Petar Zlatanovic, José P. Andrade and João Rocha-Neves in Scandinavian Journal of Surgery

Supplemental Material

sj-docx-3-sjs-10.1177_14574969241282611 – Supplemental material for The diagnostic accuracy of intraoperative near-infrared spectroscopy in carotid artery endarterectomy under general anesthesia: A systematic review with meta-analysis

Supplemental material, sj-docx-3-sjs-10.1177_14574969241282611 for The diagnostic accuracy of intraoperative near-infrared spectroscopy in carotid artery endarterectomy under general anesthesia: A systematic review with meta-analysis by Luís Duarte-Gamas, Mariana Fragão-Marques, Petar Zlatanovic, José P. Andrade and João Rocha-Neves in Scandinavian Journal of Surgery

Supplemental Material

sj-docx-4-sjs-10.1177_14574969241282611 – Supplemental material for The diagnostic accuracy of intraoperative near-infrared spectroscopy in carotid artery endarterectomy under general anesthesia: A systematic review with meta-analysis

Supplemental material, sj-docx-4-sjs-10.1177_14574969241282611 for The diagnostic accuracy of intraoperative near-infrared spectroscopy in carotid artery endarterectomy under general anesthesia: A systematic review with meta-analysis by Luís Duarte-Gamas, Mariana Fragão-Marques, Petar Zlatanovic, José P. Andrade and João Rocha-Neves in Scandinavian Journal of Surgery

Supplemental Material

sj-docx-5-sjs-10.1177_14574969241282611 – Supplemental material for The diagnostic accuracy of intraoperative near-infrared spectroscopy in carotid artery endarterectomy under general anesthesia: A systematic review with meta-analysis

Supplemental material, sj-docx-5-sjs-10.1177_14574969241282611 for The diagnostic accuracy of intraoperative near-infrared spectroscopy in carotid artery endarterectomy under general anesthesia: A systematic review with meta-analysis by Luís Duarte-Gamas, Mariana Fragão-Marques, Petar Zlatanovic, José P. Andrade and João Rocha-Neves in Scandinavian Journal of Surgery

Footnotes

Declaration of conflicting interests

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Funding

The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This research was supported by National Funds through FCT—Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia, I.P., within CINTESIS, R&D Unit (reference UIDB/4255/2020) and within the scope of the project RISE, Associated Laboratory (reference LA/P/0053/2020).

ORCID iD

Luís Duarte-Gamas

Supplemental material

Supplemental material for this article is available online.

References

Naylor

Rantner

Ancetti

, et al: Editor’s choice—European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) 2023 clinical practice guidelines on the management of atherosclerotic carotid and vertebral artery disease. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2023;65(1):7–111.

AbuRahma

Avgerinos

Chang

, et al: Society for Vascular Surgery clinical practice guidelines for management of extracranial cerebrovascular disease. J Vasc Surg 2022;75(1S):4S–22S.

Munster

Franchini

Qureshi

, et al: Temporal trends in safety of carotid endarterectomy in asymptomatic patients: Systematic review. Neurology 2015;85(4):365–372.

Kragsterman

Pärsson

Lindbäck

, et al: Outcomes of carotid endarterectomy for asymptomatic stenosis in Sweden are improving: Results from a population-based registry. J Vasc Surg 2006;44(1):79–85.

Lareyre

Raffort

Weill

, et al: Patterns of acute ischemic strokes after carotid endarterectomy and therapeutic implications. Vasc Endovascular Surg 2017;51(7):485–490.

Piffaretti

Tarallo

Franchin

, et al: Outcome analysis of carotid cross-clamp intolerance during carotid endarterectomy under locoregional anesthesia. Ann Vasc Surg 2017;43:249–257.

Bevilacqua

Ticozzelli

Orso

, et al: Anesthetic management of carotid endarterectomy: An update from Italian guidelines. J Anesth Analg Crit Care 2022;2(1):24.

Rocha-Neves

Pereira-Macedo

Ferreira

, et al: Impact of intraoperative neurologic deficits in carotid endarterectomy under regional anesthesia. Scand Cardiovasc J 2021;55(3):180–186.

Sakudo

: Near-infrared spectroscopy for medical applications: Current status and future perspectives. Clin Chim Acta 2016;455:181–188.

10.

Khan

McInnis

Ross-White

, et al: Overview and diagnostic accuracy of near infrared spectroscopy in carotid endarterectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2021;62(5):695–704.

11.

Duarte-Gamas

Pereira-Neves

Sousa

, et al: The diagnostic accuracy of intra-operative near infrared spectroscopy in carotid artery endarterectomy under regional anaesthesia: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2021;62(4):522–531.

12.

Pennekamp

Moll

De Borst

: The potential benefits and the role of cerebral monitoring in carotid endarterectomy. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2011;24(6):693–697.

13.

Al-Rawi

Kirkpatrick

: Tissue oxygen index: Thresholds for cerebral ischemia using near-infrared spectroscopy. Stroke 2006;37(11):2720–2725.

14.

Whiting

Rutjes

Westwood

, et al: QUADAS-2: A revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies. Ann Intern Med 2011;155(8):529–536.

15.

Wallace

Dahabreh

Trikalinos

, et al: Closing the gap between methodologists and end-users: R as a computational back-end. J Stat Softw 2012;49(5):1–15.

16.

Beese

Langer

Lang

, et al: Comparison of near-infrared spectroscopy and somatosensory evoked potentials for the detection of cerebral ischemia during carotid endarterectomy. Stroke 1998;29(10):2032–2037.

17.

Bissacco

Attisani

Settembrini

, et al: Modifications in near infrared spectroscopy for cerebral monitoring during carotid endarterectomy in asymptomatic and symptomatic patients. Ann Vasc Surg 2022;79:239–246.

18.

Botes

Le Roux

Van Marle

: Cerebral monitoring during carotid endarterectomy—A comparison between electroencephalography, transcranial cerebral oximetry and carotid stump pressure. S Afr J Surg 2007;45(2):43–46.

19.

Ceyhan

Ovali

: The effect of cerebral oximeter use on the shunt placement concerning carotid endarterectomy surgery. Ann Card Anaesth 2019;22(2):158–161.

20.

Cura

Arun

, et al: Effects of sevoflurane and propofol anesthesia on cerebral oxygenation in patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy. Turk Neurosurg 2022;32(1):76–82.

21.

De Letter

Sie

Thomas

, et al: Near-infrared reflected spectroscopy and electroencephalography during carotid endarterectomy—In search of a new shunt criterion. Neurol Res 1998;20(suppl. 1):S23–S27.

22.

Duffy

Manninen

Chan

, et al: Comparison of cerebral oximeter and evoked potential monitoring in carotid endarterectomy. Can J Anaesth 1997;44(10):1077–1081.

23.

Findlay

Kesarwani

Jacka

, et al: Combined stump pressure and oximetry for shunt use during carotid endarterectomy. Can J Neurol Sci 2017;44(6):692–696.

24.

Friedell

Clark

Graham

, et al: Cerebral oximetry does not correlate with electroencephalography and somatosensory evoked potentials in determining the need for shunting during carotid endarterectomy. J Vasc Surg 2008;48(3):601–606.

25.

Grubhofer

Plöchl

Skolka

, et al: Comparing Doppler ultrasonography and cerebral oximetry as indicators for shunting in carotid endarterectomy. Anesth Analg 2000;91(6):1339–1344.

26.

Hirofumi

Otone

Hiroshi

, et al: The effectiveness of regional cerebral oxygen saturation monitoring using near-infrared spectroscopy in carotid endarterectomy. J Clin Neurosci 2003;10(1):79–83.

27.

Kamenskaya

Loginova

Lomivorotov

: Brain oxygen supply parameters in the risk assessment of cerebral complications during carotid endarterectomy. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2017;31(3):944–949.

28.

Kondov

Beyersdorf

Schöllhorn

, et al: Outcome of near-infrared spectroscopy-guided selective shunting during carotid endarterectomy in general anesthesia. Ann Vasc Surg 2019;61:170–177.

29.

Kuzhuget

Starodubtsev

Ignatenko

, et al: The role of stump pressure and cerebral oximetry in predicting ischaemic brain damage during carotid endarterectomy. Brain Inj 2017;31(13–14):1944–1950.

30.

Manwaring

Durham

McNally

, et al: Correlation of cerebral oximetry with internal carotid artery stump pressures in carotid endarterectomy. Vasc Endovascular Surg 2010;44(4):252–256.

31.

Mauermann

Crepeau

Pulido

, et al: Comparison of electroencephalography and cerebral oximetry to determine the need for in-line arterial shunting in patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2013;27(6):1253–1259.

32.

Michel

Weigand

Eckstein

, et al: Measurement of local oxygen parameters for detection of cerebral ischemia. The significance of cerebral near-infrared spectroscopy and transconjunctival oxygen partial pressure in carotid surgery. Anaesthesist 2000;49(5):392–401.

33.

Mille

Tachimiri

Klersy

, et al: Near infrared spectroscopy monitoring during carotid endarterectomy: Which threshold value is critical? Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2004;27(6):646–650.

34.

Park

Yook

Yoo

, et al: Comparison of the effect of sevoflurane or propofol anesthesia on the regional cerebral oxygen saturation in patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy: A prospective, randomized controlled study. BMC Anesthesiol 2019;19(1):157.

35.

Pedrini

Magnoni

Sensi

, et al: Is near-infrared spectroscopy a reliable method to evaluate clamping ischemia during carotid surgery? Stroke Res Treat 2012;2012:156975.

36.

Pennekamp

Immink

Den Ruijter

, et al: Near-infrared spectroscopy to indicate selective shunt use during carotid endarterectomy. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2013;46(4):397–403.

37.

Sihotsky

Berek

Kopolovets

, et al: Cerebral monitoring during carotid endarterectomy using transcranial cerebral oximetry. Bratisl Lek Listy 2020;121(6):431–436.

38.

Tambakis

Papadopoulos

Sergentanis

, et al: Cerebral oximetry and stump pressure as indicators for shunting during carotid endarterectomy: Comparative evaluation. Vascular 2011;19(4):187–194.

39.

Uchino

Nakamura

Kuroda

, et al: Intraoperative dual monitoring during carotid endarterectomy using motor evoked potentials and near-infrared spectroscopy. World Neurosurg 2012;78(6):651–657.

40.

Uno

Suzue

Nishi

, et al: Hemodynamic cerebral ischemia during carotid endarterectomy evaluated by intraoperative monitoring and post-operative diffusion-weighted imaging. Neurol Res 2007;29(1):70–77.

41.

Wang

, et al: The efficacy of near-infrared spectroscopy monitoring in carotid endarterectomy: A prospective, single-center, observational study. Cell Transplant 2019;28(2):170–175.

42.

Yucel

Ketenciler

Gursoy

, et al: The effect of hemodynamic parameters on cerebral oxygenization during carotid endarterectomy. Braz J Cardiovasc Surg 2022;37(1):80–87.

43.

Montisci

Sanfilippo

Bura

, et al: Status of the circle of Willis and intolerance to carotid cross-clamping during carotid endarterectomy. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2013;45(2):107–112.

44.

Zarrinkoob

Wåhlin

Ambarki

, et al: Blood flow lateralization and collateral compensatory mechanisms in patients with carotid artery stenosis. Stroke 2019;50(5):1081–1088.

45.

Williams

Mead

Picton

, et al: The influence of contralateral carotid stenosis and occlusion on cerebral oxygen saturation during carotid artery surgery. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 1995;10(2):198–206.

46.

Krawisz

Rosenfield

White

, et al: Clinical impact of contralateral carotid occlusion in patients undergoing carotid artery revascularization. J Am Coll Cardiol 2021;77(7):835–844.

47.

Banga

Varga

Csobay-Novák

, et al: Incomplete circle of Willis is associated with a higher incidence of neurologic events during carotid eversion endarterectomy without shunting. J Vasc Surg 2018;68(6):1764–1771.

48.

Myrcha

Pinheiro

Rocha-Neves

, et al: The effect of the collateral cerebrovascular circulation on tolerance to carotid artery cross-clamping and on early outcome after carotid endarterectomy. J Vasc Surg. Epub ahead of print 26 April 2024. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2024.04.052.

49.

Samson

Cline

Showalter

, et al: Contralateral carotid artery occlusion is not a contraindication to carotid endarterectomy even if shunts are not routinely used. J Vasc Surg 2013;58(4):935–940.

50.

Schimmel

George

Schwarz

, et al: Carboxyhemoglobin levels induced by cigarette smoking outdoors in smokers. J Med Toxicol 2018;14(1):68–73.

51.

Prockop

Chichkova

: Carbon monoxide intoxication: An updated review. J Neurol Sci 2007;262(1–2):122–130.

52.

Niemann

Sørensen

Siebenmann

, et al: Carbon monoxide reduces near-infrared spectroscopy determined “total” hemoglobin: A human volunteer study. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 2017;77(4):259–262.

53.

Song

Kim

Cho

, et al: Evaluation of cerebral blood flow change after cigarette smoking using quantitative MRA. PLoS One 2017;12(9):e0184551.

54.

Pisano

Galdieri

Iovino

, et al: Direct comparison between cerebral oximetry by INVOS(TM) and EQUANOX(TM) during cardiac surgery: A pilot study. Heart Lung Vessel 2014;6(3):197–203.

55.

Yoshitani

Kawaguchi

Tatsumi

, et al: A comparison of the INVOS 4100 and the NIRO 300 near-infrared spectrophotometers. Anesth Analg 2002;94(3):586–590; table of contents.

56.

Davie

Grocott

: Impact of extracranial contamination on regional cerebral oxygen saturation: A comparison of three cerebral oximetry technologies. Anesthesiology 2012;116(4):834–840.

57.

Lawrence

Alves

Jicha

, et al: Incidence, timing, and causes of cerebral ischemia during carotid endarterectomy with regional anesthesia. J Vasc Surg 1998;27(2):329–334; discussion 335–337.

58.

Chongruksut

Vaniyapong

Rerkasem

: Routine or selective carotid artery shunting for carotid endarterectomy (and different methods of monitoring in selective shunting). Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014;2014(6):CD000190.

59.

Coelho

Peixoto

Canedo

, et al: Critical analysis of the literature and standards of reporting on stroke after carotid revascularization. J Vasc Surg 2022;75(1):363–371.

60.

Sharpe

Dennis

Nasim

, et al: Dual antiplatelet therapy prior to carotid endarterectomy reduces post-operative embolisation and thromboembolic events: Post-operative transcranial Doppler monitoring is now unnecessary. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2010;40(2):162–167.

61.

Huo

Xin

, et al: Association of atherosclerotic plaque features with collateral circulation status in elderly patients with chronic carotid stenosis. J Geriatr Cardiol 2020;17(4):202–209.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.02 MB